presentation to the minnesota legislature february 5 2013
play

Presentation to the Minnesota Legislature February 5, 2013 by - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

American Council fur an Enlergy-Efficient Ecunnmy UTILITY SECTOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN MINNESOTA: DOING WELL.MANY REASONS TO DO MORE Presentation to the Minnesota Legislature February 5, 2013 by Martin Kushler, Ph.D. Senior Fellow American


  1. American Council fur an Enlergy-Efficient Ecunnmy UTILITY SECTOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN MINNESOTA: DOING WELL….MANY REASONS TO DO MORE Presentation to the Minnesota Legislature February 5, 2013 by Martin Kushler, Ph.D. Senior Fellow American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy

  2. The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) • Nonprofit 501(c)(3) dedicated to advancing energy efficiency through research, communications, and conferences. Founded in 1980. • ~40 staff in Washington DC, + field offices in DE, MI, and WI. • Focus on End-Use Efficiency in Industry, Buildings, Utilities, and Transportation; and State & National Policy • Funding: Foundations (34%), Federal & State Grants (7%), Contract work (21%) Conferences and Publications (34%), Contributions and Other (4%) Martin Kushler, Ph.D. (Senior Fellow, ACEEE) • 30 years conducting research in the utility industry, including: • 10 years as Director of the ACEEE Utilities Program • 10 years as the Supervisor of the Evaluation section at the Michigan PSC • Have assisted over a dozen states with utility EE policies • Minnesota experience: • Advisor to Xcel CIP Advisory Board 2000-2008, 2012-present • Advisor to MN Legislative Auditor on CIP evaluation (2005) • Advisor to MNCEE, 2012-present 2 2 Arnennan Buuncil in: an Eh.er§y-EiF:cier1:Enunumy

  3. TOPICS • Minnesota’s energy disadvantage • Why energy efficiency should be the top priority • Energy efficiency as a utility system resource • Utility economic concerns regarding customer EE • Regulatory mechanisms to address utility concerns • Energy efficiency as economic development • A few current ‘hot topics’ • Grading Minnesota • Opportunities for further progress American Buuncil in: an ffiéréy-ElI:cieni Enunumy

  4. KEY POINT #1: MINNESOTA HAS A BIG ENERGY PROBLEM • Minnesota uses a lot of energy – Total cost $12 billion per year in 2000 By 2010, had increased to $21 billion!!! • Minnesota is essentially totally dependent on fuels imported from other states and countries Minnesota imports: – 100% of the coal and uranium used – 100% of oil & petroleum products – 100% of the natural gas 4 Amman Buuncil in: an £:1er§ge-EiF=cier1:Enunumy

  5. COST OF MINNESOTA ’ S ENERGY IMPORTS • Before the new ‘high energy cost’ era (circa 2000), roughly $7 billion per year was leaving Minnesota to pay for fuel imports • At 2010 market prices, this dollar outflow was over $13 billion per year THIS IS A HUGE ECONOMIC DRAIN ON MINNESOTA’S STATE ECONOMY! 5 American Buuncil in: an ffiéréy-ElI:cieni Enunumy

  6. Economic Burden on Minnesota Homes and Businesses: State Taxes vs. Energy Costs (2010) $25.0 $20.9 $20.0 $14.2 Billions of Dollars $15.0 $10.0 $13 billion drain for imported fuels $5.0 $0.0 Total MN Taxes (2010) Total MN Energy Costs (2010) C E E E - - Q 0 6 0 0 _ mmlmn fiuncll for an Energy-Efflnlam Euannmyr

  7. EFFECTS ON THE STATE ECONOMY This additional $6 billion annual drain on Minnesota’s economy is roughly equivalent to the lost payroll from closing 120 major manufacturing plants . (assuming 1000 jobs @ $50,000 each, per plant) Even the Wall Street Journal has written about the unprecedented transfer of wealth, calling it a “bonanza” and “windfall” for the handful of big energy producing states (i.e., AK, NM, ND, WY and TX) and countries (e.g., OPEC). 7 Amman Buunnil in: an £:12r§5'-EiF:ciel1£Enunumy

