quantum information with trapped ions
play

Quantum information with trapped ions Trapped ions as qubits for - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quantum information with trapped ions Trapped ions as qubits for quantum computing and simulation Qubit architectures for scalable entanglement Mainz, Germany: 40 Ca + Quantum thermodynamics with ions Quantum thermodynamics


  1. Quantum information with trapped ions • Trapped ions as qubits for quantum computing and simulation Qubit architectures for scalable entanglement • Mainz, Germany: 40 Ca +

  2. Quantum thermodynamics with ions Quantum thermodynamics introduction • • Heat transport, Fluctuation theorems, Phase transitions, Heat engines • Outlook • Hartmut Kihwan Dzmitry Häffner Kim Matsukevich

  3. Overview Average values km In equilibrium, or very close to it Large system: Many degrees of freedom Fluctuations unimportant and many particles m Work probability distribution Thermal fluctuations Small system: mm few degrees of freedom Brownian motion and single particles Probabilistic nature µm of quantum processes Quantum system: Quantized Observation of system matters degrees of freedom, superpositions and entanglement nm Correlations with environment (bath) matter New machines

  4. Energy transport Hartmut Häffner Transport of radial phonons via a linear ion crystal Energy propagation Propagation of quantum correlations Vibrationally assisted energy transport Explores high dimensional Hilbert space Transport involving nonlinear interactions Understanding transport principles in light harvesting

  5. The ion crystal Ca + Qubits Local motion Coulomb interaction

  6. The scheme: Generating and detecting quantum correlations • Excite first ion on sideband, generates spin-motion entanglement • Motion propagates throught the crystal • Wait-time • Analyse if motion returned back • Contrast of Ramsey reveals delocalization of motional excitation

  7. Result: Dynamics of quantum correlations N=42 Delocalization and relocalization of quantum correlations wait Following the dynamics of a single phonon on a background thermal background of 200 phonons BUT: Linear dynamics → can be described efficiently Ramm et al., NJP 16 063062 (2014) Abdelrahman et al., Nat. Comm. 8 15712 (2017)

  8. Light harvesting complex Motivation to study transport phenomena Ishizaki, Flemming, PNAS 106 17255 (2009)

  9. Light harvesting complex - model Transport in a controlled system Site-site coupling

  10. Light harvesting complex - model Transport in a controlled system Inhomogenity inhibits the energy transfer Site-site coupling

  11. Light harvesting complex - model Transport in a controlled system Environment Site-site coupling Environment helps fulfilling resonance condition Vibrationally assisted energy transport

  12. Full Hamiltonian Transport in a controlled system K Site-site coupling J Even for small phonon excitation and few ions becomes high dimensional Hilbert space

  13. Minimal system – two ions Demonstration of the basic transfer dynamics Measured probability of population transfer K J Ca + Ca + Vibrationally assisted energy transport Site-site coupling Detuning Spin-bath coupling

  14. Measurement sequence Experimental sequence Excite the donor Turn on simulation donor acceptor ? Time Measure population in J = 1.3 kHz acceptor state |SD> Parameter K = 1.4 kHz control ∆ = 4 kHz Gorman et al ., PRX 8 , 011038 (2018)

  15. Result Varying environmental frequency controls transport Environment Environment absorbs energy Probability of transfer P(acceptor) Gorman et al ., PRX 8 , 011038 (2018)

  16. Result Environment Environment Environment gives up energy absorbs energy Probability of transfer P(acceptor) Gorman et al ., PRX 8 , 011038 (2018)

  17. Result Temperature reduced from <n>=5 to <n>=0.5 Environment Environment Environment gives up energy absorbs energy Probability of transfer Related work with SC: Potočnik et Gorman et al ., PRX 8 , al. , Nat. Comm 9 , 904 (2018) 011038 (2018)

  18. Quantum thermodynamics with ions Quantum thermodynamics introduction • Heat transport • Phase transitions • • Fluctuation theorem Hartmut Single ion refrigerator • Häffner Heat engines • Kihwan Outlook • Kim Dzmitry Matsukevich

  19. Structural phase transition & defect formation Germany before phase transition

  20. Berlin at the critical point of the structural phase transition

  21. Germany after the structural phase transition

  22. 1D, 2D, 3D ion crystals Wineland et al., J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 103, 259 (1998) Depends on a =( w ax / w rad ) 2 • Enzer et al., PRL85, Depends on the number of ions a crit = cN b • 2466 (2000) 1D Generate a planar Zig-Zag when n ax < n y rad << n x • rad • Tune radial frequencies in y and x direction 2D

