pol pol201y1 po politics of development
play

POL POL201Y1: Po Politics of Development Karol Czuba, University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

POL POL201Y1: Po Politics of Development Karol Czuba, University of Toronto Lecture 7: Institutions Institutionalism Anno Announc uncements Library session: Today, 2-3.30 pm, in Robarts 4033 Attendance is mandatory Kevins


  1. POL POL201Y1: Po Politics of Development Karol Czuba, University of Toronto Lecture 7: Institutions Institutionalism

  2. Anno Announc uncements • Library session: – Today, 2-3.30 pm, in Robarts 4033 – Attendance is mandatory • Kevin’s office hours: – Tuesday, 13 th June, 1.30-2.30 pm, in either SS 3058 or PoliSci Lounge • Volunteer notetakers needed by Accessibility Services Karol Czuba, University of Toronto

  3. Re Recap • Modernization • Neoliberalism • Geography • History, including colonialism / imperialism à • Exploitation / dependency Karol Czuba, University of Toronto

  4. Re Recap • Geography: why does it matter? – Easterly and Levine: “tropics, germs, and crops affect development through institutions ” – Easterly, William, and Ross Levine. 2003. “Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 50 (1): 3-39. • History: why does it matter? – Exploitation à dependency / underdevelopment theories Karol Czuba, University of Toronto – Institutions

  5. In Institu titutio tions • ”Stable, valued, recurring patterns of behavior” Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies . New Haven: Yale University Press. – • ”Humanly devised constraints that structure political, economic, and social interaction” North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. – • " First , an institution is a set of rules that structure social interactions in particular ways. Second , for a set of rules to be an institution, knowledge of Karol Czuba, University of Toronto these rules must be shared by the members of the relevant community or society.” – Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • “Rules of the game” – North, Douglass. “Institutions and Credible Commitment.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) / Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 149, no. 1 (1993): 11-23.

  6. Ty Types of institutions • Formal: – E.g. rule of law, laws, courts, recognized rights (such as property rights), systems of contract enforcement • Informal: – E.g. customs, norms, ideological consensus Karol Czuba, University of Toronto

  7. Ev Evidence that institutions ma matter: r: Ac Acemogl glu et et al. (2001) • Disease environment determined colonial policies, which in turn resulted in the establishment of different political regimes and divergent development trajectories. Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. – Robinson. 2001. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91 (5). Karol Czuba, University of Toronto

  8. Ev Evidence that institutions matter: Sokoloff an and Eng Engerman • Latin America: – Large and concentrated factor endowments: – Brazil and the Caribbean: production of sugar and other highly valued crops (that required extensive use of slaves) – Mexico and Peru: rich mineral resources -> – Highly unequal distribution of wealth, elite persistence and stability -> – In the long term, low economic development • Canada and the United States: Karol Czuba, University of Toronto – More limited factor endowments: production of grains and hays, based on labourers of European descent who had relatively high and similar levels of human capital -> – Relatively equal distribution of wealth -> – Large middle class, small elites -> – High economic development – Sokoloff, Kenneth, and Stanley Engerman. 2000. "History lessons: Institutions, factor endowments, and paths of development in the New World." Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3): 217-32.

  9. Ev Evidence that institutions matter: : Ro Rodrik et et al. • Deep determinants of economic development: – Geography – Market integration – Institutions • The quality of institutions contributes to income level much more than geography and trade Karol Czuba, University of Toronto Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian and Francesco – Trebbi. 2004. “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development.” Journal of Economic Growth 9: 131-165.

  10. Ev Evidence that institutions matter: Dell • Mita : forced labour system instituted by the Spanish government in Peru and Bolivia in 1573 and abolished in 1812 • 200 indigenous communities required to send one-seventh of their adult male population Karol Czuba, University of Toronto to work in the Potosí silver mines and Huancavelica mercury mines • Elevation, ethnic distribution, etc. identical across the study (grey) boundary (natural experiment)

  11. Ev Evidence that institutions matter: Dell • Long-run mita effect: – 25% lower household consumption – 6% higher childhood stunting – Decreased integration into into road networks – Increased prevalence of subsistence agriculture – Historically weaker property rights Karol Czuba, University of Toronto – Historically lower education attainment Dell, Melissa. 2010. “The Persistent Effects of Peru’s Mining Mita .” Econometrica 78 (6): 1863–1903. –

  12. Ev Evidence that institutions matter: Ac Acemogl glu et et al. (2002) • “Reversal of fortune”: – In 1500, civilizations in Meso-America, the Andes, India, and Southeast Asia were richer than those located in North America, Australia, New Zealand, or the southern cone of Latin America – 500 years later, the reverse is true Karol Czuba, University of Toronto

  13. Ev Evidence that institutions matter: Ac Acemogl glu et et al. (2002) • Differential profitability of alternative colonization strategies in different environments: – Extractive institutions that concentrate power in the hands of a small elite in prosperous and densely settled areas (forced labour in mines and plantations, excessive taxation) – Institutions of private property (i.e. inclusive institutions) in previously sparsely settled areas that saw European settlement (encouragement of commerce, and industry through secure property rights) Karol Czuba, University of Toronto • Institutional reversal à reversal in relative incomes – Acemoglu, Daron, James Robinson, and Simon Johnson. 2002. “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4): 1231-1294.

  14. Bu But why y do institutions s ma matter? r? Karol Czuba, University of Toronto

  15. Func Functio tions ns of ins institutio titutions ns • Reduction of costs of political and economic bargaining: – Bargaining / contestation as an integral component of both political action and economic exchange à – Contracts – Procedures that enforce compliance, detect deviations / violations, and reduce uncertainty • Constraints on power: Karol Czuba, University of Toronto – ”Humanly devised constraints that structure political, economic, and social interaction.” North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance . Cambridge: Cambridge University – Press.

  16. In Institu titutio tionaliz alizatio tion • Institutionalization: “the process by which organizations and procedures acquire value and stability” Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies . New Haven: Yale University Press. – • Institutionalization != political development • Political development: “change over time in political institutions.” Fukuyama, Francis. 2014. Political Order and Political Decay . New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux. – Karol Czuba, University of Toronto

  17. In Institu titutio tional al em emer ergen ence • Path dependence and increasing returns / self-reinforcement • Critical junctures • Design vs. accident Karol Czuba, University of Toronto

  18. In Institu titutio tional al em emer ergen ence: e: des esig ign • Interclan conflict in Genoa in the 12 th century • A series of civil wars • Critical juncture: participation in imperial campaign to conquer Sicily offered considerable rewards if the Genoese could unite à • 1194: decision to alter the existing political system (i.e. alter the rules of the Genoese political game) and appoint a podesta , a non-Genoese hired by the Karol Czuba, University of Toronto city to be its military leader, judge, and administrator for a short period of time (usually a year) Greif, Avner. 1998. “Self-enforcing political systems and economic growth: Late Medieval Genoa.” In Bates, Robert H., Avner – Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, Barry R. Weingast (eds.). Analytic narratives . Princeton: Princeton University Press. 25-64.

  19. In Institu titutio tional al em emer ergen ence: : accident • Long-term path dependent evolution à • Increasing returns / self-reinforcement à • Lock-in Karol Czuba, University of Toronto

Recommend


More recommend