practices
play

Practices The RP he RP Jour ourney ney in in Wic ichita, K - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Restorative Practices The RP he RP Jour ourney ney in in Wic ichita, K hita, KS Jan an L. L. Pete eterse sen, n, EdD EdD Rob ob Simo Simon, n, MA MAC Goals of This Session : Over Ov erview view and e and empha mphasis sis


  1. Restorative Practices The RP he RP Jour ourney ney in in Wic ichita, K hita, KS Jan an L. L. Pete eterse sen, n, EdD EdD Rob ob Simo Simon, n, MA MAC

  2. Goals of This Session : Over Ov erview view and e and empha mphasis sis : : � Ho How w we de e developed our eloped our initia initiativ tives es � Continuing t Continuing the par he paradigm adigm shift shift and RP and RP jour journey ney � Wher here w e we ar e are no e now: w: st stories ories fr from om the field the field

  3. Challenges! We Get It! Often ten attrib ribut uted ed to Mother ther “We, the willing, led Teresa... sa... by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, for so long, with so little, we are now qualified to do anything with nothing .” Konstantin Josef Jireček Dec 13, 1881- Czech Historian, Diplomat and Slavist

  4. Cur Current Alliance ent Alliances f s for W or Wic ichita R hita RP � Kansas State Department of Education (KSDE) � Kansas Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution (KIPCOR) � International Institute for Restorative Practices (IIRP)

  5. KSDE & USD 259 Adopted Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS): A Holistic Approach

  6. Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) � Every child learns and achieves to high standards � Learning includes academic and social competencies � Every member of the education community continues to grow, learn and reflect � Change is intentional, coherent and dynamic

  7. Rethinking School Discipline PBIS Approach Traditional Approach � Proactive and � Reactionary and expected unexpected � Teaches � Often alienates the appropriate ways individual for needs to be met � No opportunity to � Opportunity to redress wrong repair harm

  8. Punitive Approach � Shifts accountability away from school and students — Blaming and Shaming goes both ways � Does not recognize relationship between academic skills and behaviors � Does not problem solve or work to change behaviors

  9. Positive Behavior Intervention Supports PBIS framework PROFOUNDLY MATTERS! � Rather than blaming, shaming, excluding the student, a holistic approach is considered. � The fundamental aim of PBIS is to PREVENT violence, aggression, and disruptive behaviors before they occur! � SUSPENSIONS AND EXPULSIONS ARE THE LAST RESORT.

  10. KEY POINT “You can’t make someone feel worse and expect them to perform better!” Randy Sprick, PhD, Safe & Civil Schools

  11. The Fit of Restorative Practices � A philosophy, a change of heart and NOT a program. � Research based strategies to address social and emotional learning. � Requires ongoing learning and reflection. � In other words, IT STARTS WITH ME!

  12. Our Our Ongoing Pr Ongoing Process ocess MTSS & PBIS: The Bridge to Restorative Practices

  13. )

  14. MTSS: Tier I � Proactive, systematic, school wide strategies to teach prosocial skills. � Circles in whole classes or large groups � Norm-setting � Problem solving � Academic skills

  15. MTSS: Tier II � Early intervention for At Risk behaviors � Whole classrooms, small groups � Alternatives to suspension & expulsion � Increased academic support � Restorative Questions � Peacemaking circles

  16. RESTORATIVE QUESTIONS � What happened? � Who has been affected by what has happened? In what way? � What do you think needs to happen to make things right?

  17. MTSS: Tier III � Intensive supports for high risk behaviors � Collaboration with community supports � Behavioral Intervention Support Plans � Formal Restorative Conferences conducted by a trained facilitator. � Parents are involved in all levels of the MTSS Tiers.

  18. Restorative Practices: Basic Philosophy Peop eople ar le are ha e happier an ppier and d mor more e lik likel ely y to ma to make e positiv positive e chan hange ge whe hen t n tho hose in a se in auth uthority do ority do things WITH things WITH them them rather than ther than TO the them or m or FOR the them. m.

  19. SOCIAL DISCIPLINE WINDOW From IIRP Website – Saufler Anxious, vigilant Passive enabling Reactive, defensive

  20. RELAXED ALERTNESS � Adults MODEL � Emotional regulation — keeping our own emotions in check to help de- escalate emotionally charged situations. � Active listening and perspective taking. � The behaviors we want to see! If we fly off the handle, how can we expect anything different from our students?

