r eport on the ongoing activity of the c haracterization
play

R EPORT ON THE ONGOING ACTIVITY OF THE C HARACTERIZATION C LUSTER - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

R EPORT ON THE ONGOING ACTIVITY OF THE C HARACTERIZATION C LUSTER - STRATEGIES ON HOW TO LINK THE TWO ACTIVITIES Marco Sebastiani Roma TRE university, Engineering Department Materials Science and Technology Group Marco Sebastiani T HE


  1. R EPORT ON THE ONGOING ACTIVITY OF THE “C HARACTERIZATION C LUSTER ” - STRATEGIES ON HOW TO LINK THE TWO ACTIVITIES Marco Sebastiani Roma TRE university, Engineering Department Materials Science and Technology Group

  2. Marco Sebastiani T HE CHARACTERIZATION CLUSTER  A cluster of project has been launched with a kikc-off meeting in Brussels on the 2 7 th Novem ber  Main aim is permitting closer cooperation between projects working on research and development in the area of nano-scale characterisation.  Three experts, already working with several of the projects, have been assigned to act as daily secretary and contacts and form sub-clusters :  “ Sensors ” Rudolf Frycek  “ Characterisation Tools ” Costas Charitidis EMMC Feb 4th 2015  “ Characterisation for Model Validation ” Gerhard Goldbeck  “ Metrology – Standardisation ” 2

  3. Marco Sebastiani M AIN SCOPE OF THE CLUSTER  Identify and group projects according to application areas and technologies;  Identify com m on interests (scientific, technical and commercialization wise) of on-going research and development;  Identify m ethods to support and strengthen common dissemination activities of the projects;  Agree with projects on how to support their individual and common innovation and exploitation activities;  Identify subjects and formulate recom m endations for new research, innovation and business development policies; EMMC Feb 4th 2015  Contribute to implement the priorities envisaged for the 2 0 1 6 -2 0 1 7 w ork program m e of the NMBP Programme. 3

  4. Marco Sebastiani M AIN OUTPUT OF THE KICK - OFF MEETING  The structure of the sub-clusters have been agreed and specific responsibilities are assigned;  The three discussion papers for sub-clusters have been prepared and can be shared with EMMC;  Objectives :  maximize the cooperation between projects  identify com m on interests in on-going research and development  establish the formation of standard m ethodologies on nanocharacterization in Europe  promote the connection with external bodies  avoid duplicating work and improve efficiency  provide a forum for discussion EMMC Feb 4th 2015  disseminate the nanocharacterization issues to industrial stakeholders and general public 4

  5. Marco Sebastiani N EW CHARACTERISATION TOOLS : THE KEY-WORDS  High resolution characterization/ calculation tools are already available in the scientific community;  Some of them are ready for down-scaling to industry  Key w ords for their effective application into nanomaterials development are:  Developm ent of PORTABLE new characterization tools  Exploitation into Best practice guides and standards  TRI POD structure of the EU projects on characterization;  Establishment of Materials Databases EMMC Feb 4th 2015  Sm art sharing of raw data  Synergic I nteraction w ith m odelers (through EMMC and its Validation WG) 5

  6. Marco Sebastiani C HARACTERISATION - TOOLS SUB - CLUSTER  Main required horizontal actions:  Validation of measurement procedures  New standard reference materials  Metrological traceability (ensures measurement results made at different times and different locations )  Legislation (guidelines for proper standardization)  Establishment infrastructure for effective exchange of information between clusters (Nano- KTN, NanoSafety Cluster , EMPIRA , ISO, OECD EMMC Feb 4th 2015 initiatives) 6

  7. Marco Sebastiani C HARACTERISATION - TOOLS SUB - CLUSTER  Potential future actions  Finalise the working groups and participants  Establish a mechanism or infrastructure on how this cluster can link interact with other clusters/ programs to provide synergy but not duplication  Each WG to use the infrastructure to extract information from different clusters/ programmes  Each WG to write priority areas  Cluster should to present and discuss priority areas across the different WG. EMMC Feb 4th 2015  Give a report to EC on the basis of this finding.  W rite a call , wherever possible include priorities from different WGs. 7

