quigley sub area plan
play

Quigley Sub-Area Plan April 19, 2017 Don Kostelec, AICP Alta - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quigley Sub-Area Plan April 19, 2017 Don Kostelec, AICP Alta Planning + Design, Boise, ID Photo Credit: Bike Walk Wichita Purpose A more focused evaluation of transportation network connectivity in the area served by Quigley Road


  1. Quigley Sub-Area Plan April 19, 2017 Don Kostelec, AICP Alta Planning + Design, Boise, ID Photo Credit: Bike Walk Wichita

  2. Purpose • A more focused evaluation of transportation network connectivity in the area served by Quigley Road and Fox Acres What has happened since the Hailey • Transportation Master Plan was adopted nearly a decade ago? • What would be likely impacts of buildout of proposed developments? • Help City provide guidance to current proposed development on analysis and potential requirements

  3. Hailey Transportation Plan 2026

  4. Hailey Transportation Plan

  5. Hailey Transportation Plan

  6. Collector Streets

  7. Collector Streets • Overall Goal: Distribute transportation users between local streets and arterials • May serve as an “arterial” for pedestrians and bicyclists • Are part of a network to support their distribution function

  8. Collector Streets ?

  9. Why connectivity? 1. It’s safer—for everyone. 2. Creates redundancy in the network 3. Better serves pedestrians, bicyclists & drivers 4. Improves delivery & efficiency of city services 5. Gives you more options for SH 75 Post-1950s Pre- 1950s Source: Norm Garrick Presentation

  10. Why connectivity?

  11. Why connectivity for active transportation?

  12. Traffic Impacts • Roadway links function well and are generally within acceptable thresholds (very common) • Intersections are where vehicular traffic flow impacts occur • Fox Acres & SH 75 in buildout of existing phase • Also influenced by other, past developments in the area

  13. Quigley Development Traffic Impact Study - Agree with methods and science applied throughout the study - Went beyond the norm for traffic counts for this type of development - 1.6% “background” growth per year - Not a through highway, so little traditional background growth - Therefore, it captures some level of growth from other future development - Traffic volumes are low on almost every street , - Therefore even large increases in % of traffic does not impact Level of Service

  14. Quigley Development Traffic Impact Study - Existing traffic and buildout traffic on Bullion (what is the change) - While it sounds high because it goes from 105 to 250 in a peak hour. That seems significant, but the LOS does not change even with that amount of traffic. - Might be different if Bullion was on the border of something unacceptable, then it might look different - Croy & 8 th – A now, B no-build, C in worst case scenario - Numbers are low all-around; Likely that many of the numbers - Do not see that it will increase ff f ld l k l

  15. Fox Acres & SH 75 • Currently: 85% of traffic goes north; 15% goes south • Right turn from Fox Acres to northbound SH 75 currently over capacity in AM peak period • Assuming similar split and worst case scenario of existing Quigley proposal (diagram at left) AM Peak: TODAY

  16. Fox Acres & SH 75 • Currently: 85% of traffic goes north; 15% goes south • Right turn from Fox Acres to northbound SH 75 currently over capacity in AM peak period • Assuming similar split and worst case scenario of existing Quigley proposal (diagram at left) AM Peak: 2020 Buildout

  17. Traffic Impacts

  18. Conceptual Quigley Design Options

  19. Traffic Diversion & Traffic Management

  20. Traffic Diversion & Traffic Management

  21. Traffic Diversion & Traffic Management

  22. Traffic Diversion & Traffic Management

  23. QUESTIONS? Photo Credit: Bike Walk Wichita

Recommend


More recommend