  21. Compass Compass of of Shame: Shame: Whe hen po n positi sitive e af affec ect ha t has bee s been n inte interrup upte ted d

  22. Esc Escaping ping th the e Comp Compas ass s of of Shame Shame: : Finding Find ing You our r Cen Cente ter Expressing authentic emotion without finger pointing, blaming, or shaming Accepting ownership for one’s part in the dilemma

  23. FAIR PROCESS Engagement: Everyone affected by a decision • is given a chance to provide input. Explanation: After a leader has made a • decision, that decision has been made clear to stakeholders. Expectation Clarity: Everyone involved • understands the implications of the decision, the specific expectations, and the consequences. • It’s ALL about RESPECT and OPEN communication!!

  24. STICK WITH IT until your breakthrough!

  25. Our Gr Our Grass assroots oots Wichita, Kansas West High School As A Model

  26. Our G Our Grassr assroots oots Fir First st Yea ear � Starting small with people who are already restorative in nature � Conducting a Book Study � Training staff � Forming a School Climate Team � Fitting practices within existing district initiatives

  27. Our G Our Grassr assroots oots Secon Sec ond d Yea ear � Ongoing training � Implementing circles and RP strategies at all levels of MTSS � Working closely with leadership team � Ongoing work with key supporters and the School Climate Team � Conducting school climate surveys

  28. Our G Our Grassr assroots oots Thir hird d Yea ear � Continuing second year activities � Implementing circles and RP strategies at all levels of MTSS � Deeper conversations with district level leadership and gaining support � Inviting board members to trainings � Ongoing data collection

  29. Our G Our Grassr assroots oots Fou ourth thYea ear � Ongoing RP activities from previous years � Including feeder pattern schools in conversations and trainings � Developing community coalition � Training for district leadership � Engaging students � Expanding school climate team

  30. STUDENT VOICES ESSENTIAL !!! • I want a teacher who ca cares es about me! • I want a teacher who is pr prep epar ared ed! • I want a teacher who will treat me fair airly! • I want a teacher who knows their stuf stuff! • I want a teacher who res espe pects cts me! • I want a teacher who has a sa safe classroom! • I want a teacher who teaches rea eal w l wor orld ld skills ! • I want a teacher who cha hall llen enge ges me! • I want a teacher who li likes es stud studen ents! ts! • I want a teacher who has a sense of hu humor mor!

  31. STORIES FROM THE FIELD NOTE: Contact Jan or Rob for a reflection of stories

  32. Wichita West High School

  33. Qualitative Research: STUD STUDENTS ENTS “With the talking stick, we didn’t have to compete to speak.” “Everyone had a chance to say something.” “Behaviors are better and more respectful.” “It worked to stop bullying.” “Finally, the bully didn’t talk over everyone.”

  34. Qualitative Research: STUDENT � “Oh kids are talking alright. They hey ar are scr e screaming eaming and and yelling and fighting an elling and fighting and d scr screaming eaming and and yelling and elling and fighting to be he fighting to be hear ard. B d. But ut still, still, NOB NOBOD ODY is is listening. listening. TOD ODAY , , we were listened to.”

  35. Qualitative Research: Teacher � “The process was amazing. I tried everything to deal with bullying. We found a safe way for everyone to have a voice without blaming or targeting anyone specifically. The bully was able to apologize. Those who were bullied got to share how bullying made them feel. It was a learning experience about empathy, and I teach math. It was awesome!”

  36. Qualitative Research: Parent “If this is how you ar are handling e handling bull bullying in y ying in your our sc school, w hool, we e LOVE VE your school.”

  37. Further Research � Reduction in school suspensions and expulsions � Improved retention of teachers � Fewer incidences of fighting and aggression � Increased positive school climate � Fewer office referrals � Improved staff to staff, student to staff, and student to student relationships

  38. Goals f Goals for the Futur or the Future Wha hat t we ar e are e dr drea eaming ming .. ... Integrated and consistent implementation � of Restorative Practices throughout Wichita West High School Wichita’s USD 259 as a model Restorative � Practices School District Restorative Practices promoted � throughout the state of Kansas Collaboration between IIRP and KIPCOR � A Midwest Center for Restorative Practices � in Kansas

Recommend


More recommend