T ransportation System s Transportation Systems Management Management & Op erations (TSM O): & Operations (TSMO): A Capabi lity Improvement Improvement W orkshop A Capabirty Workshop Sa n Luis Luis Obi spo San Obispo Oct ober ber 25, 25, 201 7 Octo l . 2017
Reminder --Wide Range of Strategies to d e R a i nge O ' f Strategi , e s to ! Reminder - - W i Match Causes of Congestion Match Causes , of Co 1 ngestion I Newer Strategies Conventional Strategies • Traffic Responsive • Incident Management/FSO Signalization/Prioritization • Freeway Management • Integrated corridor • Work Zone Management Management • Travel Weather Management • Active (Freeway) Traffic • Traveler Information/DMS/511 Management • Improved BRT/P&R • Improved information for • Ramp metering/shoulder use Demand Management • Eco-Driving
Corridor Region is Growing Cor ro g 0 Population Employment I Pi • mo-Grov · r-AG + San to Mario Son Luis Obispo 160,000 ------------------, 70~000 -------------- 140,000 +---------- _,__. -----I 60~000 +---------~ ~ --------1 120,000 -1---------= .,... ---------t 50~000 +----- ---=--- ~ ~ ---- --I 100,000 +---- __.,:;,.. -----------1 40~000 +----- ~ -------------1 30~000 +----------------1 60,000 -1----------------1 20~000 +------------------- 40,000 +- - ~ ~- ;;;.lll!!!!!!!~~ L_ - ~ 20,000 ,i,,,,,,,,,,,,,-----------"""""""' O -t-----------------1 20AO 2040 2010 2010
~ ■1 +- - ■ it- ■ i1i,- ~ - ~ ■ - j ,j- + -~1-1- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Corridor Performance Co I C 0 0 ., 6 ' 0 ff "' iii .2 Arroyo Pismo ;;; S an L uis ;s Gr anae Beac n O D lsp o Atas caa ero ;;; i ,jj (, ,.. 0 l, C u - 5• i ;' • .,.. ___ ,.. __ ,.. ___ ....,..,..,. ........ .... ........ - .... ~i,- ... _..,...., ____ ..., _____ ..,i,- ........... ■ i1 .... ............ - :.: .,.. ____ :I'! !!""• ! ? Q 0 C n ., . .... m . . .. ... .;; " 0 ... Sd11 fY fY L ., .,. '" w " Miguel u :zl:;; m · ~ " ft ~ u. ~ L ,. L .. ~ n "::) u C/l "' "' I t= C 'I ~ , • C 7 rn C,
Widely Varying State of the Practice elyVa gSa 0 the Pr c ce • • Abandoned l v , ehid le Legis l ation/ Po l IC, Y 21 . + IIJ.S. M etropolllta n Arieas I N, NC FL , GA.. M I Safe, Qu i ck C1 ' ea ranee Laws-Driver -25 States , l ncludl 1 ng I D. NC , OHi, Removal r TX. VA.. W1 SC, TN .1..30+ ll.LS. M'etmpolita n Areas. AZ 1 ( Phoen ix ), • Service · Pa r tro' ls, CA , , FL.. GA . (Atla r nta ), I IN . Mill, M NI , N Ml (Allbuque rque), OR TIN, UJ (SaH!: La l ke 1 C · ~y ) CA (Redd 1 l ng . Stockton) Mill 1 (BaH : lmorie) 1 •· 1 (I De'lawa , re Valley R: NJ/PA egion) • . OH 'Veh 1 icl e-M ounted Push I Bu mpe ·. , (Cinc { ninat i), TN (Chattanooga ), TX 1 (Aust i n), IIJT 1 ( Sa lt La 1 ke · Ci ty) • ll nciident l nvestig~t · on Sites .16+ IL LS. M-et r opontain Areas . TX , ( Houston) • • • AZ, CA, 1 00~ FL, ~ , Sa1fe • , Qu i ck Cl ea ra , nce Laws--Authorl , ty IL ., IN, KV. , MO ., NM , NC, Removal OH , OR', SC, TN, TX, VA. WA • • n Ar , eas CA, FL , GA;, II D, 35+ ILJ ., S. Met ri opollta · Qu i. ck Cl earance/Open Roads Policy , NV , , N HI , TN. UT, WA, W I II • LA, MD . • • Non-ca r go Veh i cle Ruid l Discha 1 rge Po l i cy • FIL, MN I • ni) WA Fatal 1 I ity 0erHf 1 lcatlon/ Remova ll Po l iC , )" PA TIN. TX (Al11Stl1 1 • n Ar , eas FI L, IN, TX 93+ U.S. Met ri o· pollta · Exped ited l Orash I nveslti , ga , t · on ( N( i U1jh Ce ntra 'I Region) . UT • Qu i ck Cl eara r in,g, nce , Us F1 l re Appa 1 ratus TX ( Aust in ) • Tow i ng nd ! Recovery 1 Qu a1 i ck rClea 1 ra nee ! FIL , GA, ' WA ll ncentives FllL, IIL ( Ohicago ), LA. MO, NJ , OH • DE . , I Majo1r lllncident Response Teams (Cina · nnat i. 1 Co:l ul!llbus) •. NY', TX (Oa'llas Co.), ' WA.
