Materials for GSA Outreach Materials for GSA Outreach April 2019 April 2019
GSP Topics & Project Schedule GSP Topics GSP Finalization Elements 2
• Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles 2 columns • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles Deliverable Review Schedule Update • Click to edit bullet styles
GSP Deliverables Review Schedule Approved By Board 3/13 BOARD Stafg provide Possible MEETING BOARD response to BOARD • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles Public Drafu#1 Public Public Final Drafu JPA Board - MEETING comments/ GSA MEETING GSA Final D goes Deliverable goes to Board Review of GSP Discussion (if JPA Board discussion of Review JPA Board Approval for Review to Board for Period Distributed areas of – Actjon proposed Actjon 2 columns Review disagreement) revisions • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles Bundle 1 (Administratjve July 10- May 1 May 8 June 5 June 12 Sept 15 Oct 15 Nov 5 Nov 13 Dec/Jan • Click to edit bullet styles Informatjon; Plan Aug 25 Area; HCM) • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles Bundle 2 July 10- (Water Budget – June 5 June 12 July 1 July 10 Sept 15 Oct 15 Nov 5 Nov 13 Dec/Jan Aug 25 at basin-scale) • Click to edit bullet styles Bundle 3 (Undesirable Results & • Click to edit bullet styles Minimum July 10- June 5 June 12 July 1 July 10 Sept 15 Oct 15 Nov 5 Nov 13 Dec/Jan Thresholds, Aug 25 Monitoring Network, Projects)
Policy Decisions Policy questions coming to the Board in April include items on the following topics: • Water Budget Planning Estimates – Adoption of water budget planning assumptions for GSP development • Sustainability Indicators – Guidance on which sustainability indicators will be fully addressed in the GSP • Monitoring, Measuring, and Model Refinements – Guidance to conduct monitoring, measuring, and modeling at the basin-scale subject to a financing plan • Project Implementation – Guidance on level at which projects can be implemented in the GSP 5
• Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles 2 columns • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles Water Budget Planning Estimates • Click to edit bullet styles
Water Budget Comparison Optimized GW Pumping Reduction Ag GW Urban GW Urban GW Ag GW Pumping Pumping Pumping Pumping Deep Deep • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles Stream Percolation Stream Percolation Seepage Other Recharge Seepage Other Recharge 2 columns • Click to edit bullet styles 121,200 105,400 680,000 265,600 203,200 163,900 • Click to edit bullet styles 610,200 258,200 165,700 164,500 Subsurface Subsurface Subsurface Subsurface • Click to edit bullet styles 192,400 57,600 180,600 Inflow Outflow 56,400 Inflow Outflow • Click to edit bullet styles -33,700 -3,000 • Click to edit bullet styles Change in Storage Change in Storage • Click to edit bullet styles Projected Conditions Sustainable Yield: Optimized GW Pumping Reduction Note: All flows are rounded annual • Click to edit bullet styles averages in acre- feet per year (AFY) D R A F T
• Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles 2 columns • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles Outreach Update • Click to edit bullet styles
Groundwater Sustainability Workgroup Update • 6 Workgroup members and 4 members of the public attended the Groundwater Sustainability Workgroup meeting held on March 13th. • The next Workgroup meeting will be held on April 10 th at 4:00pm at the San Joaquin County Public Works Department • Notes from Workgroup meeting are available on the website, esjgroundwater.org (under ‘Agendas’ tab) 9
Workgroup Input on Funding & Financing The Groundwater Sustainability Workgroup discussed GSP funding and financing strategies at their February meeting, and developed the 12 key points of input, presented at the GWA Board meeting in March. 1 0
Workgroup Input on Funding & Financing – 1 of 2 1. P3 financing, unless designed well, can be unsuccessful 2. How will GSAs hold each other accountable? Monitoring should be increased in areas by the cone of depression 3. Should DACs have free access to potable water outside their area/ is this a potential solution? Is a funding source needed to fund DAC water needs? 4. Should markets be considered within the basin? 5. Does it affect rating, etc. if a small GSA needs a very expensive project? 6. Inflows and outflows to GSAs may be equitable for assessing a basin-wide fee 7. We’re all in this together – if one GSA defaults, there are ramifications to the rest of the basin. 1 1
Workgroup Input on Funding & Financing – 2 of 2 8. What would it take to vote yes on a sales tax? - Understanding of how it would be used - Some are against it because of impacts to DACs 9. A sales tax might make it easier to do projects where they are needed and prevent pumping restrictions 10. Anticipate competition with statewide taxes for water issues 11. Pros and cons of regional vs. GSA-level needs need to be evaluated 12. If projects generate revenue, could a portion of the (a “fee”) be reverted to the region to offset costs to areas that need a subsidy? 1 2
• Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles 2 columns • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles • Click to edit bullet styles DWR Update • Click to edit bullet styles
Technical Support Services Funding Update • Review: DWR’s Technical Support Services (TSS) provides funding to construct monitoring wells in areas where data gaps exist. • The TSS application for the Eastern San Joaquin Subbasin has been submitted to DWR with a request to fund two new monitoring wells in areas in the Subbasin. 1 4
TSS Requested Monitoring Well Locations These locations were D r y C r e e k • S u r f a c e w a t e r i n t e r a c t i o n selected based on their ability • P o t e n t i a l G D E s • C o s u m n e s S u b b a s i n to assess sustainability and • L o w G W l e v e l s support future projects. C a l a v e r a s / H w y 8 8 • S u r f a c e w a t e r i n t e r a c t i o n There is potential to request • L o w G W l e v e l s additional TSS support for the installation of monitoring wells. 1 5
Recommend
More recommend