penplace
play

PenPlace Aurora Highlands Civic Association January 31, 2013 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 13, 2022 •521 likes •912 views

PenPlace Aurora Highlands Civic Association January 31, 2013 Presentation Outline Site Analysis Process To-Date Project Overview 2 Site Analysis Location Site Analysis Site Analysis 4 Existing Condition Site Analysis Site

  1. PenPlace Aurora Highlands Civic Association January 31, 2013

  2. Presentation Outline • Site Analysis • Process To-Date • Project Overview 2

  3. Site Analysis

  4. Location Site Analysis Site Analysis 4

  5. Existing Condition Site Analysis Site Analysis 5

  6. Existing Condition Site Analysis Site Analysis 6

  7. Area Site Analysis Site Analysis - VORNADO/CHARLES E SMITH OWNED LAND Acres Square Feet 9 .2 401,549 - Buildable Area 1.2 - 12th St ROW 50,201 Additional Area 80 , 164 1.8 Total 531,914 12.2 Pen Place ' • • • • MARRIOTT OWNED LAND 65,753 1.5 * Buildable Area has been revised to include sidewalks and streetscape up to the curb l ine . .... 100 200 7

  8. Metro and VRE Access Site Analysis Site Analysis M etro Distance: 2, 000 ' Time: 9m in. Ma ll Distance: 1,200• T ime: 5 m in. VRE Distance: 3,000' Ti me : 13 min . Metro Distance: 2,S OO' T ime: 11 min . 8

  9. ~ Bus Site Analysis Site Analysis 1/2 mi le w 9

  10. Streetcar Site Analysis Site Analysis PenUigon City 10

  11. 1976 PDSP Site Analysis Site Analysis Army Navy Drive Parcel 2 200.000 affb : western COl11116icial: 100.000 off .: 29Q.O(),~,\ electric co . corn : SO.OOOg.si msidential: 2,250 hotel: 300roon• res. : 1,000du. Parcel 4 ( 11

  12. Metropolitan Park Site Analysis Site Analysis Parcel 1D Parcel 3 12

  13. Unit Transfer Site Analysis Site Analysis PenPlace enPlace Metropolit Metropolitan Park an Park Parcel 1D Parcel 1D Parcel 3 Parcel 3 13

  14. Pentagon City Metro Station Area Site Analysis Site Analysis 1 1f'H ST. S. 12TH ST . 14

  15. . · r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i.;- ~ ~ ~ ~.a'il ~1! ~ ~ ·.-,. Residential Concentration Site Analysis Site Analysis • 8,655 EXISTING AND PLANNED RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN PENTAGON CITY METRO STATION AREA • ADDITIONAL 3,000+ ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN PENTAGON CITY AREA .,·· 1!# . : lnfrastructur eJ Office Servi ces /11 : .. : Retail Park - .;- • . Hote l = " • ,;! I: Ground Floor Retail . .. . , .E fl, .. Residential Mufti-Family 1• I .... Site Boundary .. : Residential-Single Family '{ I I I I I Pentagon City MSA ., : Crystal City Sector Plan : Parking .... • • • • .. • • ,.. • u • .., 0 O NE SECURE BUILDING SC HEME • • • : . ... - - • atJlli•.!!i- lnl• l7tb St~et.S _:. , ........ ,. ..-,--;;- . • 'I 15

  16. ~ • • ~ · - · -· ~ ~e~id!i! n t i s;! I · - ~ " ~ ~ ~ Use Mix Site Analysis Site Analysis 1::iQ_tfil Pe ntagon City Metro Station Area • 14.6% 62 .5% 10.2% 12 .6% wi th PenPlace 25 .2% 56.9% 6.4 % 11.5 % 47% 34% 14% 4% Crystal City Station Area Ross lyn Met ro Station Area 53% 34 % 9% 3% Ballston Metro Station Area 47% 42% 4% 7% Cou rt hou se Metro Station Area 34 % 60 % 4% 3% Virginia Square Metro Stat i on Area 36% 53% 7% 4% Clarendon Me tr o S tation Area 26 % 61 % 0% 1 3% S ource : A ED Databa se, F eb 2 011 *I nclude s Pentagon Centre as appro ved and the PDSP parce ls as appro v ed and pl anned . ROSSL YN COURT HOUSE CLARENDON i VIRGINIA SQUARE to I ::i I -"°'""" ~ I -··- N ' BA LLSTON t • L .. - : ~· '"-._ \i - ... . _ .J ., EfJ IA \81'1 ST S PENTAGON CITY METRO STATION AREA ROSSLYN - BALLSON CORRIDOR METRO STATION AREA 16

  17. ~ ~ Density and Use Mix Site Analysis Site Analysis Density and Use Mix at Metro Station Areas (Existing and PDSP or 4.1 Approved) 25,000,000 20,000,000 • .., Retail Q) Q) u. Hote l Q) 15,000,000 ta Iii Residential :::J • C' CJ) Office 10,000,000 5,000 , 000 0 Crystal Rosslyn Ballston Pentagon Court Virginia Clarendon City City house Square 17

