onset voicing and tonal distribution in the taiwanese
play

Onset voicing and tonal distribution in the Taiwanese lexicon - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction Method Results Discussion Onset voicing and tonal distribution in the Taiwanese lexicon Sheng-Fu Wang ( ) New York University NACCL-29 June 18, 2017 Onset voicing and tones Sheng-Fu Wang ( ) Introduction


  1. Introduction Method Results Discussion Onset voicing and tonal distribution in the Taiwanese lexicon Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) New York University NACCL-29 June 18, 2017 Onset voicing and tones Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 )

  2. Introduction Method Results Discussion Overview and synchronic lexicon? synchronic phonetic efgects Onset voicing and tones Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) ◮ Background: onset voicing and tonogenesis ◮ Research question: relationship between phonetic motivations ◮ Method: lexical statistics from dictionary ◮ Results and Discussion: a mixture of diachronic and

  3. Introduction Method Results Discussion Onset voicing and Tonogenesis (e.g., Ohde, 1984) distinctive phonological feature (e.g., Hombert et al., 1979) Onset voicing and tones Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) ◮ Voiced/voiceless stops cause F0 perturbations in vowel onset ◮ voiced → low F0 ◮ voiceless → high F0 ◮ Tonogenesis: when such F0 difgerences are reanalyzed as

  4. Introduction Method Onset voicing and tones onsets? onsets (or null efgect)? refmect the phonetics of tonogenesis? Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) Onset voicing and Tonogenesis in Min 1974; Handel, 2003) Discussion Results ◮ Min: Tonogenesis and voicing change (e.g., Norman, 1973, ◮ *p-, *p h - → p-, p h - with high tones ◮ *b- → p-, p h - with low tones ◮ *m-, *m h - → m-/b- with low tones ◮ Research question: does the current tone-onset association ◮ high tones (44, 52, 44q) → more likely to occur with voiceless ◮ low tones (24, 11, 32, 21q) → more likely to occur with voiced

  5. Introduction 24 Onset voicing and tones 44q *D, low (yang-ru) 21q *D, high (yin-ru) 32 *C, low (yang-qu) 11 *C, high (yin-qu) *B, low (yang-shang) 42 *B, high (yin-shang) *A, low (yang-ping) Method 44 *A, high (yin-ping) tonal value in TW diachronic class & register value before or after the fmip? registers The twist: fmip of tonal register Discussion Results Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) ◮ The low-level tone (11) had high tonal register (yin-qu) ◮ The checked tones (44q, 21q) used to have the opposite tonal ◮ Are they more likely to occur with voiceless or voiced onsets? ◮ If there’s an association, is it more likely to follow the tonal ∅

  6. Introduction Method Onset voicing and tones the contemporary lexicon no matter what languages change/develop language change (see de Lacy and Kingston, 2013)? stops development (other than remnants of sound change) motivated (e.g., Blevins, 2004; Mielke, 2008)? voicing and tonal register in the synchronic grammar ? Why looking at this? Synchronic vs. diachronic explanation Discussion Results Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) ◮ What is the nature of the association (if any) between onset ◮ results of ‘blind’ language change that are phonetically ◮ Laryngeal-tone systems are independent of the tonal ◮ It is possible for low tones to associate more with voiceless ◮ somehow encoded in Universal Grammar that constrains ◮ Constraints on laryngeal-tone systems should afgect how ◮ High tones should be associated more with voiceless stops in

  7. Introduction Method Results Discussion Potential Results on tone-onset voicing association synchronically patterns (or anywhere at all?) Onset voicing and tones Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) ◮ The question: p ↔ H & b/m ↔ L? ◮ For tones that have not undergone fmip of tonal register: ◮ Yes: Phonetic explanation makes sense both diachronically and ◮ No: Motivation for sound change is not refmected in synchronic

  8. Introduction Method Onset voicing and tones tone-onset combination in newly introduced syllable types combination in syllable types developed/introduced later change Potential Results on tone-onset voicing association (cont.) Discussion Results Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) ◮ The question: p ↔ H & b/m ↔ L? ◮ For tones that have undergone fmip of tonal register: ◮ consistent with diachronic tonal register: ◮ The onset-tone distribution has not changed because of tonal ◮ No phonetic efgects on the likelihood of tone-onset ◮ consistent with synchronic tonal register: ◮ The distribution has changed because of tonal change? ◮ after the tonal fmip, phonetic efgects on the likelihood of

  9. Introduction Method Results Discussion Method: Dictionary Education g0v.tw ( 零時政府 ) vowel length (mono, diph, triph) Onset voicing and tones Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) ◮ The Taiwan Southern Min online dictionary by the Ministry of ◮ the version open-sourced by the MoeDict ( 萌典 ) team of ◮ Dictionary processing: ◮ Tallying attested tones for each syllable type ◮ Mapping syllable-level phonological features to syllable types ◮ e.g., Onset-voicing (+, − , n/a) , vowel nasality (+, − , n/a),

