project manager s assessment
play

Project Managers Assessment Overall performance for the Tank - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 05, 2022 •280 likes •1.68k views

Project Managers Assessment Overall performance for the Tank Operations Contract (TOC) is favorable with a cumulative-to-date cost performance index (CPI) of 1.01 and schedule performance index (SPI) of 0.99. The FY 2018 CPI started at 0.93

  1. Project Manager’s Assessment (cont.) C-Farm Stabilization: The project is preparing engineering and work documents to disconnect, remove, and/or isolate electrical, water and hydraulic systems, and remove the POR107 exhauster from service following completion of C-105 post-retrieval sampling efforts. Stabilization efforts will reduce maintenance costs and mitigate the potential for environmental occurrences and/or contamination spread in the time period between completion of retrieval and start of closure activities. HIHTL Removal: A pre-bid meeting was held to discuss the installation of a new SCBA bottle handling/egress tent at AN Farm. The new tent will support FY18 removal of hose-in-hose transfer lines (HIHTL) within AN Farm at the AN06A and the AN101A pits. Work planning for the removal of up to 20 expired or soon to expire HIHTL began. Field crews removed shield plates and hose barns from POR138 to AN101A Pit. Disconnecting and removing the hoses will be delayed to March 2018 pending the availability of the new SCBA Bottle Handling Tent for AN Farm. AY-102: Preparations to perform flow examinations by pumping the annulus liquid waste to the primary tank were initiated. This examination will capture an enhanced view of the surface contour of the leak site areas. The view will provide a visual assessment of extent of conditions, identification of specific refractory air slots experiencing flow, and evaporation time for the volume held up in the primary tank in order to evaluate the number of pumping operations needed to remove the residual annulus liquid. AY-102 Recovery Project performed flow examinations to confirm previously identified leak sites by pumping the annulus liquid waste to the AY-102 primary tank. Previously identified potential leak sites were confirmed to leak, and five new leak sites were identified by visible flow of liquid through penetrations of the primary tank bottom. Based on hold-up following annulus pumping it is assumed that approximately 150 gallons of liquid remained in the primary tank. Process engineering estimated 12 pumping cycles to reach a waste level below the minimum threshold required to operate the pump (5 inches). AY-102 Recovery Project was preparing a recommendation to close tank 241-AY-102 based on high definition video examinations and evaluation of inspection data that revealed numerous through-floor penetrations that serve as the primary sources of waste leakage to the annulus. An inspection report providing a detailed account of available data was being developed for transmittal to the State of Washington, Department of Ecology as required by PCHB 14-041c 241-AY-102 Settlement Agreement Section II.B.5.c. ORP requested a proposal for all AY-102 Recovery Phase 3 project scope, including the Phase 4 planned activities required to layup 241-AY-102 for an extended period of time. A meeting to support development of the proposal was kicked off with WRPS Contracts and AY-102 Project staff in attendance. AX Farm Equipment Removal: WRPS completed the shipment of grouted thermocouples from AX-102 riser 7A and AX-104 riser 7A and cover blocks from AX-101 pits C and D and AX-103 pit B to ERDF for disposal. Crews continued cleanout of AX-103 pit D, and preparations for the removal of the AX-104 pit C riser 1A sluicer commenced. A-Farm Ventilation: WRPS completed quality assurance of exhausters to be used to ventilate A-Farm tanks during equipment removal/installation and retrieval activities. October 2017 4

  2. Project Manager’s Assessment (cont.) One System, Chief Technology Office and Closure WRPS Engineering and One System personnel visited the Savannah River Site to benchmark and compare waste characterization processes and systems. Flowsheet development and waste feed delivery processes and tools were also reviewed so that best practices at both sites were identified. Fabrication of the two units of the prototype Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) Transportation system, namely the ILAW container pallet and the ILAW trailer, began and will continue during FY18, with delivery of the prototypes expected before June 30, 2018. At that point, the system will undergo integrated testing in order to identify any modifications that may be required prior to the fabrication of the production units. Tank Farm Projects AP Transfer Pump Replacements: Following installation of the new AP-106 pump and jumper, the cover blocks were re-installed and actuator field measurements taken for vendor use in fabrication. The vendor completed fabrication, and the actuators and electrical tie-ins were installed. The old AP-106 pump was prepared for disposal at ERDF. SX Barrier Construction Evapotranspiration Basin: The site preparation and grading for the SX Farm Evapotranspiration Basin to the south of the farm was completed. The subcontractor crew will continue excavation and construction of the basin into early November. The anchor trench excavation and soil compaction are forecast to begin the first week of November, followed closely by the installation of the basin liner. Grab Sampling FY18: The first round of the samples for the large volume sample at AP-107 was completed and samples were sent for analysis on October 13, 2017. The hedgehog sample containers will be inspected and returned to the site to complete the second round of sampling. This sample is performed in support of Waste Feed Delivery engineering. The sampling team will prepare to grab sample AP-107 early in November and continues to support in process sampling at C-105 for the retrieval organization. Comprehensive Vapors Action Plan The Chemical Protection Program Office (CPPO) finalized the draft Comprehensive Vapors Actions status dashboard update process. The dashboard is designed to monitor the progress of the draft Comprehensive Vapors Action Plan (CVAP) Key Performance Parameters (KPP) 1 through 7 and will be updated monthly. CPPO published its FY2017 Annual Summary. It is available now on HanfordVapors.com. NUCON Abatement: WRPS drafted the Propane Decision Paper, discussing the viability of fuels to support the bench-scale testing. Diesel appears to be the preferred fuel. A review was provided with comments on the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Test Plan for the bench-scale testing. TerraGraphics identified a need to revise the statement of work in order to support fabrication of electrical equipment. October 2017 5

  3. Project Manager’s Assessment (cont.) Cartridge Filter Testing: Since the out briefing with the third party, WRPS and Hanford Atomic Metal Trades Council have been working to complete full-face air purifying respirators (FFAPR) implementation at AP farm. WRPS still allows workers to voluntarily upgrade to SCBA in this location if desired. The third party reviews of the cartridge testing reports and subsequent comment resolution took much longer than anticipated. This has delayed the transition from SCBA to air-purifying respirator for some work activities in the ventilated farms. A new FFAPR implementation date is likely to be announced in the first quarter of FY2018. Production Operations Crews transferred 190,526 gallons of waste from the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Basin 42 to the Effluent Treatment Facility for the fiscal year 2018 thus far. Additionally, the 222-S Laboratories brokered 1,703 samples to off-site commercial laboratories. This period the DST Recirculation of Tank AP-107 to support staging feed to the Waste Treatment Plant. Finally, removal and replacement of LERF 44 Basin pump. Engineering P&CS Engineers: • Completed design activities for AN, AW, 702AZ Exhauster stack monitors, with modification travelers approved and final comments provided for the Instrumentation & Controls Engineering Change Notices, including loop diagrams, panel arrangements, and network connectivity. • Received parts and began configuration of components with Mission Support Alliance ahead of bench scale testing of the Cisco access point in support of wireless improvement test activities. Engineering also approved Safety Requirement Evaluation Document revisions for Annulus Leak Detector and Freeze Protection, which clearly differentiated safety design requirements and general design requirements. • Completed revisions of the Software Design Description and the Requirement Traceability Matrix documentation. This supports software quality assurance activities in support of this system. Also initiated design and development to include Flush Line capability within the Waste Transfer Route Map planning application as well as a new time monitoring capability and a new user interface for tracking required actions. • Completed field activities to download and test alarm rationalization including removal of unused 2/3-way valves from user interface at AP Farm. This included revisions to three alarm response procedures and a training bulletin for AP Farm operations. This work reduces the number of alarms on Tank Farm Operators responding to Tank Farm Monitoring and Control System consoles. Additional October 2017 Items of Note • The Hanford vapors trial has been granted a fifth delay by U.S. Judge Thomas Rice. The trial is now scheduled to begin August 29, 2018, allowing for continued settlement discussions in a lawsuit demanding better protection for Hanford workers from chemical vapors. October 2017 6

  4. Safety Statistics Through October 2017, Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) had worked 3,662,782 hours (266 days) without a Lost Time Workday Injury and 685,914 hours (49 days) without a Recordable case. There were no Recordable cases in October. Integrated Safety Management System The Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 cumulative performance indicators for Recordable cases (0.00) and DART cases (0.00) surpassed the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) goals of 1.10 and 0.60, respectively. Additionally, the 12-month rolling average safety rates remained low, with a rates of 0.12 for Recordable cases and 0.04 for DART cases. Total Recordable FY 2018 Cumulative Summary Days Away, Restricted Workdays or Transferred (DART) FY 2018 Cumulative Summary * * * Score Based on FY 2018 Cumulative Case Rate October 2017 7

  5. Safety Statistics (cont.) Days Away, Restricted Workdays or Transferred (DART) Total Recordable 12 Month Rolling Average Summary 12 Month Rolling Average Summary First Aid Case Rate - 12 Month Rolling Average Summary No Recordable cases in October: • Employee was walking under stairs to perform routine surveys and hit head on metal staircase causing laceration to the scalp Six First Aid cases in October: • Employee slipped off edge of concrete walkway causing strain/sprain to knee. • When latch got stuck on conex box employee pulled on the latch as it broke loose it struck employee’s finger causing pain. • While wearing SCBA, employee tripped and fell forward causing strain/sprain to hand, neck, and back. • Employee tripped on hose in C-Farm, fell forward strained/sprained finger. • While stepping onto sidewalk employee rolled ankle causing sprain/strain. • Employee tripped coming down the steps and fell causing pain to the knee and back. October 2017 8

  6. PMB Funds Analysis by Year FY 2009-2017 Actuals Carryover from FY 2017 LAWPS Carryover LAWPS Capital Projected FY 2018 Expense PMB Fee $1,000.0 Projected Expense PMB funding for FY 2018 is $614.9M. The $900.0 $54.4 projected funding for LAWPS in FY 2018 is $86.7M. The fee pool for FY 2018 is $54.4M. The FY 2017 Carryover is $97.6M. There $800.0 is $60.6M in LAWPS Carryover, for a total of $914.2M $ Millions $700.0 $48.2 $38.0 $600.0 $614.9 $28.3 $500.0 $32.9 $28.0 $21.6 $400.0 $23.5 $19.0 $634.9 $621.6 $300.0 $17.9 $523.7 $471.0 $430.4 $409.9 $200.0 $86.7 $362.0 $366.6 $261.6 $60.6 $100.0 $97.60 $- October 2017 9

  7. FY 2017 Performance Based Incentive Profile PBI Completed On Schedule Forecast Within 20 Projected to Miss # of Milestones Pending Project Days of Terminal Date Terminal Date Realignment October 2017 10

  8. Not-to-Exceed (NTE) Tracking Report October 2017 11

  9. NTE Tracking Report (cont.) October 2017 12

  10. NTE Tracking Report (cont.) October 2017 13

  11. NTE Tracking Report (cont.) October 2017 14

  12. Change Proposal Summary October 2017 15

  13. Expense SV/CV Forecast Projections October 2017 16

  14. Capital SV/CV Forecast Projections October 2017 17

  15. Small Business Reporting Through October 2017, WRPS has awarded a total of $1,650M in subcontracts, of which $1,073M (65.1%) CTD is attributed to small businesses. The CTD awards to small businesses exceeds the 58.2% small business subcontracting goal. WRPS will continue to promote small business subcontracting by setting aside procurement actions for small businesses when appropriate, as well as by reaching out to new small businesses in furtherance of this objective. In October 2017, the Small Business Program Manager continued to meet with vendors in the Tri-Cities area. Locally, WRPS continuously supports the Tri- City Regional Chamber of Commerce and Procurement Technical Assistance Centers (PTAC) as a way to reach out and promote small business subcontracting in the area and encourage growth of local and regional small businesses. The SBPM attended the Tribes Networking Session as part of Connect Tri-Cities which connected the Hanford Small Business Council with many native owned small businesses reaching from Yakima, WA to Pendleton, OR. The SBPM announced the Small Business Incentive Winners on stage at the Tri-City Regional Chamber luncheon at the Red Lion in Pasco as well as attended a breakfast for Access Tri-Cities which focused on helping people with disabilities as well as working on hurdles that you can overcome. The WRPS SBPM continues to attend the free government marketing workshops that PTAC puts on monthly. The SBPM is continuing to meet with the Hanford Small Business Council monthly and the next meeting is planned for Tuesday, November 14th, 2017. The Small Business Council is also continuing to plan Bridging Partnerships which is being held in April 2018 at the Three Rivers Convention Center in Kennewick, WA. October 2017 18

  16. Baseline Change Requests October 2017 19

  17. Risk Management Assessment Management of TOC risks continued in October 2017. TOC key risks cross cutting the various programs and projects are identified below along with their associated ongoing/ planned handling actions, status of the handling actions, any emergent quality issues, staffing, alternative courses of action or other problems that may impact the baseline scope. During the month of September, WRPS maintained 30+ active risk registers. CURRENT RISK STATUS October 2017 20

  18. Risk Management Assessment (cont.) Identified risks realized in October included : In Pit Heating • LAWPS InPFP-005-R – “WRPS Resources Not Available When Required” • Handling Actions: 710 - “DOE scope changes occur during LAWPS design” • Utilize Planning and Interface Meetings Handling Action: • • Plan and Communicate Resource Needs Mitigate magnitude of external stakeholder driven change • RCT Assigned to Specifically Support Project Cross-Site Transfer Lines • SS Airflow CRSTL-049-R - “Direct Buried line that powers 6241 -V does not pass • DNFSB-005-R – “PPE Availability Impacts Field Work” Megger Test” (impacted closed) Handling Actions: Handling Action: • • Perform schedule coordination activities and support integration between projects and Do Megger Test Prior to Proposal phases. • Create a Priority List SX Interim Barrier • • Additional I&C resource applied (better R2A2) SXIBP-019-R - “Procurement Delays” Handling Action: • Initiate long lead procurements early AP-801 • AP801-001-R – “Resource Availability” ETF Integrity Assessment Handling Action: • • Negotiate priority ETFIA-001-R - “Resource Availability” Handling Action: • AW 103 Pump and Jumper Currently being developed • AW103-013-R – “Special Resources not Available to Execute Scope Which Causes Delays” Handling Actions: • Coordination in T4 meetings • Train additional field work supervisor October 2017 21

  19. Risk Management Assessment (cont.) October 2017 22

  20. Risk Management Assessment (cont.) October 2017 23

  21. Risk Management Assessment (cont.) October 2017 24

  22. Risk Management Assessment (cont.) October 2017 25

  23. Risk Management Assessment (cont.) October 2017 26

  24. Risk Management Assessment (cont.) October 2017 27

  25. Government Furnished Services and Information (GFS/I) October 2017 28

  26. Tank Farm Projects October 2017 SX FARM EVAPOTRANSPIRATION BASIN AP-106 PUMP REPLACEMENT

  27. Tank Farm Projects Safety As of October 31, 2017 Tank Farm Projects has worked 1,357,393 hours or 1,315 days without a Lost Time Workday Injury And Has worked 523 days since a Recordable case. Work Related Injuries during October No reportable cases 12 Month Rolling Wave October 2017 30

  28. Tank Farm Projects Key Deliverables Status FY2018 Key Deliverables Target Forecast 242-A Integrity Assessment- Leak Test and IQRPE Assessment Report for DOE-ORP (WAC 173-303 Recommendation) SEP17 DEC17 Complete 90% design for AP-105 DFLAW upgrades DEC17 DEC17 Complete 242-A Process Condensate Station DEC17 DEC17 Continuous Air Monitor Upgrades - Issue Report JAN18 JAN18 AP801 Water Service Upgrade - Complete field installation of new equipment FEB18 FEB18 Complete twelve SST Integrity visual inspections FEB18 FEB18 Complete field work supporting ETF Integrity Assessment MAR18 MAR18 DST Improvement Plan - Procure robotic crawlers (2) MAR18 MAR18 242-A Reboiler - complete fabrication and deliver MAR18 MAR18 Complete field work supporting 219-S Integrity Assessment MAY18 MAY18 Simulant Valve Testing - completion of 1,500 cycle & Leak Testing all valves MAY18 MAY18 Complete permanent power installation to 6241-V in support of Crossite Transfer line Reactivation JUN18 JUN18 Complete nine DST Annulus visual inspections JUN18 JUN18 Perform encasement pressure checks at three pits. JUL18 JUL18 Leak Detector Relay Replacement Installation complete AUG18 AUG18 October 2017 31

  29. Tank Farm Projects DNFSB/TPA/Consent Decree Milestones October 2017 32

  30. Tank Farm Projects FY18 PBI Milestones TFP Total Fieldwork Field Float Change Float per % Probability Terminal Completion (to 1 wk PBI Completion Terminal of completion PBI # PBI Title Dates Analyst POC % of Fee Total Available Fee 11/13/17 8/31/18) (FES) 11/13/17 Date by 09/30/18 PBI-37.0.2.1 Complete Grab Sample #1 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission - AP-107 large sample 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 0.9% $75,000 23-Oct-17A 213 1 31-Oct-17A 228 100% PBI-37.0.2.2 Complete Grab Sample #2 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission - AP-107 chemistry grab 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 0.9% $75,000 13-Nov-17 202 1 20-Nov-17 214 80% PBI-37.0.2.3 Complete Grab Sample #3 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 0.9% $75,000 27-Nov-17 193 0 5-Dec-17 205 80% PBI-37.0.2.4 Complete Grab Sample #4 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 0.9% $75,000 16-Mar-18 118 -2 26-Mar-18 130 80% PBI-37.0.2.5 Complete Grab Sample #5 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 0.9% $75,000 09-May-18 80 0 17-May-18 92 80% PBI-37.0.2.6 Complete Grab Sample #6 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 0.9% $75,000 13-Jun-18 56 0 21-Jun-18 68 80% PBI-37.0.2.7 Complete Grab Sample #7 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 0.9% $75,000 18-Jul-18 32 0 26-Jul-18 44 80% PBI-37.0.2.8 Complete Grab Sample #8 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 0.9% $75,000 15-Jan-18 161 144 23-Jan-18 173 80% PBI-37.0.4 Complete robot crawler demonstration through field deployment in one DST 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Castleberry, Jim 1.2% $100,000 13-Jun-18 44 -2 21-Jun-18 54 80% PBI-37.0.5.1 Perform Ultrasonic testing examination of DST AY-101 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Castleberry, Jim 1.2% $100,000 06-Feb-18 115 -2 14-Feb-18 125 80% PBI-37.0.5.2 Perform Ultrasonic testing examination of DST AZ-101 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Castleberry, Jim 1.2% $100,000 23-Apr-18 73 -2 1-May-18 83 80% PBI-37.0.5.3 Perform Ultrasonic testing examination of DST AP-107 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Castleberry, Jim 1.2% $100,000 14-Jun-18 43 -2 25-Jun-18 53 80% PBI-37.0.6 Complete design, fabrication, and testing of an annulus pumping system capable of deployment in anyone of the 27 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin May, Dustin 3.6% $300,000 31-Jul-18 18 11 8-Aug-18 28 80% double-shell tanks PBI-38.0.1.1 Complete HVAC Control room upgrade (Complete the removal and replacement of the 242 ‑ A Evaporator Control 30-Sep-18 Wright, Bryan Stoner, Tyler 3.3% $275,000 03-Jan-18 134 0 10-Jan-18 145 80% Room HVAC system) PBI-38.0.1.2 Complete 242-A Evaporator Fire alarm panel upgrade 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Stoner, Tyler 3.3% $275,000 4-Jun-18 61 0 11-Jun-18 61 80% PBI-38.0.4.1 Complete installation of in-pit heaters in ten (10) pits 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Nelson, Bobby 3.5% $292,000 28-Aug-18 11 0 6-Sep-18 11 80% PBI-38.0.4.2 Complete AZ-102 pump replacement 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin May, Dustin 3.5% $292,000 26-Apr-18* 153 0 30-Apr-18 153 80% PBI-38.0.4.3 Complete AW-103 pump replacement 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin May, Dustin 3.5% $292,000 16-Aug-18* 41 0 20-Aug-18 41 80% PBI-38.0.4.4 Complete wireless instrumentation installation in nine (9) pits 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Larsen, Doug 3.5% $292,000 4-Sep-18 6 0 18-Sep-18 6 80% PBI-38.0.4.5 Complete electrical upgrades to AW-103 and AW-104 to support 242-A Evaporator campaigns and transfers from 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin Stoner, Tyler 3.5% $292,000 15-Mar-18* 195 0 19-Mar-18 195 80% 241-AW-3 and 241-AW-4 PBI-38.0.4.6 Complete electrical installation to one permanent safety shower and electrical racks to three existing showers. 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin Jansen, Jeff 3.5% $292,000 19-Apr-18 74 -4 30-Apr-18 84 80% PBI-38.0.5 Complete one (1) basin cover replacement at ETF 30-Sep-18 Wright, Bryan Stoner, Ryan 10.2% $850,000 05-Sep-18 -2 0 12-Sep-18 9 80% PBI-38.0.6.1 Complete AW Farm safety significant (SS) flow upgrades 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Larsen, Doug 3.9% $325,000 20-Feb-18 101 0 05-Mar-18* 116 80% PBI-38.0.6.2 Complete AZ Farm safety significant (SS) flow upgrades 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Larsen, Doug 3.9% $325,000 26-Mar-18 -28 0 05-Apr-18* 97 80% PBI-41.0.2 In support of completion of TPA M-045-92, Complete Evapotranspiration Basin at SX Farm 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin Jansen, Jeff 6.0% $500,000 07-Mar-18* 203 0 11-Mar-18 203 80% PBI-41.0.3 In support of completion of TPA M-045-92, Complete North Barrier as designed at SX Farm 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin Jansen, Jeff 6.0% $500,000 09-May-18* 140 0 13-May-18 140 80% PBI-41.0.4 In support of completion of TPA M-045-92, Complete South Barrier as designed at SX Farm 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin Jansen, Jeff 6.0% $500,000 30-Aug-18* 27 0 3-Sep-18 27 80% PBI-46.0.1 Complete design of AP-105 for Tank Farm Upgrades 30-Sep-18 Koerner, Chris Stoner, Ryan 3.0% $250,000 05-Feb-18 116 0 12-Feb-18 127 80% PBI-46.0.2 Submit the 90% design submittal for AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades 30-Sep-18 Koerner, Chris Stoner, Ryan 3.0% $250,000 15-Aug-18 9 0 22-Aug-18 20 80% PBI-46.0.3 Removal and installation of AP-105 equipment to support Tank Farm Upgrades 30-Sep-18 Koerner, Chris Stoner, Ryan 10.2% $850,000 24-Aug-18 5 0 30-Aug-18 15 80% PBI-46.0.4 Procure and fabricate AP-105 equipment to support Tank Farm Upgrades 30-Sep-18 Koerner, Chris Stoner, Ryan 4.2% $350,000 09-Apr-18 81 0 16-Apr-18 92 80% $8,302,000 October 2017 33

