nsw minerals industry ohs conference 2008
play

NSW Minerals Industry OHS Conference 2008 Stream - Equipment Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NSW Minerals Industry OHS Conference 2008 Stream - Equipment Design A case study of two NSW DPI incident investigations and the results from testing conducted on a winder haulage rope and chain components Tony Smith - Senior Investigator NSW


  1. NSW Minerals Industry OHS Conference 2008 Stream - Equipment Design A case study of two NSW DPI incident investigations and the results from testing conducted on a winder haulage rope and chain components Tony Smith - Senior Investigator NSW DPI Wally Koppe – Inspector of Mechanical Engineering NSW DPI

  2. N S W Case Study One – Failure of a Winder Haulage Rope D P I � Incident Date 6 May 1999 the 52mm drift haulage rope broke after being in service for 15 months � Rope rated at 1828kN (186 tonnes) � 80 t capacity winding system winder Load = 58.7 tonnes X Dolly car + 4 persons Drift grade 1:3.5 Flat top and MPV 725m long Equipment Design

  3. Failed Haulage Rope Equipment Design N S W I D P

  4. Consequence of Failed Rope drift haulage rope Equipment Design N S W I D P

  5. N S W Consequence of Failed Rope D P I Longwall chock chock carrier MPV travelled 40m from flat top Tyre tread cut from tyre casing as ejected from flat top Equipment Design

  6. N S W Non Destructive Testing D P I Non destructive testing � – Inbye 90m of rope NDT – Outbye rope NDT examined at wire rope plant LMA is not directly � proportional to actual loss of strength Outer wires contribute 57% to � 66% of total strength of wire rope Equipment Design

  7. N S W Destructive Testing D P I Destructive testing � – Resin end testing – Grip testing Relationship between � NDT measured LMA and loss of actual strength Effects of obstructions in � drift were clear Equipment Design

  8. N S W Destructive Test Results D P I 2000 110% New rope minimum breaking load 1828 kN (BHP Ropes Certificates) 100% 1800 Wyee Colliery M&M Drift Rope 90% 1600 Destructive Test Points INCIDENT 6 May 1999 80% 1400 70% KN Breaking Strength 1200 KN Breaking Strength % of New Rope Strength % of new rope strength 60% 1000 Steel Sleepers - least worn Steel Sleepers - most worn 50% 800 BHP recorder start 40% Tommy Dodd Roller 600 30% Side Rollers Rope Brake 400 Ramp End 20% 200 10% 0 0% 4 0 7 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 8 8 8 0 5 0 5 1 2 1 3 6 8 1 1 4 6 3 8 1 1 - 2 2 9 3 3 6 7 7 8 4 5 7 5 9 0 1 1 1 3 4 4 5 7 8 0 - - 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 1 Location from drum end to ramp end in metres (Not to linear scale) Track end ref 801= capel point 991+ train length 17 = 1008m Equipment Design

  9. Breaking Force Vs LMA Equipment Design N S W I D P

  10. N S W Wire and Rope measurements D P I � Rope Diameter Measurements – Using diameter loss to identify strength is not considered accurate – Significant diameter loss may occur after being placed in service due to bedding of rope components � Individual Wire examination and Analysis – New rope and 8 samples of broken rope were chemically and microstructure analysed – Individual wires tested for tensile strength, torsion and reverse bend cycles as per AS 3569-1989 Equipment Design

  11. N S W Case One Recommendations D P I � Publicise the DPI report � Encourage regular audits of winders and wire ropes by experts � AS 4812 was published in 2003. � Encourage use of auto systems to limit maximum loads on ropes to an envelope suitable for the load. Equipment Design

  12. Case Study Two – Failure of a Chain Connector Failure of a Chain Connector Case Study Two Equipment Design N S W I D P

  13. N S W Case Study Two – Failure of a Chain Connector D P I � Incident Date 28 May 2004 � Underground coal mine installing a longwall � Two 1.8m length chain sets reeved around a longwall shearer ranging arm � 20mm herc alloy chain assembly failed at the connector � Connector placed in side loading � Components rated at WLL 9.8 tonne in reeved pull Equipment Design

  14. Chain connectors placed in side pull connector in simulation of Chain side pull incident Equipment Design Post N S W I D P

  15. N S W Effective forces at time of incident D P I Chain sling assembly 36 tonne max. WLL of 9.8 tonne pull by shearer in a reeved pull Tailgate Free to rotate Maingate Tailgate Drive Unit Drive Unit Shearer Partially loaded AFC Resistance of 269 tonnes Chain Maingate drive held Component Stationary by brake system 1320 kN per strand Failure Equipment Design

  16. N S W Connector straight pull test D P I Straight Pull Test Ultimate load 470kN 47.9 tonnes � Pin sheared into 4 pieces � � Legs intact and deformed Equipment Design

  17. N S W Connector side pull test D P I Side Pull Test Connector arm failed. Ultimate load 236kN 24.1 tonnes � Similar failure mode to � Failed connector body near eye connector involved in 52% less than AS 3766-1990 requirement � the incident ( in straight pull ) Equipment Design

  18. N S W Case Two Recommendations Summary D P I � Standards of Mechanical Engineering practice � Supervision and training � Fatigue management � Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) and Suppliers of Lifting and Pulling Mining Equipment Equipment Design

  19. N S W Standards of Mechanical Engineering practice D P I � Chain sling arrangements in Australian Standards to be modified to reflect best practise . “Assemble only one chain or fitting to each � Hammerlock type body half.” � Identify working load limits (WLL) of all lifting and pulling equipment Equipment Design

  20. N S W Supervision and Training D P I � Development of a mining industry certified competency based training course. � Ensure clear lines of authority � Contractor Management systems to clearly define the scope of work and supervisory role of the contractor. Equipment Design

  21. N S W OEM and suppliers of lifting and pulling equipment D P I � OEM to assemble chains with only one load bearing component on any one end of a connector � OEM/Suppliers to supply adequate instructional documentation for assembly, installation and safe use of equipment supplied. � OEM/Suppliers to identify pulling forces and weight of equipment supplied. Equipment Design

  22. N S W Lessons Learned D P I When mines are preparing lifting and pulling work procedures they should take the opportunity to: � ensure compliance with Working Load Limit (WLL) of pulling and lifting equipment. � ensure information is readily available at the work site to identify forces applied to pulling and lifting equipment. � ensure a competent person supervises and takes responsibility for all pulling and lifting tasks. Equipment Design

  23. N S W Response by NSW DPI D P I � Safety Alerts published for both incidents � Conducted an industry seminar on winder systems � Ongoing Audit of powered winding systems through to 2009 � Consultation with Australian Standards Committees, OEM’s and mining industry � Legislative changes incorporating design and plant registration for winding systems Equipment Design

  24. N S W DPI published reports D P I � CD available free of charge � CD contains all reports � Contact DPI publications – Maitland � www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/minerals/safety Equipment Design

Recommend


More recommend