P6.0 LIP Subcommittee December 17, 2018 Local Input Points vs. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

P6.0 LIP Subcommittee December 17, 2018

Local Input Points vs. Funded Projects

P4.0 LIPs vs. Funded Projects REGIONAL DIVISION IMPACT NEEDS REGIONAL IMPACT 17 Projects funded with zero LIPs Total Funded 232 344 • Aviation = 2 • Highway = 3 MPO/RPO • Rail = 2 200 319 Max LIPs • Transit = 10 MPO/RPO 12 9 Some LIPs DIVISION NEEDS 6 Projects funded with zero LIPs MPO/RPO 20 16 • Aviation = 3 Zero LIPs • Bike/Ped = 2 Div Eng • Highway = 1 178 172 Max LIPs Div Eng 22 103 Some LIPs Div Eng 32 69 Zero LIPs 3

P4.0 LIPs vs. Funded Projects REGIONAL IMPACT 560 Projects eligible for LIPs but not funded • MPO/RPO LIPs assigned = 270 • Div Eng LIPs assigned = 57 • Max LIPs assigned by both = 27 (all Highway) DIVISION NEEDS 1245 Projects eligible for LIPs but not funded • MPO/RPO LIPs assigned = 203 • Div Eng LIPs assigned = 50 • Max LIPs assigned by both = 6 (all Highway) 4

Number of Regional Points

Number of Regional Points Total Eligible P5.0 Local Input Projects Where Projects Where MPO/RPO Name Projects for 1 st PO Points 100% Ownership Regional LIP Albemarle RPO 1,300 31 31 30 Burlington Graham MPO 1,300 22 21 20 Cabarrus Rowan MPO 1,700 15 15 14 Cape Fear RPO 1,300 46 42 31 Capital Area MPO 2,500 105 100 85 Charlotte Regional Transportation PO 2,500 51 50 50 Down East RPO 1,400 28 25 22 Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO 1,800 52 39 36 Eastern Carolina RPO 1,300 34 29 25 Fayetteville Area MPO 1,800 22 16 15 French Broad River MPO 1,800 33 32 30 Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO 1,800 29 28 28 Goldsboro Urban Area MPO 1,200 9 9 7 Grand Strand Transportation Study Area 1,100 16 14 13 Greater Hickory MPO 1,700 17 17 17 Greensboro Urban Area MPO 1,800 25 20 18 Greenville Urban Area MPO 1,300 13 8 5 High Country RPO 1,400 25 25 25 6

Number of Regional Points Total Eligible P5.0 Local Input Projects Where Projects Where MPO/RPO Name Projects for 1 st PO Points 100% Ownership Regional LIP High Point Urban Area MPO 1,600 29 24 20 Isothermal RPO 1,300 19 19 18 Jacksonville Urban MPO 1,300 13 13 12 Kerr-Tar RPO 1,300 28 26 24 Land-of-Sky RPO 1,100 12 11 10 Lumber River RPO 1,500 28 25 22 Mid-Carolina RPO 1,400 26 23 15 Mid-East RPO 1,200 26 17 11 New Bern MPO 1,100 12 11 10 Northwest Piedmont RPO 1,300 16 14 14 Peanut Belt RPO 1,200 24 22 20 Piedmont Triad RPO 1,500 35 32 28 Rocky Mount Urban Area MPO 1,200 7 6 5 Rocky River RPO 1,200 18 17 16 Southwestern RPO 1,300 28 27 27 Triangle Area RPO 1,400 26 21 21 Upper Coastal Plain RPO 1,500 34 27 26 Wilmington Urban Area MPO 1,500 37 28 27 7 Winston-Salem Urban Area MPO 1,800 26 23 19

Number of Regional Points Total Eligible P5.0 Local Input Projects Where Projects Where Division Projects for 1 st Div Points 100% Ownership Regional LIP 01 1,500 53 53 50 02 2,000 72 70 68 03 2,400 107 102 100 04 2,200 66 57 53 05 2,500 150 144 140 06 2,400 58 55 49 07 2,500 84 78 77 08 2,000 57 55 49 09 2,500 52 50 46 10 2,500 69 68 68 11 1,700 39 36 35 12 2,500 43 40 39 13 2,000 49 47 42 14 1,700 54 52 50 8

Number of Regional Points Should number of Regional Points be reduced? If yes… • How much of a reduction? • Do reduced points disappear or move to Division Needs allocation? • Consider pooling into a single allocation between Regional and Division (next topic)? 9

Number of Division Needs Points Total Eligible P5.0 Local Input Projects Where Projects Where MPO/RPO Name Projects for 1 st PO Points 100% Ownership Regional LIP Albemarle RPO 1,300 71 71 68 Burlington Graham MPO 1,300 37 35 33 Cabarrus Rowan MPO 1,700 33 33 31 Cape Fear RPO 1,300 69 65 56 Capital Area MPO 2,500 189 183 167 Charlotte Regional Transportation PO 2,500 117 115 115 Down East RPO 1,400 60 55 51 Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO 1,800 100 83 80 Eastern Carolina RPO 1,300 38 37 30 Fayetteville Area MPO 1,800 67 61 60 French Broad River MPO 1,800 78 77 73 Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO 1,800 73 72 72 Goldsboro Urban Area MPO 1,200 35 35 34 Grand Strand Transportation Study Area 1,100 17 15 14 Greater Hickory MPO 1,700 29 29 29 Greensboro Urban Area MPO 1,800 57 53 51 Greenville Urban Area MPO 1,300 33 28 25 High Country RPO 1,400 38 38 38 10

