overview of reliability engineering and my current
play

Overview of Reliability Engineering and My Current Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Overview of Reliability Engineering and My Current Research Mohammad Modarres Department of Mechanical Engineering Presented at the Workshop on: Aging and Failure in Biological, Physical and Engineered Systems Harvard University, Cambridge MA


  1. Overview of Reliability Engineering and My Current Research Mohammad Modarres Department of Mechanical Engineering Presented at the Workshop on: Aging and Failure in Biological, Physical and Engineered Systems Harvard University, Cambridge MA May 15-17, 2016

  2. Outline PART 1: – A Quick Overview of Reliability Engineering – Current Leading Researches in Reliability Engineering PART 2: – My Current Research: • Reliability Based on Entropy • Damage Precursors and Uses in Prognosis and Health Management (PHM) – Conclusions

  3. Reliability Engineering Overview • Reliability engineering measures and improves resistance to failure of an item over time • Two Overlapping Frameworks for Modeling Life and Performance of Engineered Systems Have Emerged: – Data or Evidence View: Statistical / Probabilistic – Physics-View • Empirical: Physics of Failure • Physical Laws • Areas of Applications – Design (Assuring Reliability, Testing, Safety, Human- Software-Machine, Warranty) – Operation (Repair, Maintenance, Risks, Obsolescence, Root Cause Evaluations)

  4. Data or Evidence View: Statistical / Probabilistic Metric – Post WWII Initiatives due to unreliability of electronics and fatigue issues • Inspired by the weakest link, statistical process control, insurance and demographic mortality data analysis methods • Defined reliability on an item as the likelihood of failures based on life R ( t ) Pr( T t ) distribution models = ≥ • Systems analysis methods – Based on the topology of components of the system – Based on the logical connections of the components (fault trees, etc.) – Common Assumptions • Use of historical failure data or reliability test data are the truth and every items have the same resistance to failure as the historical failures indicate • Maintenance and repair contribute to renewal of the item • Degradation trend can be measured by the hazard rate . In this case 𝑆 " 𝑢 = 𝑓 &' ( , 𝑥ℎ𝑓𝑠𝑓 H . = cumulative hazard,and h . = hazard rate – Issues • Results rarely match field experience

  5. Physics-Based View of Reliability – Failures occur due to failure mechanisms – This view started in the 1960’s and revived in the 1990’s. – Referred to physics-of-failure, time to failures are empirically modeled: S o = Operational Stresses 𝑢 ? = 𝑔(𝑇 C ,𝑇 D ,𝑕,𝑒 " ,𝜾G S e = Environmental Stresses g = Geometry related factors • Inspired by advances in fracture mechanics 𝜾 = material properties • Accelerated life and degradation testing provide data d = defects, flaws, etc. • Probabilistic empirical models of time to failure (PPoF models) developed and simulations • Benefits • No or very little dependence on historical failure data • Easily connected to all physical models • Address the underlying causes of failure (failure mechanisms) • Specific to the items and the condition of operation of that item • Drawbacks • Hard to model interacting failure mechanisms • Models markers of degradation not the total damage • Based of small experimental evidences and more on subjective judgments

  6. Physics-Based View (Cont.) • Modern Areas of Research – Hybrid Models Combined Logic Models, Physical Models (PoF) and Probabilistic Models • Tremendous emphasis on – PHM methods in support of resilience, replacement, repair and maintenance – Reliability of autonomous systems and cyber-physical safety security • Applications of Data science – Sensors – Data / information fusion – Simulation tools (MCMC, Recursive Bayes and Bayesian filtering) – Machine learning – Search for fundamental sciences of reliability • Thermodynamics • Information theory • Statistical mechanics

  7. Reliability Summary Time-to-Failure Distribution Endurance to Damage Damage /Degradation Initial Damage t 2 t 1 Life

  8. Summary of Reliability Overview Data Driven Why Entropy? ü Entropy can model Empirical PoF multiple competing degradation processes leading to damage ü Entropy is independent of the path to failure ending at similar total entropy at failure Future ü Entropy accounts for complex synergistic effects of interacting degradation processes ü Entropy is scale independent

  9. • My Recent Research on Damage, Degradation and Failure

  10. An Entropic Theory of Damage • Failure mechanisms are irreversible processes leading to degradation and share a common feature at a deeper level: Dissipation of Energy • Dissipation (or equivalently entropy generation) ≅ Damage Entropy generation Dissipation energies Degradation mechanisms Damage Failure 1 occurs when the accumulated total entropy generated exceeds the entropic-endurance of the unit • Entropic-endurance describes the capacity of the unit to withstand entropy • Entropic-endurance of identical units is equal • Entropic-endurance of different units is different • Entropic-endurance to failure can be measured (experimentally) and involves stochastic variability 1. Defined as the state or condition of not meeting a requirement, desirable behavior or intended function