  18. Conclusions Site Analysis Site Analysis • High Residential Concentration • Office would provide daytime population • Makes local retail uses more viable • Compliments (rather than overloads) transportation infrastructure • Site farthest away from single family home neighborhoods, adjacent to I-395 and surrounded by other high density uses • One of only a few sites in Arlington that can support secure office setback requirements • Opportunity to complete 12 th Street and create a vibrant place 18

  19. Process To-Date

  20. Initial Filing Process T Process To-Date o-Date County Process Step 1: Phased Development Site Plan Amendment (Overall Plan) Feb 2010 Nov 2011 Feb 2012 - Cu rrent Jan to Aug 2011 Step 2: 4.1 Final Site Plan Application for each Building (Building Design and Details) Step 3: Final Engineering Site Plan and Building Permits 20

  21. Initial Application Process T Process To-Date o-Date st.CURE. off\Ct 2 \otal 312, 000 s.f. 12 f\oo rs pR\V.C..iE off\Ct 2 \otal soG , 400 s.f. 1s - 22 f\oors 21

  22. Long Range Planning Process Process T Process To-Date o-Date County Process Step 1: Phased Development Site Plan Amendment (Overall Plan) Feb 2010 Jan to Aug 2011 Nov 2011 Feb 2012 - Cu r rent Step 2: 4.1 Final Site Plan Application for each Building (Building Design and Details) Step 3: Final Engineering Site Plan and Building Permits 22

  23. Guiding Principles Process T Process To-Date o-Date A. COMPATIBILITY C. DISTRIBUTION OF DENSITIES & HEIGHTS 1. Development should create a sense of place both internal and external 1. The highest densities of the Pentagon City PDSP area should be planned to the site. It should contribute to the sense of place and community for Parcel 1 D given its close proximity to existing and future transit nodes, vitali ty envisioned for the enti re Pentagon City neighbo rh ood. and given the site's distance from low-densi ty residential areas. 2. High quality urban de sign and architectural design should define the 2. Additional density should be considered for this site and could site. be achieved through TDRs/density transfers and the provision of 3. Mechanical penthouses (and associated lighting) should be screened extraordinary community benefits. and designed in a manner that is consistent with the rest of the 3. Building heights should be varied to break up the skyline. building in terms of materials and architecture. All outdoor lighting on 4. In general, buildi ng heights should not exceed the height of the tallest the site should comply with Dark Sky standards. building on top of the Metro station in the approved Pentagon Cent re 4. Parking should be located underground. development. Additional bu il ding height exceeding the tallest bu ilding in 5. Given the site's location adjacent to the Pentagon and its unique edge Pentagon Centre may be considered with the provision of extraordinary conditions adjacent to an elevated highway, the site is an appropriate community bene fi ts. location to consider placing secure office facilities. Any secure office 5. Building heights should be compatible with the surrounding development facili ty on the site should be designed to be compatible with the fabric, including other new proposed buildings. surrounding uses and projected future uses, and to minimize negative 6. Design techniques such as tapering and step backs should be considered impacts on the pedestrian experience. Specifically, safe, publicly as re lated to pedestrian environments and vi ew co rridors. accessible pedestrian paths accommodating convenient north-south 7. Buildings along 12th Street should incorporate st ep backs in order to and east-west linkages should be provided. The location of secure foster a pedest ri an oriented environmen t. facilities should ensu re that open space and interior roads are not inhibited. Secure facilities shall not be located along 12th Street. 6. Building and site designs should support and promote a diverse range of transportation alternatives to car ownership and si ng le occupancy vehicle dr iving. D. OPEN SPACE 7. Development at the ground plane should be designed at a pedestrian scale, creating visual interest and variety. 1. Significant publicly accessible open space should be incorporated on 8. Proposals for this site should be compatible with adjacent approved Parcel 1 D. In addition, a public plaza along 1 2t h Street th at is activated developments and the ongoing redevelopment of Crystal City. with retail and connected to transit nodes should be encouraged. 9. Development should realize the vision for 12th Street as a fu lly 2. Open space should be well-designed, visible from the street, incorporate activated retail and transit-oriented corridor. universal design p ri nciples, and provide permanent public access through a public access easement. 3. The desi gn of public spaces should include links to established pedestrian connections created by surrounding development and access to existing and future transit nodes on and aro un d the site. 4. Public spaces should be lighted in a manner that promotes safety, while minimizing unwanted impacts on surrounding uses and complying with approp ri ate Dark Sky and energy efficiency standards. B. MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT 5. Publi cl y accessible recreational space sh ou ld be provided on Parcel 1 D 1. The uses on the site sho ul d re flect a more balanced dist ri bution of or an adjacent site to help meet the re creational needs of employees, residents and visitors. uses in the Pentagon City Met ro Station area. 2. 12th St reet should be activated with ground floor retail uses and should include neighborhood-serving retail, restaurants, and services. 23

Recommend

More recommend