  31. Tank Farm Projects Performance CM and FYTD CM CM CM CM CM FYTD FYTD FYTD FYTD FYTD FYTD FYTD WBSL5 Title BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI FY BAC FYP FCST FY Spend SVFCST VACP TCPI 5.01.01.03.08 - Core & Grab Sampling incl. ORSS & Equip 0 2 13 2 (12) 0 2 13 2 (12) - 0.12 0 341 322 341 20 1.10 5.01.01.03.09 - Tank Waste Sampling Program FY18 158 158 160 0 (2) 158 158 160 0 (2) 1.00 0.99 2,725 2,725 2,724 0 1 1.00 5.01.01.03.10 - Grab Sampling 4 71 55 67 16 4 71 55 67 16 16.26 1.30 1,680 1,680 1,675 (0) 5 0.99 5.01.01.05.11 - 242-A Integrity Assessment 48 54 87 6 (33) 48 54 87 6 (33) 1.13 0.62 103 172 255 69 (83) 0.70 5.01.01.05.20 - DST Integrity Improvement Plan 11 3 1 (8) 3 11 3 1 (8) 3 0.29 6.51 1,383 2,422 2,570 1,141 (149) 0.98 5.01.01.05.23 - CHEM-D-42 Leak Assessment 14 42 25 28 17 14 42 25 28 17 2.92 1.71 238 297 337 59 (40) 0.82 5.01.01.05.26 - Tank Integrity Chemistry & Corrosion (FY17&18) 21 21 3 0 17 21 21 3 0 17 1.00 5.97 357 357 339 0 17 1.00 5.01.01.05.27 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY17 0 134 58 134 75 0 134 58 134 75 - 2.30 0 1,689 1,410 1,689 279 1.15 5.01.01.05.28 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection 79 100 118 21 (17) 79 100 118 21 (17) 1.27 0.85 167 362 254 195 107 1.91 5.01.01.05.29 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasement Testing FY17 0 0 4 0 (4) 0 0 4 0 (4) - 0.10 0 128 172 128 (43) 0.76 5.01.01.05.30 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY17 0 0 4 0 (4) 0 0 4 0 (4) - - 0 26 52 26 (26) 0.54 5.01.01.05.31 - Tank Chemistry Control FY17 0 57 82 57 (25) 0 57 82 57 (25) - 0.70 0 406 340 406 66 1.35 5.01.01.05.33 - FFS-Simulant Valve Testing 43 7 24 (36) (17) 43 7 24 (36) (17) 0.16 0.30 708 614 490 90 123 1.69 5.01.01.05.35 - SST Integrity Assessment 22 4 17 (17) (13) 22 4 17 (17) (13) 0.21 0.26 991 989 863 (2) 126 1.16 5.01.01.05.36 - DST Structural AOR to Support Tank Lvl Increase 110 60 85 (50) (25) 110 60 85 (50) (25) 0.54 0.70 411 812 1,020 401 (208) 0.80 5.01.01.05.38 - Integrity Project Mgt & Oversight FY18 153 153 59 0 94 153 153 59 0 94 1.00 2.60 2,643 2,643 2,403 (0) 240 1.06 5.01.01.05.40 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY18 9 0 0 (9) 0 9 0 0 (9) 0 - - 1,401 1,113 1,397 0 (284) 1.00 5.01.01.05.41 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection FY18 0 129 10 129 120 0 129 10 129 120 - 13.38 1,601 1,601 1,385 (0) 216 1.07 5.01.01.05.42 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasemnt Testing FY18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 429 429 417 (0) 11 1.03 5.01.01.05.43 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY18 6 2 3 (5) (1) 6 2 3 (5) (1) 0.25 0.62 809 809 799 0 11 1.01 5.01.01.05.44 - Tank Chemistry Control FY18 37 22 10 (15) 12 37 22 10 (15) 12 0.59 2.28 2,516 2,516 2,475 0 41 1.01 5.01.01.05.45 - ETF Integrity Assessment 139 85 36 (54) 49 139 85 36 (54) 49 0.61 2.36 497 727 668 235 60 1.02 5.01.01.05.47 - 219-S Integrity Assessment 16 3 4 (13) (2) 16 3 4 (13) (2) 0.17 0.62 1,562 1,562 1,061 0 501 1.48 5.01.02.06.13 - Replace ETF Basin Covers 0 8 42 8 (34) 0 8 42 8 (34) - 0.19 3,591 3,605 4,658 14 (1,053) 0.78 5.01.04.01.16 - TF Automation Upgrades (DNFSB Action 3-1) 0 6 27 6 (21) 0 6 27 6 (21) - 0.22 0 72 254 72 (182) 0.29 5.01.04.01.18 - DST In-Pit Heating 37 48 65 11 (17) 37 48 65 11 (17) 1.29 0.74 1,840 2,612 3,014 816 (402) 0.88 5.01.04.01.20 - LOW Van Software/Hardware upgrades 0 8 5 8 3 0 8 5 8 3 - 1.67 0 39 14 39 24 3.13 5.01.04.01.30 - Cross-Site Transfer Line Activation 25 13 12 (11) 1 25 13 12 (11) 1 0.54 1.08 376 408 488 32 (80) 0.83 5.01.04.01.44 - AP-801 Water Service Upgrade 12 14 72 2 (58) 12 14 72 2 (58) 1.13 0.19 739 860 895 122 (35) 1.03 5.01.04.01.48 - DNFSB Recommendation 2012-2 Act 2-2 thru 2-4 304 91 121 (212) (30) 304 91 121 (212) (30) 0.30 0.75 4,155 4,311 4,150 156 161 1.05 5.01.04.01.50 - 242-A Process Condensate Sampling Station 0 7 8 7 (1) 0 7 8 7 (1) - 0.88 0 384 410 384 (26) 0.94 5.01.04.01.51 - Tank Farm Projects Prog Oversight - Opt P2 815 815 714 0 102 815 815 714 0 102 1.00 1.14 14,103 14,103 13,787 0 316 1.02 5.01.04.01.54 - Continuous Air Monitor Upgrades Evaluation 72 0 2 (72) (2) 72 0 2 (72) (2) 0.00 0.03 130 233 134 103 99 1.76 5.01.04.01.60 - SY Exhauster Upgrades 0 0 6 0 (6) 0 0 6 0 (6) - - 8,629 9,661 14,053 1,032 (4,391) 0.69 5.01.04.01.64 - DST Transfer Pump Replacements (FY17&18) 162 129 91 (33) 37 162 129 91 (33) 37 0.80 1.41 5,646 6,799 6,625 1,154 174 1.02 5.01.04.01.69 - Leak Detector Relay Replacement 84 48 78 (36) (30) 84 48 78 (36) (30) 0.57 0.62 1,122 1,227 1,208 105 18 1.04 5.01.04.01.77 - TF Automation Upgrades (FY17&18) 56 58 25 2 33 56 58 25 2 33 1.04 2.35 2,773 3,063 3,655 303 (592) 0.83 5.01.04.01.79 - AW-103 and AW-104 Electrical Upgrades 33 76 5 43 71 33 76 5 43 71 2.32 15.53 516 626 577 109 48 0.96 5.01.04.01.80 - DNFSB-2012-2 Streamlined Approach to SS Vent. 0 0 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 0 (0) - - 667 667 668 0 (1) 1.00 5.01.04.01.81 - AP-106 Transfer Pump Replacement 79 975 530 896 445 79 975 530 896 445 12.39 1.84 79 1,076 637 998 440 0.95 5.01.04.01.85 - 242-A Spare Reboiler 0 8 13 8 (5) 0 8 13 8 (5) - 0.63 0 515 535 515 (20) 0.97 5.01.04.01.87 - DST TAPD and ISP Revision (FY17 & 18) 4 0 (0) (3) 1 4 0 (0) (3) 1 0.09 (1.17) 392 388 331 (0) 57 1.18 5.01.04.01.88 - Safety Shower Upgrades 29 17 13 (11) 5 29 17 13 (11) 5 0.61 1.39 787 759 988 (27) (229) 0.76 5.01.04.01.89 - Critical Transfer System Components 0 0 (157) 0 157 0 0 (157) 0 157 - - 0 107 570 107 (462) 0.15 5.01.04.01.91 - 242-A Evaporator Fire Alarm Panel Upgrades 0 1 5 1 (3) 0 1 5 1 (3) - 0.31 0 781 836 781 (55) 0.94 5.01.04.01.92 - 242-A Control Room HVAC Upgrade 97 57 84 (40) (26) 97 57 84 (40) (26) 0.59 0.69 214 443 407 229 36 1.19 5.01.04.01.93 - Annulus Emergency Pumping Capability 28 39 11 11 28 28 39 11 11 28 1.40 3.49 269 303 251 34 52 1.10 5.01.04.01.94 - Fire Alarm System Upgrades - 2704HV & 222-S Lab 95 9 3 (86) 6 95 9 3 (86) 6 0.09 2.98 399 427 500 28 (73) 0.84 5.01.05.01.13 - Construction & Commissioning Mgmt - Opt P2 179 179 207 0 (28) 179 179 207 0 (28) 1.00 0.87 3,094 3,094 2,894 (0) 200 1.08 5.02.01.04.11 - Interim SX Barrier - Construction 158 442 550 285 (108) 158 442 550 285 (108) 2.80 0.80 5,526 5,889 7,795 363 (1,906) 0.75 5.02.01.04.12 - Interim SX Barrier - North Construction 0 0 2 0 (2) 0 0 2 0 (2) - - 4,459 4,459 4,457 (0) 2 1.00 5.03.02.06.08 - Project Management Upgrades support DFLAW 119 214 5 96 210 119 214 5 96 210 1.81 46.31 1,379 1,564 1,278 185 285 1.06 5.03.02.06.09 - AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 482 588 346 105 242 482 588 346 105 242 1.22 1.70 3,089 3,733 3,475 644 258 1.01 5.03.02.06.10 - AP-105 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 337 156 183 (181) (27) 337 156 183 (181) (27) 0.46 0.85 7,439 7,743 7,391 304 352 1.05 Total 4,076 5,216 3,939 1,140 1,278 4,076 5,216 3,939 1,140 1,278 1.28 1.32 91,632 104,472 110,378 13,481 (5,906) 0.94 October 2017 34

  32. Tank Farm Projects Current Month Variances SCHEDULE ($1,140k) COST ($1,278k) 5.1.1.5.27 DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing ($134k) 5.1.1.5.38 Integrity Project Management & Oversight FY18 ($94k) Cause: Schedule recovery – Received the PTZ-70 camera assemblies that were planned in Cause: Reduced labor usage for Integrity engineering personnel supporting specific projects. September and delayed due to vendor experiencing supply chain issues. Impact: The spend forecast has been updated to reflect future efficiencies in labor usage. Impact: Carryover recovery 5.1.1.41 SST Integrity Visual Inspection FY18 ($129k) 5.1.1.5.41 SST Visual Inspections ($120k) Cause: Accelerated work package planning preparation in order to expedite execution of the SST Cause: Labor usage savings realized during work package planning. The efficiencies were visual inspections during FY18 and maintain continuity of crew performance following execution of realized by utilizing the same planner for each work package and consolidating the video work the video inspections carryover from FY17. packages by tank farm thus reducing the total number of work packages needed. Impact: Favorable schedule variance. Impact: The current month efficiencies have resulted in a cost savings that will continue through work package planning for the remaining videos. 5.1.4.1.48 DNFSB Recommendation 2012-2 Act 2-2 thru 2-4 (-$212k) 5.1.4.1.51 Tank Farm Projects Program Oversight – Opt 2 ($102k) Cause: Delay to installation in AW Farm SS flow instrumentation while engineering resolved the Cause: Labor usage costs reduction for resources primarily in TFP Craft & Field Crew Oversight design issue discovered during review of the AW Farm ECN. that are being utilized on project work. Impact: Delay resulted in reducing float for Action 2-3 to 0 days and Action 2-2 to -28 days. Impact : The spend forecast has been updated to reflect future efficiencies in labor usage. 5.1.4.1.81 AP-106 Transfer Pump Replacement ($896k) 5.1.4.1.81 AP-106 Transfer Pump Replacement ($445k) Cause: Schedule recovery – AP-106 pump installation preparation activities, actuator fabrication, Cause: Labor usage costs were less than originally anticipated for the AP-106 pump pump installation, and pump disposal activities. Previous month delay was due to the flex and float installation. Resource reductions primarily included HPTs, NCOs, and IHTs that were used pump being removed was plugged and needed to be cleared with a hydraulic ram. Additional time during the pump installation. was needed to install and remove pump clearing equipment as well as cleaning the pit after Impact: Some cost recovery to offset labor increases during the pump removal. removal. Impact: Carryover recovery but AZ-102 pump replacement mobilization is still delayed.one month. 5.2.1.4.11 Interim SX Barrier – Construction (Evapotranspiration Basin) ($285k) 5.3.2.6.8 Project management Upgrades Support to DFLAW ($210k) Cause: Schedule recovery – Subcontractor completed mobilization to SX Farm equipment set up, Cause: Efficiencies in the project management support. The field work for both the FY17 basin site preparations, and beginning basin excavation activities. carryover (parking lot construction) and the existing October work (pit upgrades) did not Impact: Carryover recovery – Subcontractor plans to finish on schedule. require the amount of planned support. Impact: The overall estimate at completion has been reduced because of the efficiencies actualized during October 5.3.2.6.9 AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW ($242k) Cause: Subcontractor cost savings on in-progress work on construction of the gravel parking area. Impact: The estimate at completion has been reduced because of the efficiencies actualized during October. October 2017 35

  33. Tank Farm Projects Performance Cumulative to Date CTD CTD CTD CTD CTD CTD TCPI BAC WBSL5 Title BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CTD CPI CTD 5.01.01.03.08 - Core & Grab Sampling incl. ORSS & Equip 1,866 1,526 1,643 (340) (117) 0.82 0.93 1,866 1.10 5.01.01.03.09 - Tank Waste Sampling Program FY18 158 158 160 0 (2) 1.00 0.99 2,725 1.00 5.01.01.03.10 - Grab Sampling 4 71 55 67 16 16.26 1.30 1,680 0.99 5.01.01.05.11 - 242-A Integrity Assessment 1,710 1,647 1,733 (63) (85) 0.96 0.95 1,765 0.70 5.01.01.05.20 - DST Integrity Improvement Plan 1,379 230 478 (1,149) (249) 0.17 0.48 2,751 0.98 5.01.01.05.23 - CHEM-D-42 Leak Assessment 246 215 341 (31) (126) 0.87 0.63 470 0.82 5.01.01.05.26 - Tank Integrity Chemistry & Corrosion (FY17&18) 243 243 91 0 152 1.00 2.67 578 1.00 5.01.01.05.27 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY17 3,651 2,096 2,456 (1,555) (360) 0.57 0.85 3,651 1.15 5.01.01.05.28 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection 1,387 1,214 1,688 (173) (474) 0.88 0.72 1,475 1.91 5.01.01.05.29 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasement Testing FY17 289 161 92 (128) 69 0.56 1.75 289 0.76 5.01.01.05.30 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY17 959 933 565 (26) 368 0.97 1.65 959 0.54 5.01.01.05.31 - Tank Chemistry Control FY17 2,190 1,842 2,044 (349) (202) 0.84 0.90 2,190 1.35 5.01.01.05.33 - FFS-Simulant Valve Testing 836 710 886 (125) (176) 0.85 0.80 1,500 1.69 5.01.01.05.35 - SST Integrity Assessment 71 56 183 (15) (127) 0.79 0.31 1,041 1.16 5.01.01.05.36 - DST Structural AOR to Support Tank Lvl Increase 1,128 677 659 (451) 18 0.60 1.03 1,429 0.80 5.01.01.05.38 - Integrity Project Mgt & Oversight FY18 153 153 59 0 94 1.00 2.60 2,643 1.06 5.01.01.05.40 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY18 9 0 0 (9) 0 - - 1,401 1.00 5.01.01.05.41 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection FY18 0 129 10 129 120 - 13.38 1,601 1.07 5.01.01.05.42 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasemnt Testing FY18 0 0 0 0 0 - - 429 1.03 5.01.01.05.43 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY18 6 2 3 (5) (1) 0.25 0.62 809 1.01 5.01.01.05.44 - Tank Chemistry Control FY18 37 22 10 (15) 12 0.59 2.28 2,516 1.01 5.01.01.05.45 - ETF Integrity Assessment 1,489 1,200 740 (289) 460 0.81 1.62 1,846 1.02 5.01.01.05.47 - 219-S Integrity Assessment 16 3 4 (13) (2) 0.17 0.62 1,562 1.48 5.01.02.06.13 - Replace ETF Basin Covers 3,641 3,635 5,920 (6) (2,285) 1.00 0.61 7,232 0.78 5.01.04.01.16 - TF Automation Upgrades (DNFSB Action 3-1) 8,557 8,491 9,947 (66) (1,456) 0.99 0.85 8,557 0.29 5.01.04.01.18 - DST In-Pit Heating 3,410 2,605 4,278 (805) (1,672) 0.76 0.61 5,213 0.88 5.01.04.01.20 - LOW Van Software/Hardware upgrades 1,327 1,296 1,649 (31) (353) 0.98 0.79 1,327 3.13 5.01.04.01.30 - Cross-Site Transfer Line Activation 102 59 54 (43) 5 0.58 1.10 454 0.83 5.01.04.01.44 - AP-801 Water Service Upgrade 473 353 352 (120) 1 0.75 1.00 1,199 1.03 5.01.04.01.48 - DNFSB Recommendation 2012-2 Act 2-2 thru 2-4 9,680 9,312 7,750 (369) 1,562 0.96 1.20 13,532 1.05 5.01.04.01.50 - 242-A Process Condensate Sampling Station 1,073 696 587 (377) 109 0.65 1.18 1,073 0.94 5.01.04.01.51 - Tank Farm Projects Prog Oversight - Opt P2 15,010 15,010 13,703 0 1,308 1.00 1.10 28,298 1.02 5.01.04.01.54 - Continuous Air Monitor Upgrades Evaluation 181 6 13 (174) (7) 0.03 0.46 239 1.76 5.01.04.01.60 - SY Exhauster Upgrades 2,008 975 1,608 (1,032) (632) 0.49 0.61 10,637 0.69 5.01.04.01.64 - DST Transfer Pump Replacements (FY17&18) 2,199 1,011 1,081 (1,187) (69) 0.46 0.94 7,682 1.02 5.01.04.01.69 - Leak Detector Relay Replacement 423 282 612 (141) (330) 0.67 0.46 1,461 1.04 5.01.04.01.77 - TF Automation Upgrades (FY17&18) 1,364 1,063 524 (301) 539 0.78 2.03 4,082 0.83 5.01.04.01.79 - AW-103 and AW-104 Electrical Upgrades 174 108 28 (66) 80 0.62 3.92 658 0.96 5.01.04.01.80 - DNFSB-2012-2 Streamlined Approach to SS Vent. 25 25 5 0 20 1.00 4.70 692 1.00 5.01.04.01.81 - AP-106 Transfer Pump Replacement 3,569 3,467 4,255 (101) (788) 0.97 0.81 3,569 0.95 5.01.04.01.85 - 242-A Spare Reboiler 982 474 316 (507) 159 0.48 1.50 982 0.97 5.01.04.01.87 - DST TAPD and ISP Revision (FY17 & 18) 391 387 272 (3) 115 0.99 1.42 778 1.18 5.01.04.01.88 - Safety Shower Upgrades 1,045 1,061 1,151 16 (90) 1.02 0.92 1,803 0.76 5.01.04.01.89 - Critical Transfer System Components 284 177 198 (107) (21) 0.62 0.89 284 0.15 5.01.04.01.91 - 242-A Evaporator Fire Alarm Panel Upgrades 811 31 49 (780) (18) 0.04 0.63 811 0.94 5.01.04.01.92 - 242-A Control Room HVAC Upgrade 544 275 337 (269) (62) 0.50 0.82 660 1.19 5.01.04.01.93 - Annulus Emergency Pumping Capability 98 75 62 (23) 13 0.77 1.21 339 1.10 5.01.04.01.94 - Fire Alarm System Upgrades - 2704HV & 222-S Lab 151 37 10 (115) 26 0.24 3.52 456 0.84 5.01.05.01.13 - Construction & Commissioning Mgmt - Opt P2 3,285 3,285 2,760 0 525 1.00 1.19 6,200 1.08 5.02.01.04.11 - Interim SX Barrier - Construction 818 740 716 (78) 23 0.90 1.03 6,186 0.75 5.02.01.04.12 - Interim SX Barrier - North Construction 0 0 2 0 (2) - - 4,459 1.00 5.03.02.06.08 - Project Management Upgrades support DFLAW 308 219 9 (89) 210 0.71 25.67 1,568 1.06 5.03.02.06.09 - AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 3,929 3,391 3,693 (538) (302) 0.86 0.92 6,536 1.01 5.03.02.06.10 - AP-105 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 2,431 1,947 1,714 (485) 233 0.80 1.14 9,533 1.05 Total 434,542 422,202 425,390 (12,341) (3,189) 0.97 0.99 522,099 0.94 October 2017 36

