mmd 2018 summit st louis union station
play

MMD 2018 Summit St. Louis Union Station T hursda y, 05.31.2018 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MMD 2018 Summit St. Louis Union Station T hursda y, 05.31.2018 Afte rno o n Se ssio n Co ho rt 1 ~;~ ~ Small- We st Mid- South Cadre LINN CO. R-I POPLAR BLUFF R-I Mid.East Mid.South ., Mid.West MOUND CITY R-II WILLOW


  1. MMD 2018 Summit St. Louis Union Station T hursda y, 05.31.2018 Afte rno o n Se ssio n Co ho rt 1

  2. ~;~ ~ Small- We st Mid- South Cadre LINN CO. R-I POPLAR BLUFF R-I • Mid.East • Mid.South ., • Mid.West MOUND CITY R-II WILLOW SPRINGS R-IV Small.East :··· ; • Small.West CAMERON R-I MCDONALD CO. R-I i--- - --- ----- ·-- --- --- - --- -- - --- .•.. -- -- - --- -- ---- -- - -- ---- --- -- --- -- -·-··-. ::· .. -· • Urban/Suburban \... >/ Participating Buildings SHELDON R-VIII : 1 · -., 5 lll1nc -- .... __ .. . t, 10 -~~- LINN CO . R -1 15 . ( CAMERON R·I 20 23 Small- E ast Mid- E ast 3/ 21 BE LTON 124 • GREEN FOREST R-II FARMINGTON R-VII STRAIN-JAPAN R-XVI MERAMEC VALLEY R-III SEDA LI A 200 MISSOUrl STRAIN-JAPAN R-XVI .. HAYTI R-II ROLLA 31 .. • ·--··- .. ·- ... ROLLA 31 MALDEN R-I FARMINGTON R- V II \ SH ELDON R-VIII GREEN FOREST R- 11 .. ., l < SPRINGFIELD R ·X II • •-::•{. WILLOW S PRI NGS R- IV • '• Mid- We st Ur ban/ Subur ban ~--· - ·-··· · ·· ··· ·· ······················· · ··· ·· · ·· · ·· ························· :;;{::·: MALD EN R·I .f MCDONALD CO . R·I BELTON 124 FT. ZUMWALT R-II ,( .. HAYTi R. 11 --~ .~-:'! , ... SEDALIA 200 PATTONVILLE ::~ \- ·~· ·' UNIVERSITY ACADEMY SPRINGFIELD R-XII ( ,. :~:'.; ----------- -- -- -- RAYTOWN C-2

  3. Eng ngagement nt wi with th CS CST T thro hroug ugh Fe Feb 2 2018 8 217 I n-pe rso n a nd/ o r virtua l inte ra c tio ns b e twe e n CST a nd distric ts Ave ra g e numb e r o f inte ra c tio ns a c ro ss 21 distric ts with prio r CW e xpe rie nc e . Ave ra g e numb e r o f inte ra c tio ns a c ro ss 7 distric ts witho ut prio r CW e xpe rie nc e .

  4. E NGAGE ME NT WIT H CST : T OPICS 54% Effective teaching/learning practices 49% Collaborative teams 36% Data-based decision making 36% MMD expectations/logistics/DESE… 31% Alignment and systems planning 25% Common formative assessment 19% School-based implementation… 12% Leadership 20% Other

  5. Sta te wide c o lla b o ra tio n - - ...................... .. - - -----,,, \ . , \ \ , ' \ \ ) I

  6. Distric t fo c us % Hig h 0% 50% 100% % Mo de ra te E nsure tha t a ll sc ho o ls in the distric t a lig n the ir wo rk with distric t-e sta b lishe d g o a ls a nd pra c tic e s De plo y princ ipa ls to pro vide da ta -b a se d fe e db a c k to te a c he rs (b o th individua ls a nd te a ms) a b o ut the ir…

  7. Distric t fo c us % Hig h % Mo de ra te 0% 50% 100% Mo nito r the de g re e o f imple me nta tio n o f fo c use d impro ve me nt stra te g ie s… Use a lig ne d te a m struc ture s to suppo rt full imple me nta tio n o f… De fine fo r the b e ne fit o f a ll sta ff wha t full imple me nta tio n o f…

  8. What factors do you think were most associated with changes in the effective teaching and learning practices? Co mmo n F o rma tive Asse ssme nt # o f fa c ilita to r visits Size o f the sc ho o l Da ta -b a se d De c isio n- Stude nt-te a c he r Ma king Sc ho o l le ve l ra tio L e a de rship Ge o g ra phic lo c a tio n Po ve rty (F RL ra te ) Cha rte r o r ma g ne t P.D. sta tus CW hi sto ry T itle 1 sta tus Please vote for those you think are associated: 1. Open web browser, go to www.menti.com. 2. Use the code 601196. 3. Vo Vote. .

  9. We were able to predict 67% of the change for ETLP from just a few variables (and all of the others had no impact) Variable Effect Positive change in Common Formative Assessment domain + CWIS score Positive change in Data-based Decision making domain CWIS + score + Having a higher school Free and Reduced Price Lunch Rate Being located in a rural setting Being located in a remote setting ( more than 25/35 miles from an urban center )

  10. Impacts on Effective Teaching and Learning Practices Here are the results from that study: We were able to predict 67 percent of the change for ETLP from just a Nearly all of the change few variables (and all of the others had no impact) was explained by Variable Effect + Positive change in Common Formative Assessment domain CWIS score + Common Formative Positive change in Data-based Decision making domain CWIS score + Having a higher school Free and Reduced Price Lunch Rate Assessment Being located in a rural setting Being located in a remote setting ( more than 25/35 miles from an urban center )

  11. T hurs M M i i s s s s o o u u r r i M i M o o d d el el D D i i s s t t r r i i c c t t s: 2 : 2 0 0 1 1 8-2019 2019 05.31.2018  □ 12:30p Ove rvie w o f - CdlUtlfcadrettJ .l (cadre I) the Ye a r □ 2:30p Wo rld Ca fe Cohort 1: 16 districts □ 3:45p Clo sing 102 buildings Cameron (1 Buchanan Co (1) Smllhv,lle (3) Cohort 2: 53 districts zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA 244 buildings Sherwood Cas,s (1) Sheldon (1) Total: 69 districts Aurorat5) 346 buildings @ Mo Mo de lDistric ts O v e r v i e w o f t h e Y e a r # MMDCha t

Recommend


More recommend