presentation
play

Presentation on Strategy of Octane Management at IOCL Mathura - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation on Strategy of Octane Management at IOCL Mathura Refinery New Delhi, 16 th 17 th April 12 IOCL Mathura Refinery IOCL Mathura Refinery IOCL Mathura Refinery Agenda Mathura Refinery Configuration &


  1. Presentation on Strategy of Octane Management at IOCL – Mathura Refinery New Delhi, 16 th – 17 th April’ 12 IOCL – Mathura Refinery IOCL – Mathura Refinery IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  2. Agenda  Mathura Refinery – Configuration & Major Process Units.  MS Barrel of Mathura Refinery.  Challenges on meeting EURO-IV MS specification.  Octane Management Practice at Mathura Refinery.  Conclusion. 2 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  3. Mathura Refinery Configuration:  Crude Processing Capacity 8.0 MMTPA  Major Units Atmospheric & Vacuum Unit FCCU, OHCU CRU, Isomerisation, FCC Gasoline Treater DHDT, DHDS VBU, BBU Sulfur Recovery Units, Tail Gas Treatment Unit HGUs, Power Plant, Raw water & Effluent Treatment Plant  Crude Processed High Sulfur, Nigerian, Bombay High  Crude Mix 3 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  4. MS Barrel of Mathura Refinery: Major Streams:  Treated FCC Gasoline  Isomerate  Reformate  OHCU Light Naphtha  Straight Run Naphtha 4 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  5. Importance of RON on Refinery Profitability: Base Case: Mass Flow RON Olefins Aromatics Benzene Sulfur TMT % % % ppm Light Isomerate 27.62 88.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Isomerate 3.07 80.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Reformate 36.56 99.5 1 80 1.8 0 FCC Gasoline 33.19 90.5 50 12.5 0.5 100 103.8 104.0 OHCU LN 3.02 70.0 1 8 0.8 5 SRN 0.35 57.0 1 8 2 90 103.5 TMT/Month 103.8 91.6 16.6 29.9 0.8 32.4 103.0 102.5 102.1 102.0 Case-I: RON of Reformate Reduced by 1 Number 101.5 Mass Flow RON Olefins Aromatics Benzene Sulfur 101.0 TMT % % % ppm Base Case Case-I 27.62 88.0 0 0.1 0 0 Light Isomerate 3.07 80.0 0 0.1 0 0 Monthly MS Production (Thousand MT) Heavy Isomerate 36.56 98.5 1 80 1.8 0 Heavy Reformate 33.19 90.5 50 12.5 0.5 100 FCC Gasoline 1.26 70.0 1 8 0.8 5 OHCU LN 0.35 57.0 1 8 2 90 SRN TMT/Month 102.1 91.6 16.9 30.3 0.8 32.9  Decrease of 1 RON of reformate – Decrease in MS Production by 1.8 TMT. 5 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  6. Importance of RON on Refinery Profitability: Base Case: Mass Flow RON Olefins Aromatics Benzene Sulfur TMT % % % ppm Light Isomerate 27.62 88.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Isomerate 3.07 80.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Reformate 36.56 99.5 1 80 1.8 0 104.0 103.8 FCC Gasoline 33.19 90.5 50 12.5 0.5 100 OHCU LN 3.02 70.0 1 8 0.8 5 103.5 SRN 0.35 57.0 1 8 2 90 103.0 TMT/Month 103.8 91.6 16.6 29.9 0.8 32.4 102.3 102.5 102.0 101.5 Case-II: RON of FCC Gasoline Reduced by 1 Number Base Case Case-II Monthly MS Production (Thousand MT) Mass Flow RON Olefins Aromatics Benzene Sulfur TMT % % % ppm Light Isomerate 27.62 88.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Isomerate 3.07 80.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Reformate 36.56 99.5 1 80 1.8 0 FCC Gasoline 33.19 89.5 50 12.5 0.5 100 OHCU LN 1.51 70.0 1 8 0.8 5 SRN 0.35 57.0 1 8 2 90 TMT/Month 102.3 91.6 16.9 30.2 0.8 32.8  Decrease of 1 RON of FCC Gasoline – Decrease in MS Production by 1.5 TMT. 6 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  7. Importance of RON on Refinery Profitability: Base Case: Mass Flow RON Olefins Aromatics Benzene Sulfur TMT % % % ppm Light Isomerate 27.62 88.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Isomerate 3.07 80.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Reformate 36.56 99.5 1 80 1.8 0 104.0 103.8 FCC Gasoline 33.19 90.5 50 12.5 0.5 100 OHCU LN 3.02 70.0 1 8 0.8 5 103.5 SRN 0.35 57.0 1 8 2 90 103.0 102.6 TMT/Month 103.8 91.6 16.6 29.9 0.8 32.4 102.5 102.0 101.5 Case-II: RON of Isomerate reduced by 1 Number Base Case Case-II Mass Flow RON Olefins Aromatics Benzene Sulfur Monthly MS Production (Thousand MT) TMT % % % ppm Light Isomerate 27.62 87.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Isomerate 3.07 80.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Reformate 36.56 99.5 1 80 1.8 0 FCC Gasoline 33.19 89.5 50 12.5 0.5 100 OHCU LN 1.76 70.0 1 8 0.8 5 SRN 0.35 57.0 1 8 2 90 TMT/Month 102.6 91.6 16.8 30.2 0.8 32.8  Decrease of 1 RON of Isomerate – Decrease in MS Production by 1.3 TMT. 7 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  8. Challenges & Opportunity: Challenge:  Increasing High Sulfur Crude basket.  