  34. Tank Farm Projects CTD Schedule Variances CTD SV October 2017 (-$12,341k) 5.1.1.3.8 Core & Grab Sampling (-$340k) Cause: D elay in obtaining the AY-102 grab sample (-$147k) and a delay in the procurement of sampling equipment (-$157k).The AY-102 sample is dependent upon a determination on SCBA or APR requirements to perform the work. Also higher priority sampling in support of C-105 retrieval in September contributed to the delay. The purchase of sampling equipment in September has been delayed due to engineering evaluation of functions and requirements for the equipment, as well as, examining currently available equipment for ease in procurement. Impact: This variance does not impact any other control accounts. Sampling schedule variance will continue until higher priority sampling (C-105 and AP-107 large volume) has been completed in October/November and a determination on SCBA or APR requirements has been made. Equipment schedule variance will continue through first quarter of FY18 due to engineering evaluation and long lead time for procurement, however the project has sufficient equipment to execute current scope of work. Corrective Action: The schedule variance for AY-102 sample will be recovered in the coming months once higher priority sampling has been completed and a determination on SCBA or APR requirements has been made (Projected February). The sampling equipment variance will be recovered once equipment has been ordered and received (Projected January). 5.1.1.5.20 DST Integrity Improvement Plan (-$1,149k) Cause: Delay in design, fabrication, & delivery under both the Robotic Crawler WBS 5.1.1.5.20.1 and the Flash Thermography WBS 5.1.1.5.20.2. Two contracts have been awarded under WBS 5.1.1.5.20.1 (Robotic Crawlers). One contract was placed with Kurion and the other was placed with Adaptive Energy. Each vendor will provide a different robotic crawler capable of visually examining a Double Shell Tank bottom via the air slot in the annulus. These contracts were initially delayed as the technical evaluation and proposal ranking process took longer than anticipated. The delayed placement of the Kurion contract has caused the Final Design & Fabrication activities to push out three months, from June to September. In addition, the Adaptive Energy contract was set up with "lump sum" payment terms and their crawler isn't scheduled to arrive until December 2017. This means the performance for that scope will be taken all at once, after the crawler is received. The original plan was to take performance throughout the crawler design & build process which is how the Kurion contract was setup. The contract under WBS 5.1.1.5.20.2 (Flash Thermography) was not placed. A feasibility study was done to ensure the final product could be utilized to meet the scopes intent. It was determined that the Flash Thermography technology could not properly be deployed in the field so pursuing a contract was no longer viable. With the scopes intent not able to be met and the project on hold. The Preliminary & Final Design, as well as Fabrication, Test & Delivery activities are now behind schedule. Impact: Due to the lump sum payment terms on the Adaptive Energy contract under WBS 5.1.1.5.20.1 the CTD schedule variance was expected to grow. This variance should reduce in December as the robotic crawler under that contract is scheduled to be received and the associated performance will be taken. However, due to the delayed start in placing both contracts under WBS 5.1.1.5.20.1 & WBS 5.1.1.5.20.2. The CTD schedule variance should remain until the project is completed. Flash thermography scope will no longer be performed and has been logged to go off contract. Impact: Due to the lump sum payment terms on the Adaptive Energy contract under WBS 5.1.1.5.20.1, the CTD schedule variance was expected to grow. This variance should reduce in November as the robotic crawler under that contract is scheduled to be received and the associated performance will be taken. However, due to the delayed start in placing both contracts under WBS 5.1.1.5.20.1 & WBS 5.1.1.5.20.2. The CTD schedule variance should remain until the project is completed. Corrective Action: No corrective action, however the flash thermography scope balance has been logged as part of the scopes to go off contract. Upon receipt of formal deletion modification the baseline will be updated to reflect removal. 5.1.1.5.27 DST Ultrasonic Testing FY17 (-$1,555k) Cause: Delayed start of Ultrasonic Testing (UT) at AZ-101, AY-101, and the SY Farm floor scans. The delay was originally caused by the lack of necessary support labor resources required to perform the UT Scans at AN-106. These labor resources were performing UT scans in the 242 Evaporator Room under WBS 5.1.1.5.11. After the AN-106 UT field work kicked off in December, additional delays were incurred due to poor weather conditions. The Hanford site was closed, delayed or released early a number of times in December & January. These weather related delays caused the unfavorable schedule variance to grow and subsequently delay the start of UT scans at AZ-101. UT field work at AZ-101 was again delayed due to the PUREX tunnel collapse that occurred on May 9th, 2017. Three working days were lost as crews weren’t allowed into the farm (May 9th -11th). On May 12th, the UT crew was allowed back into the farm to retrieve the two crawlers that had been left on the Double Shell Tank (DST) annulus wall since the take cover was initiated on May 9th. The extended period of time each crawler spent on the annulus wall, caused them to receive high doses of radiation. This caused some electrical components to fail and require 2 additional working days to repair (May 15th-16th). On May 18th, UT field work at AZ-101 was shut down due to the unexpected discovery of contamination in the tank annulus. This discovery resulted in a stop work at AZ- 101 as an event investigation was implemented to review what took place and develop any necessary corrective actions. Due to the delays detailed above, UT testing at AZ-101 & AY-101 are now behind schedule.AY-101 UT scans are forecast to start early November 2017. Impact: The delayed start, inclement weather, PUREX tunnel collapse, and contamination event have impacted the schedule to perform Ultrasonic Testing (UT) on six Double Shell Tanks (DST) in FY17. The field work for AN-106 finished in March but had already slipped 47 days. The three SY floor scans finished 34 days behind schedule and the field work at AZ-101 & AY-101 is now planned for FY18. The final report on the last UT is scheduled to finish on 5/16/1. Corrective Action: Continue to work with the Work Area Manager and Production Controls to ensure the necessary resources are available to complete the UT field work at AZ-101(March 2018) and AY-101 (December 2017). October 2017 37

  35. Tank Farm Projects CTD Schedule Variances CTD SV October 2017 (-$12,341k) 5.1.1.5.31 Tank Chemistry Control (-$349k) Cause: Project delays associated with subcontract award. The project anticipated laboratory testing contracts to be awarded to Savannah River National Laboratories (SRNL) and Det Norske Veritas (DNV) prior to October FY2017. However, due to the volume of new procurements at the start of the fiscal year, the procurement process was delayed and the contracts were not awarded until late November in FY2017. Additional delays occurred due to re-starting fixed exposure tests due to suspect results as well as a safety incident at SRNL labs that impacted previously approved testing methods and delayed the start of planned testing. Impact: The procurement delays resulted in negative schedule variance that will persist through the life of the project. In addition, the lab delays will result in further carry over that will extend to June FY2018. Corrective Action: No corrective action is available at this time as the work scope cannot be accelerated due to project requirements for fixed exposure times that cannot be reduced. The delays will result in carry over that will extend to June FY2018. 5.1.1.5.36 DST Structural AOR to Support Tank Level Rise (-$451k) Cause: 1) Delayed contract award and start, 2) resource availability issues, and 3) additional seismic modeling requirements being identified. 1) This scope is primarily based on a large contract with Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (PNNL). The placing of this contract was delayed as engineering resources weren't available to develop and review a technically accurate statement of work. This resulted in a two month delay in PNNL starting their support. 2) PNNL experienced resource availability issues related to a delay in placing their subcontract with Becht Nuclear Services to support performance of the Seismic modeling. The contract was delayed as Becht was no longer on PNNL's Evaluated Suppliers List (ESL) and needed to have their Quality Assurance (QA) program re-reviewed. WRPS also experienced delays in having the Evaluation Criteria Document reviewed. The contracted expert reviewer was out of the country and unavailable. These resource related delay's resulted in an additional two month slip. 3) Recommendations from the expert reviewer led to an additional seismic modeling approach being implemented into the overall Analysis of Record. This has delayed the completion of a final seismic modeling approach and resulted in an additional four month schedule slip Impact: Overall, the project is projecting to finish 9 months behind schedule (September 2018). Corrective Action: No corrective actions have been identified at this time. The project is planning to finish nine months behind schedule (September 2018). 5.1.4.1.18 DST In-Pit Heating (-$805k) Cause: Procurement of heaters needed for FY18 field installation have been delayed by 5 months due to the procurement resources working on higher company priority procurements. Originally the materials were planned to be delivered in August, the current delivery date is beginning of the second quarter FY18. Impact: Projects affected if DST In-Pit Heating is not completed are as follows: TF Automation Part 2 due to the need for the project to install the AN01A and AN06A temperature monitoring trees and update associated design media to account for the utilization of the upgrades trees from both projects and vapor controls by limiting the use of operators and redeploying these resources to other projects would not occur (projects such as DST transfers). Corrective Action: Project has worked with procurement to insure the material request is awarded and heater delivery is scheduled the second quarter of FY2018. 5.1.4.1.48 DNFSB Recommendation 2012 2-2 thru 2-4 (-$369k) Cause: Delays in completion of AW Farm installation engineering change notice (ECN). During the review of the AW Farm ECN, an interference was observed with the planned position of the by-pass spools and contamination higher than planned was noted. The resolution of these issues delayed the completion of the design by two weeks which in turn belayed the completion of the work package planning which delayed the field work start. AW field work was originally planned to start first week of October but is now planned for November 2017. Impact: The total of float for DNSFB 2012-2 Action 2-3 decreased by 9 days making the total float 1 day. The total of float for DNSFB 2012-2 Action 2-2 decreased by 39 days making the total float -29 day. Corrective Action: The project is working with engineering to resolve the interference by rotating the gear assembly 180 degrees and to include controls to mitigate exposure to contamination in the pits. 5.1.4.1.50 242-A Process Condensate Sampling Station (-$377k) Cause: Delay in the planning and installation of Condensate Sampling Stations in the 242-A facility. This work is considered secondary to the facility completing evaporator campaigns and the subsequent outage at 242-A. The project will coordinate with the facility management to complete this install in FY18 (currently forecasted to finish in December FY18). Impact: No significant impact, this schedule variance was expected following delays at 242-A (The Evaporator 5.1.2.3.3) which has affected all downstream activities. Corrective Action: None. Project priority was determined to be secondary and work scope will complete when facility is complete with electrical outage in FY18. 5.1.4.1.60 SY Exhauster Upgrades (-$1,032k) Cause: Delays to fabrication and installation as result of suspension of fabrication and construction contracts. The company is determining whether or not to continue with SY Exhauster project into the fabrication and construction phases because the estimated cost for the installation has significantly increased. Inefficiencies are anticipated as result of changing requirements to perform installation on SCBA. Currently the project is on hold until the decision is made to continue at the higher project cost or stop the project until field activities can be performed without SCBA. Impact: There is currently no impact to any major milestone. The current project completion is the end of the TOC contract period. Project total float is currently 1 day to the end of TOC contract period. Corrective Action: Letter of direction received for WRPS to return scope of SY Exhauster Upgrade to UB and log to go off contract.. October 2017 38

  36. Tank Farm Projects CTD Schedule Variances CTD SV October 2017 (-$12,341k) 5.1.4.1.64 DST Transfer Pump Replacements (-$1,187k) Cause: Result of WRPS reprioritization of the pump replacement projects. The AZ-102 pump replacement project is the successor to the AP-106 pump replacement. As a result of this realignment, the completion of design activities and start of fabrication were delayed 4 months. In addition, work package development for the laser scan, pump removal, installation, and disposal is on-going. Impact: No other immediate tasks are impacted by the delays to this project. AZ-102 installation design is 100% complete. The AW-103 design contract has been kicked off and awarded to CEES. Field work activities for AZ-102 installation are planned for first quarter FY 2018 start. Corrective Action: Full schedule recovery for fabrication and procurement activities are planned upon the receipt of the AZ-102 Actuator in January 2018. Full schedule recovery for the design activities is planned upon the release of the AZ-102 As-Built ECN in March 2018. 5.1.4.1.77 TF Automation Upgrades (FY17&18) (-$301k) Cause: Delayed while awaiting availability of engineering resources which were working on high priority work scope such as Automation Part 1 and DNFSB SS Flow Instrumentation. Engineering is needed to complete engineering change notices (ECN) for installation. The ECNs are projected to be completed during December. The statement-of-work (SOW) is being developed for fabrication of instrument panels. Resources needed for to complete procurement process are working on higher company priority work scope. Impact: No impact to this or other control accounts. The total float through the PBI-38.0.4.4 is 26 days Corrective Action: Project will continue to seek priority with engineering and will work with Tank Farm Projects Engineering Manager to ensure field work is not delayed further. 5.1.4.1.85 242-A Spare Re-boiler (-$507k) Cause: Delayed receipt of the spare 242-A re-boiler currently undergoing fabrication. The re-boiler was originally anticipated to be received in September FY17; however, during the design review it was determined that an additional Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was needed to address nozzle loads of the vessel. Impact: The additional analysis has delayed the receipt of the spare re-boiler until March FY18 and will incur a negative schedule variance that will persist until receipt. Corrective Action: The additional analysis is complete and has been approved to allow the vendor to proceed with fabrication. 5.1.4.1.91 242-A Evaporator Fire Alarm Panel Upgrades (-$780k) Cause: Delay of installation as the result of an issue with original engineering change notice (ECN) needed for the installation. Engineering determined the original design did not have enough information to upgrade the fire alarm system in 242-A Evaporator. A reference engineering change notice (ECN) was developed and will be released during September which will allow for new design to be completed. The project is awaiting contract award. The field work is scheduled to start third quarter of FY18 and complete ahead of an evaporator campaign. Impact: Currently no impact to any evaporator campaign and field work will be executed within available facility windows. Corrective Action: Project will evaluate a recovery plan with the subcontractor once the contract is awarded. 5.3.2.6. 9 AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW (-$538k) Cause: Onsite field delays in the installation of a new gravel parking lot in the AP farm that has pushed the work completion into FY18. The overall layout including additional speed bumps and further considerations of crosswalks that increased overall duration. Project expects to complete this work by November FY18. Impact: No significant impact. Corrective Action: No corrective action required, this work is of secondary priority and will not affect any successor activities. 5.3.2.6. 10 AP-105 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW (-$485k) Cause: Prolonged procurement strategy discussions and late agreement with procurement on path forward for subcontract resulted in a delay to the initiation of AP-105 Tank Farm Upgrades design. The decisions to 1) group design / construction phases as well as multiple tanks (AP-107 and AP-105) upgrades into one contract request for proposal (RFP) and 2) Allow parent companies to bid on this scope presented a novel procurement approach which required multiple reviews over eight (8) months (March - October CY16 under 5.3.2.6.7) with senior management, an independent 3rd party and ORP before acceptance. Also, 3) by virtue of the RFP value an additional month of review was given to ORP to approve contract award and approval was received late in calendar month November. As well 4) the change in the tank configuration path forward has delayed putting this design out for bid an additional month. The project awarded NTE/NTPs for the Design, Fabrication, and Construction efforts. This variance should be fully recovered by December 2017. Impact: Currently the project is forecasting an eight (8) month total delay in design completion for this control account 5.3.2.6.10 AP-105 Tank Farm Upgrades (December FY18 vs. end of April FY17). There is no impact to One System Integrated Waste Feed Delivery Plan at this time. The project awarded NTE/NTPs for the Design, Fabrication, and Construction efforts. This variance should be fully recovered by December FY18. Float will be established once the PEMP is negotiated with DOE. Corrective Action: The project will take the following corrective action to recovery contract to date schedule variance: 1) The project manager has developed a recovery plan with design subcontractor in order to recover current projected SV and deliver designs by Q1 of FY18. 2) Based on current plan, project expects performance recovery by December FY18. October 2017 39

  37. Tank Farm Projects Schedule Recovery 2017 Carryover Recovery  $896 AP-106 Pump installation and demobe  $285k SX Interim Barrier (Evapotranspiration basin excavation)  $201k AP-107 Tank Farm upgrades parking area  $134k DST UT mobilization AY-101  $118k SST Visual Inspection T-109 and mobilization to U-107 November Recovery  $ 789k DFLAW upgrades AP-105 fabrication/design and AP-107 design  $ 291k DST UT AY-101  $ 283k 242-A Control Room HVAC installation  $ 246k DST In-Pit Heating work package planning & ECN development  $ 140k SX Barrier Evapotranspiration Basin excavation  100k SST Visual Inspections U-107 and BX-102 December Recovery  $ 501k DFLAW upgrades AP-105 fabrication and design  $ 429k DST In Pit Heating  $ 396k DST UT AY-101  $ 240k 242-A Process Condensate Sampling station installation  $ 204k SST Integrity visual inspections  $ 204k DST Integrity UT planning AP-107  $ 199k AP801 Water Service upgrade installation  $ 178k TF Automation Part II  $ 153k DNFSB – SS Flow  $ 134k DFLAW upgrades AP-107 design  $ 119k Encasement checks AP-03D January Recovery  $ 834k DST Transfer Pumps AZ-102 installation  $ 517k DFLAW upgrades AP-105  $ 427k DNFSB – SS Flow  $ 279k DST UT AY-101 and AZ-101  $ 275K TF Automation Part II  $ 271k DST Improvement Plan – robotics delivery  $ 166k SST Visual inspections  $ 156 Grab sampling  $ 137k ETF Integrity Assessment  $1,415k SY Exhauster – ORP directed deferral October 2017 40

