property owners meeting sewer service charge rates
play

PROPERTY OWNERS MEETING SEWER SERVICE CHARGE RATES Edgewood Sewer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PROPERTY OWNERS MEETING SEWER SERVICE CHARGE RATES Edgewood Sewer Maintenance District Kensington Square Sewer Maintenance District Oak Knoll Sewer Maintenance District Clifford Elementary School 225 Clifford Avenue Redwood City, CA May 21,


  1. PROPERTY OWNERS MEETING SEWER SERVICE CHARGE RATES Edgewood Sewer Maintenance District Kensington Square Sewer Maintenance District Oak Knoll Sewer Maintenance District Clifford Elementary School 225 Clifford Avenue Redwood City, CA May 21, 2007 7:00 P.M. County of San Mateo Department of Public Works

  2. OVERVI EW OF TONI GHT’S MEETI NG: District Information � District Funding � Elements of the Sewer Service Charge Rates � In District Costs � Out of District Costs � Minimum Fund Reserve Targets � Proposed Rates � Rate Setting Timeline � Questions and Comments �

  3. HI SMD: Pipes ~ 1 Mile ERU - 234 BHSMD: Pipes ~ 7 Miles SHCSD: ERU - 426 Pipes ~ 2 Miles ERU - 58 CSCSD: OKSMD: Pipes ~ 19 Miles Pipes ~ 2 Miles ERU – 1,501 ERU - 118 DCSD: KSSMD: Pipes ~ 4 Miles Pipes ~ 0.8 Miles ERU - 293 ERU - 74 ESMD: Pipes ~ 0.3 Miles ELHSMD: FOSMD: ERU - 18 Pipes ~ 29 Miles Pipes ~ 81 Miles ERU – 12,597 ERU – 1,657

  4. EDGEWOOD SEWER MAI NTENANCE DI STRI CT – BOUNDARY MAP: Sewage Flows Through City of Redwood City To South Bayside System Authority (SBSA) Treatment Plant in Redwood Shores For Treatment Foster City District Redwood Boundary Shores CM: CM: Insert district map. Insert district map. Belmont San Carlos Redwood City

  5. KENSI NGTON SQUARE SMD – BOUNDARY MAP: Sewage Flows Through City of Redwood City To South Bayside System Authority (SBSA) Treatment Plant in Redwood Shores For Treatment District Redwood Boundary Shores Belmont San Carlos Redwood City

  6. OAK KNOLL SEWER MAI NTENANCE DI STRI CT – BOUNDARY MAP: Sewage Flows Through City of Redwood City To South Bayside System Authority (SBSA) Treatment Plant in Redwood Shores For Treatment Redwood Shores Belmont District District District Boundary Boundary Boundary San Carlos Redwood City

  7. SEWER/ SANI TATI ON DI STRI CTS I N COUNTY GOVERNMENT: EACH DISTRICT IS AN INDEPENDENT ENTITY WITH ITS OWN SEPARATE BUDGET Each District’s Governing Board is the Board of Supervisors � The District receives Sewer Service Charges and limited � property taxes within the District boundaries to fund sewer service The Sewer Service Charges are a Fee For Service, Not a Tax � The District collects Sewer Service Charges on the Tax Bill � because it is least costly way to collect the fee

  8. WHERE DOES MY PROPERTY TAX MONEY GO? EDGEWOOD SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT: No Property Tax Revenue Allocation � District Formed After Proposition 13 �

  9. WHERE DOES MY PROPERTY TAX MONEY GO? KSSMD Sample Property Tax Allocation (TRA 073-032) Mosquito Abatement 0.20% Sequoia Hospital Dist County Harbor District 0.37% 1.55% Air Quality Mngmnt 0.22% County Education Tax 3.74% Mid Pen ROSD 1.95% Emerald Lake Lighting 1.70% Kensington Sq SMD General County Tax SM Junior College 5.79% 25.14% 7.19% Free Library 3.67% County Fire Protection 6.81% SU High School RWC Elem School 16.57% 25.07%

  10. WHERE DOES MY PROPERTY TAX MONEY GO? OKSMD Sample Property Tax Allocation (TRA 073-008) Mosquito Abatement 0.21% County Harbor District Sequoia Hospital Dist 0.39% 1.62% Air Quality Mngmnt 0.23% Mid Penn ROSD County Education Tax 2.04% 3.91% Emerald Lake Lighting 1.78% OKSMD 1.51% General County Tax SM Junior College 26.29% 7.52% Free Library 3.83% SU High School County Fire Protection 17.32% 7.12% RWC Elem School 26.22%

  11. DI STRI CT SPECI FI C STATI STI CS: Number of Equivalent Downstream Age Treatment District Connections Residential Transport (Years) * Facility ** Units ** Agency Edgewood SMD 1 18 18 South City of Bayside Kensington 51 74 74 Redwood System Square SMD City Authority (SBSA) Oak Knoll SMD 50 114 118 *Age based on District formation date ** Based on 2006-07 SSC Report Percentage of Percentage of District Miles of Pipe Pipe in Pipe in Streets Easements Edgewood SMD 0.3 28.75% 71.25% Kensington Square SMD 0.8 0.00% 100.00% Oak Knoll SMD 1.5 33.43% 66.57%

  12. ORGANI ZATI ONAL STRUCTURE OF DI STRI CTS: SAN MATEO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS James C. Porter, Director UTILITIES-FLOOD CONTROL-WATERSHED PROTECTION SECTION Ann M. Stillman, Principal Civil Engineer BURLINGAME HILLS SMD CRYSTAL SPRINGS CSD DEVONSHIRE CSD EDGEWOOD SMD EMERALD LAKE HEIGHTS SMD FAIR OAKS SMD HARBOR INDUSTRIAL SMD KENSINGTON SQUARE SMD OAK KNOLL SMD SCENIC HEIGHTS CSD

