mixed quantum states in higher categories
play

Mixed quantum states in higher categories Linde Wester Department - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mixed quantum states in higher categories Linde Wester Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford (with Chris Heunen and Jamie Vicary) June 6, 2014 1 / 15 Table of contents Existing models for classical and quantum data Special


  1. Mixed quantum states in higher categories Linde Wester Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford (with Chris Heunen and Jamie Vicary) June 6, 2014 1 / 15

  2. Table of contents Existing models for classical and quantum data Special dagger Frobenius algebras 2-categorical quantum mechanics The construction 2( − ) The theory of bimodules The 2( − ) construction 2( CP ∗ ( − )) Applications A unified description of teleportation and classical encryption A unified security proof 2 / 15

  3. CP ∗ ( − ) 1. Special dagger Frobenius algebras in a monoidal category C : = = = = = = 3 / 15

  4. CP ∗ ( − ) 1. Special dagger Frobenius algebras in a monoidal category C : = = = = = = 2. Completely positive maps between Frobenius algebras: morphisms f in C , for which ∃ g such that g † f = g 3 / 15

  5. 2-categories and their graphical language 4 / 15

  6. 2-categories and their graphical language 0-cells Regions Classical information A 4 / 15

  7. 2-categories and their graphical language 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems B A S 4 / 15

  8. 2-categories and their graphical language 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems B A S 4 / 15

  9. 2-categories and their graphical language 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems S ′ 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics α B A S 4 / 15

  10. 2-categories and their graphical language 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems S ′ 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics α B A S 4 / 15

  11. 2-categories and their graphical language 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems S ′ 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics Horizontal composition α B A C S T 4 / 15

  12. 2-categories and their graphical language 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems S ′ 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics Horizontal composition α B A C S T 4 / 15

  13. 2-categories and their graphical language 0-cells Regions Classical information S ′′ γ 1-cells Lines Quantum systems S ′ 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics Horizontal composition α B A C S T Vertical composition 4 / 15

  14. 2-categories and their graphical language 0-cells Regions Classical information S ′′ γ 1-cells Lines Quantum systems S ′ 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics Horizontal composition α B A C S T Vertical composition 4 / 15

  15. 2-categories and their graphical language 0-cells Regions Classical information S ′′ γ Lines Quantum systems 1-cells S ′ 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics Horizontal composition α C 2 C C Vertical composition � � � H 1 H 2 � H 3 H 4 � H 1 ⊗ H 3 ⊕ H 2 ⊗ H 4 � The standard example is 2Hilb : ◮ 0-cells given by natural numbers ◮ 1-cells given by matrices of finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces ◮ 2-cells given by matrices of linear maps 4 / 15

  16. Quantum systems interacting with their environment 5 / 15

  17. Quantum systems interacting with their environment Let ( A , , ) and ( B , , ) be classical structures in C . A dagger C-D-bimodule is a morphism M satisfying: M A M B A B M = A B M M M M 5 / 15

  18. Quantum systems interacting with their environment Let ( A , , ) and ( B , , ) be classical structures in C . A dagger C-D-bimodule is a morphism M satisfying: M A M B M A B M = A B = M M M M M M M 5 / 15

  19. Quantum systems interacting with their environment Let ( A , , ) and ( B , , ) be classical structures in C . A dagger C-D-bimodule is a morphism M satisfying: M A M B M M M A B M M † = A B = = M M M M A B M M M M A M B M 5 / 15

  20. Quantum systems interacting with their environment Let ( A , , ) and ( B , , ) be classical structures in C . A dagger C-D-bimodule is a morphism M satisfying: M A M B M M M A B M M † = A B = = M M M M A B M M M M A M B M A bimodule homomorphism is a morphism f ∈ C , such that M ′ M ′ f M ′ = f M M M 5 / 15

  21. Quantum systems interacting with their environment Let ( A , , ) and ( B , , ) be classical structures in C . A dagger C-D-bimodule is a morphism M satisfying: M M M M M A B A B M M M M † M = = = A B A B M M M M M M M A bimodule homomorphism is a morphism f ∈ C , such that M ′ M ′ f M ′ = M f M M 6 / 15

  22. The 2( − ) construction How can we construct the 2-category 2( C ) from C ? 7 / 15

  23. The 2( − ) construction How can we construct the 2-category 2( C ) from C ? ◮ 0-cells: classical structures in C 7 / 15

  24. The 2( − ) construction How can we construct the 2-category 2( C ) from C ? ◮ 0-cells: classical structures in C ◮ 1-cells: bimodules of classical structures in C 7 / 15

  25. The 2( − ) construction How can we construct the 2-category 2( C ) from C ? ◮ 0-cells: classical structures in C ◮ 1-cells: bimodules of classical structures in C ◮ 2-cells: module homomorphisms in C 7 / 15

