magnetars as sources of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays
play

Magnetars as sources of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays Kumiko Kotera , - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Magnetars as sources of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays Kumiko Kotera , University of Chicago TeV Particle Astrophysics, Paris - 20/07/10 Possible sources of UHECRs: energetics AGN, jets, hot spots neutron star e.g. Norman et al. 1995, Henri et


  1. Magnetars as sources of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays Kumiko Kotera , University of Chicago TeV Particle Astrophysics, Paris - 20/07/10

  2. Possible sources of UHECRs: energetics AGN, jets, hot spots neutron star e.g. Norman et al. 1995, Henri et al. 1999 Lemoine & Waxman 2009 p r o t o n 1 0 20 F e e V 1 only FSRQ/FRII 0 20 e V AGN white GRB dwarf AGN jets e.g. Waxman 1995, Vietri 1995, Murase 2006, 2008 GRB hot spots SNR tight energetics IGM shocks Magnetars Blasi, Epstein, Olinto 2000 Arons 2003 updated Hillas diagram µ = 3 × 10 21 Z η 1 Ω 2 E ( 4 µ 33 eV taking into account current uncertainties on source parameters 5% of magnetar population would suffice 2

  3. Possible sources of UHECRs: anisotropy signatures Continuously emitting sources FRII in arrival direction of highest energy events unless - particularly strong extragalactic magnetic field - UHECR = heavy nuclei Transient sources 1) source already extinguished when UHECR arrives correlation with LSS with no visible counterpart 2) low occurence rate (of GRB/magnetars) low probability of observing events from a source unless scattering of arrival times due to magnetized regions enhanced correlation btw UHE events and foreground matter distortion of arrival direction maps according to LSS K.K. & Lemoine 2008b Kalli, Lemoine, K.K., in prep, cf. poster 3) no counterpart in neutrinos, photons, grav. waves will be observed in arrival directions of UHECRs 4) magnetars and GRBs have same anisotropy signature Auger Coll. 2008 3

  4. Transient sources: how to distinguish GRBs from magnetars? UHE neutrinos? Waxman & Bahcall 1997, Murase et al. 2006, 2008 secondary neutrinos from hadronic interactions of UHECRs accelerated in shocks inside GRBs Murase et al. 2009 secondary neutrinos from hadronic interactions in wind ejecta of newly born magnetar (proton case) caution: dependency on Physics inside source and in source environment + composition of UHECR 4

  5. Transient sources: how to distinguish GRBs from magnetars? UHE neutrinos? Gravitational waves? Waxman & Bahcall 1997, Murase et al. 2006, 2008 secondary neutrinos from hadronic interactions of UHECRs accelerated in shocks inside GRBs Murase et al. 2009 secondary neutrinos from hadronic interactions in wind ejecta of newly born magnetar (proton case) caution: dependency on Physics inside source and in source environment + composition of UHECR 4

  6. Transient sources: how to distinguish GRBs from magnetars? UHE neutrinos? Gravitational waves? Waxman & Bahcall 1997, Murase et al. 2006, 2008 GRBs : shocks produce only faint GW secondary neutrinos from hadronic interactions of e.g. Piran 2004 UHECRs accelerated in shocks inside GRBs Murase et al. 2009 secondary neutrinos from hadronic interactions in wind ejecta of newly born magnetar (proton case) caution: dependency on Physics inside source and in source environment + composition of UHECR 4

  7. Transient sources: how to distinguish GRBs from magnetars? UHE neutrinos? Gravitational waves? Waxman & Bahcall 1997, Murase et al. 2006, 2008 GRBs : shocks produce only faint GW secondary neutrinos from hadronic interactions of e.g. Piran 2004 UHECRs accelerated in shocks inside GRBs magnetars : Murase et al. 2009 dipolar magnetic field B * , secondary neutrinos from hadronic interactions in principal inertial momentum I , wind ejecta of newly born magnetar (proton case) initial rotation velocity Ω i caution: dependency on Physics inside source and in source environment + composition of UHECR 4

  8. Transient sources: how to distinguish GRBs from magnetars? UHE neutrinos? Gravitational waves? Waxman & Bahcall 1997, Murase et al. 2006, 2008 GRBs : shocks produce only faint GW secondary neutrinos from hadronic interactions of e.g. Piran 2004 UHECRs accelerated in shocks inside GRBs magnetars : Murase et al. 2009 dipolar magnetic field B * , secondary neutrinos from hadronic interactions in principal inertial momentum I , wind ejecta of newly born magnetar (proton case) initial rotation velocity Ω i GW signal specific spectrum + span in frequency Regimbau & de Freitas Pacheco 2006 Dall’Osso & Stella 2007 Regimbau & Mandic 2008 caution: dependency on Physics inside source and in source environment + composition of UHECR 4

  9. Transient sources: how to distinguish GRBs from magnetars? UHE neutrinos? Gravitational waves? Waxman & Bahcall 1997, Murase et al. 2006, 2008 GRBs : shocks produce only faint GW secondary neutrinos from hadronic interactions of e.g. Piran 2004 UHECRs accelerated in shocks inside GRBs magnetars : Murase et al. 2009 dipolar magnetic field B * , secondary neutrinos from hadronic interactions in principal inertial momentum I , wind ejecta of newly born magnetar (proton case) initial rotation velocity Ω i UHECR acceleration specific spectrum + E max Blasi, Epstein, Olinto 2000 Arons 2003 GW signal specific spectrum + span in frequency Regimbau & de Freitas Pacheco 2006 Dall’Osso & Stella 2007 Regimbau & Mandic 2008 caution: dependency on Physics inside source and in source environment + composition of UHECR 4

