on the potential of proactive domain blacklisting
play

On the Potential of Proactive Domain Blacklisting Mrk Flegyhzi, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On the Potential of Proactive Domain Blacklisting Mrk Flegyhzi, Christian Kreibich and Vern Paxson ICSI, Berkeley Spam domain registrations Kreibich et al., Spamcraft: An inside look at spam campaign orchestration LEET 2009 (CCIED:


  1. On the Potential of Proactive Domain Blacklisting Márk Félegyházi, Christian Kreibich and Vern Paxson ICSI, Berkeley

  2. Spam domain registrations Kreibich et al., “Spamcraft: An inside look at spam campaign orchestration” LEET 2009 (CCIED: The Collaborative Center for Internet Epidemiology and Defenses) 2

  3. Spam domain registrations domains dropped soon after ● blacklisted Kreibich et al., “Spamcraft: An inside look at spam campaign orchestration” LEET 2009 (CCIED: The Collaborative Center for Internet Epidemiology and Defenses) 3

  4. Spam domain registrations domains dropped soon after ● blacklisted domains registered in batches ● Kreibich et al., “Spamcraft: An inside look at spam campaign orchestration” LEET 2009 (CCIED: The Collaborative Center for Internet Epidemiology and Defenses) 4

  5. Proactive domain clustering 5

  6. Proactive domain clustering 6

  7. Name server features .COM zone file - NS records 7

  8. Name server features .COM zone file - NS records 8

  9. Name server features .COM zone file - NS records 9

  10. Name server features .COM zone file - NS records 10

  11. Name server features .COM zone file - NS records 11

  12. Registration features WHOIS registry records 12

  13. Registration features WHOIS registry records 13

  14. Registration features WHOIS registry records 14

  15. Evaluation 15

  16. Evaluation 16

  17. Evaluation 17

  18. Evaluation 18

  19. Evaluation 19

  20. Prediction accuracy 20

  21. Prediction accuracy good true positive rate, only few false positives ● # of false positives vary across clusters ● – 84% of clusters have no potential FPs (unknown) 21

  22. A note on false positives ● some other clusters (example: 123 domains, 119 FP) – many noun-noun domains 22

  23. A note on false positives ● some other clusters (example: 123 domains, 119 FP) – many noun-noun domains 23

  24. A note on false positives ● some other clusters (example: 123 domains, 119 FP) – many noun-noun domains 24

  25. A note on false positives ● some other clusters (example: 123 domains, 119 FP) – many noun-noun domains 25

  26. A note on false positives ● some other clusters (example: 123 domains, 119 FP) – many noun-noun domains ● large cluster: 1746 domains – part of a set of 80k domains – registered under a single name in Albania in Jan and Feb 2010 26

  27. Time to blacklisting 27

  28. Time to blacklisting 28

  29. Time to blacklisting 29

  30. Summary ● domains registered and used in clusters 30

  31. Summary ● domains registered and used in clusters ● more malicious domains based on a few seeds and domain registry information 31

  32. Summary ● domains registered and used in clusters ● more malicious domains based on a few seeds and domain registry information ● good accuracy – 73% of inferred domains on blacklists – 93% of domains are suspicious – false positives are often true positives 32

  33. Summary ● domains registered and used in clusters ● more malicious domains based on a few seeds and domain registry information ● good accuracy – 73% of inferred domains on blacklists – 93% of domains are suspicious – false positives are often true positives ● faster than blacklists for 92% of the inferred malicious domains 33

  34. Summary ● domains registered and used in clusters ● more malicious domains based on a few seeds and domain registry information ● good accuracy – 73% of inferred domains on blacklists – 93% of domains are suspicious – false positives are often true positives ● faster than blacklists for 92% of the inferred malicious domains early response to spam 34

  35. Spam and click volumes Kanich et al., “Spamalytics: An empirical analysis of spam marketing conversion” CCS 2008 (CCIED: The Collaborative Center for Internet Epidemiology and Defenses) 35

  36. Spam and click volumes Kanich et al., “Spamalytics: An empirical analysis of spam marketing conversion” CCS 2008 (CCIED: The Collaborative Center for Internet Epidemiology and Defenses) 36

  37. Name server ages 37

  38. NS features ● 82.2% of domains encounter fresh name servers 38

  39. Registration clusters 39

  40. McAfee SiteAdvisor 40

Recommend


More recommend