  38. Tank Farm Projects Schedule Recovery October 2017 41

  39. Tank Farm Projects Performance - FY17 Carryover Forecast Recovery Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 5.1.1.3.8 - Core & Grab Sampling incl. ORSS & Equip 1,653 36,369 - 156,091 147,295 5.1.1.5.11 - 242-A Integrity Assessment 6,001 54,885 5,908 2,112 5.1.1.5.16 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasemnt Testing (FY16) 89,031 5.1.1.5.20 - DST Integrity Improvement Plan - 131,600 271,429 96,350 127,143 196,176 211,679 83,687 23,132 5.1.1.5.23 - CHEM-D-42 Leak Assessment 27,603 10,819 8,540 11,949 5.1.1.5.27 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY17 133,727 291,174 395,621 278,653 182,644 339,244 36,771 31,211 5.1.1.5.28 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection 21,430 606 100,058 47,364 18614.59 6508 5.1.1.5.29 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasement Testing FY17 411 3,270 118,858 5,920 5.1.1.5.30 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY17 25,757 5.1.1.5.31 - Tank Chemistry Control FY17 57,135 129,754 66,523 32,856 38,943 80,774 5.1.1.5.33 - FFS-Simulant Valve Testing 20,959 56,167 12,065 340 5.1.1.5.36 - DST Structural AOR to Support Tank Lvl Increase 4,578 64,551 57,290 56,596 43,729 52,638 74,759 46,629 5.1.1.5.45 - ETF Integrity Assessment 24,660 66,452 136,926 7,010 5.1.2.6.13 - Replace ETF Basin Covers 7,910 3,843 2,162 5.1.4.1.16 - TF Automation Upgrades (DNFSB Action 3-1) 5,979 12,004 1,580 211 538 33,704 18,260 5.1.4.1.18 - DST In-Pit Heating 10,943 245,720 428,705 101,253 16,435 12,987 5.1.4.1.20 - LOW Van Software/Hardware upgrades 7,758 10,707 7,000 13,075 5.1.4.1.22 - Replacement of AW-106 Pump and Jumpers 10,337 5.1.4.1.30 - Cross-Site Transfer Line Activation 12,844 18,838 5.1.4.1.44 - AP-801 Water Service Upgrade 1,652 119,878 5.1.4.1.48 - DNFSB Recommendation 2012-2 Act 2-2 thru 2-4 153,492 2,866 5.1.4.1.50 - 242-A Process Condensate Sampling Station 6,856 93,667 239,713 44,047 5.1.4.1.54 - Continuous Air Monitor Upgrades Evaluation 102,759 5.1.4.1.60 - SY Exhauster Upgrades 11,118 57,789 963,274 5.1.4.1.64 - DST Transfer Pump Replacements (FY17&18) 834,561 319,543 5.1.4.1.69 - Leak Detector Relay Replacement 52,070 52,719 5.1.4.1.77 - TF Automation Upgrades (FY17&18) 2,457 123,737 177,148 5.1.4.1.79 - AW-103 and AW-104 Electrical Upgrades 43,316 15,122 20,277 30,493 5.1.4.1.81 - AP-106 Transfer Pump Replacement 896,415 99,510 1,709 5.1.4.1.85 - 242-A Spare Reboiler 8,195 7,612 3,351 - 16,111 480,181 5.1.4.1.89 - Critical Transfer System Components 65,736 41,735 5.1.4.1.90 - 241-BY Farm Encapsulate Asbestos Insulation 2,072 5.1.4.1.91 - 242-A Evaporator Fire Alarm Panel Upgrades 1,485 10,104 21,563 21,563 23,686 11,398 5,279 683,177 2,828 5.1.4.1.92 - 242-A Control Room HVAC Upgrade 229,481 5.1.4.1.93 - Annulus Emergency Pumping Capability 11,192 13,720 9,685 5.1.4.1.94 - Fire Alarm System Upgrades - 2704HV & 222-S Lab - 27,194 971 5.2.1.4.11 - Interim SX Barrier - Construction 284,541 78,475 5.3.2.6.10 - AP-105 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 303,927 5.3.2.6.8 - Project Management Upgrades support DFLAW 95,551 38,142 41,648 9,288 5.3.2.6.9 - AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 105,381 173,871 134,446 31,018 16,586 5,047 10,231 8,259 159,148 MONTHLY 1,839,032 2,245,766 2,366,061 3,149,368 1,005,413 1,052,245 240,062 993,185 299,497 138,575 159,148 23,132 CUMULATIVE 1,839,032 4,084,798 6,450,859 9,600,227 10,605,640 11,657,885 11,897,947 12,891,132 13,190,629 13,329,205 13,488,353 13,511,485 -$31K acceleration = SV $13,481k October 2017 42

  40. Tank Farm Projects FY18 Spend Plan FY Spend ACWP/ETC Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 PDN Target Delta Forecast Aug-17 8,721 14,606 10,477 10,491 12,080 13,201 11,799 16,598 12,291 10,222 10,932 10,463 141,879 Sep-17 5,866 11,258 9,073 8,197 7,513 8,980 8,700 9,930 9,432 9,984 13,001 8,550 110,485 Oct-17 3,939 7,989 10,481 10,212 8,214 8,668 7,917 10,039 11,837 10,364 12,655 8,063 110,378 116,276 5,898 Delta -1,927 -107 Percentage -32.9% -0.1% October delta: (-$1,927k), (-32.9 %) • -$461k DFLAW AP-107 design and parking lot completion • -$389k DFLAW AP-105 fabrication • -$160k Critical Transfer System components receipt delay • -$152k TF Automation upgrades • -$ 99k TFP Oversight – ESH&Q field resources • -$ 91k DNFSB – SS Flow instrumentation • -$ 72k Fire Alarm System upgrades design 2704HV & 222-S Lab • -$ 67k DST Integrity UT AY-101 FY Spend Forecast Delta (-$107k), (-0.1%) • $1,568k - SY Exhauster SCBA usage inefficiencies forecast • $ 298k - SX Interim barrier basin construction increased support for expanded area and OT activities • $ 209k - DST Integrity Improvement Plan robotic parts replacement OFFSET BY: • -$ 477k 219-S Integrity subcontract award significant decrease • -$ 427k DFLAW upgrades PM and AP-107 design • -$ 280k AP-107 upgrades to parking area savings • -$ 317k TF Automation upgrades projected savings • -$ 277k TFP Oversight – field crew deployments • -$ 207k Integrity Project Oversight personnel charging projects • -$ 187k Construction/Commissioning ETC reduction AEI contract PDN Delta $5,898k NTE values not fully incorporated into EAC: • SX Barrier - SCBA impacts • DST Transfer Pump - SCBA impacts • Annulus Emergency Pumping Plan NTE • Fire Alarm Upgrades 2704HV & 222-S Lab NTE • Cross-site Transfer Line Activation NTE • DFLAW Upgrades AP-107 / AP-105 NTE October 2017 43

  41. Tank Farm Projects Risks, Opportunities and Emergent Scope Risk • Schedule coordination of infrastructure projects with the 242-A Evaporator campaigns. Tank Farm Projects FY17 Emergent Scope Tracker Realization Forecast Funding Emergent Work Scope Date Finish Source 222-S Potable Water Air Gap Nov-16 TBD Prod. Ops. 2704HV & 222S Fire System Panel Replacement - design only Dec-16 FY18 TFP ETF Lead-lag compressor design/install - BBL (Project Manager) Mar-17 TBD Prod. Ops. SX Barrier Construction (Third section) Apr-17 TBD TFP Emergency Annulus Pumping Design/Fabrication (not on contract) May-17 FY18 TFP Cross Site Transfer Lines Qualification & Monitoring (not on contract) May-17 TBD TFP AP Farm Change Trailer and Parking Lot May-17 TBD TFP ETF Facility Stairs/Platforms Jun-17 FY18 Prod. Ops RCE Equipment (e.g. Core Sample Truck disposal) Jun-17 TBD Prod. Ops. 219S Integrity Assessment - Field work Jul-17 FY18 TFP ETF 310/311 Integrity Assessment Jul-17 FY18 TFP Predictive Maintenance Pilot Oct-17 TBD Prod. Ops. AY-102 Sample to support Retrieval Closure Oct-17 FY18 Retrieval U-107 LOW Replacement (sleeve?) TBD TBD TFP TSCR Infrastructure Upgrades ( ORP Letter of Direction) TBD TBD TFP October 2017 44

  42. Tank Farm Projects Accomplishments and Look Ahead Accomplishments: October: • Performed AP-107 large grab sample for Waste Feed Delivery. (two iterations) • Performed SX Farm Evapotranspiration Basin excavation • Replaced AP-106 pump; performed final NACE; reinstalled cover blocks; replaced actuators and set pointers • Completed Leak detector relay installation and electrical tie-in AP Farm • Completed T-109 SST Visual Inspection Look Ahead: November: • Initiate AW Farm SS Flow instrumentation installation • Perform AP-107 grab sample (CPL) • Initiate AY-101 UT scans of secondary liner floor and wall (STARTED) • Perform two FY17 SST visual inspections (carryover) • Remove/install 242-A Control Room HVAC (CPL) • Ship old AP-106 pump to ERDF for disposal (CPL) • Leak detector relay equipment CAT/OAT AP Farm (CPL) December: • Perform AW-102 grab sample • Perform AP-103-D NACE pit inspection • Commence AP-801 upgrades by removing existing water flow controller equipment • Complete 242-A Condensate Sampling Station upgrades • Receive in-pit heaters for remaining pits installations • Continue AW Farm SS flow instrumentation installation • Safety Shower upgrades installation AW Farm January: • Install AP-801 new water flow controller equipment • Continue AW Farm SS flow instrumentation installation • TF automation wireless equipment installation AP Farm • AW-103/AW-104 electrical upgrade site preparation & trenching • Safety Shower upgrades – install hardwire existing SY Farm shower October 2017 45

  43. Tank Farm Projects Risk Status October 2017 October 2017 46

  44. Tank Farm Projects Approved Baseline Change Requests Log Reporting FY18 (MR / FY17 Baseline BCR Number BCR Title FY18 (NEW) FY18 Total Month XFER) Running Total NA FY18 Baseline - Start of Fiscal Year (As of 10/01/17) September $0 $0 $0 $91,523,246 October 2017 $91,523,246 RPP-18-024 AW-103 Pump Flush & AZ-102 Removal/Installation Re-Plan November $453,171 $453,171 $91,976,417 November 2017 $453,171 $0 $453,171 $91,976,417 RPP-18-025 Tank-Side Cesium Removal Balance of Plant TBD RPP-18-XXX Resolution of Tanks with Failed Liquid Observation Wells (LOWs) TBD $0 $91,976,417 RPP-18-XXX Remove Flash Thermography Scope to UB for Removal from Contract TBD $0 $91,976,417 RPP-18-XXX MUST Assessment Report from BBL TBD $0 $91,976,417 RPP-18-XXX Resolution of Prosoft radio and Meru access point Communication Issue- TBD $0 $91,976,417 Automation Part 1- DNFSB Recom 2012-2 Action 3-1 RPP-18-XXX Move Remaining SY Exhauster Scope to UB for Removal from Contract TBD $0 $91,976,417 TBD $0 $0 $0 $91,976,417 Cumulative Fiscal Year to Date $453,171 $0 $453,171 $91,976,417 October 2017 47

  45. Tank Farm Projects Contract Changes NTE Total Impact Title Project Manager Status ($K) ($K) Contract Change 10,500 TBD FY18 10,500 TBD CP-16-017 DST Feed Delivery Upgrades Stoner, Ryan 11/13/17: Project will assess impacts of revised LAWPS path forward as decisions are made in the coming weeks. 4,000 20,425 in Support of DFLAW 10/19/17: Additional NTE of $2.5M received to continue AP-105 fabrication. 8/21/17: Proposal signed and submittal to ORP in process. 8/14/17: Incorporating Level 1 comments ahead of submission to ORP 7/24/17: ERRATA package distributed for WRPS review. CP-17-011 200-E-310/311 PL Transfer Wood, Rob 11/13/17: NTE will be requested following ORP proposal review, anticipate December request. 0 1,651 Lines 10/19/17: IQRPE of transfer line approved on buyback list for execution. 8/24/17: Proposal submitted to ORP. 8/14/17: Final schedule and cost revisions underway for submittal. 7/24/17: IQRPE of transfer line logged for buyback list to follow proposal submittal. CP-17-017 Annulus Emergency Pumping Follett, Jordan 11/13/17: Project actively working under $500K NTE limitation. 500 TBD Capability 8/24/17: Request for Proposal with submittal date of 12/20/17. 8/14/17: Included in FY18 all-in assessment. 7/24/17: To be included in all-in FY18 assessment. 11/13/17: Project actively working under $500K NTE limitation. CP-17-018 Cross Site Transfer Lines May, Dustin 8/24/17: Request for Proposal with submittal date of 12/20/17. 500 TBD Qualification & Monitoring 8/14/17: Included in FY18 all-in assessment. System 7/24/17: To be included in all-in FY18 assessment. 7/17/17: NTE of $500K received to initiate scope development. BCR routing for July addition RPP-17-157. CP-18-006 Balance of Plant Work Scope Ryan Stoner 11/13/17: Proposal kick off held 11/7/17, assessing path forward with impacts of revised LAWPS path forward. 5,000 TBD to Operate TSCR Technical 11/2/17: Letter of direction and NTE received from ORP. Demonstration ORP Review / Approval is or will be Required Further Not To Exceed Authorization will be Required Need for Contract Direction from ORP Developing Proposal October 2017 48

  46. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan October 2017 AW Stack Extension Conceptual Drawing – 30% Design

  47. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Key Deliverables FY2018 Key Deliverables Target Forecast SEP 2018 SEP 2018 PBI-44.0.1: Complete Installation of Stack Monitoring in AW, AX (2), AN, and 702-AZ PBI-44.0.2: Compete Field Installation and Functional Testing of PA System in B, BX, BY, S, SX, SY, T, TX, TY, and U farms. SEP 2018 AUG 2018 PBI-44.0.3: Complete SST Automation Upgrades at TY Farm SEP 2018 APR 2018 PBI-44.0.4: Complete NUCON Bench Scale Test and Summary Report SEP 2017 SEP 2017 PBI-44.0.5.1: Complete Initial Factory Acceptance Testing of Strobic Unit MAR 2018 MAR 2018 PBI-44.0.5.2: Complete Second Phase of Off-site Strobic Demonstration and Prepare Results Summary SEP 2018 SEP 2018 PBI-44.0.6: Complete Field Installation and Turnover AW Stack Extension to Operation SEP 2018 SEP 2018 PBI-44.0.7: Complete Six (6) Cartridge Testing Iterations SEP 2018 JUN 2018 Issue Quantitative Risk Analyses (QRA) for six (6) tank farms SEP 2018 SEP 2018 October 2017 50

  48. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Performance Current Month/Fiscal Year CM CM CM CM CM FYTD FYTD FYTD FYTD FYTD FYTD FYTD WBSL5 Title BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI FY BAC FYP FCST FY Spend SVFCST VACP TCPI 5.01.05.11.01 - 1-SC1 - Plan for Tank Head Space Sample - - - - 0 - - - - - - - - 9 7 9 1 1.18 5.01.05.11.09 - 9-DR1 - Head Space & Stack Sampling - - 2 - (2) - - 2 - -2 - - - 504 363 504 141 1.39 5.01.05.11.33 - 33-RM6 - New Vapor Detection Technology 0 15 26 15 (10) 0 15 26 15 (10) - 0.60 - 311 80 311 231 5.40 5.01.05.11.43 - 43-RC5 - IH Professional Development Training - - - - - - - - - - - - 170 170 170 -0 (0) 1.00 5.01.05.11.48 - CVAP Management Commitment 235 235 251 - (15) 235 235 251 - (15) 1.00 0.94 4,061 4,061 4,352 0 (291) 0.93 5.01.05.11.49 - New Vapor Detection Technologies 670 269 346 (401) (77) 670 269 346 (401) (77) 0.40 0.78 3,640 4,067 4,462 540 (395) 0.95 5.01.05.11.50 - CVAP Studies 231 223 84 (8) 139 231 223 84 (8) 139 0.96 2.66 3,551 3,874 2,723 323 1,151 1.38 5.01.05.11.51 - Head Space & Stack Sampling - - - - - - - - - - - - 214 395 390 181 5 1.01 5.01.05.11.52 - Chemical Cartridge Evaluations 126 0 175 (126) (175) 126 0 175 (126) (175) - - 3,165 3,165 3,577 0 (412) 0.93 5.01.05.11.53 - Tank Farms PA Systems for Event Notification 48 134 30 86 105 48 134 30 86 105 2.80 4.53 3,295 4,013 4,109 720 (96) 0.95 5.01.05.11.54 - Chemical Vapor Engineered Control Upgrades 28 78 83 50 (5) 28 78 83 50 (5) 2.74 0.94 883 1,050 1,137 167 (87) 0.92 5.01.05.11.55 - AW Strobic Air Upgrade 48 20 3 (27) 17 48 20 3 (27) 17 0.43 7.04 2,576 2,843 2,946 290 (103) 0.97 5.01.05.11.56 - Vapor Monitoring & Detection System Upgrades 1,861 603 603 (1,258) -0 1,861 603 603 (1,258) (0) 0.32 1.00 8,353 9,060 8,581 707 479 1.06 5.01.05.11.57 - Industrial Hygiene Trailer 8 6 9 (2) (2) 8 6 9 (2) (2) 0.78 0.72 1,871 2,130 2,129 258 0 1.00 5.01.05.11.58 - SST Stewardship Program 73 17 22 (56) (5) 73 17 22 (56) (5) 0.23 0.77 2,089 2,475 2,505 387 (31) 0.99 5.01.05.11.59 - NUCON Vapor Abatement 187 0 67 (187) (67) 187 0 67 (187) (67) - - 2,592 2,669 2,613 77 56 1.05 5.01.05.11.60 - CVAP 222-S Laboratory Upgrades 433 20 3 (413) 17 433 20 3 (413) 17 0.05 6.22 546 707 641 162 66 1.08 Total 3,950 1,621 1,701 (2,328) (79) 3,950 1,621 1,701 (2,328) (79) 0.41 0.95 37,006 41,504 40,785 4,635 719 1.02 FYTD SV Forecast $4,635K : FYTD CV Forecast $719K : • • FY17 Carryover Recovery CVAP studies: Health Process Plan national lab support reduction to meet current • PA System: AP & C farm installation and testing fiscal year scope needs ($1,151k) • • VMDS: AP farm equipment turnover VMDS: AP Turnover team smaller than planned as resources are shared between • Head space: BY farm jig comparison testing several different scopes of work ($479k) • C2Sense Prototype development and enhanced auto-sampler Offset by: development • Chemical Cartridge: National Lab increased support to aid in cartridge testing • SST Stewardship: TY Automation design reports and development of future sampling strategy document (-$412k) • CVAP Studies: Health Process Plan report production and APGEMS • New Vapor Technologies: Increased vendor support to complete development of dispersion modeling update enhanced auto-sampler. Design efforts greater than anticipated. (-$395k) October 2017 51

  49. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Current Month Predominant Cost and Schedule Variances Current Month Schedule (-$2,328K) Current Month Cost (-$79K) 5.1.5.11.56 – Vapor Monitoring & Detection Systems ($1,258k) 5.1.5.11.52 – Chemical Cartridge Evaluations (-$175k) Cause : The current-month unfavorable schedule variance is driven by delayed receipt of fence-line Cause: The unfavorable current month cost variance is due to insufficient performance being claimed in the monitoring equipment. Upfront procurement process and contract award to vendor was delayed to allow month. This is a result of the untimely notification from the vendor on their continued support to job hazard further time to finalize specifications for the equipment. analysis evaluations for use of FFAPR in ventilated tank farms. The performance will be corrected in the following month which will result in a positive current month variance in November. The CTD performance will Corrective Action : No corrective action required. Current-month variance. be accurately represented for November reporting. Corrective Action: No corrective action required for current-month variance. 5.1.5.11.49 – New Vapor Detection Technologies (-$401k) 5.1.5.11.50 – CVAP Studies ($139k) Cause : The current-month unfavorable variance is driven by delays in developing the enhanced auto sampler Cause: The current month favorable cost variance is primarily due to minimal PTR-MS support within the unit. Final design and procurement of necessary materials to develop the auto sampler required UV-DOAS level of effort work package for October. Activities for the month centered around contract negotiation with equipment specifications which were unavailable until early October FY18 after stack monitor designs for AN, the subcontractor. Support for future months is expected to recover back to budgeted levels once an AW, and AZ were completed. agreement is reached between WRPS and the subcontractor on the scope to be performed in Q1 of FY18 and a subcontract for lab data analysis for data gathered by the mobile lab in FY17 is issued. Corrective Action : No corrective action required. Current-month variance. Corrective Action: No corrective action required for current-month variance. 5.1.5.11.60 – CVAP 222-S Laboratory Upgrades (-$413k) Cause : The current month schedule variance is primarily due to the delayed procurement of the GC mass spectrometer. Subcontracting issues related to the procurement of the equipment have been resolved and the procurement contract has been issued with an anticipated receipt date of mid January. Installation and renovation activities will follow and are expected to begin in February. Corrective Action : No corrective action required. Current-month variance. October 2017 52

  50. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Performance Cumulative to Date CTD CTD CTD CTD CTD CTD TCPI BAC WBSL5 Title BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CTD CPI CTD 5.01.05.11.01 - 1-SC1 - Plan for Tank Head Space Sample 225 216 285 (9) (68) 0.96 0.76 225 1.18 5.01.05.11.09 - 9-DR1 - Head Space & Stack Sampling 4,110 3,607 2,443 (504) 1,164 0.88 1.48 4,110 1.39 5.01.05.11.33 - 33-RM6 - New Vapor Detection Technology 17,832 17,536 16,728 (296) 808 0.98 1.05 17,832 5.40 5.01.05.11.43 - 43-RC5 - IH Professional Development Training - 0 0 0 0 - - 170 1.00 5.01.05.11.48 - CVAP Management Commitment 4,946 4,946 5,272 0 (326) 1.00 0.94 8,771 0.93 5.01.05.11.49 - New Vapor Detection Technologies 8,169 7,228 8,462 (940) (1,234) 0.88 0.85 11,139 0.95 5.01.05.11.50 - CVAP Studies 3,830 3,499 3,558 (332) (60) 0.91 0.98 7,150 1.38 5.01.05.11.51 - Head Space & Stack Sampling 190 10 12 (181) (3) 0.05 0.77 404 1.01 5.01.05.11.52 - Chemical Cartridge Evaluations 5,252 5,125 4,780 (126) 346 0.98 1.07 8,290 0.93 5.01.05.11.53 - Tank Farms PA Systems for Event Notification 3,393 2,759 2,414 (633) 346 0.81 1.14 6,640 0.95 5.01.05.11.54 - Chemical Vapor Engineered Control Upgrades 1,136 1,018 1,665 (118) (647) 0.90 0.61 1,991 0.92 5.01.05.11.55 - AW Strobic Air Upgrade 444 127 59 (317) 68 0.29 2.16 2,972 0.97 5.01.05.11.56 - Vapor Monitoring & Detection System Upgrades 3,610 1,645 2,592 (1,966) (947) 0.46 0.63 10,102 1.06 5.01.05.11.57 - Industrial Hygiene Trailer 320 60 75 (260) (15) 0.19 0.80 2,183 1.00 5.01.05.11.58 - SST Stewardship Program 534 91 58 (443) 33 0.17 1.57 2,550 0.99 5.01.05.11.59 - NUCON Vapor Abatement 703 439 491 (264) (52) 0.62 0.89 3,108 1.05 5.01.05.11.60 - CVAP 222-S Laboratory Upgrades 618 42 13 (575) 29 0.07 3.18 730 1.08 Total 82,806 75,842 75,731 (6,964) 111 0.92 1.00 115,862 1.02 October 2017 53