  13. HOW DOES A SEWER SYSTEM WORK? Each District Relies On Downstream Agencies To Transport The District Collected Sewage To The Treatment Plant Image Source: Pixel-Gym

  14. DI STRI CT EXPENSES: IN DISTRICT COSTS: � Operation and Maintenance � Regulation Compliance � District Capital Improvement Projects OUT OF DISTRICT COSTS: � Sewage Transport and Treatment � Downstream Agency Capital Improvement Projects

  15. DI STRI CT EXPENSES: Edgewood Sewer Maintenance District FY 07-08 Proposed Balanced Budget Rate of $900 Fund Reserve * 26.1% O&M 29.9% In District Regulations 1.2% Treatment 42.8% * Contributes to Fund Reserve

  16. DI STRI CT EXPENSES: Kensington Square Sewer Maintenance District FY 07-08 Expenditure Per ERU of $929 (Proposed Balanced Budget Rate of $750) Fund Reserve * 0.4% Other Revenue O&M (Tax Revenue & 9.5% Interest) 18.8% Regulations 3.6% In District Treatment 36.8% District CIP 30.9% * Utilizes Fund Reserve

  17. DI STRI CT EXPENSES: Oak Knoll Sewer Maintenance District FY 07-08 Expenditure Per ERU of $705 ( Proposed Balanced Budget Rate of $650) Fund Reserve * Other Revenue 0.3% (Tax Revenue & O&M Interest) 14.1% 8.1% Regulations 8.5% In District District CIP 15.4% Treatment * Contributes to Fund Reserve 53.6%

  18. DI STRI CT EXPENDI TURE COMPARI SON Fiscal Year 2005-06 and 2007-08 Expenditure Comparison $90,000 Regulations $80,000 $70,000 District CIP $60,000 Expenditure ($) O&M $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 Treatment $20,000 $10,000 $- Edgewood Kensington Kensington Oak Knoll Oak Knoll 2007-08 2005-06 2007-08 2005-06 2007-08 District / Fiscal Year

  19. OPERATI ON AND MAI NTENANCE: � ROUTINE AND PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE � REPAIR OF DAMAGED PIPES � EMERGENCY RESPONSE � CUSTOMER ASISTANCE � DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION

  20. OPERATI ON AND MAI NTENANCE: EMERGENCY RESPONSE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK Image Source: City of Irving, Texas

  21. OPERATI ON AND MAI NTENANCE: ANTICIPATED EXPENDITURES FOR FUTURE OPERATION & MAINTENANCE BASED ON 5-YEAR HISTORICAL COSTS � 4% annual increase for inflation � 3% O&M contingency to account for unanticipated expenses

  22. REGULATI ON COMPLI ANCE: THE DISTRICTS ARE REGULATED BY: � The Regional Water Quality Control Board � The State Water Resources Control Board � The State Porter-Cologne Act � The Federal Clean Water Act

  23. REGULATI ON COMPLI ANCE: GOAL TO ELIMINATE SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS (SSO) What is a SSO? � Raw Sewage Leaves the Pipe and Flows on the Ground Surface � Sewage, if Not Captured, Can Reach Storm Drains, Creeks, Lakes, the Bay, and Ocean SSO from Manhole SSO from Manhole Near Creek SSO from Cleanout

  24. REGULATI ON COMPLI ANCE: WHAT CAUSES A SSO? Blockages, breaks, and Infiltration & Inflow in the sewer pipe will cause a SSO.

  25. REGULATI ON COMPLI ANCE: WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO ELIMINATE SSOs? UNTREATED SEWAGE IS A THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH, ANIMALS, AND THE ENVIRONMENT.

  26. REGULATI ON COMPLI ANCE: WHY I S I T I MPORTANT TO ELI MI NATE SSOs? AGENCIES HAVE BEEN LEVIED STIFF PENALTIES OR PAID LARGE SETTLEMENTS IN LAWSUITS FOR SSOs. Notice of Violation & Intent Notice of Violation & Intent to File Suit (60- -Day Notice) Day Notice) to File Suit (60 Collection System Settlement Agreement Collection System Settlement Agreement Fines!!! Plaintiffs WCWD WCWD Baykeeper, West County Toxic Coalition Lawyers for Clean Water o Collection System Capital Improvement Program Environmental Advocates o Commit $5M over 10 years vs. o System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan (SECAP) Defendants o Revise within 18 months o Update 2015 West County Wastewater District (WCWD) o CCTV-Sewer Condition Grading City of Richmond o Gravity Sewer Line Cleaning Schedule Veolia Water NA o <12” once every 4 years o >12” once every 10 years Downey Brand LLP o Design for 5 year-24/hr Storm Event Settlement Agreement Fees Settlement Agreement Fees o Continue FOG Program - Increase FSE Inspections o Attain SSO Reduction Goals WCWD/Richmond/Veolia WCWD/Richmond/Veolia o WCA NPDES Effluent Limit Violations o SEP Rose Foundation $80,000 o Attorneys Fees (Plaintiff) $57,000 The San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality o Collection System Settlement Fees Control Board imposed a $516,000 fine to the City of o Attorneys Fees (Plaintiff) - $538,000 o Oversight Cost (Plaintiff) - $100,000 South San Francisco in 2006 for sewer overflows and o Attorneys Fees (Defendants) - $300,000 o Staff Resources/In-house Counsel - $50,000 a $626,000 administrative civil liability to the City and o Settlement Agreement was reached in 15 months County of San Francisco in an impending order.

  27. REGULATI ON COMPLI ANCE: What are the Districts required to do? � Develop Sewer System Management Plans (SSMP) � Report all SSOs

Recommend


More recommend