  10. Transient sources: how to distinguish GRBs from magnetars? UHE neutrinos? Gravitational waves? Waxman & Bahcall 1997, Murase et al. 2006, 2008 GRBs : shocks produce only faint GW secondary neutrinos from hadronic interactions of e.g. Piran 2004 UHECRs accelerated in shocks inside GRBs magnetars : Murase et al. 2009 dipolar magnetic field B * , secondary neutrinos from hadronic interactions in principal inertial momentum I , wind ejecta of newly born magnetar (proton case) initial rotation velocity Ω i UHECR acceleration specific spectrum + E max Blasi, Epstein, Olinto 2000 Arons 2003 GW signal specific spectrum + span in frequency Regimbau & de Freitas Pacheco 2006 Dall’Osso & Stella 2007 Regimbau & Mandic 2008 caution: dependency on Physics inside source and in source environment + composition of UHECR observation of specific spectrum of GW = evidence of adequate magnetar parameters for acceleration of UHECR 4

  11. Magnetars and UHECRs Duncan & Thompson 1992 Magnetar characteristics (theoretical predictions): - isolated neutron star - fast rotation at birth ( P i ~ 1 ms) - strong surface dipole fields ( B * ~ 10 15-16 G) Plausible explanation for observed Anomalous X-ray Pulsars (AXP) and Soft Gamma Repeaters (SGR) e.g. Koveliotou 1998, 1999, Baring & Harding 2002 5

  12. Magnetars and UHECRs Duncan & Thompson 1992 Magnetar characteristics (theoretical predictions): - isolated neutron star - fast rotation at birth ( P i ~ 1 ms) - strong surface dipole fields ( B * ~ 10 15-16 G) Plausible explanation for observed Anomalous X-ray Pulsars (AXP) and Soft Gamma Repeaters (SGR) e.g. Koveliotou 1998, 1999, Baring & Harding 2002 Magnetars as progenitors of UHECRs: idea introduced during the “AGASA era” Blasi, Epstein, Olinto 2000 Galactic magnetars + iron particles aim: isotropic distribution in sky Arons 2003 extragalactic, faint GZK cut-off due to hard spectral index 5

  13. Blasi et al. 2000 Acceleration mechanism in magnetars Arons 2003 B 6

  14. Blasi et al. 2000 Acceleration mechanism in magnetars Arons 2003 L L light cylinder r < R L ≡ c Ω � 3 1 � R ∗ B ( r ) = 2 B ( R ∗ ) r � B 6

  15. Blasi et al. 2000 Acceleration mechanism in magnetars Arons 2003 2 c L L light cylinder relativistic wind B ∝ 1 r < R L ≡ c r Ω � 3 1 � R ∗ B ( r ) = 2 B ( R ∗ ) r � B 6

  16. Blasi et al. 2000 Acceleration mechanism in magnetars Arons 2003 2 c L L light cylinder relativistic wind B ∝ 1 r < R L ≡ c ∝ r r Ω E = v induced electric field: � 3 1 � R ∗ c × B B ( r ) = 2 B ( R ∗ ) r leads to voltage drop: × � Φ ∼ rE = rB = R L B ( R L ) Ω 2 B ∗ R 3 ∗ = 2 c 2 � R ∗ � 3 � � 2 Ω B ∗ 3 × 10 22 V ∼ B 2 × 10 15 G 10 4 s − 1 10 km c 6

  17. Blasi et al. 2000 Acceleration mechanism in magnetars Arons 2003 2 c L L light cylinder relativistic wind B ∝ 1 r < R L ≡ c ∝ r r Ω E = v induced electric field: � 3 1 � R ∗ c × B B ( r ) = 2 B ( R ∗ ) r leads to voltage drop: × � Φ ∼ rE = rB = R L B ( R L ) Ω 2 B ∗ R 3 ∗ = 2 c 2 � R ∗ � 3 � � 2 Ω B ∗ 3 × 10 22 V ∼ B 2 × 10 15 G 10 4 s − 1 10 km c particles accelerated to energy: q η Φ = q η Ω 2 B ∗ R 3 E ( Ω ) = ∗ 2 c 2 2 c � R ∗ � 3 � � 2 Ω B ∗ 3 × 10 21 eV Z η 1 ∼ 2 × 10 15 G 10 4 s − 1 10 km 10%: fraction of voltage experienced by particles 6

  18. Blasi et al. 2000 Acceleration mechanism in magnetars Arons 2003 2 c L L light cylinder relativistic wind B ∝ 1 r < R L ≡ c ∝ r r Ω E = v induced electric field: � 3 1 � R ∗ c × B B ( r ) = 2 B ( R ∗ ) r leads to voltage drop: × � Φ ∼ rE = rB = R L B ( R L ) Ω 2 B ∗ R 3 ∗ = 2 c 2 slow fast Ω � R ∗ � 3 � � 2 Ω B ∗ 3 × 10 22 V N ∼ B 2 × 10 15 G 10 4 s − 1 10 km c particles accelerated to energy: q η Φ = q η Ω 2 B ∗ R 3 E ( Ω ) = ∗ 2 c 2 E 2 c � R ∗ � 3 � � 2 Ω B ∗ 3 × 10 21 eV Z η 1 ∼ 2 × 10 15 G 10 4 s − 1 10 km 10%: fraction of voltage experienced by particles 6

Recommend


More recommend