  51. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Cumulative to Date Predominant Cost and Schedule Variances CTD Schedule (-$6,964K) CTD Cost ($111K) 5.1.5.11.53 – Tank Farms PA System for Event Notification (-$633k) 5.1.5.11.49 – New Vapor Detection Technologies (-$1,234k) Cause: The contract-to-date unfavorable schedule variance is predominately driven by; Cause: The contract to date unfavorable cost variance is predominantly driven by greater than anticipated duration and associated cost for technical subcontract support for vapor monitoring and detection system 1) Delayed initial PA system procurements ($133k) support at AP pilot operations and the next farm stack and fence line qualitative risk assessments and over arching technical support during design development of placement of VMDS equipment. 2) The delayed start of construction for the permanent public address system around the tank farms ($314k) The variance is caused by upfront design delays following a late contract award as upfront scoping Corrective Action: The project manager will continue to monitor need for technical subcontracts and work to agreements took longer than anticipated. 90% design was required before the project team could move scale back support as farms get closer to turnover to operations. forward contracting a construction subcontractor to perform field installation of field work and finalizing complete Bill of Material. 90% design is completed for necessary field packages and construction contract has been awarded. Most major purchase orders have been received with the exception of the reader boards, which will arrive in February of FY18 due to technical specification issues and priority work scope. Work package planning is delayed as a result of late construction contract award following 90% design. Project team is currently working to expedite excavation permitting in order to finalize the AP farm work package. Package planning for initial farms is complete with additional packages being completed in November FY18. Field excavation is complete and initial speaker poles have been mounted in 6 out of the 8 east area farms. Corrective Action: Following construction contract award, the project team is working to complete excavation permits and work packages in order to initiate field work. In order to maintain project schedule, the field execution strategy has changed to complete all excavation work across various farms upfront in June and early July while awaiting receipt of major procurements, which are expected in August. Following excavation and equipment receipt the project team will install all equipment across the various farms then complete functional testing in all farms in scope by November FY18. 5.1.5.11.56 – Vapor Monitoring & Detection System Upgrades (-$1,966k) 5.1.5.11.9 – Head Space & Stack Sampling ($1,164k) Cause: The cumulative to date unfavorable variance is driven by Cause: The favorable contract-to-date variance is due to usage efficiencies attributed to field labor support usage and diminished Crane & Rigging support to Head Space & Exhaust Stack Sampling in FY16. 1)Delayed receipt of fence-line monitoring equipment. Upfront procurement process and contract award to vendor was delayed to allow further time to finalize specifications for the equipment. After carrying out initial samples, it was determined that 1) Less than anticipated NCO's, IHT's, HPT's, and plant engineers are required to complete samples, 2) samples can be completed with less than originally 2)Delays in turnover procedural development and final OAT & Test Report development for AP Farm planned Crane & Rigging support because the riser caps being accessed to perform sampling can be readiness. removed manually rather than requiring Crane & Rigging support as was initially planned, and 3) exhaust stack samples are able to be completed in tandem with head space samples utilizing the same crew. Corrective Action: 1) Identify and revise necessary procedures to integrate VMDR system into farm operations. Project manager Corrective Action: No corrective action required. Cost variance is favorable and project anticipates continued is currently coordinating this effort with procedures organization. efficiencies carrying out future samples. Anticipated savings are reflected in the EAC. 2) Work package closeout for Pilot Scale Testing required prior to turnover of equipment. Engineering staff has been assigned to monitor and status closeout of each ECN and work package. October 2017 54

  52. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Cumulative to Date Predominant Cost and Schedule Variances CTD Schedule (-$6,964K) CTD Cost ($111K) 5.1.5.11.49 – New Vapor Detection Technologies (-$940k) 5.1.5.11.56 – Vapor Monitoring Detection System Upgrades (-$947k) Cause: The contract-to-date unfavorable variance is driven by: Cause: The cumulative to date unfavorable cost variance is a labor usage variance resulting from more than anticipated design labor support due to a change in project strategy in order to meet the project milestone to 1)Delays in technical subcontract support for vapor monitoring and detection system over arching technical complete three farms' design packages by the end of September FY17, specifically for AW, AN, and AZ support during design development of placement of VMDS equipment. The activity delays were a result from stacks. multiple revisions of design development due to unforeseen complications and issues regarding placement of VMDS equipment. Corrective Action: There are no corrective actions planned at the current time. The unfavorable variance is not anticipated to be recovered for design effort. 2)Delays in developing the enhanced auto sampler unit. Final design and procurement of necessary materials to develop the auto sampler required UV-DOAS equipment specifications which were unavailable until early October FY18 after stack monitor designs for AN, AW, and AZ were completed. Corrective Action: UV-DOAS equipment specifications have been received by vendor and being incorporated into the design of the enhanced auto sampler unit. WRPS engineering are working closely with vendor to ensure proper design inputs and materials are ordered. Procurements will be done in parallel and several sub-components of the enhanced auto sampler will be FAT tested on an interim basis prior to a final integrated FAT in hopes to resolve any potential issues early on in the process. 5.1.5.11.60 – CVAP 222-S Laboratory Upgrades (-$575k) 5.1.5.11.33 – 33-RM6 New Vapor Detection Technology ($808k) Cause: The cumulative to date schedule variance is primarily due to the delayed procurement of the GC Cause: The cumulative to date favorable cost variance is attributed to the following: 1) result of conversion of mass spectrometer. Subcontracting issues related to the procurement of the equipment have been resolved planned field installation and testing resources from plant forces direct labor to construction forces and the procurement contract has been issued with an anticipated receipt date of mid January. Installation subcontract and 2) the utilization of less than anticipated support for the amount of work accomplished in and renovation activities will follow and are expected to begin in February. September and October 2016 as testing normalized and focus shifted to report production. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. Installation & Renovation activities are expected to The cumulative to date favorable cost variance was partially offset by greater than anticipated subcontractor conclude in August usage cost from the following: 1) the construction subcontractor support due to initial training requirements and greater than anticipated material needed for installation, 2) unanticipated usage cost from the construction subcontractor and the national laboratory for additional support needed to troubleshoot, calibrate, and integrate the software of new detection technology equipment, 3) ongoing greater than anticipated national laboratory usage cost in delivery of bench scale test report. Extended duration as a result of delays in original equipment receipt led to increased cost and prolonged installation timeline and 4) Final construction contractor CAL settlement and invoicing. Corrective Action: No corrective action required as this is a favorable cumulative to date cost variance. October 2017 55

  53. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Schedule Recovery CM Schedule Variance Recovery Discussion - VMDS UV-DOAS Fence-line monitoring - PA System ($633k): equipment receipt (-$1,258k) - Completion of AP & C farms - CVAP 222-S Lab Upgrade Equipment - Reader Board receipt and Install receipt (-$406k) - Phase 2C/2D design reviews and release - New Vapor Detection Technology - New Vapor Technology: Enhanced Auto-sampler Enhanced Auto Sampler development development ($540k) (-$401k) - VMDS Farm Testing, Readiness, and Turnover ($1,141k) - VMDS fence-line monitors equipment receipt ($810k) - SST Automation ($443k): TY Farm Design - Head Space Sampling ($685k): Cartridge jig validation testing & associated procurements. - Strobic Air ($317k): Complete specifications and award Strobic procurement contract. - 10-wide Trailer ($260k): 10-wide trailer procurement and site design. - CVAP 222-S Lab Upgrades ($575k): Room 4S equipment upgrade planning, design, and equipment receipt. October 2017 56

  54. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Schedule Recovery Recovery Discussion Recovery Discussion - November Recovery SV: - Receipt of equipment in AP & C farm completion January FY18. Field work in November to initiate in Q2 of FY17. - December negative SV: Reader-board and additional procurements receipt into Q2 of FY18 Recovery Discussion - Q1 Recovery SV: Progress on AP farm equipment turnover - February Negative SV: Delayed receipt of Cerex stack monitors. Arrival in March instead of February as planned. October 2017 57

  55. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Spend Plan Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 FY Spend ACWP/ETC PDN Target Delta (4W) (4W) (4W) (4W) (4W) (5W) (4W) (4W) (5W) (4W) (4W) (6W) Forecast Aug-17 5,665 3,056 1,528 1,485 418 456 221 232 180 180 232 154 13,806 Sep-17 3,167 4,526 5,398 3,391 4,131 4,635 3,647 3,193 2,632 2,081 2,249 1,776 40,828 Oct-17 1,701 3,093 3,640 4,083 4,288 6,494 3,891 3,444 2,828 2,804 2,317 2,203 40,785 43,323 2,538 Delta -1,467 -43 Percentage -46.3% -0.1% October Delta: -1,467 K , -46.3 % • New Vapor Technology: Delayed procurements to develop enhanced autosampler ($390k) • Tank Farms PA System: AP & C farm installations delayed until November following work package revisions ($338k) • CVAP Studies: Health Process Plan national laboratory support for FY18 tasks on hold until completion of FY17 carryover ($203k) • Chemical Vapor Engineered Control Upgrades: Ammonia Analyzer Upgrade rescheduled for November awaiting release of ECN and work package. 242-A outage late October through early November; work to commence following ($135k) • NUCON Vapor Abatement: Delayed award of vendor contract ($191k) Spend Forecast: -$43 K, -0.1 % • Minimal change due to various offsets amongst CVAP control accounts. PDN Delta: $2,538k • PDN includes funds to execute AW Stack Extension field work which is currently not captured in the spend forecast or baseline schedule. October 2017 58

  56. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Accomplishments & Look Ahead Accomplishments October: • Awarded SST Stewardship Strategy Document contract • AW Stack 30% Design • Finalized PA System Reader-board specifications and ordered equipment • Submitted PA System Phase 2C/2D 90% Design Packages for review Look Ahead November: • Off-site field testing of C2Sense prototype devices • Install PA system in AP & C farms • AW Stack 60% Design • Finalize Health Process Plan FY17 Evaluation • Draft NUCON Bench Scale Test Plan • 222S 4S Renovation Draft Design • Award Strobic Air equipment contract • IH 10-wide trailer DOE Real Property review December: • Delivery of C2Sense prototype devices • Complete Ammonia Analyzer Phase II Tie-in • 10-wide IH Trailer 90% site design • Submit Final UV-DOAS Cerex Stack Monitor Design January: • BY-108 Cartridge Testing • Jig validation comparison head space sampling in BY farm October 2017 59

  57. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Baseline Change Log BCR Number BCR Title Reporting Month BCR Level FY18 Total FY18 Baseline Running Total RPP-17-134 Fiscal Year 2018 Planning September FY17 2 $ 46,068 $ 46,068 RPP-18-016 Move Phase I Autosampler Scope to UB November FY18 2 $ (219) $ 45,849 NUCON Vapor Abatement Propane Test and PTR-MS Study RPP-18-015 November FY18 3 $ 352 $ 46,201 Re-plan FY18 Total $ 46,201 $ 46,201 October 2017 60

  58. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Contract Change Log Total Impact Title Project Manager BCR Level Status ($K) 99,565 Contract Change FY17/18 99,565 - NTE increase to $47.3M received 10/31/17. CP-17-009 Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Gagnon, Paul -- 99,565 - Proposal audit kickoff teleconference held 10/24/17. October 2017 61

  59. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Top Risk Items Risk Current Current Risk Level Risk Id Title Org. Handling Actions Trend Owner Risk level Description Testing Results DOE- Gagnon, (1) Include key stakeholders in updates on testing Lowered residual risk Differ From Paul A progress consequences to marginal, SME ORP/T Expected or Do judgement. (8-17-17) OC Not Meet Lifecycle of risk is coming to an Low CVAPP-001-R Performance end, when VMDS equipment Criteria. down select is complete risk can close. 7-6-17 Excessive Work DOE- Gagnon, (1) Pre-plan for work stoppages based on HAMTC Stop work for all activities Stoppages ORP/T Paul A historical data. which cause or may potentially (2) Additional Communication to workforce cause emission of chemical OC (3) POD vapors updates vapors including instrusive Medium CVAPP-007-R (4) Actively publishing/sharing of IH measurement sluicing, retrieval, trasnfers, data to reassure workforce pumping, sampling, mixing, (5) Move work offshift to minimize impacts from breaching, venting, vessel dump, recovery actions (septic pumping, purex collapse). air abatement, leaks, spills, airlift (6) Modify shift schedules to lower risk of AOP15s. circulation, caustic additions, Funding/Budget Gagnon, (1) Identify funding and budget needs up front and invasive, disturbing, etc. All work Cartridge testing has only one DOE Not Available ORP Paul A communicate to ORP. testing apparatus due to funding. When Required (2) Establish NTE tracking early. (2-16-17) Current NTE for proposed CVAPP-008-R Low workscope is due to deplete 07/15/17. (5-18-17) Predicted to be funding challenged in FY18, risk will change in March of CY18. (7-6- Resources Not TOC Gagnon, (1) Identify key technical resources up front and Construction subcontractor 17) Available When Paul A secure availability. resource availability is Required (2) Utilize resource loaded schedules where problematic. 6-8-16 appropriate. Unplanned training requirements Medium CVAPP-009-R (3) Coordinate work planning to streamline for all staff that will be in the field resource utilization. including engineers, procedures, (4) IH hiring requisition planners, etc. to use SCBA (5) Special training for IH techs to speed equipment will result in onboarding. bottlenecks and schedule delays. Internal TOC Gagnon, (1) assign expediter to projec to speed process (6) IH resource usage evaluations. (7-13-16) Risk lowered to medium due to Reviews Take Paul A internal reviews complete (1-30- Longer Than 17) Anticipated New sets of internal reviews have Medium CVAPP-023-R been delayed or late, increasing risk level to high. Some internal reviews are delayed due to technical resource limitations (7- 6-17) 3rd Party DOE- Gagnon, (1) Engage 3rd party and/or subcontractor Additional delays to 3rd party October 2017 62

  60. Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Top Risk Items 6-17) 3rd Party DOE- Gagnon, (1) Engage 3rd party and/or subcontractor Additional delays to 3rd party Evaluation Paul A leadership in communicating status. reviews have resulted in ORP/T and/or (2) Develop formal communication plan between prolonged use of SCBA, OC Subcontractor senior leadership and 3rd party reviewers. increasing the duration of Medium CVAPP-026-R Testing Cause (3) Scheduled site visit to finalize 3rd party report. inefficiency in field work. 7-6-17 Delays Hazard assessments must go back through 3rd party reviews, risk impacted by CVAP-32, litigation pushing 3rd party into Failure of DOE Gagnon, (1) Create and track list of critical spares for each Spare parts and equipment have critical Paul A project and obtain necessary funding to support been procured, eliminating ORP equipment and critical spares inventory. single point failures. Risk lack of spares lowered to 'low' (8-17-17) Low CVAPP-028-R or replacements. Infrastructure DOE- Gagnon, (1) Engage with CTO Technology Management and Early integration with CTO will (hardware) to ORP/T Paul A Field Solutions to develop data handling and help mitigate rework and allow handle data interrogation infrastructure. for improved view of OC processing, (2) Lessen the data storage requirements. requirements. (4-13-17) storage, (determination of required data to be stored and Updated with data from Phoenix interrogation, the length of time it needs to be stored) database risk register (8-9-17) and reporting is Understand data quality and storage requirements, Medium Changed ownership of risk to CVAPP-030-R found to be storage durations as directed by DOE. Push 'joint' (8-17-17) insufficient for stakeholders to elimate zero detectable data points. Data requirements, handling, the quantity of (3) � and storage decisions are being collected data. made by customer and stakeholders. 11/13/17 October 2017 63

  61. LAWPS October 2017

  62. LAWPS Overview Current Month FYTD FY End Cumulative to Date WBS BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC EAC VAC TCPI FCST P BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC TCPI 5.05.01.02.01 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Project Management - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,030 1,030 970 - 60 1.00 1.06 1,030 - 5.05.01.02.02 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Project Support - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2,809 2,809 3,213 - -404 1.00 0.87 2,809 - 5.05.01.02.03 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Permitting - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 160 160 57 - 103 1.00 2.82 160 - 5.05.01.02.04 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Safety Analysis - - 7 - -7 - - 7 - -7 - - - 7 -7 - 689 689 648 - 41 1.00 1.06 689 - 5.05.01.02.05 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Technology Matur. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 816 816 495 - 321 1.00 1.65 816 - 5.05.01.02.06 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Design - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4,236 4,236 4,296 - -60 1.00 0.99 4,236 - 5.05.11.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Long Lead Procurements Design 389 786 700 397 86 389 786 700 397 86 2.02 1.12 3,840 4,815 -975 0.88 4,959 4,790 4,466 -169 324 0.97 1.07 8,411 0.88 5.05.03.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design Project Management (PM) 130 130 144 - -14 130 130 144 - -14 1.00 0.90 4,108 4,053 55 1.02 3,885 3,885 4,521 - -636 1.00 0.86 7,863 1.02 5.05.04.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design - Project Support (PS) 455 348 451 -107 -103 455 348 451 -107 -103 0.76 0.77 3,633 4,199 -566 0.88 11,651 11,520 14,323 -131 -2,803 0.99 0.80 14,829 0.88 5.05.05.01.01 - E - LAWPS - Permitting Dev., Prep & Reviews 14 10 24 -5 -15 14 10 24 -5 -15 0.68 0.40 111 223 -113 0.56 1,278 1,264 857 -14 407 0.99 1.48 1,375 0.56 5.05.06.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design Safety Analysis 43 35 33 -9 1 43 35 33 -9 1 0.80 1.03 244 539 -295 1.04 1,728 1,402 1,589 -326 -187 0.81 0.88 1,928 1.04 5.05.07.01.01 - P - LAWPS - Tech Maturation Program & Misc Tests 14 14 8 - 5 14 14 8 - 5 1.00 1.66 122 74 48 1.64 987 987 677 - 310 1.00 1.46 1,095 1.64 5.05.07.01.02 - P - LAWPS - Tech Mature. Integrated Scale Test 479 381 70 -98 310 479 381 70 -98 310 0.80 5.41 3,152 3,476 -324 0.90 25,631 25,207 24,751 -425 455 0.98 1.02 28,305 0.91 5.05.07.01.03 - P - LAWPS - Tech Maturation Full Scale Test 19 - - -19 - 19 - - -19 - - - 197 196 1 1.14 45 - - -45 - - - 223 1.14 5.05.08.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design System Integration 1,321 1,026 731 -294 295 1,321 1,026 731 -294 295 0.78 1.40 7,169 7,349 -180 1.00 18,017 17,247 17,298 -770 -51 0.96 1.00 23,865 1.00 5.05.08.02.02 - P - LAWPS - Design Reagent Systems 60 61 52 1 9 60 61 52 1 9 1.02 1.16 471 569 -98 0.97 1,040 951 787 -90 164 0.91 1.21 1,452 0.97 5.05.08.02.03 - P - LAWPS - Design Primary Pretreat System 249 415 127 166 289 249 415 127 166 289 1.67 3.28 2,040 2,173 -133 0.83 4,514 4,609 5,905 95 -1,297 1.02 0.78 6,305 0.83 5.05.08.02.04 - P - LAWPS - Design HVAC System 120 100 51 -21 49 120 100 51 -21 49 0.83 1.97 775 838 -63 1.05 1,897 1,729 2,010 -168 -281 0.91 0.86 2,552 1.05 5.05.08.02.05 - P - LAWPS - Design Solid Waste System 2 -0 1 -2 -1 2 -0 1 -2 -1 (0.00) (0.01) 85 95 -10 0.89 291 291 99 -0 191 1.00 2.93 374 0.89 5.05.08.02.06 - P - LAWPS - Design Balance of Plant System 253 204 230 -49 -26 253 204 230 -49 -26 0.81 0.89 3,409 3,527 -118 1.07 6,061 5,677 7,085 -385 -1,409 0.94 0.80 9,217 1.07 5.05.08.02.07 - P - LAWPS - Design Facilities System 258 215 412 -43 -196 258 215 412 -43 -196 0.83 0.52 2,659 4,706 -2,047 0.87 6,481 5,138 7,956 -1,344 -2,818 0.79 0.65 8,882 0.87 5.05.08.02.08 - P - LAWPS - Design Project Management & Support 471 462 409 -9 52 471 462 409 -9 52 0.98 1.13 6,833 6,816 17 1.00 15,168 15,124 14,975 -44 149 1.00 1.01 21,531 1.00 5.05.08.02.09 - P - LAWPS - Build to Print 19 17 126 -3 -110 19 17 126 -3 -110 0.86 0.13 11,580 12,002 -422 1.02 2,070 1,469 1,492 -601 -24 0.71 0.98 13,631 1.02 Total 4,294 4,202 3,576 -93 625 4,294 4,202 3,576 -93 625 0.98 1.17 50,428 55,658 -5,230 0.97 115,443 111,027 118,470 -4,415 -7,443 0.96 0.94 161,576 0.97 FTE 10,000 180,000 60 Dollars K Dollars K 9,000 50 160,000 40 8,000 140,000 30 7,000 120,000 20 6,000 10 100,000 - 5,000 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 80,000 (4W) (4W) (4W) (5W) (4W) (4W) (5W) (4W) (4W) (5W) (4W) (5W) 4,000 ACWP ETC Materials, Sub-Contracts, ODC 60,000 3,000 7,000 Thousands 6,000 40,000 2,000 5,000 20,000 1,000 4,000 3,000 - - 2,000 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 (4W) (5W) (4W) (4W) (4W) (5W) (4W) (5W) (4W) (4W) (5W) (5W) 1,000 0 BCWS CM BCWP CM BCWP FCST ACWP CM ETC BCWS CTD BCWP CTD BCWP w/ FCST CTD Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep ACWP CTD ACWP w/ ETC CTD (4W) (4W) (4W) (5W) (4W) (4W) (5W) (4W) (4W) (5W) (4W) (5W) October 2017 65 ACWP ETC

