medicaid advisory committee
play

Medicaid Advisory Committee September 23, 2015 General Services - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Medicaid Advisory Committee September 23, 2015 General Services Building Salem, Oregon Time Item Presenter 9:00 Opening Remarks Co-Chairs Oregon Health Plan (OHP) and Coordinated Care Organizations OHA update Rhonda Busek, Janna Starr, 9:05


  1. Medicaid Advisory Committee September 23, 2015 General Services Building Salem, Oregon

  2. Time Item Presenter 9:00 Opening Remarks Co-Chairs Oregon Health Plan (OHP) and Coordinated Care Organizations – OHA update Rhonda Busek, Janna Starr, 9:05  OHP enrollment and determination dashboard OHA  OHP quarterly report; 2 nd quarter 2015 Oral Health and OHP – OHA Dental Director  9:25 Oral health and OHP Dr. Austin, OHA  2015 legislative priorities and OHA initiatives on oral health 9:55 InterCommunity Health Network CCO Community Advisory Rebekah Fowler, CAC Council (CAC) Coordinator • IHN’s CAC membership and community engagement activities • Council priority areas and implementation activities outlined in the CHIP 10:25 Break Medicaid 12 Month Continuous Eligibility 10:30 Co-Chairs; staff • Review draft recommendations; finalize. Darren Coffman, Jason 11:20 Health Evidence Review Commission (HERC) Gingerich, OHA 11:50 Closing comments Co-Chairs

  3. OHA Update: Oregon Health Plan (OHP) and CCOs Rhonda Busek and Janna Starr Health Systems Division, OHA

  4. Oral Health and OHP Bruce Austin, OHA Dental Director

  5. C ommunity A dvisory C ouncil Rebekah Fowler , PhD CAC Coordinator

  6. Presentation Overview 1. Describe CAC structure & representation 2. Provide overview of CHIP and its impact 3. Discuss current CAC CHIP work 4. Give 3 CHIP activity examples 5. Discuss community engagement activities 6. Provide my contact information 7. Answer questions

  7. Community Representation  Regional CAC Structure • 12 IHN-CCO members (63%) • 3 county staff • 3 community members • 1 Chair  Three Local Advisory Committees • 6 CAC Representatives plus county & community partners • Provide broader, deeper level of community involvement

  8. CHIP: Community Health Improvement Plan  CHIP Focus Areas • Access to healthcare • Behavioral health • Chronic disease • Maternal & Child health  Strategic Planning • The CHIP focus areas are used to prioritize transformation pilot projects

  9. Current CHIP Work in Progress  The CCO will use Outcomes and Indicators to further prioritize pilot project proposals • Outcome example: IHN-CCO members will receive appropriate care at the appropriate time and place • Indicators are measures of progress toward achieving outcomes such as length of time to receive an appointment or Emergency Department use.

  10. Sample Initiatives  Health Disparities Workgroup will : • Identify areas of health disparities • Identify root causes of disparities • Develop strategic plan to create equity  Traditional Health Workers (THW) • Inventoried region’s use of THWs • Developed learning collaborative for THW alternative payment method pilot projects • Embedded THWs into patient centered primary care homes and schools

  11. Community Engagement: A Work in Progress  Community Conversations  Pros & Cons comments outreach  Strategic Planning Retreat will focus on identifying 2-5 questions the CAC wants to ask of the community

  12. Challenges  Data availability  Community engagement – lessons learned  Differences in work styles  While the CAC has always maintained an IHN-CCO member majority, more members are needed.

  13. Contact Information Rebekah Fowler, PhD CAC Coordinator rfowlerconsulting@gmail.com (541)768-7699

  14. BREAK

  15. 12-Month Continuous Eligibility for OHP Adults

  16. 12-Month Continuous Eligibility Problem: Low and moderate-income parents and childless adults experience substantial income volatility throughout the year, which affects eligibility and can cause churning on and off Medicaid Policy: 12-Month Continuous Eligibility Allows beneficiaries to maintain coverage for up to one full year, even if individuals/families experience a change in income or family status – Option for children since 1997; 32 states have adopted policy in their Medicaid or CHIP programs; 23 states have in both programs – Federal policy has been an option for Medicaid adults since 2013  To date, only New York state had has implemented the policy for their adult populations, likely due to financing barriers Impact : Promotes coverage continuity for eligible individuals, despite fluctuations in income or other eligibility criteria, but also creates additional costs for a state 54

