occupy melbourne
play

Occupy Melbourne, Your speakers: Street Preachers Sky Mykyta and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Occupy Melbourne, Your speakers: Street Preachers Sky Mykyta and Hate Mail Managing Principal Solicitor Recent Developments in Nicholas Tiverios the Implied Freedom of Solicitor Political Communication What we will cover today What


  1. Occupy Melbourne, Your speakers: Street Preachers Sky Mykyta and Hate Mail Managing Principal Solicitor Recent Developments in Nicholas Tiverios the Implied Freedom of Solicitor Political Communication

  2. What we will cover today • What is the Implied Freedom? • Occupy Melbourne: Muldoon’s case • Street preachers: Corneloup’s case • Hate mail: Monis’s case • Lessons for drafters and decision-makers • Can we help you?

  3. What is the Implied Freedom? • A limit on legislative power not a personal right • The Lange test: 1. Does the law burden free communication? 2. Is the law directed to a legitimate end compatible with representative and responsible government? • Balancing exercise at stage 2 of the test: are the means chosen reasonable?

  4. Occupy Melbourne: Muldoon’s case • Protestors wanted to continuously occupy Treasury and Flagstaff Gardens • Local Law and Regs prohibited camping without a permit • Permit denied and notices to comply issued • Action for injunctions in Federal Court • Laws breach Constitution & Charter Act?

  5. Muldoon’s case • First Lange question: – the Laws did burden free communication – Was it an effective burden? Much was not prohibited • Second Lange question: – Legitimate end: protection and equitable use of gardens – Balancing of legitimate end and means chosen • Laws valid: a win for reasonable regulation! • Muldoon & Kerrison have appealed to the Full Federal Court

  6. Street preachers: Corneloup’s case • Corneloup brothers – street preachers • City of Adelaide by-law prohibited persons from preaching or distributing printed matter on any road to any bystander or passer-by without permission • Exceptions for elections, Speakers Corner • Reasonable means of regulating public space

  7. Corneloup’s case • Laws did burden free communication • Legitimate end: The legitimate purpose concerns the safety and convenience of users of the road • Confined geographically, unsolicited communications only, permission regime, speakers corner, political exception • Laws valid: win for reasonable regulation

  8. Hate mail: Monis’s case • The appellants allegedly sent letters to relatives of several soldiers killed in action • Each communication conveyed views about a controversial political matter • s 471.12 Cth Code makes it a crime to use a postal service in a way that reasonable persons would regard as being menacing, harassing or offensive .

  9. Monis’s case • Laws did burden free communication • Legitimate end: prevent an intrusion of seriously offensive material into a person’s home or workplace (3 Justices dissenting) • Seriously offensive content only, fault requirements, incidental burden • Laws valid: another win (just) for regulators

  10. Lessons for drafters and decision-makers • Principle of legality – what is within power? • Powers can be drafted to comply with constitutional limits • OR broad powers read down • Freedom of communication not absolute – balanced with other legitimate ends

  11. Lessons for drafters and decision-makers • Can’t immunise all decisions from challenge but can put best defence • Evidence of good-decision making • In general – policies, guidelines, training of decision-makers • For specific decisions – reasons, special instructions

  12. Can we help you? • Advice on – drafting/construing legislative powers – policies and guidelines – reasons for decisions • Training for decision-makers

Recommend


More recommend