  63. LAWPS Schedule and Cost Forecast Cum SV Cum SV Forecast Cum CV Cum CV Forecast 2,000 1,000 129 -29 -23 -23 41 -206 609 627 353 0 -560 -1,000 -1,312 -2,000 -3,000 $K -4,000 -4,415 -5,032 -4,322 -5,000 -5,966 -6,000 -6,806 -7,353 -7,000 -7,443 -8,068 -7,681 -8,060 -8,998 -8,410 -8,000 -9,165 -8,841 -8,764 -9,000 -10,000 Prior Years Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 CTD October 2017 66

  64. LAWPS Current Month Variances Schedule 5.5.4.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design - Project Support (PS) -$107k Cause: The CM SV is primarily due to the following: • Performing work ahead of schedule for the DOE EM Independent Project Review in the prior period (September 2017). This effort was originally planned to occur in September and October and more performance was earned than planned in September. Performing this work ahead of the baseline schedule has resulted in a positive SV for the first month of work and a corresponding negative SV in the following period (October 2017) when the remaining work was completed, -$62k. • The CD-3A review and approval activity has been placed on hold pending formal direction from DOE regarding the LAWPS re-scoping effort. This activity will contribute to the negative SV in this account until this guidance from DOE is received and this review is replanned with a future BCR. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account. 5.5.8.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design System Integration -$294k Cause: The CM SV is primarily due to the following: • Early front end progress of tasks in the previous reporting (September 2017) period where the majority of the BCWS had been planned in the current period (October 2017), -$226k. These tasks include Publish Revision 2 of the P&IDs, Updates to the revision 0 Heat Transfer Analysis, Completion of HAZOP, Development of Safety Integration Support, and Preparation Preliminary Dose Calculations for Upset Conditions. • Delayed progress of the development of the two over one evaluations. Delays have been experienced as a result of additional time required to resolve issues with the seismic criteria of the facility and equipment, -$108k. Impact: The CM SV impact is due to the following: • Impacts due to early front end progress of tasks are minimal. In most cases the early work maximized resource utilization and facilitated the completion of the tasks by the scheduled completion date. This has allowed for downstream activities to begin as planned. • The current delays to the two over one evaluations do not negatively impact critical downstream deliverables. Further delays to this task could result in delays to the Independent Design Verification of revision 2 P&IDs. October 2017 67

  65. LAWPS Current Month Variances Schedule 5.5.8.2.3 P - LAWPS - Design Primary Pretreat System $166k Cause: The CM SV is primarily due to the following: • The A/E's review of the long lead equipment vendor drawings were planned for completion at the end of the previous reporting period (September 2017), however these tasks did not complete until the beginning of the current reporting period (October 2017). The performance of these tasks in the current period contributes to this month's favorable SV, $97k. • Early start to the Primary Pretreatment System (PPS) 3D Model updates following the recent design changes and incorporating of long lead procurement equipment. This task was able to begin approximately 2 weeks earlier than planned and contributes to the CM SV, $68k. Impact: The CM SV impact is due to the following: • No significant impact as a result of completing the vendor drawing review at the beginning of the current period versus the end of the previous period. • Early start of the PPS 3D Model will allow for its earlier completion and earlier start of downstream activities, which includes the PPS model freeze currently scheduled for late December of 2017. 5.5.11.2.1 P - LAWPS - Long Lead Procurements Design $397k Cause: The positive CM SV is due to revising the execution strategy for the Xomox valve General Assembly Drawings for remaining CFF valves. Originally this work was planned to be completed in December 2017 but the drawing activities have been accelerated and the payment milestone was completed and earned ahead of schedule. There will be a corresponding negative SV next month due to performing this work ahead of schedule in the current period, $397k. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account. October 2017 68

  66. LAWPS Current Month Variances Cost 5.5.4.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design - Project Support (PS) - $103k Cause: The CM CV is primarily due to the following: • Air Dispersion Model for LAWPS Stack subcontract work scope that has been approved as a variance, -$50k. • Labor rates. The actual average hourly rates experienced for all labor resources exceeds the hourly rate used for planning/estimating the work scope by approximately $7/hr, -$24k. • Labor usage. Additional resources have been retained to increase the quality and completeness of the preliminary design as the project progresses towards construction. In addition, the personnel performing the work are senior level individuals and were assigned to the project based on their experience and knowledge. These resources have not taken paid time off consistent with the planned allowance used to calculate the annual realized hours. The number of actual hours experienced is greater than the hours utilized for planning the work scope by approximately 203 hours, -$22k. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account. 5.5.7.1.2 P - LAWPS - Tech Mature. Integrated Scale Test $310k Cause: The CM CV is primarily due to the following: • Overstating September 2017 ACWP. At the end of FY17 a CTD accrual estimate was provided from AECOM and accrued by WRPS finance. On September 26th INV-0001009081 was paid and included in September cost but not backed out of the CTD accrual estimate provided from the vendor. The October reversal of the September accrual results in a current period credit to cost, $196k. • Understating October 2017 ACWP. At the end of October a CTD accrual estimate was provided from AECOM and accrued by WRPS finance. The period closed and AECOM subcontractor realized they had inadvertently left 100k of ACWP out of the CTD accrual estimate AECOM provided to WRPS, $113k. Impact: The CM CV impact is due to the following: • Less 2017 carryover funding required. • November ACWP will include the 100k left out of the October accrual. This has been accounted for in the ETC. October 2017 69

  67. LAWPS Current Month Variances Cost 5.5.8.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design System Integration $295k Cause: The CM CV is primarily due to the following: • Resource usage efficiencies realized by the A/E in the current period. This is attributed to the less than planned process engineering oversight and overall project support of the Quality Level and Critical Characteristics deliverables. Additionally, the Instrumentation and Controls Engineering updates to the control logic narratives in order to incorporate recent design changes has progressed with less resource usage than planned, $201k. • The revision 2a P&IDs were produced more efficiently than planned due to fewer HAZOP and design comments than assumed in the baseline plan, $45k. Impact: There is no significant impact as a result of the CM CV. 5.5.8.2.3 P - LAWPS - Design Primary Pretreat System $289k Cause: The CM CV is primarily due to the following: • efficiencies realized by the A/E in the effort to incorporate the Ion Exchange ventilation design changes into the Mechanical and Piping design drawings and model. The efficiencies are attributed to an experienced design team that has been through multiple design iterations and incorporated lessons learned from past updates, which has facilitated the progress of deliverables with less resources than planned, $185k. • A/E support to review the long lead procurement vendor drawings in the current period required less resources than planned, $88k. Impact: The EAC has been decreased as a result of the above efficiencies. 5.5.8.2.7 P - LAWPS - Design Facilities System - $196k Cause: The CM CV is primarily due to the following: • Additional effort for Architectural drawings, specifications, and Structural calculations for the weather enclosure due to the significant coordination required with the other engineering disciplines and with the A/E's subcontractor (SGH), as their designs have matured and changes are needed to the architectural model and drawings, -$130k. • Nuclear Engineering performed additional shielding calculations as a result of comments received during design review. These additional calculations were not assumed in the original plan, -$29k. Impact: The current month cost variance has been factored into the current EAC. October 2017 70

  68. LAWPS Current Month Variances Cost 5.5.8.2.9 P - LAWPS - Build to Print -$110k Cause: The CM CV is primarily due to the following: • Additional effort has been required to obtain the supporting information to develop the hand calculations and in efforts expended on the development of the first ANSYS model where vendor information has been delayed. Additionally, the cost of the ANSYS software, used to perform the analysis was realized in the current period, -$83k. • Project support and oversight of the Build to Print (BTP) work scope has exceeded the finish date of the planned effort. This is largely due to delays related to design changes, which has extended the duration of the baseline activities and required prolonged project support and oversight in support of BTP detail planning, -$16k. Impact: The current month cost variances are not expected to be recovered. Cost variances in the next reporting period are likely, as the detail planning of the remaining BTP work scope (currently in work package 5.05.08.02.09.02) will be underway and not yet implemented. October 2017 71

  69. LAWPS CTD Variances Schedule 5.5.6.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design Safety Analysis -$326k Cause: The CTD SV is due to Flammable Gas Hazard Analysis of LAWPS Piping and Vessels. The Procurement process experienced a delay in the award of the subcontract due to clarifying scope with the subcontractor prior to award. In addition, the initial analysis was performed with assumed gas volumes and max postulated pressures which provided and overly conservative results. WRPS then calculated actual pressures and gas volumes and requested a re-run of the analysis, -$308k. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. 5.5.7.1.2 P - LAWPS - Tech Mature. Integrated Scale Test -$425k Cause: The CM CV is primarily due to the following: The CTD SV is due to delays in Cross-Flow Filter Testing, Gas Generation Testing, Gas Retention and Release Testing, and AECOM 1/9 Scale Testing, -$410k. • The start of the Cross-Flow Filter Fouling Tests was initially delayed due to late completion of the preceding 4M and 6M tests. This testing has now completed, while the unfavorable SV associated with de-mobilization and the completion of test reports does not have any impacts to the remaining testing schedule, -$39k. • The start of Gas Generation Testing was initially delayed due to the unplanned diversion of PNNL resources from this task to other PNNL work in early FY 2017. In addition, process relief valves needed for the test set-up took longer than planned to be received from the supplier to enable completion of test set-up. This work started later than originally planned causing delays to the subsequent test reports. These delays will not have an impact on the overall testing program and test data needed for design, -$18k. • Commencement of the revised Gas Retention and Release Testing was initially delayed due to availability of vendor (PNNL) resources. Although testing has now started, the vendor is experiencing longer than anticipated durations due to the late start and continuing resource limitations, -$180k. • AECOM CFF foulant testing activities have been placed on hold pending formal direction from DOE regarding the LAWPS re-scoping effort. This activity will contribute to the negative SV in this account until guidance from DOE is received and this work scope is removed from the baseline, -$173k. Impact: The PNNL and AECOM testing schedules do not currently have any CTD schedule impacts as the LAWPS design is progressing with preliminary data received from test results. Corrective Action: WRPS management will meet with the A/E responsible for the Preliminary Design to assess testing impacts from the GRS/Vented IX Column and other design changes. Once the impacts are determined, the project team will determine whether it is necessary to accelerate / recover schedule for the testing. October 2017 72

  70. LAWPS CTD Variances Schedule 5.5.8.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design System Integration - $770k Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to the following: • Delayed Process Engineering's progress of the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Control and Alarm Set Point List, Design Basis Document, and two over one evaluations. Completion of the FMEA and the Control & Alarm Set Point lists have been re-sequenced in the current schedule to allow for the completion of supporting documents which include the early publish of revision 2 P&IDs and HAZOP completion. Additionally, delayed progress of the development of the two over one evaluations are a result of additional time required to resolve issues with the seismic criteria of the facility and equipment, -$218k. • Update to the current execution strategy by Instrumentation and Controls Engineering re-sequences the development and completion of the input/output (I/O) Lists, Instrument Lists, Set Point Calculations, Instrument Uncertainty Analysis, and Control Logic Narratives to occur subsequent to the final publish of the revision 2 P&IDs, which is currently scheduled for early fiscal December. While the re-sequencing contributes to the overall CTD SV, the revised logic avoids the potential for future rework caused by differences between the P&IDs and design documents, -$207k. • The extended effort around the Pipe Engineering's development of the Hydraulic Transient Analysis, which is due to unforeseen additional effort related to scope growth and coordination meetings. Preparation of the associated calculations was planned for completion in latter part of fiscal August, per the current schedule, these tasks will now complete in fiscal November. The additional effort has slowed the progress of the calculations and contributes to the CTD SV, -$129k. • Delayed progress of the A/E review of the P&IDs and PFDs. This delay is a result of the A/E's upfront extended effort to perform a more rigorous than planned review of the P&IDs, in order to optimize the approach to the upcoming Inter-Disciplinary Review (IDR) of the process calculations and P&IDs, -$85k. Impact: The CTD SV impact is due to the following: • The FMEA and process calculations also provide inputs to the revision 2 P&IDs. Currently, this delay does not impact the publish of the revision 2 P&IDs which is scheduled for early fiscal December. Any further delay could potentially impact P&ID delivery which would potentially affect the delivery date of the CD 2/3 package. • The updated execution approach for the I/O Lists, Instrument Lists, and Control Logic Narratives delay the completion of these documents; however, there is no impact to critical path. • The HTA will provide inputs to the revision 2 P&IDs. Currently, this delay does not impact the publish of the revision 2 P&IDs which is scheduled for early fiscal December. Any further delay could potentially impact P&ID delivery which would potentially affect the delivery date of the CD 2/3 package. • The extended efforts of the P&ID review will delay the start of the associated IDRs but does not impact critical downstream deliverables. It is expected that the extended effort will mitigate potential downstream delays by identifying and incorporating updates early. Corrective Action: The tasks which contribute to the unfavorable CTD SV do not currently impact the project's critical path and it is expected that these tasks will be completed as scheduled and allow for delivery of the CD 2/3 package as planned. As such, there is no corrective action as a result of the CTD SV. October 2017 73

  71. LAWPS CTD Variances Schedule 5.5.8.2.6 P - LAWPS - Design Balance of Plant System - $385k Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to the following: • In June of fiscal year 2017, an imminent change to the current design was recognized based on results of the project's integrated testing. The Integrated Project Team made the decision that the current design related to the Gas Removal System (GRS) would be replaced with Vented Ion Exchange Columns (VIXC) and additionally incorporate other essential changes required for 90% design completion. Following this decision, the project team identified urgent tasks to be performed in support of the design changes and implemented the associated scope, schedule, and budget into the PMB via BCR RPP-17-159 - LAWPS Implementation of Stage 1 GRS to Vented IX Design. Amongst these urgent tasks was the effort to revise the Balance of Plant (BOP) 3D model, which allowed the A/E to commence work while the balance of the revised execution strategy was developed. As the execution strategy matured it was evident that revisions to the BOP 3D model would require additional effort. This revised strategy has now been fully implemented via BCR RPP-17-171 - LAWPS GRS to VIXC and Essential Changes for 90% (Phase 2) and the current schedule now reflects the appropriate durations and inputs required to complete the extended effort to revise the BOP 3D Model, -$157k. • Delays to Electrical Engineering drawings as a result of the incorporation of changes from the revision 2a P&IDs. The P&IDs drive the Input/output (I/O) lists, which are required to complete the wiring diagrams and schematics, -$102k. • The preparation of the Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Calculations, and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) were re-sequenced in the current schedule to incorporate impacts for revision 8 of specification 58553 and to include updates associated with the afore mention revised execution strategy, -$85k. Impact: The CTD SV impact is due to the following: • There is no impact to critical downstream work as a result of the extended effort to revise the BOP 3D Model. The task will be worked as currently scheduled and the associated SV is expected to be recovered in November of 2017 and support of the SmartPlant 3D model freeze planned for mid-January. • There is no impact to critical downstream scope as a result of the delay to the Electrical drawings. • There is no impact to critical downstream scope as a result of the re-sequencing of activities to incorporate impacts related to revision 8 of specification 58553. Further delays to the FMEA and SIL calculations could potentially impact the planned date for the CD 2/3 package. Corrective Action: There is no corrective action as a result of the CTD SV as there is no impact to key deliverable dates. Execution of the current schedule will facilitate CD 2/3 package delivery as planned. October 2017 74

  72. LAWPS CTD Variances Schedule 5.5.8.2.7 P - LAWPS - Design Facilities System -$1,344k Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to the following: • Activities supporting the Earth Retaining System (ERS) have been placed on hold as intermediate design changes are vetted to avoid unnecessary rework around the ERS. In the interim, the associated delay contributes to the CTD SV, -$407k. • Structural Engineering's effort to prepare calculations for Ventilation Stack, Backup Exhauster, De-ionized Water Foundations, and Reagent Tank Access Platform has been extended. The extended duration of these tasks is attributed to waiting for building layout to be finalized, resource availability, and necessary design inputs. The extended duration has delayed the start of downstream checking and review activities as well as related drawings, which all contribute to the CTD SV, -$289k. • In June of fiscal year 2017, an imminent change to the current design was recognized based on results of the project's integrated testing. The Integrated Project Team made the decision that the current design related to the Gas Removal System (GRS) would be replaced with Vented Ion Exchange Columns (VIXC) and additionally incorporate other essential changes required for 90% design completion. Following this decision, the project team identified urgent tasks to be performed in support of the design changes and implemented the associated scope, schedule, and budget into the PMB via BCR RPP-17-159 - LAWPS Implementation of Stage 1 GRS to Vented IX Design. Amongst these urgent tasks was the effort to prepare the Facilities Balance of Plant (BOP) and Primary Pretreatment System (PPS) 3D model, which allowed the A/E to commence work while the balance of the revised execution strategy was developed. As the execution strategy matured it was evident that the effort to revise the BOP and PPS 3D model would require additional time. This revised strategy has now been fully implemented via BCR RPP- 17-171 - LAWPS GRS to VIXC and Essential Changes for 90% (Phase 2) and the current schedule now reflects the appropriate durations and inputs required to complete the extended effort to revise the BOP and PPS 3D Model, -$369k. • Changes to the execution strategy of the weather enclosure, design vault, and miscellaneous steel activities are a result of the incorporation of the A/E's structural subcontractor scope responsible for the Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) initial model run and corresponding data extract. The receipt of the data was worked into the current schedule, which resulted in delays to downstream activities related to Weather Enclosure Calculations, Lag Storage Calculations/Drawings, and Design Vault Calculations, -$98k. Impact: The CTD SV impact is due to the following: • The delay to ERS does not currently drive critical downstream deliverables. Once the associated design changes have been vetted, the project team will determine the best path forward for the completion of ERS. • The extended effort to complete Structural Engineering's calculations does not currently drive critical downstream deliverables. • There is no impact to critical downstream work as a result of the extended effort to revise the BOP & PPS 3D Model. These tasks will be worked as currently scheduled and the associated SV is expected to be recovered in December of 2017 and support of the model freeze planned for mid-January. • The changes to the execution strategy do currently drive critical downstream deliverables. Corrective Action: There is no corrective action as a result of the CTD SV as there is no impact to key deliverable dates. Execution of the current schedule will facilitate CD 2/3 package delivery as planned. October 2017 75

  73. LAWPS CTD Variances Schedule 5.5.8.2.9 P - LAWPS - Build to Print -$601k Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to the majority of Build to Print (BTP) work scope being put on hold while re-plan associated with the change from the Gas Removal System (GRS) to the Vented Ion Exchange (VIXC) was planned and implemented. The current BTP plan will need to be re-worked to allow for incorporation of the associated changes and other imminent design changes. As a result, progress has been limited on the activities identified as being affected by the changes, -$486k. Impact: Impacts of the changes will be assessed and captured in a future BCR which will implement the impacts from the GRS to VIXC design changes and detail plan the remaining BTP work scope, the majority of which resides in a planning package schedule to start in fiscal January. Corrective Action: The majority of remaining Build to Print work scope resides in the planning package (5.05.08.02.09.02) and is scheduled to start in fiscal January. In the coming months the remaining scope is to be detail planned, at which time the full impacts of the realized design changes will be incorporated into the BTP detail plan and implemented in a forthcoming baseline change request (BCR). October 2017 76