  23. Structural phase transition in ion crystal E kin U pot,harm. U Coulomb 6 ion crystal Phase transition @ CP: eigenfrequencies • One mode frequency  0 • Large non-harmonic contributions • coupled Eigen-functions • Eigen-vectors reorder to generate new structures

  24. Universal principles of defect formation Kibble (1976) • symmetry breaking at a second order phase transitions such that topological defects form • Zurek (1985) may explain formation of cosmic • Sudden quench though the critical strings or domain walls point leads to defect formation • experiments in solid state phys. may test theory of universal scaling Morigi, Retzger, Plenio (2010) • Proposal for KZ study in trapped ions crystals Kibble, Journal of Physics A 9, 1387 (1976) Kibble, Physics Reports 67, 183 (1980) Zurek, Nature 317, 505 (1985), DelCampo, Zurek arXiv:1310.1600, Nikoghosyan, Nigmatullin, Plenio, arXiv:1311.1543

  25. Structural configuration change in ion crystals Linear slow Zigzag Zagzig

  26. Structural configuration change in ion crystals Linear fast Zigzag Zagzig Defects

  27. Universal principles of defect formation • System response time, thus information transfer, slows down • At some moment, the system becomes non-adiabatic and freezes • Relaxation time diverges / increases diverging slow response Linear quench finite system Control of phase transition

  28. Molecular dynamics simulations

  29. Experimental setup Trap with 11 segments and parameters Controlled by FPGA and arbitray waveform gen. w /2  = 1.4MHz (rad.), rad. anisotropy tuned to 100 +3..5% w /2  = 160 – 250kHz (ax.) Laser cooling / CCD observation

  30. Molecular dynamics simulations Simulation of trajectories Small axial excitation No position flips

  31. Experimental test of the b =8/3 power law scaling Saturation of Saturation of defect density defect density b = 2.68 ± 0.06, fits prediction for inhomogenious Kibble Zurek case with 8/3 = 2.66 Offset kink Ulm et al, Nat. Com. 4, 2290 (2013) formation Offset kink Pyka et al, Nat.Com. 4, 2291 (2013) formation Ejtemaee, PRA 87, 051401 (2013) DelCampo, Zurek arXiv:1310.1600

  32. Experimental test of the b =8/3 power law scaling Saturation of Saturation of defect density defect density Offset kink Ulm et al, Nat. Com. 4, 2290 (2013) formation DelCampo, Zurek Offset kink Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, formation Pyka et al, Nat. Com. 4, 2291 (2013) 1430018 (2014) Ejtemaee, PRA 87, 051401 (2013)

  33. Jarzynski, PRL 78, 2690 (1997) Experimental testing of Crooks, PRE 60, 2721 (1999) fluctuation theorem Liphardt, et al., Sci. 296 (2002) 1832 at the quantum limit Huber et al., PRL Work distribution measured with RNA • 101 , 070403 (2008) • Proposal for a test of Jarzynski equ. with a single ion Experimental realization – work distribution measued • An et al., Nat. Phys.11, 193 (2015) Kihwan Kim

  34. Liphardt, et al., Single molecule streching Sci. 296 (2002) 1832 Attach RNA to glass bead of laser tweezer Unfolding at different rates unfold/refold single RNA molecule Work probability distribution for slow and fast unfolding

  35. Liphardt, et al., Single molecule streching Sci. 296 (2002) 1832 Attach RNA to glass bead of laser tweezer unfold/refold single RNA molecule Work probability distribution for slow and fast unfolding Crooks fluctuation theorem: Verify Crooks fluctuation theorem experimentally Crooks, Phys. Rev. E 60(1999) 2721

  36. Jarzynski, quantum Jarzynski equality Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 2690 free energy difference average exponented work quantum work probabilty Thermal no expectation value, Transition occupation Energy but correlation function probabilities difference P. Talkner et al., Phys. Rev. E 75 R increase trap confinement (2007) 050102 non-adaibatically

  37. Proposed exp. Scheme: Non-equilibrium phonon 1) Start with thermal state States in a Paul trap n=0… ~ 10 2) Determine E 0 3) Act (non-adiabatically) on trap potential quantum work probabilty 4) Determine E t Thermal no expectation value, Transition occupation Energy but correlation function probabilities difference Huber et al., PRL 101 , 070403 (2008) Deffner, Lutz, Phys. Rev. increase trap confinement E 77, 021128 (2008) non-adaibatically

  38. Non-equilibrium phonon states Huber et al., PRL 101 , 070403 (2008) , here for n=2 Deffner, Lutz, Phys. Rev. E 77, 021128 (2008)

  39. Work probability distribution Change w from 1MHz to 3MHz in 0.1µs in 0.05µs adiabatic negative potential change: work Huber et al., P(W) remains thermal PRL 101 , 070403 (2008)

Recommend


More recommend