Decreasing N+2A.  Decreasing RON of Reformate.  Increasing severity of Catalytic Reformer.  Increasing Coke formation.  Throughput limitation with fixed regeneration capability. Opportunity:  Increasing Isomerate RON.  Decrease RON loss in FCC Gasoline treater by altering yield and routing. Alternative:  Revamp CCRU. 8 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  9. Optimization of FCC Gasoline: LCN LPG Isomerization Gasoline Heart Cut to From Isomerisation Unit SHU Isomerate HDS MS Pool HCN Treated FCC Gasoline Gasoline Splitter Unit 9 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  10. Optimization of FCC Gasoline: Parameters LCN Heart Cut HCN (Treated) RON 94 - 96 90 - 92 89-90 Sulfur (ppm) < 10 ppm 120 – 130 ppm 120 ppm Isomerate Yield: 87 % RON: 87 MS Pool Heart Cut Treated Gasoline Yield: 99 % RON: 89-90 10 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  11. Optimization of FCC Gasoline: Best Practice: • Minimize Heart Cut Yield • Preferential Routing to MS Pool • Isomerisation Gasoline Splitter Unit Constrains: • Benzene in MS Pool LCN • Olefins Gasoline From SHU LPG Isomerization Minimize Heart Direct Routing of Heart Isomerate Cut Yield Cut to MS Pool HDS MS Pool HCN Treated FCC Gasoline 11 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  12. Optimization of FCC Gasoline: Case Study-I BASE CASE: All Heart Cut routed to Isomerisation 106.5 105.9 Monthly 106 Production RON Olefins Aromatics Benzene Sulfur 105.5 TMT % % % ppm 105 Light Isomerate 27.62 88.0 0 0.1 0 0 104.5 Heavy Isomerate 3.07 80.0 0 0.1 0 0 103.8 104 Heavy Reformate 36.56 99.5 1 80 1.8 0 103.5 FCC Gasoline 33.19 90.5 50 12.5 0.5 100 FCC Heart Cut 0.00 92.0 58 4 3.5 130 103 OHCU LN 3.02 70.0 1 8 0.8 5 102.5 SRN 0.35 57.0 1 8 2 90 Base Case Case-I Monthly MS Production (Thousand MT) TMT/Month 103.8 91.6 16.6 29.9 0.8 32.4 CASE-I: 75% of Heart Cut routed to Isomerisation Benefits: Monthly • MS Production increase by 2.1 TMT/Month. Production RON Olefins Aromatics Benzene Sulfur TMT % % % ppm Light Isomerate 27.62 88.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Isomerate 3.07 80.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Reformate 36.56 99.5 1 80 1.8 0 Constrains: FCC Gasoline 35.27 90.5 50 12.5 0.7 100 • RON of MS Pool. FCC Heart Cut 0.00 92.0 58 4 3.5 130 OHCU LN 3.02 70.0 1 8 0.8 5 • Temperature exotherm in HDS Reactor. SRN 0.30 57.0 1 8 2 90 TMT/Month 105.9 91.6 17.3 29.5 0.8 33.7 12 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  13. Optimization of FCC Gasoline: Case Study-II BASE CASE: All Heart Cut routed to Isomerisation 112 Monthly 110.0 Production RON Olefins Aromatics Benzene Sulfur 110 TMT % % % ppm 108 Light Isomerate 27.62 88.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Isomerate 3.07 80.0 0 0.1 0 0 106 103.8 Heavy Reformate 36.56 99.5 1 80 1.8 0 104 FCC Gasoline 33.19 90.5 50 12.5 0.5 100 102 FCC Heart Cut 0.00 92.0 58 4 3.5 130 OHCU LN 3.02 70.0 1 8 0.8 5 100 SRN 0.35 57.0 1 8 2 90 Base Case Case-II Monthly MS Production (Thousand MT) TMT/Month 103.8 91.6 16.6 29.9 0.8 32.4 CASE-II: 75 % of Heart Cut routed to MS Pool Benefits: Monthly • MS Production increase by 6.2 TMT/Month. Production RON Olefins Aromatics Benzene Sulfur TMT % % % ppm Light Isomerate 27.62 88.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Isomerate 3.07 80.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Reformate 36.56 99.5 1 80 1.8 0 Constrains: FCC Gasoline 33.19 90.5 50 12.5 0.5 100 • Benzene in MS Pool. FCC Heart Cut 6.22 92.0 58 4 3.5 130 OHCU LN 3.02 70.0 1 8 0.8 5 • Olefins & Sulfur in MS Pool. SRN 0.35 57.0 1 8 2 90 TMT/Month 110.0 91.6 19.0 28.9 0.9 37.9 13 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  14. Isomerisation Unit Light Isomerate Isomerisation Reactors DIH Light Naphtha NHDT Side Cut Recycle Heart Cut Heavy Isomerate Total Isomerate 14 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  15. Optimization of Isomerate: Light Isomerate: RON: 88.0 – 89.0 Yield: 90-95 % of Total Isomerate Total Isomerate: RON: 87 Heavy Isomerate: RON: 80.0 – 82.0 Yield: 5-10 % of Total Isomerate Heavy Isomerate: Rich in C 6 & C 7 components. Good Reformer Feed. CATALYTIC REFORMER Reformate RON: 82 RON: 98 15 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