  74. LAWPS CTD Variances Cost 5.5.3.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design Project Management (PM) -$622k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to: • Labor rates. The actual average hourly rates experienced for all labor resources exceeds the hourly rate used for planning/estimating the work scope by approximately $10/hr, -$430k. • Labor usage. The actual hours experienced to date are greater than the realized calendar hours used to plan/estimate the work. These resources have not taken paid time off consistent with the planned allocation allowance used to calculate the annual realized hours (actual hours experienced are 1,779 hours greater than planned), -$168k. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities or accounts outside of this account. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. 5.5.4.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design - Project Support (PS) -$2,803k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to: • Labor usage. Additional resources have been retained to increase the quality and completeness of the preliminary design as the project progresses towards construction. In addition, the personnel performing the work are senior level individuals and were assigned to the project based on their experience and knowledge. These resources have not taken paid time off consistent with the planned allowance used to calculate the annual realized hours. The number of actual hours experienced is greater than the hours utilized for planning the work scope by approximately 16,602 hours, -$1,821k. • Labor rates. The actual average hourly rates experienced for all labor resources exceeds the hourly rate used for planning/estimating the work scope by approximately $5/hr, -$555k. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account. Corrective Action: No corrective action is planned at this time. 5.5.5.1.1 E - LAWPS - Permitting Dev., Prep & Reviews $407k Cause: Utilizing fewer labor resources than planned. To date 11,807 hours have been earned in support of permitting activities and 6,467 actual hours have been charged, resulting in a positive CV of 5,340 hours. Preparation of draft permitting documentation has gone smoother than originally anticipated, and existing permitting staff have been able to perform the work scope in an efficient manner and avoiding the need to retain additional staffing resources originally projected to be needed, $403k. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities or accounts outside of this account. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. The variance is favorable and does not require any corrective actions at this time. October 2017 77

  75. LAWPS CTD Variances Cost 5.5.7.1.1 P - LAWPS - Tech Maturation Program & Misc Tests $310k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to the following: • To date, the engineering support required to oversee performance of subcontracted national laboratory support has been less than planned. The national laboratories (SRNL and PNNL) have extensive historical knowledge and experience with the subcontracted work scope and the WRPS Technology Maturation personnel. Thus, they are able to perform the work scope with reduced oversight, $142k. • During the time between the baseline of the sRF-3 testing and the subcontract award, the engineering design was further developed and refined. This resulted in some experienced efficiencies during the testing phase, $183k. There is no change to the variance drivers from the prior reporting period. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. The variance is favorable and does not require any corrective actions at this time. 5.5.7.1.2 P - LAWPS - Tech Mature. Integrated Scale Test $455k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to the following: • The account is experiencing labor price/usage efficiencies. Originally, staffing levels were assumed and planned at a higher level to provide oversight and support to the Integrated Engineering-Scale test. Project Manager and Project Controls support were planned under this account. However, this support has been provided by resources already assigned to the project under the Project Management account. Also, the actual hourly rate experienced in this account for engineering support/oversight is less than the planning rate by approximately $16/Hr, $708k. • The actual cost for resin procurements was significantly less than planned. Originally, resin was planned to be procured in two batches. The quantity of required resin was reduced to 500 gallons based on the refined needs of the project, $491k. • National Laboratory Technology Maturation program testing and oversight has experienced a negative cost variance that was driven by revisions to the test plan. The biggest impact was caused by a change in the design to eliminate the Hydrogen Diffusion Design Feature (HDDF) and provide a standby, on demand, vessel ventilation for flammable gas mitigation, -$671k. • Additional labor and material costs incurred at both the Full-Scale and the Integrated Test Facility during checkout and commissioning were driven by unplanned modifications to the column designs, re-assembly, and leak-testing before the initial tests could be re-started. The costs also include tank nozzle modifications and hotel costs for the PM and Operators at the Integrated Test Facility. In addition, the cost for the 1/9 Scale Integrated test planned equipment is greater than estimated. Procurement of unplanned equipment was required to support the test program and associated unplanned fabrication/installation labor costs have been experienced. The variance is further impacted by implementing the simulant development and procurement risk mitigation strategy earlier in the year. The Integrated Scaled Testing negative CV is partially off-set by savings achieved to date in Project Management and QA/Safety oversight. The combination of the variances experienced during Integrated Scaled Testing described in number 4 results in a negative CTD CV, -$73k. Impact: The cumulative CV is unrecoverable and has been factored into the EAC. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. October 2017 78

  76. LAWPS CTD Variances Cost 5.5.8.2.4 P - LAWPS - Design HVAC System -$281k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to the HVAC Model requiring more effort than planned to produce 60% drawings due to the 60A and 60B package split. In addition, more effort was required to incorporate crane design vendor data into the ventilation design and to establish the modeling baseline design parameters, -$231k. Impact: The increased modeling effort is not recoverable and has been factored into the current EAC. Corrective Action: There is no corrective action planned as the majority of the CTD CV is considered to be non-recoverable. 5.5.8.2.6 P - LAWPS - Design Balance of Plant System -$1,382k Cause: The CTD CV is due to: • Electrical specification, drawing, and modeling efforts have been accelerated to support the project schedule. The effort for specification development has been impacted by the iterative process required on the procurement and quality sections of the specifications. Additional unplanned effort to complete electrical drawings has been realized as a result of new design requirements and the need for more design drawings. Additionally, the Electrical Engineering effort for the Hazardous Area Classification required more effort than planned to address review comments and different base assumptions, -$896k. • The BOP Controls Specs, Control System Spec, Safety System Spec, and developing the CSI spec format and requirements have been impacted by the redefinition of the quality requirements. This change in formatting has caused unplanned specification rework to meet the new format requirements, -$174k. • Development of the SIL/FMEA calculations contributes to the unfavorable cost variance. Several activities have required effort beyond what was initially planned because more complex analysis has been required. In addition, higher costs have been realized due to additional resource ramping up and increased effort to perform the work. The original estimate was for 6 Safety Integration Functions (SIFs), and through the development of the design, there are now 19 SIFs that are factored into the calculations requiring more time and effort to complete, -$96k. • Control drawings have been revised multiple times and continue to be updated. Control cabinet and room layouts have been revised to address additional space requirements for elevated I/O counts, -$77k. Impact: The CM CV impact is due to the following: • A portion of the variance will be recoverable because it is due to accelerated drawing development. However, the amount of effort required to complete the additional drawings currently exceeds the original estimate and that portion of the cumulative variance is not recoverable and has been factored into the EAC. • The additional effort for the preparation of CSI formatted specs and incorporation of QL/CC sheets is not recoverable. It is anticipated to impact the future preparation of specifications as well. The impact to the future specifications should be less than what has currently been experienced because the disciplines will apply lessons learned from the initial spec development. • The CV is not recoverable and the impacts are included in the EAC. • The CV is not recoverable and the impacts are included in the EAC. Corrective Action: There is no corrective action planned as a result of the CTD CV as the impact is considered to be non-recoverable October 2017 79

  77. LAWPS CTD Variances Cost 5.5.8.2.7 P - LAWPS - Design Facilities System -$2,818k Cause: The CTD CV is due to: • Weather Enclosure Structural calculations and seismic analysis (SSI) activities performed by subcontractor SGH, Vault Concrete calculations, Vault Steel calculations, and Cell Cover calculations started late due to contract negotiations that resulted in cost and schedule impacts caused by the tightly compressed schedule. The subcontract award to SGH was significantly higher than the A/E baseline estimate for the work scope. Additionally, vault steel, vault cover, and vault concrete calculations all went through multiple iterations as equipment arrangements matured and ensure alignment with the concrete substructure, -$1,739k. • Additional effort for Architectural drawings has been required due the significant coordination required with the other engineering disciplines and with SGH, as their designs have matured and changes are needed to the architectural model and drawings, -$452k. • Architectural specifications for the Weather Enclosure involved a larger number of specs than originally anticipated and the Change Facility experienced significant changes due to requests made during the WRPS design reviews to accommodate operational and radiation protection needs, -$229k. • 3D modeling activities went through a number of iterations in order to synchronize the SGH model with the A/E structural vault model and the integrated A/E Smart Plant model, -$209k. • Additional effort for Structural drawings has been required due to the need to align the initial vault designs with the SGH design of the upper weather enclosure structures and to perform the weather enclosure structure drawings, -$112k. Impact: The CTD CV impact is due to the following: • The variance associated with the SGH subcontract will continue/increase as the work scope progresses to completion and is not considered to be recoverable. • The cost variance due to additional effort required for Architectural Drawings is anticipated to increase throughout the completion of the design for the weather enclosure and additional buildings, as the degree of coordination is not anticipated to decrease. • The cost variance associated with the Architectural specifications is expected to increase as the increased count of weather enclosure specs will need to be revised for the 90% submittal. • Further impacts related to 3D modeling are not currently anticipated. • The CV associated with additional efforts for the structural drawings is included in the current EAC. No further impacts are anticipated. Corrective Action: The variance is not recoverable and is reflected in the EAC. 5.5.11.2.1 P - LAWPS - Long Lead Procurements Design $324k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to AECOM design oversight and reviews for the CFF has required less effort than initially planned, $320k. Impact: The EAC has been reduced to account for this efficiency. However, the favorable variance at completion is offset by the CFF final design comment incorporation scope that was approved as a variance. Corrective Action: There is no corrective action planned. October 2017 80

  78. LAWPS Challenges/Issues/Opportunities Challenges • Efficient transition of design to the optimized LAWPS facility. Issues • WDOE continues to desire that the HVAC system be included in the RCRA Permit which could lead to significant design changes. Opportunities • Transition to an Optimized LAWPS based on a DOE driven change in requirements for the Project. DOE recently changed the requirement for filtration from 0.1 microns to 10 microns. In addition, DOE will now accept the use of non-elutable resins. Both of these requirement changes will allow for a simplified LAWPS facility that will meet mission objectives. October 2017 81

  79. LAWPS Contract Changes / BCR Log Contract Changes / NTE Status Contract Assigned Target Estimated Tech Lead Current Status Changes Date Completion Impact ($M) • Build-to-Print BCR RPP-17-125 implemented remainder of proposal into 16-Feb-17 C. Burke TBD $5.0M CP-17-008 the baseline in May 2017. • RPP-17-159 implemented the initial design effort associated with changing the system from Gas Removal to Vented IX GRS to VIXC 19-Jul-17 C. Burke TBD $5.0M Column. CP-17-031 • RPP-17-171 implemented the remainder of the proposal scope into the baseline in September 2017. • RPP-17-171 implemented the scope of the proposal into the DOE-EM Review baseline in September 2017. TBD 18-Sep-17 C. Burke $0.2M • CP-17-033 NTE increased from 200k to 270k via e-mail from Contracting Officer dated 10/05/17. BCR Status Target Estimated BCR#/Description Level CAM Current Status Completion Impact BCR to be processed and Jeff Filip RPP-18-005: FY 2018 Rate Change 3 October 2017 $20k implemented for October Tom Sackett (LAWPS) reporting. BCR to be processed and RPP-18-006: FY 2018 Performance Based Jeff Filip 2 October 2017 $0k implemented for October Incentive Milestones Tom Sackett reporting. BCR to be processed and RPP-18-030: FY 2018 Performance Based 3 Tom Sackett October 2017 $303k implemented for Incentive Milestones November reporting. October 2017 82

  80. Chief Technology Office & Closure October 2017 LAWPS Engineering-Scale Alternate Retrieval End Effector Integrated Test Platform Fabrication Testing ILAW Glass Samples DFLAW Radioactive Waste Test Platform

  81. Chief Technology Office & Closure Overview October 2017 84

  82. Chief Technology Office & Closure Schedule Recovery Cumulative to Date SV Forecast October 2017 85

  83. Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Current Month Variances Cost 5.3.1.7.5 WFD System Performance $272k • Cause : The CM CV is primarily due to efficiencies in the WRPS labor resources necessary to complete DFLAW Feed Qualification Maturation - sampling of AP-107 and shipping the samples to Pacific Northwest National Lab (PNNL). The estimate to obtain the AP-107 sample was based on historical actuals. However, for the AP-107 sample, the resources required to perform the work scope were significantly less than historical experience. • Impact : No impact to the project. Estimates to complete represent projected spend forecast. 5.3.12.2.2 Technology Maturation & Analysis $105k • Cause : The CM CV is primarily due to resource usage efficiencies in the Technology Maturation and Analysis level of effort (LOE) account, as there has been less management oversight/support required than what was originally planned. The efficiency is a result of the following: 1) The senior project management position has been recently filled by a staff member already on-board, while the other project manager position has been supported in the interim by another staff member also already on-board. 2) The SRNL technical support resource is currently supporting the work scope under and Inter Entity Work Order (IEWO). Under an IEWO, no cost is incurred. However, the associated performance is reported, resulting in a favorable cost variance. • Impact : There is no impact as a result of the CM CV. 5.3.12.2.6 DFLAW Rad Waste Test Bed -$224k • Cause : The CM CV is due to additional resources necessary to complete the fourth and fifth Ion Exchange run with AP-105 waste, writing the Operating procedures and Test Plan for the melter, and writing the AP-105 Filter Report by Pacific Northwest National Lab (PNNL). • Impact : No impact to the project. October 2017 86

  84. Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Current Month Variances Schedule 5.2.1.4.1 Vadose Zone Mgmt & Regulatory Docs -$105k • Cause : The CM SV is due to delays in receiving comments from Ecology on the WMA C RFI and CMS reports, which has resulted in delays to the comment response activities for the RFI and CMS reports. • Impact : Comment response activities will continue to be delayed until Ecology comments are received on the RFI and CMS reports. 5.2.4.2.6 Integrated Disposal Facility Perf Assessment -$102k • Cause : The CM SV is due to subcontracts not being issued in time to begin work at the beginning of FY18. The current tasks are to prepare and present summary information from the IDF Performance Assessment to the DOE group (the Low-Level Waste Federal Review Group (LFRG)) reviewing the analysis. As a result of contract award delays, work did not begin until the end of the reporting period. In addition, work performance was also predicated on the LFRG finaliz ing the review plan and accepting WRPS’s review schedule. Finalization of the LFRG review plan by the LFRG has also been delayed, which impacted the start of the work. • Impact : Initially, webinar presentation preparation was planned to be completed in advance of starting the weekly presentations to the LFRG. Webinars were planned to begin at the end of the month of OCT 17. This was so that OCT could be used to develop the webinar presentations, while the LFRG was finalizing their review plan, on- boarding review team members, and starting their review of the submitted documents which were delivered to the LFRG in SEP 17. As a result of contracting delays, preparation did not begin and was not completed before the start of the first webinar, Oct 31, 17. 5.3.1.7.5 WFD System Performance $114k • Cause : The CM SV is primarily due to completion of DFLAW Feed Qualification Maturation - sampling of AP-107 and shipping the samples to Pacific Northwest National Lab (PNNL)later than planned. Additionally, the completion of the AP-105 column analytical - bulk chemistry sample analysis and filter analysis (platform correlation) was completed later than anticipated. • Impact : No impact to the project, or any other accounts outside of this account. October 2017 87

  85. Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Contract to Date Variances Cost 5.3.12.2.1 Technology Development $3,177k • Cause : The CTD CV is due to the following: 1) Labor usage efficiencies in FY 14. At the beginning of FY 14, a significant portion of scope was not authorized. As a result, labor resources were redirected to other project accounts. In Jun 14, the afore-mentioned scope was authorized and implemented into the baseline. However, the reinstatement of staff to the project was slower than expected due to completion of reassigned work. 2) SRNL actual costs under Inter Entity Work Order (IEWO) contracts were not processed through TOC financial systems, which resulted in a favorable cost variance. 3) Labor usage efficiencies experienced in FY 15 in the LOE account for Technology Development and Program Management. 4) PNNL subcontract labor usage and price efficiencies under the Low Temperature Waste Form account were realized in FY 15. This is a result of their historic knowledge and expertise of the work scope. • Impact : No impact to the project. The SRNL IEWO contracts (IEWO = BCWS, BCWP without ACWP) will cause a final positive CTD variance. • Corrective Action : No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance. 5.2.4.2.3 - RCRA Closure Plan Updates $2,094k • Cause : The CTD CV is due to labor & subcontractor resource efficiencies. Internal subject matter experts were used, instead of additional subcontractor support, to develop the TPA Closure Plans (Tier 1, 2, & 3), WIR, and DOE 435.1 Closure Plan. Realignment of internal resources supporting multiple activities within the organization resulted in labor utilization efficiencies. Also, comments received from ORP required fewer document revisions than planned. • Impact : Using internal subject matter expert support has resulted in an overall cost savings for the TPA Tier 1, 2, and 3 Closure Plans, WIR development, and DOE 435.1 Closure Plan development. Cost efficiencies have been accounted for in the EAC. • Corrective Action : No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance. 5.3.6.1.4 IDF Glass Testing $1,957k • Cause : The CTD CV is primarily due to the following 1) Subcontract resources provided by Pacific Northwest National Lab (PNNL) experienced usage efficiencies due to their historical knowledge and expertise of the IDF Glass Testing Program, FYs 14 - 16, $1,351k, and FY 17, $152k. 2) WRPS labor resource usage in FY 14 was less than the planned baseline for oversight/management of the IDF Glass Testing Program, $404k. This efficiency is attributed to the labor resources and confidence in subcontractor's historical knowledge and expertise of the work scope, which required less oversight/management. • Impact : There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account. • Corrective Action : No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance. 5.3.1.7.3 Waste Feed Delivery Technology $1,796k • Cause : The CTD CV is primarily due to the following: 1) FY 17 cost efficiencies realized in the preparation for Hanford Waste End Effector (HWEE) Testing, and Under Double- Shell Tank (DST) Non-Visual Inspection Effectiveness Testing. The definition phase of both projects was performed with significantly less resources than originally planned as the project team has been able to leverage existing data to its advantage for the Simulant and End Effector design. Additionally, PNNL and WRPS were able to effectively engage their team and contributing counterparts in preparing for both tests. 2) Subcontract technical support of emerging engineering studies, under WFD Technology Solutions. This is a level of effort activity and required less support than planned in FY 14 and FY 15. 3) The subcontract work performed by EnergySolutions for the Small- Scale Solids Delivery Testing, which started in FY 2014 and completed in the 4th quarter of FY 15, experienced cost efficiencies due to its labor pricing and usage being less than planned, FY 14 and FY 15. 4) Subcontract resource usage efficiencies realized in FY 16 in the WFD Technology Solutions account, which is attributed to less than planned external reviews and technical support. • Impact : There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account. • Corrective Action : No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance. October 2017 88

  86. Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Contract to Date Variances Cost (cont.) 5.3.12.2.2 Technology Maturation & Analysis $1,630k • Cause : The CTD CV is primarily due the following: 1) Labor usage efficiencies have been realized in the Technology Maturation & Analysis LOE account, as there has been less management oversight/support required than what was originally planned. This is primarily due to a senior project manager being moved to another project in mid-Fiscal Year (FY) 16, the attrition of project manager in mid-FY 17, and the attrition of a senior engineer mid-year FY 16. The responsibilities for the senior project manager and the senior engineer have been filled by existing resources. The other project manager position has been supported in the interim by another staff member also already on- board. 2) Resource usage efficiencies related to the subcontract support for external reviews and technical support in the Technology Maturation & Analysis LOE account. To date, there has been less subcontract support required than originally planned. • Impact : There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account. • Corrective Action : No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance. 5.3.1.7.5 WFD System Performance $1,371k • Cause : The CTD CV is primarily due to labor usage and price efficiencies in subcontract resources and labor. 1) The subcontract work for the Isolok Reference Sampler Testing, which began in FY 14 and completed in the third quarter of FY 15, experienced efficiencies due to subcontractor labor rates and actual usage being less than originally assumed in the baseline. Also, less subcontract oversight was required due to the experience of the subcontracted resources. 2) Fewer labor resources were used than what was planned in support of the Feed Delivery Technical Issue Resolution in FY 2014. • Impact : There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account. • Corrective Action : No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance. 5.3.10.3.2 Secondary Waste Form Development $1,251k • Cause : The CTD CV is primarily due to resource usage and price efficiencies realized by the National Laboratories subcontracted to perform this scope. 1)The work being performed by SRNL in support of the Waste Form Development of Fresh Properties has experienced resource usage efficiencies in the work performed to date and the project expects that this trend will continue with their remaining work. The contract was awarded to SRNL for significantly less than what was originally estimated and to date, they have been able to execute the scope within the funds awarded and they do not expect to exceed this. 2) PNNL experienced resource usage and price efficiencies in FY 14. This is attributed to the fact that PNNL has worked extensively in the past on similar work scope and was able to engage efficiently to support this effort. 3) The National Labs (PNNL & SRNL) contracted to support Secondary Waste Form Development in FY 15 also experienced resource usage and price efficiencies, again due to the fact that the national labs have worked extensively in the past on similar work scope and were able to engage efficiently to support this effort. • Impact : No impact to the project. • Corrective Action : No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance. October 2017 89

