Pennsylvania State University Atrium Medical Corporation Architectural Engineering Table of Contents Headquarters Facility Senior Thesis Final Presentation Title Page Project Information Depth Analysis 1 Depth Analysis 2 Depth Analysis 3 Conclusion & Recommendations Acknowledgements Ref: Atrium Medical Project Documents Ref: Atrium Medical Project Documents 40 Continental Boulevard Jeffrey Martin Merrimack NH, 03054 Advisor: Dr. Leicht April 16 th , 2014 Jeffrey Martin | Advisor: Dr. Robert Leicht | Final Presentation
Project Information: Existing Conditions Proposed 101,200 SF New Addition (Footprint) Location: 40 Continental Boulevard, Table of Contents Merrimack, NH 03054 Site Size: 2,367,100 SF Title Page Existing Structure: 2 Story building Project Information • Depth Analysis 1 114,000 SF Existing Conditions • Depth Analysis 2 Owner Information Previous Owner: Fidelity Investments • Depth Analysis 3 Building Information Conclusion & Recommendations New Owner: Atrium Medical Acknowledgements Corporation/ Maquet Getinge Group Project Scope: Existing Renovation 101,200 SF New Addition Ref: www.google.com/maps Existing 100,000SF Building to be Renovated Jeffrey Martin | Advisor: Dr. Robert Leicht | Final Presentation
Project Information: Owner Information Project Owner: Atrium Medical Corporation/ MAQUET/GETINGE Group Table of Contents Previous Owner: Fidelity Investments Title Page Reason for Purchase: Company Expansion Project Information Bring all 450 + Employees • Depth Analysis 1 Existing Conditions Into One Facility. Ref: www.theiddoctor.info • Depth Analysis 2 Owner Information • Specializes in R&D and Manufacturing Divisions of Work: Manufacturing, Storage, • Depth Analysis 3 Building Information • Cardiology Business Offices, R&D, Conclusion & Recommendations • Radiology Acknowledgements Engineering Shops • Chest Trauma • Thoracic Drainage • Business unit of MAQUET Cardiovascular (Structured Alliance) • Member of GETINGE Group of companies Ref: www.classiccapital.net Jeffrey Martin | Advisor: Dr. Robert Leicht | Final Presentation
Project Information: Building Information • CM Firm: Hutter Construction Table of Contents • Architect: Lavallee Brensinger • Structural Engineer: Foley Buhl Roberts Title Page • Civil Engineer: Hayner Swanson Inc. Project Information • Mechanical Engineer: Johnson & Jordan Inc. • Depth Analysis 1 Existing Conditions • Electrical Engineer: Gate City Electric • Depth Analysis 2 Owner Information Ref: Atrium Medical Project Documents • Depth Analysis 3 Building Information Conclusion & Recommendations • Project Location: 40 Continental Boulevard, Acknowledgements Merrimack, NH 03054 • Building Size: 101,200 SF • Zoning: I-3 Industrial • Description: Single Story Building Ref: All Images found on www.google.com/images Interior Mezzanine Jeffrey Martin | Advisor: Dr. Robert Leicht | Final Presentation
Depth Analysis 1: Problem Statement Description of Structure: Steel Structure: Atrium Medical Corporation Table of Contents • Structure: Steel Superstructure • Beams: Wide Flange Steel Beams Title Page • Columns: Wide Flange Steel Columns Project Information • Roof Joists: K-Series Joists Depth Analysis 1 • Depth Analysis 2 • Lateral Bracing: Problem Statement HSS Steel Sections • Depth Analysis 3 Proposed Solution • Foundations: Concrete spread & • Conclusion & Recommendations Structural Breadth strip footings and piers • Acknowledgements Total Design Summary • Analysis Results Problem: Owner not utilizing the opportunity to develop a more efficient structure, in regards to either cost or Ref: Atrium Medical Revit Structural Model scheduling. Jeffrey Martin | Advisor: Dr. Robert Leicht | Final Presentation
