Learning Outcomes Compare and contrast CDIO, design thinking and - PDF document

WORKSHOP ON DELIVERING & ASSESSING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT Lim Cheng Siong, PhD lcsiong@utm.my Fauzan Khairi Che Harun, PhD fauzan@utm.my f or NEW ACADEMIA LEARNING INNOVATION (NALI) 22-23 MAY. 2017 Learning Outcomes • Compare and contrast CDIO, design thinking and integrated design project • Identify the key requirements in integrated design project • Implementing design thinking in integrated design project 2

CDIO • CDIO: Conceive — Design — Implement — Operate. • It was conceived at the M assachusetts Institute of T echnology in the late 1990s. • M IT and three Swedish universities formally founded the CDIO Initiative => cdio.org 3 CDIO http:/ / cdio.org/ 4

CDIO STANDARD DESCRIPTION 1 CDIO as Context 2 CDIO Syllabus Outcomes 3 Integrated Curriculum 4 Introduction to Engineering 5 Design-Build Experiences 6 CDIO Workspaces 7 Integrated Learning Experiences 8 Active Learning 9 Enhancement of Faculty CDIO Skills Enhancement of Faculty Teaching 10 Skills 11 CDIO Skills Assessment 12 CDIO Program Evaluation 5 CDIO • CDIO is an educational framework for producing the next generation of engineers. • Complementing to OBE • Example of implementation for SKEM : – Performed CDIO analysis for SKEM program – Introduction for IO in Intro2EE for 1 st year SKEM students – M issing knowledge in C-D-I-O is covered before the students can implement capstone project 6

Integrated Design Project • Integrated design project (IDP) is also known as capstone project • IDP is a final year engineering design project. • Can be introduced in 3 rd or final year as 1- or 2-semester project • Required by Engineering Accreditation Council (EAC) for engineering program. Source: myemail.constantcontact.com 7 Integrated Design Project 8

Integrated Design Project • Design (integrated/capstone) project 1. Industry, research or community based project 2. Project management 3. Prototype 4. Design thinking 5. M ultidisciplinary Source: myemail.constantcontact.com 9 Integrated Design Project • Bachelor of Engineering (Electrical- M echatronics), FKE, UTM – Capstone project for SKEM program since 2013 – EAC visit was in mid of 2013 10

Integrated Design Project • 70% of Instrumentation and M easurement course (3 rd year, 3 credits) as capstone project – Problem: heavy load to lecturer – Output: M iniature system, presentation, report – EAC report: listed as concern • Same faculty but other engineering programs without capstone project – EAC report: listed as major 11 Capstone Project Capstone project benchmarking by one of local university 12

13 14

15 Integrated Design Project • Design (integrated/capstone) project 1. Industry, research or community based project – Industry and community based projects – End users survey – End users are invited as panel 2. Project management – Facilitator and student project files, final report – Tight management: Scope within RM 500 and 12 weeks 3. Prototype – Conceptual and working prototype 16

Integrated Design Project • Design (integrated/capstone) project 4. M ultidisciplinary – Prior knowledge: intro2EE, tech. drawing, C programming, electronics, circuit design, control, embedded system, uP , PLC etc. – Each group is formed by the members from various programs 5. Design thinking – CDIO + IDEO design method 17 Sharing • IDEO design video • Capstone Project SKEM 2015 (Since 2013) • Capstone project FKE 2016 onward – SKEM , SKEE, SKEL • Electrical Engineering Capstone Showcase (EECS) 2017 18

Capstone Project FKE Conceive Design Operate Implement C D I O Engineering Design Understand Create Deliver Empathize Ideate Prototype Design Thinking Framework Define Test Ahmad, M . N. Capstone Project Design for SKEM and SKEI. Presentation Slide. Universiti Teknologi M alaysia; 2015. Capstone Project FKE 4 weeks • Project Project User’s Conceptual management Intent Need Prototype • Assembling • Programming Design Thinking (C-D) Survey, interview, design statement, 4 weeks design concept, prototype Working • Testing Prototype • Report writing • Fine tuning • Oral presentation Build (D-I) Test & Documentation (I-O) Hardware and software 4 weeks development

