polarimetry for a storage ring electric dipole moment
play

POLARIMETRY FOR A STORAGE-RING ELECTRIC-DIPOLE-MOMENT MEASUREMENT 8 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

POLARIMETRY FOR A STORAGE-RING ELECTRIC-DIPOLE-MOMENT MEASUREMENT 8 JUNE 2018 MARIA UREK FOR THE JEDI COLLABORATION MOTIVATION Barion Asymmetry Problem Barion Asymmetry Observation Standard Cosmological Model x ( N N


  1. POLARIMETRY FOR A STORAGE-RING ELECTRIC-DIPOLE-MOMENT MEASUREMENT 8 JUNE 2018 MARIA UREK FOR THE JEDI COLLABORATION Ż

  2. MOTIVATION Barion Asymmetry Problem Barion Asymmetry Observation Standard Cosmological Model x ( N – N ) / N - 1 0 - 1 8 6 1 0 ~ 1 0 B B γ Preconditions needed to explain it (Sakharov): and C violation ● C P ● Baryon number violation ● Thermal non-equilibrium in the early Universe Antimatter Matter violation in Standard Model C P ● Electroweak sector (CKM matrix well established) ● Strong interactions ( -term, strong- θ puzzle) C P Predictions orders of magnitude too small to explain the asymmetry! New sources of C violation can be seen in EDM of particles P Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 2

  3. ELECTRIC DIPOLE MOMENT -symmetry violation C P S External fields μ d Pseudo vectors The observable quantity - Energy: ● of electric dipole in electric field ● of magnetic dipole in magnetic field H violates T and P symmetry if d ≠ 0 - violation T violation ( C conserved) C P P T Page 3 Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018

  4. ELECTRIC DIPOLE MOMENT Current limits Upper limits Page 4 Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018

  5. PRINCIPLE OF EDM MEASUREMENT Charged Particles in a Storage Ring General idea: Observation of EDM interaction with electric field Simplified case – pure E field: 0: spin rotation out of horizontal plane ≠ η Build-up of vertical polarization ∝ spin rotation angle η EDM ~ 10 -29 e·cm effect of the order of deg/hour μ Extremely small effects! “Frozen spin” - Spin parallel to momentum Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 5

  6. HOW TO MEASURE BEAM POLARIZATION? Scattering from Carbon target 2 π detector - “beam” view Typically A ~ 0 . 6 y Right/Left asymmetry ∝ vertical component of polarization P y EDM signal appears here Up/Down asymmetry ∝ horizontal component of polarization P x Needed to maintain “frozen spin” condition Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 6

  7. POLARIMETRY FOR AN EDM EXPERIMENT Challenge: measurement of tiny polarization build-up For proton EDM ~ 10 -29 e·cm EDM signal and ~ 1year of measurement Systematics count! Polarimetry requirements Long term reproducibility: ➔ Continuous measurement for a long time Figure of Merit Minimization of asymmetry error: ➔ Maximization of FoM Efficiency High A y Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 7

  8. ACTIVITY AT COSY Jülich Electric Dipole moment Investigations (JEDI) R&D with towards first proof-of-principle EDM experiment for deuterons and protons Polarimetry-group activity: ● Development of dedicated polarimeter based on LYSO crystals ● Database experiment with WASA detector Motivation: ● Optimal configuration of the polarimeter Goal: A y , A yy , d /d σ Ω for ● dC elastic scattering ● main background reactions (deuteron breakup) http://collaborations.fz-juelich.de/ikp/jedi/ Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 8

  9. DEUTERON DATABASE EXPERIMENT WITH WASA Detector Setup Beamtime in November 2016 (2 weeks) Deuteron energies: 170, 200, 235, 270, 300, 340, 380 MeV Nominal beam polarization: (P y ,P yy ) = (0,0), (-⅔,0), (⅔,0), (½, -½), (-1, 1) o 17 Targets: C and CH 2 Setup: Modified WASA Forward Detector Range Hodoscopes Plastic scintillators o 4 o 4 Target position Window Counters Plastic scintillators ● Full coverage φ θ range 4° - 17° Proportional ● o 17 Trigger Hodoscope Chambers Plastic scintillator Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 9

  10. DATABASE EXPERIMENT WITH WASA Analyzing power for elastic dC scattering Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 10

  11. DATABASE EXPERIMENT WITH WASA Analyzing power for elastic dC scattering Preliminary Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 11

  12. DATABASE EXPERIMENT WITH WASA Cross section for E d kin = 270 MeV Elastic dC cross-section: Luminosity calculated using deuteron-proton ● elastic scattering registered with CH 2 target PLB 549, 307 Discrepancy in available world data even 40% ● Statistical errors shown ● Additional systematic errors ~ 7% ● Ermish et al. PRC 71, 064004 Sekiguchi et al. PRC 65, 034003 Hatanaka et al. Private communication Sakamoto et al. PLB 367, 60 Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 12

