Office of Water Project Review And the Deep Draft Navigation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Office of Water Project Review And the Deep Draft Navigation Planning Center of Expertise US Army Corps of Engineers 1

Civil Works Project Delivery Process Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Initial Problem Congressional Study Initial Study Conduct Reconnaissance Certify Reconnaissance Study Phase Identification Resolution/Authorization Funding Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Negotiate PMP Execute FCSA & Request Conduct Feasibility Complete Final RPT. and FCSA Feasibility Funds Study for Coord. & Submission Step 13 Step 10 Step 11 Step 12 Step 14 Administration Division Engineer's Washington Level Chief of Engineers Project Review Transmittal Letter Policy Review Report Authorization Step 15 Step 16 Step 17 Execute PED Draft PPA Conduct PED Agreement Review/Approval Step 18 Step 19 Step 20 Step 21 Congress Appropriates Project Execute PPA OMRR&R Construction Construction Funds

Project Authorization ( from Step14) Approval M odel No? Y es? District Approval HQUSACE “ DESIGN AGREEM ENT” PED–Preconstruction Engineering & Design FED Non-Fed Cost shared at the sam e rate as construction Civil W orks Project Delivery- “An Overview”

GI Funds Safety Assurance Review–Flood & Storm Contract Docs. Projects Sect. 2035 W RDA 2007 PED: Preconstruction Engineering Finalize detailed engineering & Usually 2 years & Design design to ready project for construction District Approval Prepare plans & specs. for first Authority EDD’s Plans & Specs. construction contract EDD–Engineering Design Docum entation Civil W orks Project Delivery- “An Overview”

PP A–Project Partnership Agreem ent Draft PP A Guidance: Approval EC 1165-2-204, dated 31 July 1997 ASA(CW ) RIT Draft PP A Package Decision Docum ent Approved? Const. Funds-  Status–see Plan & Policy Hom e Page Budgeted ? Financial Anal. Deviations  Usually 60-day Added ? review tim e. Checklist Legal Certification Civil W orks Project Delivery- “An Overview”

Coordination DIVISION CW - B HQUSACE President’s Budget ( CG ) Construction General (CG) Funds Budget EC “Energy & Water Development J-Sheets Appropriations” Civil W orks Project Delivery- “An Overview”

Draft PP A Approved ( from Step 17) Initiate Construction PP A PP A–Project Partnership Agreem ent Civil W orks Project Delivery- “An Overview”

Deep Draft Navigation Depth Cost Share < 20 ft. 90%- Fed 10%- NF * 20- 45 ft. 75%- Fed 25%- NF * CG Funds > 45 ft. 50%- Fed 50%- NF * Service Facilities 100%- NF * Plus an additional 10% of General Navigation Features if not offset byLERRs Project Cost Sharing by Project Purpose FLOOD RISK ECOSYSTEM NA VIGA TION RECREA TION MANAGEMENT RESTORA TION Inland: 65%-Federal 65%-Federal 50%-Federal 50%- Federal 50%- Non-Federal 35%- Non-Federal 35%- Non-Federal 50%- T rust Fund Deep Draft: (see above) Civil W orks Project Delivery- “An Overview”

If budgeting for a new PED start, the approval date of the latest econom ic analysis m ust not precede the date of the MSC budget subm ission date by m ore than 3 years. If PED is continuing, the date of approval of the latest econom ic analysis m ust not precede the M SC budget subm ission date by m ore than 5 years.

Level 1–Reaffirm ation • Qualitative analysis affirm s that all previous benefits are still valid Level 2–Benefit Update • Som e quantitative analysis is needed for benefits, but no m ajor changes Level 3–Econom ic Reevaluation • Conditions, Econom ics and Engineering have changed so significantly that full reanalysis is warranted Level 4–General Reevaluation • Scope is beyond an econom ic update (new Plan Form ulation)

Work in Kind under Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 Contributed Funds/Advanced Funds Section 408 Submittal under 33 USC 408