Capstone Project FKE 21 EECS 2017 22

Design Thinking • Video: ABC Nightline - IDEO Shopping Cart • Design Thinking Bootcamp at Genovasi, 2-4 July, 2013. 23 Design Thinking 24

Design Thinking “Design thinking is a human-centered approach to innovation that draws from the designer's toolkit to integrate the needs of people, the possibilities of technology, and the requirements for business success.” (Tim Brown, president and CEO, IDEO) 25 Design Thinking Ahmad, M . N. Capstone Project Design for SKEM and SKEI. Presentation Slide. Universiti Teknologi M alaysia; 2015. 26

Electronic Device for UTM Security Enhancement Project 27 Electronic Device for UTM Security Enhancement Project 28

Design Sheet • Please refer the distributed design sheet 29 Empathize and Define 30

Group Activities 1 • Based on the given project theme, your group is required to: – Prepare interview script with a minimum of 10 interview questions for in-depth study of user’s problems and needs. – Identify and interview a minimum of 10 real users. Encouraged to use a voice recorder / smartphone. – Perform on-site observation (People, Object, Environment, M essage, Service). Encouraged to use a camera / camcorder / smartphone. 31 Group Activities 1 • Expected outcome: 32

Empathize and Define 33 Group Activities 2 • Perform data extraction (by each member) – Identify the background of the user and his / her problems and needs . Write using minimum words on a sticker. Sketching is highly encouraged. – Also extract any important information from observation. – 1 sticker = 1 point or finding Note: duplicated point by members for the same end user => choose only 1 point • Some of discussion tips – One conversation at a time – Be visual – Go for quantity 34

Empathize and Define 35 Group Activities 3 • Perform data clustering – Y ou can group the similar problems / needs into the same cluster. – Y ou must be clear on the identified problems / needs and the background of the users (male vs. female, parents vs. children, managers vs. workers etc.) 36

Empathize and Define 37 Group Activities 4 • From the clustered data, vote for 3 needs* that will give high degree of satisfaction to your end users and make your product unique and sell like hotcakes. Then produce in 2 mahjong papers for: – a personification (users’ profile with pain points and 3 needs) from the clustered data – A design statement based on the developed personification * 3 needs is enough for a capstone project 38

Personification Super J ohn PROFILE • Age: 30+ • Very busy career man • Very ambitious at work • Highly educated in his profession • Spending a lot of time on work & family PAIN POINTS • Less interested in taking sports (physical activities) • Unfit physically: tired • Imbalance between career, family and physical and body pain activities • Forced to join • Priority on job with endless tasks organization sport activities NEEDS • Group motivation – group with same skills level, good coach / leader • Easily accessible sport facilities and health support system – save time and hassle free • M onitoring health progress – good tracking system Design Statement How we may help Super John to have easily accessible sport facilities together with support system while enjoying physical activities with friends? Super J ohn

Design Statement • How we may help <USER> to <NEED> + <INSIGHT> • How we may help Super John to have easily accessible sport facilities while enjoying physical activities? • How we may help M at Lebah to monitor beehive from anywhere at anytime? • How we may help Si Zerror to make group studying more exciting? Design Statement • From the personification, produce in 1 mahjong paper for: – A design statement based on <USER>, <NEED> and <INSIGHT> 42

Personification and Design Statement • Application of personification and design statement – individually look into the technology and theory for the potential solutions (X5) catering specific need / pain point – Preferred: creative, effective and low cost solutions Ideate 44

Design Discussion vs. M eeting with Boss Source: www.stratum-international.com IDEO 7 Brainstorming Rules 1. Defer judgment – for now, suspend critique. 2. Encourage wild ideas – breakout ideas are right next to the absurd ones. 3. Build on the ideas of others – listen and add to the flow of ideas. 4. Stay focused on the topic – focus on target / scope. 5. One conversation at a time – maintain momentum as a group. 6. Be visual – use stick-a-note to draw ideas. 7. Go for quantity – best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.

Group Activities 5 NEW ideas in minutes • Option / Feature from each reviewed (X3) project. • One sticker one feature. Sketching is highly encouraged.

Solution Sub-function Group Activities 5 DERIVED ideas in minutes • How to improve your team member’s proposed options (X3)? • If the idea is duplicated, the 2nd person has to come out with a new idea.