products of idempotent matrices over pr fer domains
play

Products of idempotent matrices over Prfer domains Laura Cossu - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Products of idempotent matrices over Prfer domains Laura Cossu based on a joint work with P . Zanardo Conference on Rings and Factorizations Graz, February 19-23, 2018 The property (ID n ) 2 of 21 The property (ID n ) The property (ID n )


  1. Products of idempotent matrices over Prüfer domains Laura Cossu based on a joint work with P . Zanardo Conference on Rings and Factorizations Graz, February 19-23, 2018

  2. The property (ID n ) 2 of 21

  3. The property (ID n ) The property (ID n ) An integral domain R satisfies property (ID n ) if any singular (det = 0) n × n matrix over R is a product of idempotent matrices. 2 of 21

  4. The property (ID n ) The property (ID n ) An integral domain R satisfies property (ID n ) if any singular (det = 0) n × n matrix over R is a product of idempotent matrices. I dempotent matrix : square matrix M such that M 2 = M . 2 of 21

  5. The property (ID n ) The property (ID n ) An integral domain R satisfies property (ID n ) if any singular (det = 0) n × n matrix over R is a product of idempotent matrices. I dempotent matrix : square matrix M such that M 2 = M . Standard form of a 2 × 2 non-identity idempotent matrix over R : � a b � , with a (1 − a ) = bc . c 1 − a 2 of 21

  6. Motivations and first results The problem of characterizing integral domains satisfying property (ID n ) has been considered since the middle of the 1960’s: 3 of 21

  7. Motivations and first results The problem of characterizing integral domains satisfying property (ID n ) has been considered since the middle of the 1960’s: J.A. E rdos , On products of idempotent matrices, Glasgow Math. J., 8: 118–122 , 1967. - Fields satisfy property (ID n ) for every n > 0. 3 of 21

  8. Motivations and first results The problem of characterizing integral domains satisfying property (ID n ) has been considered since the middle of the 1960’s: J.A. E rdos , On products of idempotent matrices, Glasgow Math. J., 8: 118–122 , 1967. - Fields satisfy property (ID n ) for every n > 0. T.J. L affey , Products of idempotent matrices, Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 14 (4): 309–314 , 1983. - Euclidean domains satisfy property (ID n ) for every n > 0. 3 of 21

  9. Motivations and first results The problem of characterizing integral domains satisfying property (ID n ) has been considered since the middle of the 1960’s: J.A. E rdos , On products of idempotent matrices, Glasgow Math. J., 8: 118–122 , 1967. - Fields satisfy property (ID n ) for every n > 0. T.J. L affey , Products of idempotent matrices, Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 14 (4): 309–314 , 1983. - Euclidean domains satisfy property (ID n ) for every n > 0. J. F ountain , Products of idempotent integer matrices, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 110: 431–441 , 1991. - (ID n ) is equivalent to other properties in the class of PID’s. - The ring of integers Z and DVR’s satisfy property (ID n ) for every n > 0. 3 of 21

  10. (ID n ) and (GE n ) in Bézout domains 4 of 21

  11. (ID n ) and (GE n ) in Bézout domains The property (GE n ) An integral domain R satisfies property (GE n ) if any invertible n × n matrix over R is a product of elementary matrices. 4 of 21

  12. (ID n ) and (GE n ) in Bézout domains The property (GE n ) An integral domain R satisfies property (GE n ) if any invertible n × n matrix over R is a product of elementary matrices. N ote : fields and Euclidean domains satisfy (GE n ) for every n > 0, not every PID satisfies (GE n ) for every n > 0. 4 of 21

  13. (ID n ) and (GE n ) in Bézout domains The property (GE n ) An integral domain R satisfies property (GE n ) if any invertible n × n matrix over R is a product of elementary matrices. N ote : fields and Euclidean domains satisfy (GE n ) for every n > 0, not every PID satisfies (GE n ) for every n > 0. Theorem (Ruitenburg - 1993) For a Bézout domain R (every f.g. ideal of R is principal) TFAE: (i) R satisfies (GE n ) for every integer n > 0; (ii) R satisfies (ID n ) for every integer n > 0. W. R uitenburg , Products of idempotent matrices over Hermite domains, Semigroup Forum, 46(3): 371–378 , 1993. 4 of 21

  14. Lifting properties 5 of 21

  15. Lifting properties If R is a Bézout domain: - R satisfies (ID 2 ) ⇔ it satisfies (ID n ) for all n > 0 (Laffey’s lift - 1983); 5 of 21

  16. Lifting properties If R is a Bézout domain: - R satisfies (ID 2 ) ⇔ it satisfies (ID n ) for all n > 0 (Laffey’s lift - 1983); - R satisfies (GE 2 ) ⇔ it satisfies (GE n ) for all n > 0 (Kaplansky’s lift -1949). 5 of 21

  17. Lifting properties If R is a Bézout domain: - R satisfies (ID 2 ) ⇔ it satisfies (ID n ) for all n > 0 (Laffey’s lift - 1983); - R satisfies (GE 2 ) ⇔ it satisfies (GE n ) for all n > 0 (Kaplansky’s lift -1949). Thus, in a Bézout domain (ID 2 ) ⇔ (ID n ) ∀ n ⇔ (GE n ) ∀ n ⇔ (GE 2 ) . 5 of 21