Number of Division Needs Points Total Eligible P5.0 Local Input Projects Where Projects Where MPO/RPO Name Projects for 1 st PO Points 100% Ownership Regional LIP High Point Urban Area MPO 1,600 60 53 50 Isothermal RPO 1,300 41 41 40 Jacksonville Urban MPO 1,300 29 28 27 Kerr-Tar RPO 1,300 43 41 39 Land-of-Sky RPO 1,100 29 26 25 Lumber River RPO 1,500 45 42 39 Mid-Carolina RPO 1,400 61 58 50 Mid-East RPO 1,200 39 30 24 New Bern MPO 1,100 27 26 25 Northwest Piedmont RPO 1,300 42 40 40 Peanut Belt RPO 1,200 32 30 28 Piedmont Triad RPO 1,500 55 52 49 Rocky Mount Urban Area MPO 1,200 32 31 29 Rocky River RPO 1,200 32 31 30 Southwestern RPO 1,300 49 48 48 Triangle Area RPO 1,400 77 72 66 Upper Coastal Plain RPO 1,500 57 49 46 Wilmington Urban Area MPO 1,500 73 66 65 11 Winston-Salem Urban Area MPO 1,800 66 61 58

Number of Division Needs Points Total Eligible P5.0 Local Input Projects Where Projects Where Division Projects for 1 st Div Points 100% Ownership Regional LIP 01 1,500 101 101 96 02 2,000 136 132 130 03 2,400 197 192 190 04 2,200 153 144 141 05 2,500 269 264 261 06 2,400 150 147 139 07 2,500 176 168 167 08 2,000 130 126 120 09 2,500 120 115 111 10 2,500 135 135 135 11 1,700 76 71 70 12 2,500 112 109 108 13 2,000 99 96 90 14 1,700 112 110 107 12

Single Allocation of Points (Pooling)

Single Allocation of Points (Pooling) Are there deadlines to preliminary assignments? Are there minimum allocations (number or percentage) to Regional? Is the total allocation… • Double the P5.0 allocation? • Reduced allocation? • A new method/calculation of allocation? • “Flex”? 14

Using P5.0 Allocations for P6.0

Using P5.0 Allocations for P6.0 Population 2017 Census Local Input MPO/RPO Name rounded to Pop. Points nearest 50,000 Albemarle RPO 171,857 150,000 1,300 Burlington-Graham MPO 163,689 150,000 1,300 Cabarrus-Rowan MPO 335,662 350,000 1,700 Cape Fear RPO 145,122 150,000 1,300 Capital Area MPO 1,213,855 1,200,000 2,500 Charlotte Regional Transportation PO 1,404,395 1,400,000 2,500 Down East RPO 192,686 200,000 1,400 Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO 437,771 450,000 1,900 Eastern Carolina RPO 172,294 150,000 1,300 Fayetteville Area MPO 388,337 400,000 1,800 French Broad River MPO 403,871 400,000 1,800 Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO 391,592 400,000 1,800 Goldsboro Urban Area MPO 90,544 100,000 1,200 Grand Strand Area Transportation Study 41,151 50,000 1,100 Greater Hickory MPO 364,040 350,000 1,700 Greensboro Urban Area MPO 393,925 400,000 1,800 Greenville Urban Area MPO 128,970 150,000 1,300 High Country RPO 210,013 200,000 1,400 16

Using P5.0 Allocations for P6.0 Population 2017 Census Local Input MPO/RPO Name rounded to Pop. Points nearest 50,000 High Point Urban Area MPO 292,141 300,000 1,600 Isothermal RPO 132,025 150,000 1,300 Jacksonville Urban Area MPO 143,418 150,000 1,300 Kerr-Tar RPO 163,739 150,000 1,300 Land-of-Sky RPO 75,020 100,000 1,200 Lumber River RPO 227,564 250,000 1,500 Mid-Carolina RPO 190,586 200,000 1,400 Mid-East RPO 118,070 100,000 1,200 New Bern Area MPO 51,180 50,000 1,100 Northwest Piedmont RPO 169,952 150,000 1,300 Peanut Belt RPO 116,901 100,000 1,200 Piedmont Triad RPO 250,707 250,000 1,500 Rocky Mount Urban Area MPO 75,718 100,000 1,200 Rocky River RPO 108,075 100,000 1,200 Southwestern RPO 136,912 150,000 1,300 Triangle Area RPO 225,288 250,000 1,500 Upper Coastal Plain RPO 233,038 250,000 1,500 Wilmington Urban Area MPO 269,996 250,000 1,500 Winston-Salem Urban Area MPO 421,783 400,000 1,800 17

Using P5.0 Allocations for P6.0 Population 2017 Census Local Input Division rounded to Pop. Points nearest 50,000 01 259,691 250,000 1,500 02 497,434 500,000 2,000 03 715,383 700,000 2,400 04 592,632 600,000 2,200 05 1,550,893 1,550,000 2,500 06 686,398 700,000 2,400 07 931,245 950,000 2,500 08 526,103 550,000 2,100 09 759,311 750,000 2,500 10 1,538,877 1,550,000 2,500 11 369,183 350,000 1,700 12 755,237 750,000 2,500 13 506,803 500,000 2,000 14 362,696 350,000 1,700 18

Discussion ?? 19