Oregon Learns K-12 Achievement C Compact t Implementation p Oregon Education Investment Board April 12 2012 April 12, 2012 1
29% 29% 30% 30% 40% 40% 17% 18% 40% 41% 41% 42% 42% 20% 13% 13% 10% 10% All working-age Young adults Goal (2025) adults (2010) adults (2010) (2010) (2010) Less than high school High school only High school only Associate's degree or credential Bachelor's degree or higher 2
A hi Achievement Compacts are… t C t Forward looking: A roadmap to 40/40/20 Forward-looking: A roadmap to 40/40/20 About student outcomes, not inputs A tool to budget a plan, not plan a budget A way to showcase best practices and promote collaboration Succinct: Key leverage points for reaching statewide priorities for student achievement Evolving 3
Oregon accountability system Waiver from certain NCLB provisions filed in January, final decision expected late May, early January, final decision expected late May, early June. Achievement compacts are anchor for the accountability system: • At a district level • About support, collective impact and prioritizing investments • A system to set goals and incentivize annual progress, aligned with 40/40/20 Achievement compacts are high level snapshots, not the only tool in Oregon’s accountability system. 4
Achievement Compact Achievement Compact School & District Report Card School & District Report Card Policymakers -- State & District Priority/Focus/Model Designation y g Parents & & Public Guide budget Student-level data Educators & & policy Provide Community Community setting at tti t ratings & state & local i nformation Students, Families, & level to about Teachers improve Focus state school & achievement & district district school school quality lit Inform teaching & improvement learning efforts. 5
Reducing Regulatory Burdens For 2012-13 • Division 22 reporting requirements waived Division 22 reporting requirements waived • Implement online tool to streamline reporting By July 31, 2012 ODE will report to the OEIB on: • Streamlining improvement planning for Focus & Streamlining improvement planning for Focus & Priority Schools • Including Achievement Compacts in the overall Including Achievement Compacts in the overall reporting system • A plan to seek repeal or waiver of unnecessary or y redundant CIP requirements 6
Timeline for 2012-13 Compacts April 5 to District boards complete their compacts June 30 April 12 Data validation process begins May 4 May 4 Deadline to request corrections Deadline to request corrections Technical assistance on goal setting and Mid-May trajectory toward 40/40/20 trajectory toward 40/40/20 July 2 Districts return completed compacts Chief Education Officer accepts compacts and July 31 local priority measures D Deadline to establish achievement compact dli t t bli h hi t t Sept. 30 advisory committees 7
Final K-12/ESD Achievement Compact Template College and Career Ready: Are students completing high school ready for college or career? 9th graders of Dis- 9th graders of Dis- 9th graders of 9th graders of Dis- 9th graders of 2006-07 advantaged 2007-08 advantaged 2008-09 Dis- advantaged 2009-10 advantaged 2012-13** Dis- advantaged 4 Y 4-Year Cohort Graduation C h G d i O Optional i l O Optional i l R Required i d Required R i d Optional O i l Optional O i l 5-year Cohort Graduation Optional Optional Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional 5-Year Completion Optional Optional Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional Post-Secondary Enrollment Pending Pending Optional Optional Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional Earning 9+ College Credits Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional Disadvantaged is aggregate of disadvantaged student groups (details on pp. 2-4) Gray shaded boxes are district-provided projections and goals **2012-13 goals are optional G h d d b di t i t id d j ti d g l **2012 13 g l ti l Progression: Are students making sufficient progress toward college and career readiness? Dis- Dis- 2012-13 Goal Dis- 4-Year Goal 2009-10 All 2010-11 All 2011-12 All* Dis- advantaged Dis- advantaged advantaged advantaged All advantaged (2015-16)** Ready for School Kindergarten readiness assessment under development 3rd Gr. Reading Proficiency Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional 3rd Gr. Math Proficiency 3rd Gr Math Proficiency Optional Optional Optional Optional Required Required Required Required Optional Optional Optional Optional 6th Grade On-Track Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional 9th Grade On-Track Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Required Required Optional Optional *Estimate based on most recent available data **2016 Goals are optional Equity: Are students succeeding across all buildings and populations? 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Goal 4-Year Goal (2015-16)** Priority & Focus Schools* Required Optional DISAGGREGATED DATA AND GOALS FOR EACH DISADVANTAGED STUDENT GROUP LISTED ON PP 2-4 *Prior to 2012-13, school in federal AYP "Need Improvement" status **4-year Goals are optional Local Priorities: What other measures reflect key priorities in the district? (optional, up to 3) Dis- Dis- Dis- Year Year Year Dis- advantaged 1-Year Goal 4-Year Goal** Dis- advantaged advantaged advantaged advantaged Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional Optional **4-year Goal optional Investment: What is the public investment in the district? (does not include capital investments) 2010-11 2011-12* 2012-13* 2012-13 QEM calculation of Formula Revenue District Share Local Revenue not passed through formula Local Revenue not passed through formula District Official District Official Federal Revenue State Grants not passed through formula OEIB Chief Education Officer NOTE: The gray fields for current and past data are optional, as are the tan fields for local priorities. Districts should fill in the blue fields with their targets, provided student counts are six or more. 8
College and Career Ready: Are students completing high school ready for college or career? y g 4-year cohort graduation 5-year cohort graduation 5-year completion Post-secondary enrollment Earning 9+ college credits Earning 9+ college credits 9
Progression: Are students making sufficient progress toward college and ffi i t t d ll d career readiness? Ready for School (under development) 3 rd Grade Reading Proficiency 3 rd Grade Math Proficiency 6 th Grade On Track (attendance) 9 th Grade On Track (attendance and credits) 10
Equity:Are students succeeding across E it A t d t di all buildings and populations? Priority & Focus Schools P i it & F S h l Disaggregated data and goals for each disadvantaged student group listed on disadvantaged student group listed on pp 2-4 11
Equity: Are students succeeding across all populations? Economically disadvantaged Economically disadvantaged Limited English Proficient Students with Disabilities Students with Disabilities Black (not of Hispanic origin) Hispanic origin Hi i i i American Indian/Alaska Native Pacific Islander (when available) Asian (not included in “Disadvantaged” aggregate) TAG (not included in “Disadvantaged” aggregate) 12
Local Priorities: What other measures reflect key priorities in the district? y p O Optional i l Optional Optional 13
Investment: What is the public Investment: What is the public investment in the district? (does not include capital investments) include capital investments) Form la Re en e Formula Revenue Local Revenue not passed through formula Local Revenue not passed through formula Federal Revenue State Grants not passed through formula 14
Information to come Age-out data for special education students g p Recalculated pass rates for reading and math under new cut scores approved by the State Board of Education Technical methodologies for district data staff Post-secondary enrollment for 2010 grads 15
16
17
18
Contact us • Comments to the OEIB Education investment@state or us Education.investment@state.or.us • Questions Questions Margie Lowe, 503-689-5194, Margie.Lowe@state.or.us g @ • On the Web www.education.oregon.gov, Scroll down and click on “Oregon Education Investment Board” 19
Recommend
More recommend