  8. Marco Sebastiani “ Characterization Tools” Sub-Cluster WG3 WG1 WG2 WG4 Metrology SMEs & Industrial Standardization Networking activities Instrumentation needs • Contact with other EU • Standardization of • Commercialization • Principles/Theory analytical methods and • Implementing high-risk & international bodies • Methodology SOPs. and metrology institutes and high-potential • Technical Issues • Validation of • Establish Communities • Nanometrology innovation ideas measurement • Entrepreneurship of Research (CoRs) • New topics/techniques techniques • Open Research Data • Internationalisation • Development of new • Common Platforms • High returns of reference materials • Exchange of experience investment • Development of 3D between national calibration standards innovation agencies • Contact with standardization/regulati on bodies EMMC Feb 4th 2015 WG5 Dissemination • Industrial application • Standardization • Workshops/Conferences • Associations • Legislation • Website 8

  9. Marco Sebastiani “ Characterization Tools” Sub-Cluster WG3 WG1 WG2 WG4 Metrology SMEs & Industrial Standardization Networking activities Instrumentation needs Contact person : Contact persons : Contact persons : Contact person : Zora Strelcova Lars Mattsson Tofail Syed Adriele Prina-Mello Antonio Nigro Ratna Tandra Contributors : Contributors: Conrtibutors: Ratna Tandra Jordi Fraxedas Contributors: Marielle Wouters Marco Sebastiani Stefan Weigel Andrea Fornana Denis Stoiakine Olga Kazakova Christof Hubner Marco Sebastiani Michela Sega Philip Martin EMMC Feb 4th 2015 WG5 Dissemination Contributors: NTUA, FORTH/ICE-HT 9

  10. Marco Sebastiani C HARACTERISATION FOR M ODEL V ALIDATION  The key areas of characterisation for model validation the sub-cluster:  Support model development.  Characterisation to determine m odel input param eters  Characterisation to validate the output of simulations  Characterisation of materials and systems on an industrial product scale  Certification of models and methodologies EMMC Feb 4th 2015 10

  11. Marco Sebastiani C HARACTERISATION FOR M ODEL V ALIDATION  In order to deliver on industry’s need for well validated models (e.g. structure-property relations) there is a need for m uch m ore com prehensive data including:  Reliable (open) data sets  Local / nano-scale material characterization in terms of property determination for material constitutive laws. New nanoscale measurement techniques required to validate and to calibrate models e.g. of microelectronic devices and systems.  Multi-scale characterisation  Keeping raw data as much as possible  Including the effects of processing, including process EMMC Feb 4th 2015 parameters  Extending from materials to device and systems data and models. 11

  12. Marco Sebastiani C HARACTERISATION FOR M ODEL V ALIDATION  The key objectives are to:  I m prove the links betw een characterisation and m odelling.  Overcome the lack of data issue, including  access to existing data  comprehensive storage of new data  Procedures to provide (multi-scale) materials data that allow to validate (and to calibrate) models, see for example the slide from the microelectronics field. EMMC Feb 4th 2015 12

  13. Marco Sebastiani A NEW CONCEPT FOR MATERIALS DATABASES Exp. Linking Materials, Tools, Num. Scientist Scientist and Experts through the Database to the Market 3D-Lithography Atomistic Model EMMC Droplet Interface Behavior Properties Interface Properties: Hydrophobic Surface Design Database Input Database Input Database Input Market players use the database for novel EMMC Feb 4th 2015 applications 13

  14. Marco Sebastiani E XPERIMENTAL DATA HANDLING - T ODAY Models Published ??? ??? data EMMC Feb 4th 2015 Interpretation ?????? 14

  15. Marco Sebastiani E XPERIMENTAL DATA HANDLING - T OMORROW Models VALIDATION!!! Feedback Information from people on how the accessing raw data Raw Data the raw are data obtained ONLINE EMMC Feb 4th 2015 Published data with the interpretation 15

  16. Marco Sebastiani T OOLS ARE ALREADY AVAIBALE EMMC Feb 4th 2015  Involvement of scientific publishers is very important!! 16

  17. Marco Sebastiani C HARACTERISATION FOR M ODEL V ALIDATION - ACTI ONS  Support and work closely with the EMMC on a sharing database system for data and the Materials Modelling Market Place.  Identify existing research data(-bases) to provide more information about a first (still unconnected) set of databases.  Establish information databases  of actors including characterisation laboratories.  of methods and types of data they can provide.  Identification of gaps in data as well as characterisation capabilities (methodologies and tools). EMMC Feb 4th 2015  Establish a stronger collaboration between institutes and tool suppliers (R&D&I). 17

Recommend


More recommend