Depth Analysis 1: Proposed Solution Sequence of Events: Advantages of Precast Structures: Develop System Design Table of Contents • Decrease in Project Schedule (Precast Concrete) • Saves Space on-site Title Page • Saves Money (labor) Structural Project Information Breadth Depth Analysis 1 Select Precast • Depth Analysis 2 Problem Statement Components Disadvantages of Precast Structures: Develop Load • Depth Analysis 3 Proposed Solution • Conclusion & Recommendations • Availability Cases Structural Breadth Size Precast Depth • Acknowledgements Total Design Summary • Timing Members • Analysis Analysis Results • Small Margin of Error Perform Cost Analysis • High Material Cost Perform Install. Analysis Results & System Comparison Ref: All Images found on www.google.com/images Jeffrey Martin | Advisor: Dr. Robert Leicht | Final Presentation
Depth Analysis 1: Developing a Design Structural Breadth: Square Concrete Columns Double Tee Beam Table of Contents Title Page Ref: www.condor-rebar.com Project Information Ref: www.nitterhouse.com/technical-info Ref: www.concretetech.com Proposed System Layout Inverted Tee Beam Ref: www.timesunion.com Depth Analysis 1 • Depth Analysis 2 Problem Statement • Depth Analysis 3 Proposed Solution Column Line 6 • Conclusion & Recommendations Structural Breadth Column Line 5 • Acknowledgements Developing a Design Ref: www.nitterhouse.com/technical-info Ref: www.dynaspan.com Column Line 4 • Determining Loads Ledger Beam • Sizing Members Column Line 3 • Total Design Summary Column Line 2 • Analysis Results Column Line 1 Ref: www.nitterhouse.com/technical-info Ref: Atrium Medical Project Documents Ref: www.cpm-group.com Jeffrey Martin | Advisor: Dr. Robert Leicht | Final Presentation
Depth Analysis 1: Determining Loads Structural Breadth: Mechanical Loads • Loads due to (8) AHU’s and (4) RTU’s Table of Contents • Act as point load(s) throughout roof • Maximum AHU load = 9000 lbs. Title Page Project Information Snow Loads : Snow Drift Loads: Depth Analysis 1 Ref: www.trane.com • Depth Analysis 2 Problem Statement Member Self Weights & • Depth Analysis 3 Proposed Solution • Conclusion & Recommendations Structural Breadth Superimposed Loads • Acknowledgements Developing a Design • Loads from: • Determining Loads Ref: Atrium Medical Project Documents • Double Tees • Sizing Members • Snow loads from structural • Two main roof levels • Ledger & Inverted Tee Beams • Total Design Summary • Lower Roof Height = 17’ 0” drawings • Superimposed Dead = 15 PSF • Analysis Results • Flat Roof Snow Load = 42 • Higher Roof Height = 27’ 8” • Max Surcharge = 92.31 PSF PSF Ref: www.nitterhouse.com/technical-info • Surcharge Length = 16.94 Jeffrey Martin | Advisor: Dr. Robert Leicht | Final Presentation
Depth Analysis 1: Sizing Members Structural Breadth: Double Tee Beam 9 kips Beam Designs Concrete Column Loads 0.57 k/ft. 26”x10’ D.T (No Table of Contents Column Line # Total Axial Loads Topping), 26-6.6P Column Line 1 178.4 kips 0.923k/ft. Column Line 2 409.6 kips Title Page Inverted Tee Beam Column Line 3 426.8 kips Project Information Column Line 4 463.1 kips Inverted Tee Beam Depth Analysis 1 Column Line 5 409.6 kips 40IT36-A • Depth Analysis 2 6.083 k/ft. Problem Statement Column Line 6 178.4 kips • Depth Analysis 3 Proposed Solution Interior Ledger Beam Concrete Column Designs • Conclusion & Recommendations Structural Breadth • Acknowledgements Developing a Design Designs Selected For Columns by Column Line 32LB28 (SP 13-6-0) • Determining Loads Column Line 1 10" x 10" w/ 4 - #5 bars at 17 ft height 4.289 k/ft. (TB 6 - #9) • Column Line 2 10" x 10" w/ 4 - #10 bars at 17 ft height Sizing Members • Column Line 3 10" x 10" w/ 4 - #11 bars at 17 ft height Total Design Summary Exterior Ledger Beam Column Line 4 12" x 12" w/ 4 - #8 bars at 27.5 ft height • Analysis Results Column Line 5 10" x 10" w/ 4 - #10 bars at 27.5 ft height 18LB32 (SP 6-4-0) 2.875k/ft. Column Line 6 10" x 10" w/ 4 - #5 bars at 27.5 ft height (TB 4 - #9) Jeffrey Martin | Advisor: Dr. Robert Leicht | Final Presentation
Recommend
More recommend
