mary nichols psy d research psychologist quality amp
play

Mary Nichols, Psy.D. Research Psychologist Quality & Clinical - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Use of CANS data to screen for psychosis risk at a large childrens behavioral health agency Mary Nichols, Psy.D. Research Psychologist Quality & Clinical Outcomes Astor Services for Children & Families Rhinebeck, NY Agenda I.


  1. Use of CANS data to screen for psychosis risk at a large children’s behavioral health agency Mary Nichols, Psy.D. Research Psychologist Quality & Clinical Outcomes Astor Services for Children & Families Rhinebeck, NY

  2. Agenda I. Background on the use of agency CANS data II. Overview of Early Identification of Psychosis Project III. The psychosis screening algorithm IV. Other project activities: Diagnostic Evaluation, Consultation, Technical Assistance and Follow-up V. Illustrative case example and outcomes data VI. Q/A

  3. Astor Services for Children & Families • Delivers nationally-acclaimed services for over 50 years. • Offers a broad array of residential, educational, and community based programs at more than 35 sites in the Hudson Valley Region and New York City area of New York State. • Serves over 6,500 children, adolescents, and their families each year.

  4. Evolution of the CANS at Astor • 2003: CANS implementation begins • 2005: Use of CANS is fully established throughout clinical programs • 2009: C entralization of data collection and outcomes management • 2012: Change from CANS-MH to the CANS-NY, also explores use of an electronic submission system • 2013 : Agency adopts an electronic health record (Qualifacts Carelogic), continues paper CANS submission by programs • July 2015 : Switch to CANS completion within Electronic Health Record

  5. AMHF Early Intervention for Psychosis project (2012-2014) Eligible youth participants were: • Between the ages of 8 and 19 • Active clients in adolescent day treatment, school based clinics, partial hospitalization, residential treatment, or home based crisis intervention programs Project goal: • Fully screen 140 youth for psychosis risk • Provide between 15 and 40 clients with comprehensive diagnostic evaluation, technical assistance re: EBP, and long-term follow-up care coordination and evaluation of outcomes.

  6. Research Background • Literature on psychosis risk and identification in youth (Cannon et al., 2008) • The North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study • Conversion to full blown psychotic disorders predicted by the combined presence of: - Genetic risk and a recent and dramatic deterioration in functioning - Unusual thought content - Social impairment - History of substance abuse

  7. The Psychosis Risk Screening Algorithm • To Screen positive, at least two of the risk factors shown in the research to predict development of psychotic disorders needed to be present • Starting with a large dataset of CANS, we applied a decision rule in pre-screening process: – Clients were considered risk-positive if at least 2 of the below standards were true: • Psychosis = 1, 2, or 3 • Substance Use = 2 or 3 • Social Functioning = 2 or 3

  8. Evaluation of Screening Procedure

  9. Evaluation and Consultation Evaluation Tools: • Kiddie-SADS-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) • Structured Interview for Psychosis Risk Syndromes (SIPS) • CANS-NY Consultation – EBP’s Recommended : • Family Psychoeducation • Social Skills Training • Cognitive Remediation • Care coordination • Psychiatry/Medical

  10. Reliable Change Index (RCI)

  11. Q & A

  12. References Axelson, D., Birmaher, B., Zelazny, J., Kaufman, J., & Gill, M. K. (2009). K-SADS-PL: 2009 working draft. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatry.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/Documents/assessments/KSADS-PL_2009_working_draft_full.pdf Cannon, T. D., Cadenhead, K., Cornblatt, B., Woods, S. W., Addington, J., Walker, E., . . . Heinssen, R. (2008). Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: A multisite longitudinal study in North America. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65, 28-37. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.3 Gearing, R. E. (2008). Evidence-based family psychoeducational interventions for children and adolescents with psychotic disorders. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 2-17. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2247440/ Lyons, J. (2011). Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths – NY [Measurement instrument]. Retrieved from https://canstraining.com/lschmidt/cans-new-york/node/printable-copy-of-the-manual Maier, W., Cornblatt, B.A., & Merikangas, K.R. (2003). Transition to schizophrenia and related disorders: Toward a taxonomy of risk. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 29, 693-701. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007039 McClellan, J., & Stock, S. (2013). Practice Parameter for the Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Schizophrenia. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 52, 976 – 990. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.02.008 McGlashan, T. H., Walsh, B. C., & Woods, S. W. (2010). The psychosis-risk syndrome: handbook for diagnosis and follow-up. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Recommend


More recommend