lucas pastor
play

Lucas Pastor November 10 2017 Joint-work with Rmi de Joannis de - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Coloring squares of claw-free graphs Lucas Pastor November 10 2017 Joint-work with Rmi de Joannis de Verclos and Ross J. Kang 1 A (proper) k -coloring of G is an assignement of colors { 1 , . . . , k } to the vertices of G such that any two


  1. Line-graphs In a line-graph, the neighborhood of any vertex is the union of at most 2 cliques. 13

  2. Line-graphs In a line-graph, the neighborhood of any vertex is the union of at most 2 cliques. 13

  3. Line-graphs In a line-graph, the neighborhood of any vertex is the union of at most 2 cliques. The class of graphs having this property is the class of quasi-line graphs. 13

  4. Quasi-line graphs In a quasi-line graph, the neighborhood of any vertex cannot have 3 pairwise non-adjacent vertices. 14

  5. Quasi-line graphs In a quasi-line graph, the neighborhood of any vertex cannot have 3 pairwise non-adjacent vertices. claw 14

  6. Quasi-line graphs In a quasi-line graph, the neighborhood of any vertex cannot have 3 pairwise non-adjacent vertices. claw The class of graphs having this property is the class of claw-free graphs. 14

  7. line-graph 15

  8. line-graph quasi-line 15

  9. line-graph quasi-line claw-free 15

  10. Molloy and Reed Molloy and Reed line-graph quasi-line claw-free 15

  11. Molloy and Reed Molloy and Reed line-graph quasi-line Us claw-free 15

  12. Theorem [de Joannis de Verclos, Kang, P.] There is an absolute constant ǫ > 0 such that, for any claw-free graph G : χ ( G 2 ) ≤ (2 − ǫ ) ω ( G ) 2 16

  13. Theorem [de Joannis de Verclos, Kang, P.] There is an absolute constant ǫ > 0 such that, for any claw-free graph G : χ ( G 2 ) ≤ (2 − ǫ ) ω ( G ) 2 Roadmap 1. From claw-free to quasi-line graphs. 16

  14. Theorem [de Joannis de Verclos, Kang, P.] There is an absolute constant ǫ > 0 such that, for any claw-free graph G : χ ( G 2 ) ≤ (2 − ǫ ) ω ( G ) 2 Roadmap 1. From claw-free to quasi-line graphs. 2. From quasi-line graphs to line-graphs of multigraphs. 16

  15. Theorem [de Joannis de Verclos, Kang, P.] There is an absolute constant ǫ > 0 such that, for any claw-free graph G : χ ( G 2 ) ≤ (2 − ǫ ) ω ( G ) 2 Roadmap 1. From claw-free to quasi-line graphs. 2. From quasi-line graphs to line-graphs of multigraphs. 3. Prove the theorem for line-graphs of multigraphs. 16

  16. Second neighborhood The second neighborhood of v , denoted by N 2 G ( v ), is the set of vertices at distance exactly two from v , i.e. N 2 G ( v ) = N G 2 ( v ) \ N G ( v ). 17

  17. Second neighborhood The second neighborhood of v , denoted by N 2 G ( v ), is the set of vertices at distance exactly two from v , i.e. N 2 G ( v ) = N G 2 ( v ) \ N G ( v ). The square degree of v , denoted by deg G 2 ( v ), is equal to deg G ( v ) + | N 2 G ( v ) | . 17

  18. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . 18

  19. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . 1. The proof is by induction on | V ( G ) | . 18

  20. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . 1. The proof is by induction on | V ( G ) | . 2. Note that ( G \ v ) 2 � = G 2 \ v . 18

  21. v 19

  22. v 19

  23. v 19

  24. 19

  25. 19

  26. v 19

  27. v 19

  28. clique in G 2 − v v 19

  29. maybe not in ( G \ v ) 2 19

  30. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . 20

  31. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . If N G ( v ) is not a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 then N G ( v ) is the union of two cliques. 20

  32. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . If N G ( v ) is not a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 then N G ( v ) is the union of two cliques. v 20

  33. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . If N G ( v ) is not a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 then N G ( v ) is the union of two cliques. y x v 20

  34. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . If N G ( v ) is not a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 then N G ( v ) is the union of two cliques. d ( x, y ) ≥ 3 y x v 20

  35. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . If N G ( v ) is not a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 then N G ( v ) is the union of two cliques. d ( x, y ) ≥ 3 y x v 20

  36. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . If N G ( v ) is not a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 then N G ( v ) is the union of two cliques. d ( x, y ) ≥ 3 y x v 20

  37. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . If N G ( v ) is not a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 then N G ( v ) is the union of two cliques. d ( x, y ) = 3 y x v 20

  38. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . If N G ( v ) is not a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 then N G ( v ) is the union of two cliques. d ( x, y ) = 3 y x z v 20

  39. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . If N G ( v ) is not a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 then N G ( v ) is the union of two cliques. d ( x, y ) = 3 y x z v 20

  40. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . If N G ( v ) is not a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 then N G ( v ) is the union of two cliques. d ( x, y ) = 3 y x z v 20

  41. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . If N G ( v ) is not a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 then N G ( v ) is the union of two cliques. d ( x, y ) = 3 y x z v 20

  42. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . If N G ( v ) is not a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 then N G ( v ) is the union of two cliques. d ( x, y ) = 3 y x z v 20

  43. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . If N G ( v ) is not a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 then N G ( v ) is the union of two cliques. d ( x, y ) = 3 y x z v 20

  44. Lemma For G claw-free, either G is a quasi-line graph or there exist v ∈ V ( G ) with deg G 2 ( v ) ≤ ω ( G ) 2 + ( ω ( G ) + 1) / 2 whose neighborhood is a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 . If N G ( v ) is not a clique of ( G \ v ) 2 then N G ( v ) is the union of two cliques. d ( x, y ) = 3 y x z v 20

  45. Upper bound on deg G 2 ( v ). 21

  46. Upper bound on deg G 2 ( v ). v 21

Recommend


More recommend