preventing stroke in atrial fibrillation pharmacist roles
play

Preventing Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation: Pharmacist Roles in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Preventing Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation: Pharmacist Roles in Optimizing Therapy and Ensuring Patient Safety William E. Dager, Pharm.D., BCPS (AQ- Cardiology), FCCP , FCSHP , FCCM, FASHP UC Davis Medical Center Sacramento, California


  1. Preventing Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation: Pharmacist Roles in Optimizing Therapy and Ensuring Patient Safety William E. Dager, Pharm.D., BCPS (AQ- Cardiology), FCCP , FCSHP , FCCM, FASHP UC Davis Medical Center Sacramento, California

  2. Disclosures • The following faculty and planners report no relationships pertinent to this activity – William E. Dager, Pharm.D., BCPS (AQ-Cardiology), FCCP, FCSHP, FCCM, FASHP, Faculty – James S. Kalus, Pharm.D., BCPS (AQ-Cardiology), FASHP, Faculty – Angela R. Raval, Pharm.D., Staff – Carla J. Brink, M.S., B.S.Pharm., Staff ASHP Advantage staff have no relevant financial relationships to disclose

  3. Learning Objectives ‒ Assess or reassess the need for anticoagulation therapy and bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. ‒ Recommend an appropriate target-specific oral anticoagulant for patients with atrial fibrillation, based on critical differences among the options and patient needs. ‒ Develop a plan for ongoing assessment of patients with clinical challenges who are receiving oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation.

  4. Atrial Fibrillation (AF) • Most common arrhythmia in U.S. – 9% of patients over age 65 years in the U.S. • Prevalence increases with age • Risk factors – Age – Hypertension (HTN) – Heart failure (HF) • Complications: frequent hospitalizations, hemodynamic abnormalities, and thromboembolic events January CT et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 28. [Epub ahead of print]

  5. Stroke in AF • AF → Stroke risk 5x higher • Stroke risk increases with age • AF-related stroke frequently more severe January CT et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 28. [Epub ahead of print]

  6. Impact of AF on Cost of Treating Stroke Mean Cost Per Patient Patients with AF Patients without AF Acute hospitalization $7190 ± 4439* $5838 ± 3662 Readmission $1936 ± 5908 $1118 ± 4256 Inpatient rehab $2058 ± 3637 $1733 ± 2809 Total direct costs $15,575 ± 10,945* $11,638 ± 9571 *p<0.05 ‒ Indirect costs (due to loss of productivity) accounted for 18% of total costs ‒ But what about the impact on quality of life? Brüggenjürgen B et al. Value Health. 2007; 10:137-43.

  7. Therapy Considerations • Rate and/or rhythm control - Antithrombotic therapy - Regulatory considerations • Clinical quality measures (VTE prophylaxis) • Stroke core measures • Joint Commission: (2012) Extra care for blood thinners • Management of co-morbidities

  8. Regulatory Considerations Measure Description STK - 1 Ischemic/hemorrhagic: venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis received or documentation why not the day of and day after hospital admission STK – 2 Ischemic: discharged on antithrombotic therapy (no preferred agent, includes new oral anticoagulants) STK - 3 Ischemic stroke with AF: prescribed anticoagulation therapy at hospital discharge (new anticoagulants included) STK - 4 Acute ischemic stroke arriving within 2 hours of onset: IV-tPA (tissue plasminogen activator) initiated within 3 hours of stroke onset STK - 5 Ischemic stroke received antithrombotic therapy by end of hospital day 2 STK - 6 Discharged on statin medication STK - 8 Stroke education provided STK - 10 Assessed for rehabilitation Related CQM for 2014 - STK 2, STK3, STK 4 (must report 16 of the 29) http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/Stroke.pdf (accessed 2014 Jun 25).

  9. Question Which of the following are included in the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, but not CHADS 2 ? a. Female gender b. Prior myocardial infarction (MI) c. Age 65-74 years d. All the above

  10. AF Anticoagulation: Risk/Benefit Assessment Risk for Thrombosis • Stroke Risk Assessment ‒ CHADS 2 ‒ CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ‒ Other factors not included - e.g. Thrombus seen on echo (Smoke), renal impairment • Other Indications for Anticoagulation Risk for Bleeding Event • Scoring ‒ HAS-BLED ‒ HEMORR 2 HAGES • Presence of Antiplatelet Agents • Fall Risk

  11. Stroke Risk Stratification in AF CHADS 2 CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc CHADS 2 CHA 2 DS 2 - VASc Heart Failure (1) CHF/LV dysfunction (1) 2 (4/100 pt 2 Hypertension (1) Hypertension (1) years) (2.2%/yr) Age ≥ 75 years (1) Age ≥ 75 years (2) 4 (8.5/100 4 pt years) (4%/yr) Diabetes (1) Diabetes (1) Stroke/TIA (2) Stroke/TIA (2) Vascular disease (1) [Prior MI, PAD, or aortic plaque] Age 65 – 74 years (1) Sex Female (1) TIA = transient ischemic attack PAD = peripheral artery disease LV = left ventricular Gage BF et al. JAMA. 2001; 285:2864-70. Lip GYH et al. Stroke. 2010; 41:2731-8.