  16. Optimization of Isomerate – Case Study BASE CASE: Heavy Isomerate Routed to MS Pool 105 Mass Flow RON Olefins Aromatics Benzene Sulfur 104.7 TMT % % % ppm Light Isomerate 27.62 88.0 0 0.1 0 0 104.5 Heavy Isomerate 3.07 80.0 0 0.1 0 0 Heavy Reformate 36.56 99.5 1 80 1.8 0 104 103.8 FCC Gasoline 33.19 90.5 50 12.5 0.5 100 OHCU LN 3.02 70.0 1 8 0.8 5 103.5 SRN 0.35 57.0 1 8 2 90 103 TMT/Month 103.8 91.6 16.6 29.9 0.8 32.4 Base Case Case-I Monthly MS Production (Thousand MT) Benefits: CASE-I: Heavy Isomerate Routed to Reformate • MS Production increase by 0.9 TMT/Month. Mass Flow RON Olefins Aromatics Benzene Sulfur TMT % % % ppm Light Isomerate 27.62 88.0 0 0.1 0 0 Constrains: Heavy Isomerate 0.00 80.0 0 0.1 0 0 • Capacity utilization of reformer. Heavy Reformate 39.16 99.5 1 80 1.8 0 FCC Gasoline 33.19 90.5 50 12.5 0.5 100 • Double processing of a single stream. OHCU LN 3.02 70.0 1 8 0.8 5 SRN 1.70 57.0 1 8 2 90 TMT/Month 104.7 91.6 16.6 31.6 0.8 33.3 16 IOCL – Mathura Refinery

Recommend


More recommend