REGIONAL TRANSMISSION Broward County, Florida SYSTEM MASTER PLAN Solicitation No. PNC2116651P1
Empower WWS with an Adaptive, Transparent and Defendable Regional Transmission System Master Plan ADAPTIVE MASTER PLAN & INNOVATIVE IDEAS & NEW REDUNDANCY OF STAFF DYNAMIC CIP TECHNOLOGIES • Adapt to ever changing conditions • County-owned support decision • 80+ professionals exclusively tools specialized in planning and asset • WWS can continue the CIP management planning cycle on their own after • Monetize consequence of failure project completion • Local team of Condition • Condition assessments tool assessment and master planning • Understanding of why a project is selector specialist, backed by B&V global needed and the trigger for it • Adaptable CIP management resources • Maximize reduction of risk while platform • Training of WWS staff minimizing investments $ 2
Scope of Work & Approach Ricardo Vieira Project Manager Amanda Schwerman Master Plan Lead 3
Pioneers of Dynamic & Adaptive Planning; Enabling Utilities to Adapt to Changing Conditions Static Adaptive 4
Levering Technology and Innovation Capacity & Growth GIS & SCADA Operational Optimization AM Programs (Maximo) Energy & Resiliency Sensors (Pressure/Flow) Identify & Reduce High Pressures Condition Assessments Stakeholders DATA HUB MODELING Important Triggers that Drive CIP Key Performance Hydraulic, Transient / Surge Indicators CAPITAL RISK BASED PLANNING PRIORITIZATION Renewal & Replacement $20 M RawWaterIntake Pumping Pump Station Capital, O&M, $18 M Regional Transmission System Treatment ControlValves Pipeline Cash Flow (2015 dollars) Inspections $16 M Storage WaterMain Emergency Monetize Risk $14 M Plan $12 M (cost of failure vs improvement) $10 M Business Cases (Financials) $8 M $6 M Capital Prioritization $4 M $2 M CIP Improvements are $0 M 2039 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 2033 2035 2037 Based on Triggers Dynamic Master Planning allows the County to invest in projects only when needed. 5
Master Planning for Risk Reduction Capacity and Redundancy Evaluations Comprehensive Capital Improvement Plan Build System Hydraulic Model Calibration Evaluation Identify Projects based WWS Planning on Capacity Transient & Operations Analysis Modeling Input CIP CIP Spending Prioritization Analysis (iCIP) Optimized CIP WWS training Identify Projects Condition and Reliability based on Risk Evaluations (Monetizing Risk) Tool Risk Selection & Pipe Data Prioritization Inspection Plan Developing Emergency Plan Pump Field Risk Station Data Assessments Prioritization
New Ideas & Technologies Ricardo Vieira Project Manager Amanda Schwerman Master Plan Lead 7
Innovyze’s InfoMaster Tool • ArcGIS based tool • Consolidates data into a single platform • Streamlines risk-based prioritization for rehab planning 8
Traditional Risk Planning Physical Characteristics Likelihood of Failure Replace/ Likelihood of Failure (LoF) Economic-Based 5 10 15 Re-design 20 25 Failure History Replacement Strategy Strategy 4 8 12 16 20 External Impacts 3 6 9 12 15 Predictive Monitoring Environmental Strategy Consequence No Proactive of Failure 2 4 6 8 10 Replacement Condition Monitoring- Economic Based Strategy 1 2 3 4 5 Consequence of Failure (CoF) Social Provides management strategies based on system risk 9
Follow WaterRF 4451 to monetize consequence of failure Physical Characteristics Likelihood of Failure Replace/ Likelihood of Failure (LoF) Economic-Based Re-design Failure History Replacement $ 739,398 $ 4,963,776 $ 15,334,741 $ 5,489,925 $ - Strategy Strategy $ 6,268,252 $ 49,423,588 $ 64,093,928 $ 35,576,623 $ 667,370 External Impacts Predictive $ 16,430,675 $ 199,127,037 $ 276,683,409 $ 188,702,793 $ 6,768,894 Monitoring Environmental Strategy Consequence No Proactive of Failure Replacement $ 42,970,404 $ 261,686,497 $ 255,773,656 $ 346,974,606 $ 21,984,289 Condition Monitoring- Economic Based Strategy $ 1,647,806 $ 8,402,144 $ 15,177,510 $ 49,885,355 $ 9,811,598 Consequence of Failure (CoF) Social Maximize Risk Reduction while Minimizing Investments 10