  12. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines Risk Category Recommendation CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc = 0 No therapy CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc = 1 OAC or ASA or no therapy CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ≥ 2 OAC Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban Unstable INR OAC = oral anticoagulant = warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban ASA = aspirin January CT et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 28. [Epub ahead of print]

  13. Major Hemorrhage in AF: HEMORR 2 HAGES • Hepatic or renal disease • Ethanol abuse • Malignancy • Older (> 75 years) • Reduced platelet count/function • Rebleeding risk (2 points) • Hypertension (uncontrolled) • Anemia • Genetic factors (CYP2C9 polymorphisms) • Excessive fall risk Any  5 Total Points 0 1 2 3 4 Score • Stroke Adjusted Risk 1.9 2.5 5.3 8.4 10.4 12.3 18.2 *CYP=cytochrome P450 Bleeds per 100 patient years Gage et al. Am Heart J. 2006; 151:713-9.

  14. HAS-BLED Score for Estimating Bleeding Risk in AF n = 3,665 patients taking warfarin from SPORTIF cohort Events Score Major Bleeding H: HTN 1 point 0 points 0.9% A: Abnormal renal/liver function 1 point each 1 point 3.4% S: Stroke 1 point 2 points 4.1% B: Bleeding history/predisposition 1 point 3 points 5.8% L: Labile INR (TTR <60%) 1 point 4 points 8.9% E: Elderly (>65 yr) 1 point 5 points 9.1% D: Drugs † /alcohol 1 point each TOTAL † Antiplatelets, NSAIDS, or steroids TTR - time in therapeutic range Lip GYH et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57:173-80.

  15. Case: Atrial Fibrillation (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score = 4) • 85-year-old female patient • New onset AF > 48 hours • ESRD on hemodialysis • Cardiac stent placed 8 weeks ago ‒ Taking clopidogrel 75 mg daily and aspirin 325 mg daily

  16. Case Discussion Questions • Would this patient’s stroke risk be high enough for anticoagulation? • What agents (including doses) could be used for stroke prophylaxis? • How would you manage risk associated with the need for antiplatelet therapy?

  17. Anticoagulant Sites of Action on the Common Pathway Extrinsic activation pathway Intrinsic activation pathway VII VKA IX VKA X X Direct Xa Inhibitors (Free and bound Xa) Xa Indirect Xa Inhibitors Rivaroxaban , Apixaban, UFH, LMWH Edoxaban Fondaparinux Direct Thrombin Inhibitors Dabigatran, Argatroban Thrombin Prothrombin Bivalirudin, Lepirudin VKA Fibrin Fibrinogen Clot Formation

  18. Facilitating Optimal Antithrombotic Therapy • Cost of therapy (coverage and copay) • Management support • Adherence • Compliance with follow up • Other indications for anticoagulation • Drug/food interactions – Including antiplatelet agents • Organ function (kidneys, liver) • Quality of life • Success/failure of past therapies • Bleeding risks/needs for reversal

  19. Question Which statement is true? a. Opened dabigatran capsules have no impact on bioavailability b. RE-LY assessed dabigatran 75 mg dosing for renal dysfunction c. Rivaroxaban renal dose adjustment depends on indicated use d. Treat paroxysmal AF more aggressively with antithrombotic therapy than persistent AF

  20. AHA/ACC/HRS 2014 Recommendations I C Individualized antithrombotic therapy (stroke, bleeding, patient values/preferences) I B Antithrombotic selection based on thromboembolism risk, not type of AF I B CHA 2 DS 2 ‐ VASc score preferred I B Use warfarin if mechanical heart valve present (Avoid dabigatran [III B]) I A Warfarin: INR weekly initially, then monthly I C Unable to maintain Tx INR on warfarin ‐ use dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban I C Periodic revaluation for stroke to bleeding risk I C AF and mechanical heart valve and procedure: Bridge UFH, LMWH based on risk of thrombosis and bleeding I B Assess renal fxn initially and periodically when using for DTI or anti ‐ Factor Xa agent I C Atrial flutter therapy same as atrial fibrillation IIa B CKD ‐ CrCl < 15 mL/min or hemodialysis – warfarin preferred (NOAC not recommended [III C]) IIb C CKD – Moderate to severe + CHA2DS2 ‐ VASc ≥ 2 – reduced dose NOAC – safety/efficacy unknown IIb C PCI required – Consider Bare Metal Stent to minimize dual antiplatelet therapy Can interrupt during PCI UFH – Unfractionated heparin, LMWH – Low molecular weight heparin, INR – International January CT et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 28. [Epub ahead of print] Normalized Ratio, fxn – function, DTI – direct thrombin inhibitor, CKD – chronic kidney disease, PCI- percutaneous coronary intervention; NOAC – New oral anticoagulant

Recommend


More recommend