  18. Lifting properties If R is a Bézout domain: - R satisfies (ID 2 ) ⇔ it satisfies (ID n ) for all n > 0 (Laffey’s lift - 1983); - R satisfies (GE 2 ) ⇔ it satisfies (GE n ) for all n > 0 (Kaplansky’s lift -1949). Thus, in a Bézout domain (ID 2 ) ⇔ (ID n ) ∀ n ⇔ (GE n ) ∀ n ⇔ (GE 2 ) . N ote : (GE 2 ) � (ID 2 ) outside Bézout domains: local non-valuation domains satisfy (GE 2 ) but not (ID 2 ). 5 of 21

  19. The conjecture (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout Q uestion : What about (ID n ) outside the class of Bézout domains? 6 of 21

  20. The conjecture (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout Q uestion : What about (ID 2 ) outside the class of Bézout domains? 6 of 21

  21. The conjecture (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout Q uestion : What about (ID 2 ) outside the class of Bézout domains? Theorem (Bhaskara Rao - 2009) Let R be a projective-free domain (every projective R -module is free). If R satisfies property (ID 2 ), then R is a Bézout do- main. .S. B haskara R ao , Products of idempotent matrices over integral domains, Linear K.P Algebra Appl., 430(10): 2690–2695 , 2009. 6 of 21

  22. The conjecture (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout Q uestion : What about (ID 2 ) outside the class of Bézout domains? Theorem (Bhaskara Rao - 2009) Let R be a projective-free domain (every projective R -module is free). If R satisfies property (ID 2 ), then R is a Bézout do- main. .S. B haskara R ao , Products of idempotent matrices over integral domains, Linear K.P Algebra Appl., 430(10): 2690–2695 , 2009. This result and those by Laffey and Ruitenburg suggested the following: Conjecture (Salce, Zanardo - 2014) If an integral domain R satisfies property (ID 2 ), then it is a Bézout domain. L. S alce , P . Z anardo , Products of elementary and idempotent matrices over integral domains, Linear Algebra Appl., 452:130–152 , 2014. 6 of 21

  23. The conjecture (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout N ote : - In view of Laffey’s lift, if this conjecture would be true, then every domain satisfying property (ID 2 ) would satisfy property (ID n ) for any n > 0. 7 of 21

  24. The conjecture (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout N ote : - In view of Laffey’s lift, if this conjecture would be true, then every domain satisfying property (ID 2 ) would satisfy property (ID n ) for any n > 0. - (GE 2 ) � Bézout Local non-valuation domains are non-Bézout domains satisfying (GE 2 ). 7 of 21

  25. The conjecture (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout N ote : - In view of Laffey’s lift, if this conjecture would be true, then every domain satisfying property (ID 2 ) would satisfy property (ID n ) for any n > 0. - (GE 2 ) � Bézout Local non-valuation domains are non-Bézout domains satisfying (GE 2 ). E xamples : Unique factorization domains Projective-free domains Local domains + (ID 2 ) ⇒ Bézout PRINC domains (introduced by Salce and Zanardo) 7 of 21

  26. (ID 2 ) ⇒ Prüfer Our first result in support of the conjecture is the following Theorem 1 If R is an integral domain satisfying property (ID 2 ), then R is a Prüfer domain (a domain in which every finitely generated ideal is invertible). 8 of 21

  27. (ID 2 ) ⇒ Prüfer Our first result in support of the conjecture is the following Theorem 1 If R is an integral domain satisfying property (ID 2 ), then R is a Prüfer domain (a domain in which every finitely generated ideal is invertible). Thus, it is not restrictive to study the conjecture inside the class of Prüfer domains. 8 of 21

  28. Sketch of the proof of Th.1 Idea of the proof of Theorem 1: we first prove as a preliminary result that, given a , b ∈ R non-zero a b � � product of idempotents ⇒ ( a , b ) invertible. 0 0 9 of 21

  29. Sketch of the proof of Th.1 Idea of the proof of Theorem 1: we first prove as a preliminary result that, given a , b ∈ R non-zero a b � � product of idempotents ⇒ ( a , b ) invertible. 0 0 If we assume that R has (ID 2 ), then every two-generated ideal of R is invertible. 9 of 21

  30. Sketch of the proof of Th.1 Idea of the proof of Theorem 1: we first prove as a preliminary result that, given a , b ∈ R non-zero a b � � product of idempotents ⇒ ( a , b ) invertible. 0 0 If we assume that R has (ID 2 ), then every two-generated ideal of R is invertible. We conclude since R is a Prüfer domain iff every two-generated ideal of R is invertible. 9 of 21

  31. A new relation between (ID 2 ) and (GE 2 ) 10 of 21

  32. A new relation between (ID 2 ) and (GE 2 ) Proving a preliminary technical result and using a characterization of the property (GE 2 ) over an arbitrary domain proved by Salce and Zanardo in 2014, we get that Theorem 2 If an integral domain R satisfies property (ID 2 ), then it also satisfies property (GE 2 ). 10 of 21

Recommend


More recommend