michael palladino september 19 2011
play

Michael Palladino September 19, 2011 1 Todays Agenda Review of the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Michael Palladino September 19, 2011 1 Todays Agenda Review of the main drivers for change External bandwidth capacity Full campus wireless connectivity Potential funding model changes Short term (Options 2 & 3)


  1. Michael Palladino September 19, 2011 1

  2. Today’s Agenda  Review of the main drivers for change  External bandwidth capacity  Full campus wireless connectivity  Potential funding model changes  Short term (Options 2 & 3)  Longer term (Option 4)  Status of the main drivers  Next steps 2

  3. Drivers For Change  Internet and Internet 2 external connections will need to increase significantly over the next 5 years  10-fold campus backbone increase  Most wired connections moving from 10 to 100 or 1000Mbps  Rates for wired 1000Mbps continue to go down  FY’10 - $30, FY’11 - $20, FY’12 - $15, FY’13 -likely $10/month  More cloud services will be used  Need for full-campus wireless access  Need to further simplify our funding model and the way we bill for networked devices, especially as more and more consumer products are connected to PennNet 3

  4. External Connectivity  There will be significant increases in Internet and Internet 2 connectivity needs when servers and services shift to the cloud and applications are not housed on PennNet infrastructure  In the last 11 years  Internet usage has grown from 100 Meg to 2000 Meg  Internet 2 usage has grown from 45 Meg to 400 Meg  Unit costs have gone down, but they are not free  Internet- $4/Meg month (Gig $48k/year)  Internet 2- $20/Meg month (Gig $240k/year) 4

  5. Internet Current Bandwidth Usage 5

  6. Internet Projected Bandwidth Usage 12000 10000 8000 Mbps 6000 4000 2000 0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 6

  7. External Connectivity: Internet  Next steps  We continue to monitor usage and will make adjustments as bandwidth grows  Currently have three, 1 Gig pipes under contract with 2 vendors  We will continue to secure reliable, low-cost and flexible options with 2 different Internet Service Providers with diverse fiber routes back to campus  Eventually two-10 Gig interfaces  Ability to scale bandwidth as needed at known rate increases  2-3 year terms to lock in low rates 7

  8. Internet 2 Current Bandwidth Usage 8

  9. External Connectivity: Internet 2  Next steps  We continue to monitor usage and will make adjustments as bandwidth grows  Currently have 500 Meg contract under contract, burstable to 1000 Meg  The ION/DYNES service will soon be available which should divert some research bandwidth to this lower-cost option  By FY’13 or FY’14 Internet 2 rates will be decreasing  We could bill significant consumers, however, we prefer not to due to complexity, additional cost and disincentive to research computing 9

  10. Wireless Current Status  Access point growth  1760 APs on 09/01/2010  2592 APs on 09/15/2011  832 APs added (47% increase)  34,018 distinct users in last 6 months  55,619 distinct devices in last 6 months 10

  11. Full-Campus Wireless Connectivity  Earlier this year, there was a NPTF consensus that Penn should have full-campus wireless solution by FY’14 to support:  Increasing mobile demands  Exponential growth of consumer devices  Use of mobile devices integrated into classroom instruction 11

  12. Full-Campus Wireless Connectivity  Current Status  Residential (100%)  College House/Sansom Towers/Greeks(Penn-owned)  Schools  General coverage (nearly 100%)  High density coverage (100% where there is programmatic need)  Administrative areas (15-20%)  Outside (10%)  Penn Park recently completed 12

  13. Wireless AP Projected Growth 6000 5000 4000 # of Aps 3000 2000 1000 0 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 13

  14. Full Campus Wireless Issues  Given Penn’s decentralized nature and the current funding model for wireless, we have issues to address  Who owns the mobile users as they consume AP bandwidth capacity and IP addresses?  Who is owner of outside and public spaces?  How should we prorate costs in shared buildings?  Should we put wireless in non-Penn owned buildings?  Science Center 14

  15. Full Campus Wireless  Goal  Have a full campus wireless network by FY’14 (Sept. ‘13)  Next steps  Fully articulate strategy  Finalize design, plans and costs  Operating costs increase by at least $1M annually  We will need over 2500 new access points  Obtain peer data  Seek faculty and student support  Seek central funding in the fall of 2011 15

  16. Full Campus Wireless  Are there other alternatives that should be investigated?  Eliminate wireless on campus and just have vendor solutions from wireless providers (3G and 4G)  Is this like the modem pool was years ago when good service was available from commodity providers and we shifted the cost to users?  Is this still very much a strategic investment for Penn?  Should we outsource an on-campus solution?  At our current rates with 5000 access points and 50000 users, ISC could deliver the service at about $3/user/month 16

