ma rc ia l zuc ke r ph d zivd l l c
play

Ma rc ia L . Zuc ke r, Ph.D. ZIVD L L C 1 E xpla in why ACT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ma rc ia L . Zuc ke r, Ph.D. ZIVD L L C 1 E xpla in why ACT s fro m diffe re nt syste ms a re no t the sa me De ve lo p a pla n fo r switc hing fro m o ne ACT syste m to a no the r De sc rib e why ACT a nd a PT T a


  1. Ma rc ia L . Zuc ke r, Ph.D. ZIVD L L C 1

  2.  E xpla in why ACT s fro m diffe re nt syste ms a re no t the sa me  De ve lo p a pla n fo r switc hing fro m o ne ACT syste m to a no the r  De sc rib e why ACT a nd a PT T a re no t inte rc ha ng e a b le 2

  3.  Mo difie d L e e -White c lo tting time  Add b lo o d to g la ss tub e , sha ke  Pla c e in he a t b lo c k  Visua l c lo t d e te c tio n  F irst de sc rib e d in 1966 b y Ha tte rsle y › Ac tiva te d Clo tting T ime  Add b lo o d to g la ss tub e with dirt, sha ke  Dia to ma c e o us e a rth a c tiva to r  Pla c e in he a t b lo c k  Visua l c lo t d e te c tio n  Pro po se d fo r b o th sc re e ning fo r c o a g ula tio n de fe c ts a nd fo r he pa rin mo nito ring 3

  4.  Gluc o po lysa c c ha ride  MW ra ng e : 6,000 - 25,000 da lto ns  Only ~1/ 3 mo le c ule s a c tive › Must c o nta in spe c ific se q ue nc e o f g luc o sa c c ha ride s to func tio n

  5. Prekallikrein ….. Kallikrein 12 11 Heparin + AT Fibrinolysis 9 Heparin + AT 7 8 10 Heparin + AT 5 T hro mb in 2 Heparin + AT CLOT Fibrinogen (Fibrin) Heparin Activity Modified from Utley, Vol.1, 1982 D-dimers FDP

  6.  Po te nc y va rie s b y ma nufa c ture r › Po te nc y va rie s b y lo t  Do se re spo nse va rie s b y pa tie nt › Ha lf life ra ng e s fro m 60 - 120 minute s › No n-spe c ific b inding  F unc tio ns b y a c c e le ra ting a c tio n o f a ntithro mb in › Antithro mb in le ve l c ritic a l fo r a ppro pria te re spo nse

  7.  Mo nito ring he mo sta sis fo r he pa rin a ntic o a g ula te d pa tie nts Bleeding Clotting 7

  8.  Po int o f Ca re › Imme dia te turn a ro und › Ra pidly a djust a ntic o a g ula nt do sing a s ne e de d  He pa rin – ha lf life va rie s b y pa tie nt  Do se re q uire d va rie s b y pa tie nt  Po te nc y va rie s b y lo t  Dire c t thro mb in inhib ito rs – ve ry sho rt ha lf life  Re q uire imme d ia te inte rve ntio n  No a ntid o te a va ila b le

  9.  Ca rdia c surg e ry  Pe rc uta ne o us c o ro na ry inte rve ntio n (PCI )  I nte rve ntio na l c a rdio lo g y  E CMO  Critic a l c a re  I nte rve ntio na l ra dio lo g y  E le c tro physio lo g y  Va sc ula r surg e ry  e tc .

  10.  I ndustry Sta nda rd Sinc e 1970s  Re c o mme nde d a s 1 o me tho d in AmSE CT g uide line s  ACT impro ve s o utc o me in CPB, PCI › AACC NACB L MPG fo r POCT  Stro ng ly re c o mme nd ACT mo nito ring o f he pa rin a ntic o a g ula tio n a nd ne utra liza tio n in c a rd ia c surg e ry. (Cla ss A, L e ve l I) › Insuffic ie nt e vide nc e to re c o mme nd spe c ific ta rg e t time s fo r use during c a rdio va sc ula r surg e ry. (Cla ss I – c o nflic ting e vide nc e a c ro ss c linic a l tria ls).  E a sy to run 10