  10. Introduction Method Onset voicing and tones voiceless onset voiced onset without tone X with tone X attestedness of High-Level tone across syllable types? efgect (Chong, 2016) Zawaydeh, 2001), palatalization and derived environment Method: Co-occurrence statistics attestedness of tones is independent Discussion Results Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) ◮ Co-occurrence statistics: Observed over Expected ◮ Testing whether the distribution of onset-voicing and ◮ Cross-table and Chi-square tests ◮ Attested vs. unattested ◮ Past studies: OCP (Coetzee and Pater, 2008; Frisch and ◮ One cross-table for each tone ◮ e.g., Is the occurrence of onset voicing independent from the

  11. Introduction O/E = 2.28 Onset voicing and tones 151 58 93 total O/E = 0.38 O/E = 1.38 102 9.93% / 25.95% 57.61% / 41.60% voiceless onset 15 (39.18) 87 (62.82) O/E = 0.20 Method 49 28.48% / 12.46% 3.97% / 19.98 % voiced onset 43 (18.82) 6 (30.18) total without high-level tone with high-level tone Results: example of one analysis (high-level tone) Discussion Results Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) χ 2 (1, N = 151) = 71.60, p < .00001 → voiceless onsets are more likely to associated with high-level tone

  12. Introduction neither *B, low *C, high 11 voiced onsets synchronic *C, low 32 voiceless onsets *D, high Method 21q voiceless onsets diachronic *D, low 44q voiced onsets diachronic Onset voicing and tones diachronic/synchronic voiceless stops 42 (positive association with..) Results Discussion Results: Overview diachronic tonal Result class & register value in TW consistent with... *B, high *A, high 44 voiceless onsets diachronic/synchronic *A, low 24 voiced onsets diachronic/synchronic Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) ∅

  13. Introduction phonetic contexts Onset voicing and tones diachronic) contexts Method value before tonal fmip associations are consistent with diachronic and synchronic Results: summary Discussion Results Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) ◮ ping-sheng and shang-sheng (44, 24, 42): onset-tone ◮ ru-sheng (21q, 44q): onset-tone associations follow the tonal ◮ Following diachronic phonetic contexts ◮ qu-sheng (11, 32): not consistent with diachronic phonetic ◮ 11: associated with voiced onsets (synchronic) ◮ 32: associated with voiceless onsets (neither synchronic or

  14. Introduction Method Results Discussion Back to our potential results diachronically and synchronically synchronic patterns (or anywhere at all?) Onset voicing and tones Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) ◮ The question: p ↔ H & b/m ↔ L? ◮ For tones that have not undergone fmip of tonal register: ◮ Yes (44, 42, 24) : Phonetic explanation makes sense both ◮ No (32) : Motivation for sound change is not refmected in

  15. Introduction Method Onset voicing and tones tone-onset combination in newly introduced syllable types combination in syllable types developed/introduced later change Back to our potential results (cont.) Discussion Results Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) ◮ The question: p ↔ H & b/m ↔ L? ◮ For tones that have undergone register fmip: ◮ consistent with diachronic fmip of tonal register (44q, 21q) : ◮ The onset-tone distribution has not changed because of tonal ◮ No phonetic efgects on the likelihood of tone-onset ◮ consistent with synchronic tonal register (11) : ◮ The distribution has changed because of tonal change? ◮ after the tonal fmip, phonetic efgects on the likelihood of

  16. Introduction (qu-sheng tones), the associations follow the original phonetic Onset voicing and tones current contexts Method context Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) hypothesis Discussion Discussion Results ◮ The results do not support the strong version of either ◮ Although, ignoring the low-level and mid-falling tones ◮ The checked tones follow early phonetic contexts rather than ◮ It supports the Blevins/Mielke view of synchronic grammar ◮ Something special about qusheng tones? ◮ a (more) synchronic efgect - dispersion? ◮ The low-level (11) tone associated with voiced onset ◮ The mid-falling tone (32) associated with voiceless onset ◮ Something about coda

  17. Introduction Method Results Discussion Next steps Onset voicing and tones Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) ◮ Type and token frequencies in lexical statistics ◮ Coda efgect ◮ Psychological reality of such biases ◮ Lexical strata ◮ More varieties of Min

  18. Introduction Method Results Discussion Take-home messages (albeit limited) tools contribute to the wider questions of synchronic and diachronic ‘natural’ explanations Onset voicing and tones Sheng-Fu Wang ( 王聖富 ) ◮ Lexical statistics and contingency patterns are interesting ◮ The patterning of onset-voicing and tones may be able to

Recommend


More recommend