  26. The 2( − ) construction How can we construct the 2-category 2( C ) from C ? ◮ 0-cells: classical structures in C ◮ 1-cells: bimodules of classical structures in C ◮ 2-cells: module homomorphisms in C In representation theory: The orbifold completion of a monoidal category 7 / 15

  27. The 2( − ) construction How can we construct the 2-category 2( C ) from C ? ◮ 0-cells: classical structures in C ◮ 1-cells: bimodules of classical structures in C ◮ 2-cells: module homomorphisms in C In representation theory: The orbifold completion of a monoidal category Some properties of 2( − ) are: 7 / 15

  28. The 2( − ) construction How can we construct the 2-category 2( C ) from C ? ◮ 0-cells: classical structures in C ◮ 1-cells: bimodules of classical structures in C ◮ 2-cells: module homomorphisms in C In representation theory: The orbifold completion of a monoidal category Some properties of 2( − ) are: ◮ 2( C ) is a 2-category. 7 / 15

  29. The 2( − ) construction How can we construct the 2-category 2( C ) from C ? ◮ 0-cells: classical structures in C ◮ 1-cells: bimodules of classical structures in C ◮ 2-cells: module homomorphisms in C In representation theory: The orbifold completion of a monoidal category Some properties of 2( − ) are: ◮ 2( C ) is a 2-category. ◮ 2( − ) preserves the dagger. 7 / 15

  30. The 2( − ) construction How can we construct the 2-category 2( C ) from C ? ◮ 0-cells: classical structures in C ◮ 1-cells: bimodules of classical structures in C ◮ 2-cells: module homomorphisms in C In representation theory: The orbifold completion of a monoidal category Some properties of 2( − ) are: ◮ 2( C ) is a 2-category. ◮ 2( − ) preserves the dagger. ◮ If C is compact, so is 2( C ): 1-cells have ambidextrous duals. 7 / 15

  31. The 2( − ) construction How can we construct the 2-category 2( C ) from C ? ◮ 0-cells: classical structures in C ◮ 1-cells: bimodules of classical structures in C ◮ 2-cells: module homomorphisms in C In representation theory: The orbifold completion of a monoidal category Some properties of 2( − ) are: ◮ 2( C ) is a 2-category. ◮ 2( − ) preserves the dagger. ◮ If C is compact, so is 2( C ): 1-cells have ambidextrous duals. ◮ If C has dagger biproducts, so do all hom-categories of 2( C ). 7 / 15

  32. The 2( − ) construction How can we construct the 2-category 2( C ) from C ? ◮ 0-cells: classical structures in C ◮ 1-cells: bimodules of classical structures in C ◮ 2-cells: module homomorphisms in C In representation theory: The orbifold completion of a monoidal category Some properties of 2( − ) are: ◮ 2( C ) is a 2-category. ◮ 2( − ) preserves the dagger. ◮ If C is compact, so is 2( C ): 1-cells have ambidextrous duals. ◮ If C has dagger biproducts, so do all hom-categories of 2( C ). ◮ The subcategory of scalars of 2( C ) corresponds to C . 7 / 15

  33. The 2( − ) construction How can we construct the 2-category 2( C ) from C ? ◮ 0-cells: classical structures in C ◮ 1-cells: bimodules of classical structures in C ◮ 2-cells: module homomorphisms in C In representation theory: The orbifold completion of a monoidal category Some properties of 2( − ) are: ◮ 2( C ) is a 2-category. ◮ 2( − ) preserves the dagger. ◮ If C is compact, so is 2( C ): 1-cells have ambidextrous duals. ◮ If C has dagger biproducts, so do all hom-categories of 2( C ). ◮ The subcategory of scalars of 2( C ) corresponds to C . ◮ 2( FHilb ) is isomorphic to the category 2Hilb . 7 / 15

  34. The 2( − ) construction How can we construct the 2-category 2( C ) from C ? ◮ 0-cells: classical structures in C ◮ 1-cells: bimodules of classical structures in C ◮ 2-cells: module homomorphisms in C In representation theory: The orbifold completion of a monoidal category Some properties of 2( − ) are: ◮ 2( C ) is a 2-category. ◮ 2( − ) preserves the dagger. ◮ If C is compact, so is 2( C ): 1-cells have ambidextrous duals. ◮ If C has dagger biproducts, so do all hom-categories of 2( C ). ◮ The subcategory of scalars of 2( C ) corresponds to C . ◮ 2( FHilb ) is isomorphic to the category 2Hilb . For proofs see LW (2013), Masters’s thesis, ’Categorical Models for Quantum Computing’. 7 / 15

  35. Horizontal composition in 2( − ) 8 / 15

Recommend


More recommend