  17. Method for Determining Costs of 12-Month Continuous Eligibility for OHP Adults, 2017-19 Biennium Estimate Estimate budget Forecast Calculate Develop annual impact for 12- OHP federal/state continuity program month continuous enrollment program costs for of coverage expenditures eligibility for for 17-19 current and new ratios for 17-19 income-eligible biennium eligibility policy biennium OHP adults

  18. Continuity Ratio • Used similar approach to the Medicaid “continuity ratio” developed by researchers at George Washington University (GWU) in 2009 _______ Average Member Months ________ = Continuity Ratio Total # of Unduplicated Enrollees that Year 100% Continuity Ratio = Everyone Was Enrolled for the Entire Year Table 2. Continuity Ratios, 2017-19 Biennium Current New Policy Eligibility Categories Difference Policy (%) (%) Medicaid Expansion Adults 68.2 78.7 +10.5 Aid to the Blind and Aid to the 83.8 87.3 +3.5 Disabled (AB/AD) Parent/Caretaker Relative 61.9 77.7 +15.8 Sources: George Washington’s analysis of Medicaid Statistical Information System Datamart for FY 2006-11; DHS/OHA Integrated Client Services data warehouse, 2008-2012 18

  19. Federal Financial Participation • Federal funding for the AB/AD and Parent/Caretaker Relative adult groups for the 2017-19 biennium is estimated at 62.47% • Federal funding for the Medicaid expansion population gradually decreases from 100% in 2016 to 90% in years 2020 and beyond – 2014 CMS guidance indicated that states would not receive the full-enhanced match rate for their Medicaid expansion population under 12-month continuous eligibility Table 4. Federal Participation for Oregon’s Medicaid Expansion Population with New Policy (i.e. 12-Month Continuous Eligibility), 2017-19 Biennium SFY Year Estimated ACA 12-Month CE FMAP Reduction Enhanced FMAP FMAP for Adults 17-19 Biennium 2018 94.50% 93.68% -0.82% 2019 93.50% 92.68% 19

  20. Results Table 8. Combined Estimated Cost for OHP Adult Populations, 2017-19 Biennium Change 17-19 Current Policy New Policy Biennium Total Member Months of 11.8 million 13.5 million 1.7 million Coverage PMPM Cost $770 $759 N/A Federal Share $7.64 billion $8.66 billion $1.01 billion FMAP 83.81% 83.58% -0.22% State Share $1.47 billion $1.7 billion $223 million Total Program Cost 2017-19 $9.1 billion $10.3 billion $1.2 billion Biennium † †The change in combined program expenditure from “current policy” to “new policy” reflects a change in the ratio of clients due to changes in the continuity ratio for the respective adult populations resulting from the implementation of 12-month continuous eligibility. Because each eligibility group has a different program expenditure (PMPM), the combined weighted average PMPM is different when the ratio of member months changes. 20

  21. Summary of Results If a 12-month continuous eligibility policy were implemented for OHP adults for the 17-19 biennium: • Coverage Continuity: estimated to increase total member months of coverage by nearly 15% over the biennium, resulting in 1,734,346 additional member months of coverage. – Continuity ratios are estimated to increase on average by nearly 10 percent for the three OHP adult populations. • Program Costs: estimated to increase total program spending by $1.23 billion  Additional federal revenue of $1.01 billion  Additional state spending of $223 million  $58 million due to decrease in ACA Expansion FMAP 21

  22. Recommendations Committee’s Task: • Prepare and submit recommendations to OHA regarding the feasibility of 12-month continuous eligibility for adults in OHP in the 2017-19 biennium. • Outline the potential fiscal impact on the state budget in the next biennium. Potential Recommendations: • Recommend to OHA to request the Legislature to fund 12- month continuous eligibility for 17-19 biennium • Don’t recommend 12 -month continuous eligibility • Alternative options/considerations: see draft memo

  23. Preliminary Recommendations (July 2015) Request policy as part of Oregon’s 1115 Waiver renewal: Propose to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that 12-month continuous eligibility for OHP income-eligible adults be incorporated into Oregon’s 1115 waiver in 2017, including waiving the reduction in FMAP for this policy, reducing the overall state investment to $165 million. Monitor OHP program performance: Implement data collection procedures to monitor changes in the fiscal, quality and health outcomes that result from churn in OHP:  Adopt transparent OHP eligibility, enrollment and redetermination performance indicators.  Complete annual assessment of administrative costs that result from churn and potential savings to the Medicaid program, CCOs, and health providers if this policy were adopted. Conduct longitudinal cost-benefit study: estimate potential financial benefits that could result from changes in health care utilization associated with increases in coverage continuity (i.e. stable Medicaid coverage).

  24. Public Comment or Testimony

Recommend


More recommend