Inspection Protocol Report X Pipeline Technology Selection Condition Assessment Support Tool Remote Field Electromagnetic Select any of the following information for the pipe to be inspected Coating / Risk Rating Flow Fluid Material Diameter Controls Lining External Ultrasonic Thickness Major Pressurized Wastewater DIP 8” to 35” Cement Mortar Live 1” to 7” Cement Mortar Isolation/Dewater/ Severe Gravity Gas ABS cleaning Major Pressurized 8” to 35” Medium-Thick Sludge ACP Coatings Live Moderate Pumped Wastewater 36” to 60” CIP Minor Thin-filmed coating Water >60” CMP Negligible CSP CU External Guided Wave DIP ERCP FRPP GS HDPE NCS Inline Leak and Gas Pocket PE RUN … RESET QUIT REPORT Detection Time Savings, Efficiencies and Consistency A value added Service of
Integrated Capital Improvement Tool (iCIP) is a Powerful Decision Support Tool Mallard Connector Main Transmission Main Size Quantity Unit Cost Construction Cost Line Item 36" DIP (34000 lf) Pipe 1 36 ##### lf $244.27 /lf $8,305,300 N/A Pipe 2 0 0 lf $0.00 /lf $0 N/A Pipe 3 0 0 lf $0.00 /lf $0 36" BOL Connection BOL Connection 36 3 ea $33,980.00 /ea $101,900 36" EOL Connection EOL Connection 36 1 ea $33,980.00 /ea $34,000 36" Line Valves (17) Line Valve 36 17 ea $33,980.00 /ea $577,700 Blowoff Valves (7) Blowoff Valve 7 ea $6,000.00 /ea $42,000 N/A Fire Hydrant 0 ea $2,600.00 /ea $0 Cathodic Protection (34000 lf) Cathodic Protection ##### lf $5.00 /lf $170,000 N/A Major Roadway Crossing 0 lf $5,000.00 /lf $0 Secondary Road Crossing (750 lf) Secondary Road Crossing 750 lf $800.00 /lf $600,000 N/A Railroad Crossing 0 lf $5,000.00 /lf $0 N/A Stream Crossing 0 ea $20,000.00 /ea $0 Pavement Removal and Replacement (28000 SYD) Pavement Removal and Replacement ##### SYD $65.00 /SYD $1,820,000 Erosion Control (34000 lf) Erosion Control ##### lf $3.00 /lf $102,000 Restoration (34000 lf) Restoration ##### lf $2.50 /lf $85,000 Traffic Control (340 days) Traffic Control 340 days $1,500.00 /day $510,000 N/A Additional Construction Cost 1 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 2 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 3 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 4 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 5 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 6 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 7 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 8 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 9 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 10 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 11 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 Subtotal $12,347,900 Surveys, Record Documents, GPS Information $61,700 General Requirements (10%) $1,234,800 Contractor Fee (5%) $617,400 Mobilization (3%) $370,400 Contingencies (10%) $1,234,800 Total Construction Cost $15,867,000 We will provide Broward County with a dynamic CIP management platform 12
Maximize Risk Reduction While Minimizing Investments 2,500 250 Criticality Project Capital Cost (Nominal $Millions) Safety Relative Asset Portofolio Risk Regulatory 2,000 200 Financial Target Score Cumulative Capital Spend 1,500 150 Investment Drives Risk 1,000 100 Reduction 500 50 0 0 2031 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 • Higher Level of Spending Reduces Significant Level of Portfolio Risk • Capital is Being Spent on the Most Important Projects 13 13
~4 .~3 e: WARD ~ Re.set ~ ~ ~ ~ ·Se~ · ! he ~ L~uderd~ ~"' ~ B ~ Number of Sites Filtered Browa rd County Risk Assessment Dashboard 92 COUNTY FLOR I DA Monagement G ro up e A B e c Ma n age me nt Group l en gt h of Pi pe by Ma n age ment Group ( ft ) M aterial rh eld Beach VCP • A C PVC • C S.JK RCP )()()( I e·by DIP I B nd Park RPM I Lauderdale Y ea r Pi pe Size ( in ) 1 96 3 2010 6 54 0-0 0-0 I> Bing Pipe ID Material Year Pipe Size (in) PACP Score Consequence of Risk Score Cross/ Ad1acen1 Li ker.hood of failure Score failure Score ... R1:.J;. Heat Map s SV0368 RCP 1%3 42 Cross 200 26 4.7 12.1 • • •• 36 Cross SV1173 RCP 1963 2.33 2.6 4 .7 12.4 • RPM 1976 27 Cross 46 17 7 LS0063 38 42 Ad1~t SV0367·M RCP 1963 2.3 4.6 106 •• LS0078 RPM 1983 30 Cross 34 45 15.5 {! ., xxx 42 Adjaci.nt 1999 21 4.5 9S l.50004 1. 2 SV1172 RCP 1963 36 C1oss 2.33 23 4.5 10.7 • SV1342 RCP 2003 36 Adjaci.nt 2.45 25 11.2 4 .S 0 ., SV0004-M RCP 1963 54 C1oss 2.03 26 4.5 11.6 v SD0316 DIP 1990 34 44 15.0 c 30 CIOss RCP 1963 39 Cross 2.50 4.4 11.2 SV0435 2.5 g-2 SV134S RCP 24 44 10.S 2003 30 Adjacent 2.60 6 u LS0019 PVC 42 Cross 0.00 1.3 4.4 2008 58 v 24 A .J 54 CIOSS SV0003·M RCP 1963 2.00 10.2 , 7, Rf"P 1a;.1 rmtt.c '' 4l <1.; s 2 J 4 BLA CK & VEATCH Likelihood of failure Total Score
Assuring Continued Delivery Rafael Frias Regional Manager 15
Recommend
More recommend