  11.  Disa dva nta g e s › E a c h syste m yie lds diffe re nt numb e rs › Mo st se nsitive to hypo the rmia a nd he mo dilutio n › L ittle o r no c o rre la tio n to he pa rin le ve l  e spe c ia lly true fo r pe dia tric pa tie nts  “Sta nda rd” ta rg e t time = 480 se c o nds › De ve lo pe d with ma nua l ACT › Sug g e ste d due to hig h va ria b ility 11

  12.  Dia g no stic › Ca the te riza tio n  lo c a te a nd ma p ve sse l b lo c ka g e (s)  de te rmine ne e d fo r inte rve ntio na l pro c e dure s › E le c tro physio lo g y  I nte rve ntio na l › Ba llo o n a ng io pla sty › Athe re c to my (ro to -ro o te r) › Ste nt pla c e me nt 12

  13.  Ang io pla sty, Athe re c to my, Ste nt pla c e me nt › 10,000 unit b o lus do se o r 2 - 2.5 mg / kg › ta rg e t ACT 300 - 350 se c o nds › T a rg e t time b e re duc e d if Re o Pro Use d  Re o Pro is o ne o f 3 “GPII b / I I I a ” Inhib ito rs  Ca the te riza tio n a nd E le c tro physio lo g y › Sa me do sing a nd ta rg e ts fo r va sc ula r surg e ry › 2500 - 5000 unit b o lus do se › fre q ue ntly no t mo nito re d › if mo nito re d – T a rg e ts ~ 200 se c o nds OR twic e b a se line

  14.  E xtra Co rpo re a l Me mb ra ne Oxyg e na tio n › Ve ry sma ll windo w o f sa fe ty › NACB Guide line s:  Stro ng ly re c o mme nd ACT mo nito ring to c o ntro l he pa rin a ntic o a g ula tio n during E CMO. (Cla ss A – L e ve l II I )  T a rg e t time s fo r E CMO b a se d o n the ACT syste m. (Cla ss B – L e ve l II I ) › T a rg e t o fte n 180 – 200 se c o nds  Ba se d o n He mo c hro n P214/ 215 tub e s

  15.  De te rmine whe n to pull the fe mo ra l she a th › Pre ma ture she a th pull c a n le a d to b le e ding . › De la ye d re mo va l c a n inc re a se time in CCU. › T a rg e t se t a t e a c h site .  ACT ta rg e ts ra ng e fro m 150 – 220 se c o nd s  a PT T ta rg e ts ra ng e fro m 40 – 70 se c o nd s  Mo nito r he pa rin the ra py › T a rg e t time s de te rmine d b y e a c h fa c ility › ACT o r a PT T 15

  16.  a PT  ACT T › Ac tiva te d pa rtia l › Ac tiva te d c lo tting thro mb o pla stin time time › L a b o ra to ry o r POC › POC Only › L o w do se he pa rin o nly › L o w, mo de ra te o r hig h do se he pa rin • Syste m de pe nde nt uppe r limit  Syste m de pe nde nt

  17.  Why a re the re sults fro m diffe re nt syste ms SO VE RY diffe re nt? › Multiple a c tiva to rs › Multiple de te c tio n me c ha nisms › NO sta nda rdiza tio n  ACT Diffe re nc e s

  18.  1969 - HE MOCHRONOME T E R › Ha tte rsle y ACT  Auto ma te d he a ting  Ob je c tive fib rin c lo t d e te c tio n › two diffe re nt a c tiva to rs  CA510 (la te r F T CA510)  d ia to ma c e o us e a rth  P214 g la ss b e a d

  19. 700 600 C-ACT Clotting Time (sec) 500 P214 400 300 200 CATH 100 PTCA CPB ECMO 0 Dialysis 0 1 2 3 4 5 Heparin (units/ml)