  8. KEY POINT #2: MINNESOTA’S FUTURE IS NOT IN FOSSIL FUELS MINNESOTA’S RECOVERABLE RESERVES AS A SHARE OF U.S. RECOVERABLE RESERVES (Source: U.S. EIA) • Coal: 0% • Oil: 0 % • Natural Gas: 0% [also Uranium: 0%] Why would Minnesota support policies that encourage greater consumption of these resources? (At the state OR federal level !) 8 A-'|1ur=.na:1 Buunuil in: an [;'|£F§}'-E€.‘:Ei3l1F.E|3UHUH'|)"

  9. 2011 Coal Production by Region Million Short Tons (peroent change from 2010) _ Wstern uncludnsnlaska} 5B?.*1 1-new ' _ Appiaclian . 335.1 ' £11-I1‘!-H Interior ' "IE-9.! _ - {'9.1‘i‘u] Source: LLS. Energy Information Administration, Quarterly Coei Report, October-December 2011 {April 2012), preliminary 2011 date. Production does not include refuse recovery. 9 i1.'nurua'| lluuiuil in’ an ['1arg','-E*"-ci2n'. Euununiy

  10. Figure 9. Oil proved resewes by state/area, 2010 U.S. Total: 25.2 billion barrels of crude oil plus lease condensate [ME Pacific Federal Olfshore WA MT _ 363 369 /*' _ .» VT I-I‘ I 4., NH T? NY: MA 55 3' IA PA ~"' ' ‘ff OH 34 NI C 1|. LN 54 MD —oE 64 wv 302 M01 lg VA N C ‘,4 TN1 AR ‘ 42 SC _.-- MS AL 254 60 GA ‘ll million barrels (statelarea count) I 1,001 16 6,356 (5) - 501161000 (6) "‘\ . 0. ‘ ~r‘,.n¢ M. /. 201 to 500 1 to 200 (16) 6 10 0 (20) I Data withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data