  11. An Entropic Theory of Damage(Cont.) [1, 3,4] T ` d 𝜏 = 1 𝛼 𝜈 S + 1 𝑈 𝜐:𝜗̇ \ + 1 + 1 𝑈 K 𝐾 M N 𝛼𝑈 − Q 𝑈 Q 𝑤 ^ 𝐵 ^ 𝑈 Q 𝑑 b 𝐾 b −𝛼𝜔 𝑈 SUV ^UV bUV Thermal Mechanical Chemical External field energy Diffusion [1] [2] 5 5 F=330 MPa Fracture Fatigue Failure (MJ m -3 K -1 ) 4.5 4.5 F=365 MPa Entropy to Failure (MJ/m 3 K) 4 4 F=405 MPa F=260 MPa 3.5 3.5 F=290 MPa 3 3 Product of thermodynamic 2.5 2.5 forces and fluxes 2 2 1.5 1.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0 0 500 5000 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Number of Cycles to Failure Time (Cycle) × 10 4 [1] Anahita Imanian and Mohammad Modarres, A Thermodynamic Entropy Approach to Reliability Assessm ent with Application to Corrosion Fatigue, Entropy 17.10 (2015): 6995-7020 [2] M. Naderi et al., On the Thermodynamic Entropy of Fatigue Fracture, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 466.2114 (2009): 1-16 [3] D. Kondepudi and I. Prigogine , “Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures, ” Wiley, England, 1998. [4] J. Lemaitre and J. L. Chaboche, “ Mechanics of Solid Materials, ” 3 rd edition; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000. 𝑲 T ( 𝑜 = 𝑟, 𝑙, 𝑏𝑜𝑒 𝑛) = thermodynamic fluxes due to heat conduction, diffusion and external fields, T = temperature, 𝜈 S = chemical potential, 𝑤 " = chemical reaction rate, 𝝊 = stress tensor, 𝝑 \ ̇ = plastic strain rate, 𝐵 ^ = chemical affinity, 𝜔 = potential of the external field , and 𝑑 b = coupling constant [3, 4].

  12. Entropy as an Index of Damage • The evolution trend of the damage, 𝐸 , according to our theory is dominated by the entropy generated: ( 𝐸~𝛿 p |𝑢~ w [𝜏|𝑌 " 𝑣 , 𝑲 " 𝑣 ]𝑒𝑣 | 𝐸 = 𝛿 p − 𝛿 p q , 𝛿 = 𝜍𝑡 volumetric entropy generation 𝛿 p r − 𝛿 p q • The reliability expressed in terms of entropic damage : ~ ~ 𝑆 𝑢 = ∫ 𝑕 𝑢 𝑒𝑢 = 1- ∫ 𝑔(𝐸|𝑢)𝑒𝐸 ( • € •

  13. Reliability of Structures Subject to Corrosion-Fatigue (CF)

  14. ̇ Entropy Generation in CF • Contribution from corrosion activation over-potential, diffusion over-potential, corrosion reaction chemical potential, plastic and elastic deformation and hydrogen embrittlement to the rate of entropy generation: 𝜏 = 1 𝑈 𝑲 ‚,ƒ 𝑨 ‚ 𝐺𝐹 ‚ ‡•ˆ,‡ + 𝑲 ‚,‰ 𝑨 ‚ 𝐺𝐹 ‚ ‡•ˆ,• + 𝑲 Š,ƒ 𝑨 Š 𝐺𝐹 Š ‡•ˆ,‡ + 𝑲 Š,‰ 𝑨 Š 𝐺𝐹 Š ‡•ˆ,• + 1 𝑈 𝑲 ‚,‰ 𝑨 ‚ 𝐺𝐹 ‚ •‹Œ•,• + 𝑨 Š 𝐺𝑲 Š,‰ 𝐹 Š •‹Œ•,• Diffusion dissipations + 1 𝑈 𝑲 ‚,ƒ 𝛽 ‚ 𝐵 ‚ + 𝐾 ‚,‰ 1 − 𝛽 ‚ 𝐵 ‚ + 𝑲 Š,ƒ 𝛽 Š 𝐵 Š + 𝑲 ‚,ƒ 1 − 𝛽 Š 𝐵 Š + 1 𝑈 𝝑̇ \ : 𝝊 + 1 𝑈 𝑍𝑬 Mechanical Chemical reaction dissipations dissipations +𝜏 ' Hydrogen embrittlement dissipation 𝑈 = temperature, 𝑨 ‚ = number of moles of electrons exchanged in the oxidation process, 𝐺 = Farady number, 𝐾 ‚,ƒ and 𝐾 ‚,‰ = irreversible anodic and cathodic activation currents for oxidation reaction, 𝐾 Š ,ƒ and 𝐾 Š ,‰ = anodic and cathodic activation currents for reduction reaction, 𝐹 ‚ ‡•ˆ,‡ and 𝐹 ‚ ‡•ˆ,• = anodic and cathodic over-potentials for oxidation reaction, 𝐹 Š ‡•ˆ,‡ and 𝐹 Š ‡•ˆ,• = anodic and cathodic over-potentials for reduction reaction, 𝐹 ‚ •‹Œ•,• and 𝐹 Š •‹Œ•,• = concentration over-potentials for the cathodic oxidation and cathodic reduction reactions, 𝛽 ‚ and 𝛽 Š =charge transport coefficient for the oxidation and reduction reactions, 𝐵 ‚ and 𝐵 Š = chemical affinity for the ̇ =dimensionless damage flux, 𝑍 the elastic energy, and 𝜏 oxidation and reductions, 𝜗̇ \ =plastic deformation rate, 𝜐 =plastic stress, 𝐸 ' =entropy generation due to hydrogen embrittlement. [1] Imanian, A. and Modarres. M, “ A Thermodynamic Entropy Based Approach for Prognosis and Health Management with Application to Corrosion-Fatigue, ” 2015 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, 22-25 June, 2015, Austin, USA.

Recommend


More recommend