  87. Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Contract to Date Variances Schedule 5.2.4.2.7 Waste Mgt Area C Performance Assessment -$931k • Cause : The CTD SV is primarily due to (1) a delay in receiving comments from Ecology on WMA C documents - Past Leaks Analysis, Baseline Risk Assessment, RCRA Closure Analysis, and (2) a delay in initiating NRC review of the WMA C PA as planned/scheduled. This NRC review of the WMA C PA is linked to the NRC review of the WMA C WIR being done under WBS 5.2.4.2.3.2 (DOE 435.1 Closure Plans). The WIR was transmitted to DOE-HQ for review by the Office of General Council in Jul 17. The time required for review and approval by the Office of General Council at DOE-HQ to submit the WIR to NRC for review is expected to delay the start of the concurrent NRC review of the WMA C PA and WIR. • Impact : The delay in receiving comments back from Ecology on the following WMA C documents, Past Leaks Analysis, Baseline Risk Assessment, RCRA Closure Analysis, will delay completion of updates to these documents until sometime in FY18. The delay in the start of NRC review will push out completion of the concurrent PA review by the NRC into FY18 and will impact completion of updates to the WMA C PA in response to NRC review comments until the 1st quarter of FY19. The delay in the start of the NRC review of the WMA C PA will have a similar impact in the NRC review for the WMA C WIR and updates planned in response to NRC review comments on the WIR (See 5.2.4.2.3 RCRA Closure Plan Updates). • Corrective Action : No corrective actions planned. The variance is expected to continue into the first quarter of FY 2018. 5.2.1.4.1 Vadose Zone Mgmt & Regulatory Docs -$910k • Cause : The CTD SV is due primarily due to delays in receiving Ecology's comments on the RFI and CMS documents. The RFI and CMS documents were submitted to Ecology in Dec 16, and comments were expected the week of Feb 15, 17. However, Ecology has not returned comments on these two documents. Ecology submitted a letter (17-NWP-058) to ORP on May 22, 17 requesting an extension for completing its review and final comments on WMA C documents (RCRA Closure Analysis of WMA C, PA of WMA C, Analysis of Past Tank Waste Leaks and Losses, and BRA for WMA C) by Jul 16, 17. Ecology requested an additional extension to complete its review by Oct 16, 17. Until Ecology completes its review and comments of these documents, it can't start its review and comments of the RFI/CMS. Ecology will address the RFI/CMS documents after completion of WMA C document reviews. • Impact : The SV is expected to continue until comments are received from Ecology on the RFI and CMS documents. Despite the delays, WRPS will still be able to respond to the comments and update the reports in order to meet the TPA milestone (M-045-62: Submit Phase 2 Corrective Measures Implementation Work Plan for WMA C) by its due date. However, work on the CMIP cannot proceed as planned and will be re-planned. A modification to the baseline activities was implemented under BCR RPP-17-134, which better aligned the CMIP activities with the official proposed Milestone finish date of Aug 31, 2028 (17-TF-0046). • Corrective Action : No corrective actions planned. 5.2.4.2.3 RCRA Closure Plan Updates -$646k • Cause : The CTD SV has improved from Sep 17 to Oct 17; however, the CTD SV is still primarily due to delayed receipt of comments from ORP and Ecology on the TPA Closure Plans, and from ORP and DOE-EM on the WIR evaluation that took place during FY17. • Impact : The delay will impact the completion of final drafts of the TPA Closure Plans and DOE 435.1 documents (WIR Evaluation and Closure Plans), which have been carried over from FY17 into FY18. • Corrective Action : A strategy is being developed to accelerate the final approval of the DOE O 435.1 documents (WIR Evaluation and Closure Plans). Discussions are on- going with Ecology on the path forward for the TPA Closure Plans. The CAM and project leads are aware of the delays and discussing this topic weekly. October 2017 90

  88. Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Contract to Date Variances Schedule (cont.) 5.3.6.1.4 IDF Glass Testing -$424k • Cause : The CTD SV is primarily due to the Lysimeter facility upgrades. Transfer of the Field Lysimeter Test Facility (FLTF) and needed upgrades has delayed procuring equipment, preparing test materials and preparing the Lysimeter samples for insertion into the facility. It is anticipated that these activities will not start until the second quarter of FY 18. Upon completion of the upgrades to the facility, PNNL can perform the detailed test configuration definition and pretest modeling for the Lysimeter testing. • Impact : The transfer of the Field Lysimeter Test Facility (FLTF) from CHPRC to WRPS, and upgrading the facility is largely driving out the preparation of the Lysimeter for Waste Form Insertion and is expected to move out to the second quarter of FY 18. This will delay the start of testing to be done in FY 18; however, there is no current impact to critical downstream tasks as a result of this schedule variance. • Corrective Action : No corrective actions planned. The variance is expected to continue into the first quarter of FY 2018. 5.3.12.2.4 Solid Secondary Waste Stream Tech Mat (DFLAW) -$337k • Cause : The CTD SV is primarily due to the Solid Secondary Waste (SSW) - phase 2 preparation and curing of the samples, and conducting the waste form tests 1 & 2, starting later than expected. Delays are due to limitations of subcontracted resources, and additional preparation of samples and cure times. Phase 2 testing and final results memo is expected to complete mid-November. • Impact : No impact to critical path or other control accounts. • Corrective Action : No corrective actions planned. The variance is expected to continue into the first quarter of FY 2018. 5.2.4.2.8 Waste Mgt Area A/AX Perf Assessment -$289k • Cause : The CTD SV is primarily due to (1) activities X242-82WA1-11 and X242-82WA1-12 (Review by Ecology and update Residual Inventory & Soil Inventory Rev. 0 documents). These activities cannot proceed due to Ecology's priorities. Ecology was unable to review the data packages describing WMA A-AX Tank Residual Inventories and WMA A-AX Soil Inventory in FY17, so this scope carried over to FY18. The (FES) schedule was modified to shift the Ecology review into the early part of FY18, when Ecology’s schedule will allow for this review; and, (2) delays in completing the conceptual model report by the subcontractor . Also, adjustments to the site conceptual models being documented in the Geologic Framework Conceptual model package report have delayed the completion of this report, and has led to some delays in the final selection and testing of model parameters being used in the numerical model development work. The subcontractor spent some time with technical staff at CH-PRC to come up with models at A-AX that were consistent with those that PRC staff were developing for use in a Hanford site-wide Composite Analysis that they are undertaking in the upcoming two years. This took longer than originally planned. • Impact : The review, dispositioning and incorporation of Ecology comments into the Residual Inventory and Soil Inventory documents cannot be completed until after the Ecology review and receipt of their comments. The scheduled activities of resolving comments and updating the documents carried over into FY18. • Corrective Action : There is no corrective action planned, since the SV will be made up once Ecology is able to review the Residual Inventory & Soil Inventory Rev 0 documents, which is planned for completion in FY 18. October 2017 91

  89. Chief Technology Office FY 2018 Key Deliverables FY 2018 Key Deliverables Target Forecast Complete design of a new sampling technique for the Tank Farms – PBI-42.0.5 Q4 Sep-18 Complete selection of non-destructive examination (NDE) technology based on FY 2017 Effectiveness Testing and complete integration testing with a delivery system for under double shell tank developed by the Tank and Pipeline Integrity (TAPI) group Q4 Sep-18 – PBI-42.0.2 Modify and issue revision to the RPP Technology Roadmap – PBI-42.0.4 Q4 Sep-18 Complete requirement and specification definition, detailed design, and fabrication and factory acceptance testing of a Q4 Sep-18 mechanical waste gathering system technology and submit an effectiveness test report – PBI-42.0.9 Operate the current first feed AP-107 through the DFLAW Radioactive Waste Test Platform to support Waste Feed Q4 Sep-18 Qualifications PBI-42.0.8 Complete testing and laboratory studies to support disposal related waste form performance necessary for advanced glasses, Q4 Sep-18 secondary liquid waste streams, and secondary solid waste forms – PBI-42.0.1 Complete detailed test configuration definition and pretest modeling for lysimeter testing – PBI-42.0.6 Q4 Sep-18 Complete waste form development and performance testing for EMF bottoms disposition onsite – PBI-42.0.3 Q4 Sep-18 Complete testing and laboratory studies to support disposal related waste form performance necessary for advanced glasses, Q4 Sep-18 secondary liquid waste streams, and secondary solid waste forms – PBI-42.0.1 October 2017 92

  90. Closure & Corrective Measures FY 2018 Key Deliverables FY 2018 Key Deliverables Target Forecast In support of completion of TPA M-045-92, prepare Barrier 3 Design/Monitoring Plan – PBI-41.0.1 Q3 MAY 2018 Provide to ORP and DOE LFRG responses to DOE LFRG review comments on Rev. B of the Integrated Disposal Facility Performance Assessment (IDF PA) along with an updated PA document that incorporates the proposed revisions to address the Q4 SEP 2018 comments – PBI-41.0.5 October 2017 93

  91. Chief Technology Office & Closure Contract Changes Estimated Contract Changes Assigned Date Tech Lead Target Completion Current Status Impact ($M) NTE - Initial SX Barrier 5-Jul-17 D. Parker Jul-17 $100k ORP direction to proceed received from Contracting Conceptual Expansion Officer via email 7/5/2017. BCR for NTE scope implemented in July 2017. Proposal submitted to DOE. October 2017 94

  92. Chief Technology Office & Closure BCR Status BCR#/Description Level Assigned Date CAM Target Completion Estimated Impact Current Status Nothing to report. October 2017 95

  93. One System October 2017

  94. One System Ov Over erview view October 2017 97

  95. One System Sc Sche hedu dule le Rec ecover ery Cumulative to Date SV Forecast October 2017 98

  96. One System Major Major Cur Curren ent t Mont Month V h Var arianc iances es Cost 5.03.01.07.01 Project Flowsheets $278k Cause : The CM CV is primarily due to the procurement of gProms licenses. The gProms licenses were originally planned for procurement through the subcontract process. However, due to procurement workload at Fiscal Year End (FYE) for 2017, the subcontract was not awarded. In order to obtain the license renewals before they expired, the gProms licenses were purchased though the ADP process at the end of September 2017. It was expected that the cost would be incurred during October 2017, and the associated performance was reported in October. However, FYE 2017 processes resulted in the delays in posting of P-Card cost. It is anticipated that the cost will be reported during November 2017. Impact : There is no impact to any other accounts outside of this account. 5.03.06.01.03 ILAW Transporters $166k Cause : The CM CV is due to: The early phase PSSD and ILAW Transporter Prototype Fabrication work scope accomplished during the current reporting period required fewer resources than planned in the baseline. However, it is expected that as the projects progress, and increased resource ramp up occurs, costs will increase. These expected cost increases will offset the experienced early phase efficiencies. Impact : There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account. October 2017 99

  97. One System Major Major Cur Curren ent t Mont Month V h Var arianc iances es Schedule 5.3.1.7.1 Project Flowsheets $110k • Cause : The CM SV is primarily due to the procurement of ESP Licenses. Originally, 2-year ESP licenses were planned for procurement at the start of FY 17. However, changes in Procurement requirements and process precluded the purchase of 2-year licenses, and 1-year licenses were procured. Performance for the procurement of the 1- year licenses (1/2 of the original BCWS) was reported in the same period the cost was reported. The remaining BCWS was re-planned in Sep 17. The licenses renewals for FY18 were purchased in October offsetting the unfavorable performance from the prior reporting period. • Impact : There is no impact to any other activities or accounts outside of this account. There is no impact to the critical path. The impact is to the current month reporting only. October 2017 100

Recommend

Kane County Case Management System Assessment Project URL Integration Kane County CMS

Kane County Case Management System Assessment Project URL Integration Kane County CMS

Kane County Case Management System Assessment Project URL Integration Kane County CMS Assessment Project Final Presentation October 25, 2011 Amir Holmes, Senior Business Analyst & Project Manager Dave Usery, CEO Proposed Solution

226 views • 19 slides
Kane County Case Management System Assessment Project URL Integration Kane County CMS

Kane County Case Management System Assessment Project URL Integration Kane County CMS

Kane County Case Management System Assessment Project URL Integration Kane County CMS Assessment Project Final Report Presentation September 30, 2011 Amir Holmes, Senior Business Analyst & Project Manager Proposed Solution The key

485 views • 20 slides
National Integrity System Assessment 2018 Update Liz Brown, Project Manager/Editor 2013 NIS

National Integrity System Assessment 2018 Update Liz Brown, Project Manager/Editor 2013 NIS

National Integrity System Assessment 2018 Update Liz Brown, Project Manager/Editor 2013 NIS Assessment Core Message It is beyond time for serious and urgent action to protect and extend integrity in New Zealand Since 2013 Some positives

155 views • 14 slides
Environmental Impact Assessment Study Ivan Mitrovic Project manager, Directorate for Inland

Environmental Impact Assessment Study Ivan Mitrovic Project manager, Directorate for Inland

Preparation of necessary documentation for rive raining and dredging works on critical sectors on the Danube River in Serbia Environmental Impact Assessment Study Ivan Mitrovic Project manager, Directorate for Inland Waterways Public hearing

940 views • 91 slides
Kane County Case Management System Assessment Project URL Integration Project Update April

Kane County Case Management System Assessment Project URL Integration Project Update April

Kane County Case Management System Assessment Project URL Integration Project Update April 14, 2011 Amir Holmes, Senior Business Analyst & Project Manager Presentation Overview Review of Original Project Goals & Tasks Status

199 views • 15 slides
Report from the Project Manager Bill Boroski Contractor Project Manager Contractor Project

Report from the Project Manager Bill Boroski Contractor Project Manager Contractor Project

Report from the Project Manager Bill Boroski Contractor Project Manager Contractor Project Manager USQCD All-Hands Meeting Brookhaven National Laboratory April 16-17, 2010 Outline Outline Completion of the initial computing project

475 views • 16 slides
October 31, 2018 DOE Assessment Team Nancy Godfrey, DOE Assessment Coordinator Greg Newcom,

October 31, 2018 DOE Assessment Team Nancy Godfrey, DOE Assessment Coordinator Greg Newcom,

October 31, 2018 DOE Assessment Team Nancy Godfrey, DOE Assessment Coordinator Greg Newcom, FocalPoint K12/MAARS Project Manager Welcome to the District Assessment Coordinators (DACs) and Career & Technical Education Directors (CTE) and

313 views • 27 slides
District Assessment Coordinators Career & Technical Education Directors and MAARS DOE

District Assessment Coordinators Career & Technical Education Directors and MAARS DOE

District Assessment Coordinators Career & Technical Education Directors and MAARS DOE Assessment Team Nancy Godfrey, DOE Assessment Coordinator Greg Newcom, FocalPoint K12/MAARS Project Manager Welcome to the District Assessment

892 views • 36 slides
Report from the Project Manager Bakul Banerjee Associate Contractor Project Manager Associate

Report from the Project Manager Bakul Banerjee Associate Contractor Project Manager Associate

Report from the Project Manager Bakul Banerjee Associate Contractor Project Manager Associate Contractor Project Manager USQCD All-Hands Meeting Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory May 14-15, 2009 Outline Organization update OMB300

556 views • 16 slides
Level 5 Operations/ Departmental Manager EPA-Kit Mock Assessment Materials Presentation and

Level 5 Operations/ Departmental Manager EPA-Kit Mock Assessment Materials Presentation and

Level 5 Operations/ Departmental Manager EPA-Kit Mock Assessment Materials Presentation and Q&A on the Work-Based Project ODM 2.7 1 Mock Assessment Documentation The following pages contain documentation that may be used for

504 views • 4 slides
SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROJECT 5/15/2012 1 System Assessment Project Status Update Phase one:

SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROJECT 5/15/2012 1 System Assessment Project Status Update Phase one:

Project Update SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROJECT 5/15/2012 1 System Assessment Project Status Update Phase one: relay setting comparison All contract engineer reports have been reviewed and no additional corrective actions have been

370 views • 3 slides
Institutional Learning Outcomes Diversity Pilot Assessment Project Presented to ILO Subcommittee

Institutional Learning Outcomes Diversity Pilot Assessment Project Presented to ILO Subcommittee

Institutional Learning Outcomes Diversity Pilot Assessment Project Presented to ILO Subcommittee May 1, 2017 2013-14 I 2014-15 l 2015-16 I 2016-17 Julie Stein, Educational Effectiveness Project Manager Dr. Fanny Yeung, Educational

341 views • 18 slides
HELCOM 2nd Holistic Assessment The assessment is carried out through the HOLAS II project

HELCOM 2nd Holistic Assessment The assessment is carried out through the HOLAS II project

HELCOM 2nd Holistic Assessment The assessment is carried out through the HOLAS II project The assessment report will: follow-up the goals and objectives of the Baltic Sea Action Plan (BSAP) be developed so that it can serve as a

404 views • 6 slides
Unit 10 The World of Project Management and The Role of Project Manager The Role of Project

Unit 10 The World of Project Management and The Role of Project Manager The Role of Project

Unit 10 The World of Project Management and The Role of Project Manager The Role of Project Manager Source: Project Management in Practice, 4th Edition, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, Wiley, 2011. Project Management: A Systems Approach to

712 views • 32 slides
State of Oregon HRIS Project Enterprise Readiness Assessment Consulting Services Memorandum

State of Oregon HRIS Project Enterprise Readiness Assessment Consulting Services Memorandum

State of Oregon HRIS Project Enterprise Readiness Assessment Consulting Services Memorandum To: Joyce Martinez HRIS Business Case Project Manager From: Robin Milne Dye Management Group, Inc. Date: September 30, 2013 Subject: Enterprise

593 views • 23 slides
Assessing your organisations capacity needs Catherine Gould, ECB Project Manager, Oxfam 19 th

Assessing your organisations capacity needs Catherine Gould, ECB Project Manager, Oxfam 19 th

Assessing your organisations capacity needs Catherine Gould, ECB Project Manager, Oxfam 19 th May 2011 www.ecbproject.org SUMMARY OF PRESENTATION 1. Introducing our self assessment tool 2. The information we collect 3. How we make sense

240 views • 11 slides
Bob Diezi, Project Manager, District One Road Rangers Project Manager Responsibilities

Bob Diezi, Project Manager, District One Road Rangers Project Manager Responsibilities

Bob Diezi, Project Manager, District One Road Rangers Project Manager Responsibilities Point of contact for the Department Thoroughly knowledgeable and experienced in relation to all aspects of the scope of services and the contract

447 views • 20 slides
Delivering the 2016 Assessment Update Halton Region Nancy Huether, Regional Manager Lou

Delivering the 2016 Assessment Update Halton Region Nancy Huether, Regional Manager Lou

Delivering the 2016 Assessment Update Halton Region Nancy Huether, Regional Manager Lou Castellani, Account Manager April 13, 2016 PROPERTY ASSESSMENT & PROPERTY TAXES The Municipal Property Assessment Corporation determines Current Value

613 views • 28 slides
NEI Perspective on Licensing Beyond 60 Julie Keys Sr. Project Manager Sr. Project Manager

NEI Perspective on Licensing Beyond 60 Julie Keys Sr. Project Manager Sr. Project Manager

NEI Perspective on Licensing Beyond 60 Julie Keys Sr. Project Manager Sr. Project Manager jyk@nei.org Background Background Operation beyond 60 years is needed to meet energy demands Currently licenses issued to 40 with 20 year

646 views • 8 slides
Steven Theisen Project Communications Manager Mark Vesperman, P.E. Design Project Manager 3 4

Steven Theisen Project Communications Manager Mark Vesperman, P.E. Design Project Manager 3 4

Steven Theisen Project Communications Manager Mark Vesperman, P.E. Design Project Manager 3 4 Westbound Beltline expansion, Seminole Highway to Whitney Way, anticipated to start in mid-March 2016. Midvale Boulevard reconstruction,

516 views • 13 slides
B Impact Assessment Training Presentation Spring 2014 The B Impact Assessment Project Want to

B Impact Assessment Training Presentation Spring 2014 The B Impact Assessment Project Want to

B Impact Assessment Training Presentation Spring 2014 The B Impact Assessment Project Want to help an organization improve its environmental and social impact? Then the B Impact Assessment Project is for you! 2 The B Impact Assessment Project

529 views • 24 slides
Welcome Joint Public Service Centre Project Welcome Agenda Introductions Project

Welcome Joint Public Service Centre Project Welcome Agenda Introductions Project

Staff Engagement Group 7 th November 2014 Welcome Joint Public Service Centre Project Welcome Agenda Introductions Project Update Key Task Area Project Manager Updates Engagement Assessment Results Implementation

856 views • 38 slides
Speaker SMAPP Project Enhancing Mathematics Assessment with Singapore Mathematics Assessment

Speaker SMAPP Project Enhancing Mathematics Assessment with Singapore Mathematics Assessment

Speaker SMAPP Project Enhancing Mathematics Assessment with Singapore Mathematics Assessment and Validated Resources Pedagogy Project Sep 2008 Dec 2012 WONG Khoon Yoong (A/P) RD & I (Research, Development and Mathematics

306 views • 9 slides
Project Manager/Document Manager: Katie Hoffman Budget Manager/Web Designer: Hannah Reed Client

Project Manager/Document Manager: Katie Hoffman Budget Manager/Web Designer: Hannah Reed Client

Project Manager/Document Manager: Katie Hoffman Budget Manager/Web Designer: Hannah Reed Client Contact/Document Manager: Daniel Marquez Project Description The objective is to design and build a clean hood and a portable clean room.

236 views • 11 slides

More recommend