Further Capability Improvements Objective – “mainstreaming” continuous improvement Creating an Effective Program to Advance Transportation System Management and Operations Key differentiators – not projects – but improvements in processes and arrangements that support continuous improvement – “ Institutionalize” Workshop process – helps regions evaluate and improve key capabilities – Primer from any starting point – 60+FHWA-sponsored state DOT and regional workshops nationwide/ 5 in CA
Beyond ITS “Projects”: B e y o n d l ' T S ' ' P r o j e c t s ' ' : 1 Keys to Successful Implementation K e y s to S u c c e s s f u l l m p l e m e n t a t i o n 1 1 • key business and technical process for effective (routine) implementation is essential to increased impact • Formal organizational structure and collaborative relations key Example: Incident Management – combination of ITS infrastructure, Management Center with multi-jurisdictional participation, integrated communications, pre-defined procedures and protocols, close transportation/PSA cooperation and co-training, private sector participation & incentives, performance measurement, after-action analysis ……………………
The Structure of Capability The Structure of Cap 1 ab· ity Effective TSM&O Strategies Performance Measurement Systems and Technology Processes Business and technical “Capabilities” Business processes support strategies Collaboration Organization and relationships Organization and Staffing support processes Culture
The 6 Dimensions of CMM The 6 Dimensions of CI MM Business Processes, including planning, programming and budgeting 1. (resources) and project development and procurement. Systems and Technology, including use of systems engineering, 2. concepts of operations, systems architecture standards, interoperability, and standardization. Performance Measurement, including measures definition, data acquisition, 3. analytics, communication and utilization. Culture, including technical understanding and business case, leadership, 4. outreach, and program legal authority. Organization and Staffing, including programmatic status, organizational 5. structure and accountability, staff capabilities, training/development, and recruitment and retention. Collaboration, including relationships with public safety agencies, local 6. governments, MPOs, and the private sector. 9
Synergism among Dimensions
The Path to Excellence T e Pa h o Excelle ce ? What capabilities To Here CAPABILITIES From Here How to Improve? TIME
Capability Levels (for each dimension) re L£VH4 I 1 Optimized Where does the region stand For each dimension?? LM l l I Integrated - - - - - - l!VE12 :\fanaged LEVH l Performed
Focus of Capability Improvement 1 ocus of Capability l m p r o v e m e 1 nt F Workshop Wor l kshop Objective: Given the current state of play – how to get better Approach – a structured dialogue among key participants that focuses on most effective process and institutional changes that will serve as the basis for continuing improvement “The answers are in this room”
Capability Level Self Evaluation Structure 1 il y Level Sel Evalua o St uct e Capa LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ELEMENTS PERFORMED MANAGED INTEGRATED OPTIMIZING Planning & x Programming Lowest x Systems & lev el is Technology con straint x Performance Measurement x Culture x Organization/ staffing x Collaboration
Recommend
More recommend