  11. --_:-:I-_I.i|r I.:II I I *--i"--‘Y/-' -‘.. .. . -'j_-,-I .' .51 - . . M .._’D:-:J,_’I_-'?‘r1.'.‘-t Lower 48 stat es shale plays "‘ I I :?~i:];.~*i '-4" »-'F' :0-‘ . 1"-;l_-1*--.__ E‘ “‘ -=\- -gs ‘-"- 1 - :1; \- -L ' . _ 1'-i~\. r ..,:. -. .-,1‘-I -11' . '.--*._-‘-_,._/?.i-.~'--"=_r»'- .=I_' II,-11 _'I~ .--at»-,-1,?¢>,_:;i_".:-1.0.’ 'i.~1‘-~,‘-I.--.11.).-.1" )- .4.-IZ.g _.II 'I{-‘Q1 '-‘T:"_'-i'§i.,L- It f_I-' '-I -u- ;"-"*:-<7?-" '. --"7?irJ’.?%€J.'*‘- Ni0brara* .4 - - --—--___ '"———______ II1" Montana r'\L'I * --1.-.~"-.,;--" i-‘:" * Q-';"' ‘Z " Tihrusl , - Bakkena as ~ _J___ ' = ew<>=B@i - Heflh“ -is Ir _ . "Q 1 {Fl :_I,:i'!': ' Williston ‘_LH’=I-‘- r ' ‘L 1" -l r’-II I ‘ '. II '¢.,' 1' '_.- _ -' I _ .1-"II IF _-"I II fI II |I II Hasm -—-._,.__ l"'F:j§\.,__\- _1 .-' I .2. 1%!‘ - .-1'; i,_II 1%‘; _ r .,51 " m_~i:'0wdsr_Rii1sr mi '§"¢"L K1’ - II I I? _.¢_ I- I 35lI@'_" _._—-B~EiSii2i__I| ‘1 L\\ 9 _.sa~’ I] 'L1.:"- 1 "J- . {.1 _.- ' I 1 e .- "‘. ii ll"-fir‘ _ - *IEl|_EiCl1iEit'l . ," N i __ i'|.|'|iC loan " 1 535;“ ' #2’? ~*-'1'-' ' 5'"--1-'__ . " Mancgs ~ I , 4 ‘gr; i -~.—=4____ I ._ res l'- ' 1 i Xv Ela in -nntrimi 4.. ' _ =Ii_, ;'. / 2 K I 7. .—I—-IT:"==-__f_‘I-%r%g1n I '_ ‘ ‘# ~§Z\I i I -.-;-._ _ i _ _ ._ _ .-,I .-I.-_-.iiir \_w- III ‘ ‘I _I_____.-—-" mm" Forsst , Jr i J" /' - Haé'ir1___ QM . . XII. _' _,II' -_;;_,- s_I-I_II_I_ Citi,iEIssin 5 IIIIIIIIIIS I I I‘ I »_ I _ . ' ,0 arc * " tics I H‘ -l - ' -.\. - I Piceéoéé-'fi 09 J 3 "~._ F) ' ,4‘ = iEBan.Joai;i',ii_ii-"'1--.1-5 '_ " 'l.CaWPi‘ .» _ _I iTIi'E '" Basin.iI_III " "3' I.=--;,¢_ ' , - i Mfll"5I__/4 ,I' Basin.-"' -__1 Elasin ' E:-:cello- " New-J -I ' ’ I . __ __ Mullqr -in I W, 1* —-—' rokss Platform Edllhmy _ -'.:-1-’i‘l=I__ I-' .iHerm'os -_ I . I .--ref‘ I; J If ED /3 HI _ _ _ Kl) M 1 I "H-___ " ' “ ,PfiI'6lEE§'@33m‘='!""- “ Pierre 1 I4-1.1‘ LI;___IIII'i,,r-———¢ 1' *s*"' ~uuasawo+er »1 TI‘ -#1———"“ | - - '\ ' .4 ' , , '1; . I -" .1 '-__- ...L___\ 4 q _ . //-"4 ' ‘ 1 ‘ Jui-'11 .f ‘ R ' .5an In Batqni ns a ko w LII i 6 ‘-. -~ ,1’ i s sin - 35'" 4 Ela in - F Chaffifl" ' | ' Pg .- -. —_ - 'lI X I Ii? _ I __ - I -' Palogtgiérfi Hams’ ELQEIIQI Fir ma Basin aikwgirgir IIII_III_cn"asmE_aIIHI If -Santa" iils'riEi.1= I -_'_' ' . __T_ '.‘ii'si_'_itura,'Los W1Q"“7‘i’~'~/"“‘-i.. Fln3.ri:l- _ vaiia,i,Is Ridge “~ 1’ ~‘_F.@_;_ I ilivalon-' ' I .II Bar Neal—"‘ l Proyincs xf HBII TIII_ 5 | A IJ '5;a;;in_g' . "I _ 4 lionefiprlng PIEIIIIIEI Miles . -_ I ""-~--.___.__1_I|-——-'~TI_—- Elasin Ft. ioonn Salt sin i _ I I K J sa ‘ \I 0 1011 -zuii Barnett Mafia Elflfilfl I -;Tusj$:fld__HI Jr“ 2 1 I ‘ ~ ‘ 1 I. 'ii",=lood_fo rd \&§‘I‘.° n { We "oh \___ J’ II II 21- I I ‘X E E - J a - 4 I;-Q” Bossier ; -II‘ Ii ' I'_"u,_ Pearsall .QI \,I i 1) ' "‘- ’-.<- _,_ '_--_ _ sstsr Shale nlaiis Basins ' ' - ' . Current plays 1 Mined Shae 8I !’ , L1-" '- I'LL I . U ' Prospective plaiis Chalk plow . .»=* 11 P-in ¢_~I ** Mixed shale 8. _ K, Stacked plays I l'm sdone play Ii?“ ,I.;= i Bhsllowsstf iioungsst xaamixed Shalea '11-

  12. As a matter of state policy, Minnesota should be trying to maximize the amount of energy efficiency it can accomplish… … and minimize the amount of additional fuel imports it needs 12 American Buuricil iii: ari tneroii-Eiiscierit Economy

  13. KEY POINT #3 It is much cheaper to save energy than it is to produce it. [We can save electricity for about one-third the cost of producing it through a new power plant …. With no carbon (CO 2 ) emissions] 13 American Buimcil in: arr tiiercii-Ell1cieniEcun0rnir

Recommend


More recommend