  13. DATABASE EXPERIMENT WITH WASA Figure of Merit for E d kin = 270 MeV FoM = d /d A σ φ 2 y PLB 549, 307 Optimal working conditions for θ : 5-9 o FoM = d /d σ Ω A y 2 Artificial enhancement by sin term θ Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 13

  14. DATABASE EXPERIMENT WITH WASA Figure of Merit for E d kin = 200 MeV FoM = d /d A σ φ 2 y PRC 70, 034318 Optimal working conditions for θ : 12-16 o FoM = d /d σ Ω A y 2 Artificial enhancement by sin term θ Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 14

  15. WASA AS A POLARIMETER Possible energy acceptance: 1. Track reaching stopping layer ● Pure elastic deuteron d ● Single deuteron ● Single track FRH1 FRH2 2. Single track in one layer before FRH3 3. Single track in two layers before etc. Single track in FRH3 Pure deuteron elastic Single deuteron in FRH3 Elliptical tight cut Band cut All triggers d p Trigger cut Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 15

  16. WASA AS A POLARIMETER Figure of Merit for E d kin = 200 MeV FoM = NA y 2 – detector acceptance included ● Flat for 3-14 o for single track in stopping layer (red line). ● Removing protons enhances FoM for higher angles because of larger A y (magenta line). Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 16

  17. WASA AS A POLARIMETER Figure of Merit for E d kin = 235 MeV FoM = NA y 2 – detector acceptance included ● Optimal for single track in stopping layer (red line). ● Distribution is peaking. ● Removing protons doesn't enhance FoM but enhances A y (magenta line). Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 17

  18. WASA AS A POLARIMETER Figure of Merit for E d kin = 270 MeV FoM = NA y 2 – detector acceptance included ● Optimal single track in one before stopping layer (red line). ● Peak narrower then for 235 MeV. ● Removing protons doesn't enhance FoM but enhances A y (magenta line and blue line). Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 18

  19. WASA AS A POLARIMETER Figure of Merit for E d kin = 300 MeV FoM = NA y 2 – detector acceptance included ● Optimal for single track in stopping layer (red line). ● Peak is narrower then for 270 MeV. ● Removing protons doesn't enhance FoM but enhances A y (magenta line and blue line). Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 19

  20. SUMMARY ● EDMs of elementary particles key for understanding sources of CP violation ➔ explanation of matter – antimatter imbalance ● Extremely ambitious measurement for charged particles ● Preparations for proof-of-principle experiment at COSY in progress for deuterons ● Polarimetry development to face the challenge of measurement of tiny polarization build-up ● Database measurement shows right direction to go Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 20

  21. THANK YOU! http://collaborations.fz-juelich.de/ikp/jedi/ mariakzurek@gmail.com @mariakzurek Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 21

  22. BACKUP Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 22

  23. MOTIVATION Electric Dipole Moment of proton and deuteron Disentangle the fundamental source(s) of EDMs How do we understand it? Dream Experiment Where is the EDM? Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 23

  24. SPIN IN MAGNETIC AND ELECTRIC FIELD Thomas-BMT equation: In storage rings (magnetic field – vertical, electric field - radial) Magnetic moment causes fast spin precession in horizontal plane Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 24

  25. EXPERIMENTAL REQUIREMENTS High precision storage ring alignment, stability, field homogeneity High intensity beams N = 4 x 10 10 per fill Polarized hadron beams P = 0.8 Large electric fields E = 10 MV/m Long spin coherence time τ = 1000 s Polarimetry analyzing power A = 0.6, acc. f = 0.005 Challenge: systematic uncertainties on the same level! Even in Pure Electric Ring – lots of sources of syst. uncertainties → Very small radial B field can mimic an EDM effect μB r ~ dE r Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 25

  26. R&D AT COSY EDMs of charged hadrons: p, d R&D with deuterons p = 1 GeV/c G = -0.14256177(72) ν s ≈ -0.161 f ≈ 120 kHz Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 26

  27. R&D AT COSY Measurement of fast precessing polarization Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 17, 052803 (2014) Precise determination of spin tune Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 094801 (2015) Spin coherence time Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 054801 (2016) Phase lock of spin precession Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 014801 (2017) Dedicated polarimetry & Database for future polarimetry Beam instrumentation Wien filter commissioning Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 27

  28. WIEN FILTER METHOD E* field tilts spin due to EDM 50% of time up 50% of time down Maria Żurek – Polarimetry for EDM 8 June 2018 Page 28

Recommend


More recommend