  20.  He mo T e c ACT (la te r Me dtro nic s ACT Plus) › Add b lo o d to dua l c a rtridg e  L iq uid ka o lin a c tiva to r  F la g mo ve s up a nd do wn  As fib rin fo rms, mo tio n slo ws  Instrume nt displa ys c lo tting time

  21. 700 675 650 625 Seconds 600 575 Hemochron 550 525 Hemotec 500 475 Pre 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 CPB min min min min min min min differences ignored by clinicians

  22.  Re po rte d in lite ra ture >20 ye a rs › Clinic a l e va lua tio ns o f He mo c hro n - mid 1970’ s › By 1981 –  po o r c o rre la tio n b e twe e n ACT a nd he pa rin le ve l › By 1988  He mo c hro n a nd He mo T e c c linic a lly diffe re nt  E a rly ’ 80’ s to Pre se nt › Impro ve d c linic a l o utc o me with ACT use  NACB L a b o ra to ry me dic ine pra c tic e g uide line fo r po int o f c a re c o a g ula tio n te sting 2007  http:/ / www.a a c c .o rg / Site Co lle c tio nDo c ume nts/ NACB/ L MP G/ POCT / Cha pte r%204.pd f

  23.  Mic ro sa mple ACT s - He mo c hro n Jr › Add b lo o d to sa mple we ll, pre ss sta rt  Silic a , ka o lin a nd pho spho lipid (ACT +)  Dia to ma c e o us e a rth (ACT -L R)  Sa mple pumpe d a c ro ss re stric tio n  F lo w slo ws with c lo t fo rma tio n  Optic s me a sure mo tio n  Clo tting time displa ye d

  24. 550 ACT+ 450 ACT-LR Jr. ACT FTCA510 350 250 150 50 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 FTCA510 ACT

  25.  Ab b o tt - i-ST AT › Add b lo o d to c a rtridg e , pre ss sta rt  Dia to ma c e o us e a rth o r ka o lin › Inse rt into instrume nt › No c lo t de te c tio n  Synthe tic thro mb in sub stra te  E le c tro -a c tive c o mpo und fo rme d a nd de te c te d a mpe ro me tric a lly  “Clo tting time ” re po rte d

  26. 1000 900 800 700 ACT 600 ator 500 Compar 400 300 He moc hron 2 200 i- ST AT Ce lite i- ST AT Kaolin 100 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 HE MOCHRON 1 ACT 26

  27.  E va lua te b y c linic a l a g re e me nt › Sta nda rd split sa mple c o rre la tio n › Sa mple s a c ro ss e ntire ra ng e › Co rre la tio n c o e ffic ie nt  R > 0.88 › T wo b y T wo ta b le o f a g re e me nt 27

  28. 900  CVOR e xa mple y = 1.09x - 7.53 800 R = 0.915 700 600 Ne w ACT 500 Curre nt Ne w N % 400 > 480 > 520 72 34% 300 200 > 480 < 520 19 9% 100 < 480 > 520 7 3% 0 0 200 400 600 800 <480 <520 117 54% Curre nt ACT  88% a g re e me nt 21 o f 26 disc re pa nc ie s • Curre nt va lue within 10% o f 480 • 5 o f 26 disc re pa nc ie s • Ne w le a ds to a dditio na l he pa rin g ive n • 28

  29.  Da ta use d to pre dic t ne w ta rg e t time  Clinic a l a g re e me nt de te rmine d fro m pre dic te d ta rg e t time  Only me tho d o f va lue in E CMO, she a th pull › Ra ng e o f va lue s to o sma ll fo r c o rre la tio n a na lysis 29

  30.  Dire c t thro mb in inhib ito rs (DT I s) › Use d if pa tie nt a t risk fo r HIT  He pa rin induc e d thro mb o c yto pe nia  “He pa rin a lle rg y” › Arg a tro b a n › Ang io ma x  No ACT F DA c le a re d fo r mo nito ring DT I s

  31. Extrinsic Pathway Monitor Monitor with with PT WARFARIN ACT / aPTT X Xa LMWH & DXaI Common Pathway Monitor II IIa (thrombin) with ??? Hirudin & DTI CLOT 31

Recommend


More recommend