Use of CANS data to screen for psychosis risk at a large children’s behavioral health agency Mary Nichols, Psy.D. Research Psychologist Quality & Clinical Outcomes Astor Services for Children & Families Rhinebeck, NY
Agenda I. Background on the use of agency CANS data II. Overview of Early Identification of Psychosis Project III. The psychosis screening algorithm IV. Other project activities: Diagnostic Evaluation, Consultation, Technical Assistance and Follow-up V. Illustrative case example and outcomes data VI. Q/A
Astor Services for Children & Families • Delivers nationally-acclaimed services for over 50 years. • Offers a broad array of residential, educational, and community based programs at more than 35 sites in the Hudson Valley Region and New York City area of New York State. • Serves over 6,500 children, adolescents, and their families each year.
Evolution of the CANS at Astor • 2003: CANS implementation begins • 2005: Use of CANS is fully established throughout clinical programs • 2009: C entralization of data collection and outcomes management • 2012: Change from CANS-MH to the CANS-NY, also explores use of an electronic submission system • 2013 : Agency adopts an electronic health record (Qualifacts Carelogic), continues paper CANS submission by programs • July 2015 : Switch to CANS completion within Electronic Health Record
AMHF Early Intervention for Psychosis project (2012-2014) Eligible youth participants were: • Between the ages of 8 and 19 • Active clients in adolescent day treatment, school based clinics, partial hospitalization, residential treatment, or home based crisis intervention programs Project goal: • Fully screen 140 youth for psychosis risk • Provide between 15 and 40 clients with comprehensive diagnostic evaluation, technical assistance re: EBP, and long-term follow-up care coordination and evaluation of outcomes.
Research Background • Literature on psychosis risk and identification in youth (Cannon et al., 2008) • The North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study • Conversion to full blown psychotic disorders predicted by the combined presence of: - Genetic risk and a recent and dramatic deterioration in functioning - Unusual thought content - Social impairment - History of substance abuse
The Psychosis Risk Screening Algorithm • To Screen positive, at least two of the risk factors shown in the research to predict development of psychotic disorders needed to be present • Starting with a large dataset of CANS, we applied a decision rule in pre-screening process: – Clients were considered risk-positive if at least 2 of the below standards were true: • Psychosis = 1, 2, or 3 • Substance Use = 2 or 3 • Social Functioning = 2 or 3
Evaluation of Screening Procedure
Evaluation and Consultation Evaluation Tools: • Kiddie-SADS-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) • Structured Interview for Psychosis Risk Syndromes (SIPS) • CANS-NY Consultation – EBP’s Recommended : • Family Psychoeducation • Social Skills Training • Cognitive Remediation • Care coordination • Psychiatry/Medical
Reliable Change Index (RCI)
Q & A
References Axelson, D., Birmaher, B., Zelazny, J., Kaufman, J., & Gill, M. K. (2009). K-SADS-PL: 2009 working draft. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatry.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/Documents/assessments/KSADS-PL_2009_working_draft_full.pdf Cannon, T. D., Cadenhead, K., Cornblatt, B., Woods, S. W., Addington, J., Walker, E., . . . Heinssen, R. (2008). Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: A multisite longitudinal study in North America. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65, 28-37. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.3 Gearing, R. E. (2008). Evidence-based family psychoeducational interventions for children and adolescents with psychotic disorders. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 2-17. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2247440/ Lyons, J. (2011). Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths – NY [Measurement instrument]. Retrieved from https://canstraining.com/lschmidt/cans-new-york/node/printable-copy-of-the-manual Maier, W., Cornblatt, B.A., & Merikangas, K.R. (2003). Transition to schizophrenia and related disorders: Toward a taxonomy of risk. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 29, 693-701. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007039 McClellan, J., & Stock, S. (2013). Practice Parameter for the Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Schizophrenia. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 52, 976 – 990. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.02.008 McGlashan, T. H., Walsh, B. C., & Woods, S. W. (2010). The psychosis-risk syndrome: handbook for diagnosis and follow-up. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Recommend
More recommend