  17. Drivers For Changing the Current Funding Model  IP billing for the non-headcount CSF charge is 20% or a little over $1M annually  The current method is too cumbersome  Over 1000+ folks involved-tracking and thinking about fiscal aspect of getting an IP address  Some client behavior in managing down IP address costs, reflects historical rates ($11.40/month) rather than the current $1.46  If we keep the same funding model, we would need to do a programming effort to bill for IPv6 addresses 17

  18. IP FUNDING MODEL CHANGE OPTIONS  Option 1  No change on billing for the Central Infrastructure Bundle of Services (80% headcount-20% IP addresses)  Wireless IP charges frozen at February 28, 2011 levels  ISC opening address ranges to accommodate substantial growth  Option 2  Eliminate all wireless IP addresses (about 12000) from IP billing pool and increase the CSF rate  Option 3  Eliminate all IP charges and just have a 100% headcount model  Option 4  Increase Central Infrastructure Bundle to include more services  Viewed as a potential longer term approach 18

  19. Option 1: No Change  Advantages  No changes necessary and bills stay the same  Disadvantages  The arbitrary date of February 28, 2011 to fix the wireless IP pool was not equal for all schools and centers  Increases costs for IPv6 billing development  Wasted time for 1000 folks involved in tracking, approving and managing IP costs in schools and centers  Higher cost for ISC to bill than 100% headcount model 19

  20. Option 1: Current Summary Costs CSF FY'12 Budget $5,205,607 FY'12 Projected # of IP addresses 59,400 Headcount Factor 80% Headcount Dollars $4,164,486 IP Factor 20% IP Dollars $1,041,121 IP rate/year $17.53 IP rate/month $1.46 20

  21. Option 1: Current School/Center Charges Total Headcount % of total IP Counts @ IP charge Total FY 12 FY'12 Adjusted based charge headcount 11/30/10 (1.46 month) Charge Headcount (80% of NW cost)* Annenberg Center For Performing Arts 17 0.07% 2,911 77 1,350 4,261 141 0.58% 24,140 602 10,551 34,691 Annenberg School for Communication Audit Compliance and Privacy 21 0.09% 3,652 39 684 4,336 260 1.07% 44,513 720 12,620 57,133 Business Services Campus Services 49 0.20% 8,446 369 6,468 14,914 40 0.16% 6,849 308 5,398 12,247 College Houses and Academic Services Development and Alumni Relations 334 1.37% 57,185 517 9,062 66,247 Division of Finance 246 1.01% 42,176 750 13,145 55,321 170 0.70% 29,107 277 4,855 33,962 Division of Public Safety Division of Recreation & Intercollegiate Athletics 129 0.53% 22,085 547 9,587 31,672 27 0.11% 4,679 129 2,261 6,940 Executive Vice President Facilities and Real Estate Services 864 3.55% 147,987 737 12,918 160,905 899 3.69% 153,850 948 16,616 170,466 Graduate School of Education Human Resources 63 0.26% 10,728 126 2,208 12,936 Information Systems and Computing 278 1.14% 47,598 600 10,516 58,114 13 0.05% 2,226 53 929 3,155 Institute of Contemporary Art International Programs 26 0.11% 4,508 89 1,560 6,068 628 2.58% 107,551 1,323 23,189 130,740 Law School Morris Arboretum 43 0.18% 7,417 106 1,858 9,275 President's Center 183 0.75% 31,387 507 8,886 40,273 Provost Interdisciplinary Programs 42 0.17% 7,246 1,027 18,001 25,247 Provost's Center 367 1.51% 62,835 801 14,039 76,874 5,752 23.65% 984,913 9,272 162,513 1,147,426 School of Arts and Sciences School of Dental Medicine 731 3.01% 125,198 1,961 34,371 159,569 496 2.04% 84,845 1,144 20,051 104,896 School of Design School of Engineering and Applied Science 1,734 7.13% 296,855 5,671 108,248 405,103 Perelman School of Medicine 4,958 20.38% 848,876 9,764 171,137 1,020,013 School of Nursing 875 3.60% 149,854 1,321 23,154 173,008 School of Social Policy and Practice 276 1.13% 47,179 211 3,698 50,877 1,079 4.44% 184,725 2,492 43,678 228,403 School of Veterinary Medicine Student Activities 1 0.00% 171 225 3,944 4,115 255 1.05% 43,712 1,860 32,601 76,313 Student Services University Library 260 1.07% 44,449 2,614 45,816 90,265 University Museum 101 0.41% 17,235 324 5,679 22,914 Wharton School 2,964 12.18% 507,399 7,164 125,566 632,965 Total 24,323 100.00% 4,164,487 54,675 1,041,121 5,205,607 21

Recommend


More recommend