Leadership and Governance in Twenty-first Century California - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Association of California Community College Administrators Leadership and Governance in Twenty-first Century California Constance M. Carroll, Ph.D. Chancellor San Diego Community College District

“ THE ONLY CONSTANT IS CHANGE. ” -Heraclitus

National Community College Context Public: 986 Private: 115 Tribal: 31 Total: 1,132 Source: AACC 2014 Fact Sheet 3

America at the “Tipping Point” U.S. Population, Actual and Projected: 2012 and 2050 2012 2050 Population (in millions) 316 438 Share of total Foreign born 13% 19% Racial/Ethnic Groups White 63% 47% Hispanic 17% 29% Black 13% 13% Asian 5% 9% Age Groups Children (17 and younger) 24% 23% Working age (18-64) 62% 58% Elderly (65 and older) 14% 19% Source: 2012 data: U.S. Census Bureau Source: 2050 projection: Pew Research Center, 2008 4

States That Have Reached the “Tipping Point” “ Minorities ” State Hawaii 83% California 65% New 64% Mexico Texas 58% Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2012 5

California Demographic History California Population by Race/Ethnicity, 1970 – 2010 100% 3% 6% 90% 12% 13% White 80% 70% 38% Latino/Hispanic 60% 78% Asian/Other 50% African 40% American 30% Multiracial 40% 20% 10% 0% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Source: United States Census Bureau, decennial censuses and American Community Survey 6

CHANGING METHODS 7

Changing Instructional Delivery & Learning Methodologies Lecture Learning Laboratory Communities Community Contract Online Education MOOCs College Workforce Open-Entry Training Open Exit Global Education 8

Changing Student Support Systems FROM: TO: Online Systems • Registration • Counseling • Learning Support 9

CHANGING STUDENTS 10

The American Community Colleges Students 13 Million Students: 8 million credit · 5 million non-credit • 45% of U.S. Undergraduates • 45% of First-Time Freshmen • 57% Women, 43% Men • 60% Part-Time, 40% Full-Time • Average Age – 28 years Source: AACC 2014 Fact Sheet 11

California Community Colleges A Diverse System 2.1 MILLION STUDENTS Urban 72 Suburban Districts Rural 112 Colleges 12

CCC System Demographics 112 colleges 2,292,252, students Filipino Latino/ 3% Hispanic Pacific 38% Islander Asian 1% 12% African American American Indian 7% 0% White Unknown 30% 6% Two or More Races 3% Source: http://datamart.cccco.edu/Students/Student_Term_Annual_Count.aspx 13

UC System Demographics 10 universities 238,686 students Filipino 4% Latino/ Asian Hispanic 33% 19% American Indian African 1% American White 4% 33% Unknown 6% Source: http://legacy-its.ucop.edu/uwnews/stat/statsum/fall2012/statsumm2012.pdf 14

CSU System Demographics 23 universities 436,560 students Filipino 1% Pacific Islander 0% Latino/Hispanic 35% Asian 16% African American Indian American 0% White 5% Unknown 31% 7% 2 or More Races 5% 15 Source: http://www.calstate.edu/AS/stat_reports/2013-2014/feth02.htm

Statewide K-12 Student Demographics 9,919 schools 6,226,989 students Pacific Islander Filipino 1% 2% Latino/Hispanic American Indian Asian 53% 1% 9% Unknown 1% Two or More White Races 25% 2% African American 6% Source: http://www.ed-data.k12.ca.us/App_Resx/EdDataClassic/fsTwoPanel.aspx?#!bottom=/_layouts/EdDataClassic/profile.asp?Tab=1&level= 04&reportNumber=16#studentsbyraceethnicity 16

CHANGING MISSION & LEADERSHIP ISSUES 17

California Community Colleges Student Success Task Force Final Recommendations 18

Background and History Pursuant to Senate Bill 1143, the California Community Colleges Board of Governors established the Student Success Task Force with the charge of examining best practices and models for accomplishing student success and presenting recommendations 12-month strategic planning process to improve student success • January – June 2011: The Task Force began its work. • July – September 2011: Developed recommendations. • September 30, 2011: Released draft recommendations, which were vetted statewide at conferences and public town halls. • December 7, 2011: The Task Force reviewed feedback on draft recommendations and revised to form finalized recommendations. • January 9, 2012: Final recommendations were approved by the Board of Governors. • September 27, 2012: SB 1456 (Lowenthal) enacted. • July 1, 2014: Student Success and Support Program; Student Equity Plan in Budget. 19

Student Success Task Force Recommendations 1. Increase College and Career Readiness 2. Strengthen Support for Entering Students 3. Incentivize Successful Student Behaviors 4. Align Course Offerings to Meet Student Needs 5. Improve the Education of Basic Skills Students 6. Revitalize and Re-Envision Professional Development 7. Enable Efficient Statewide Leadership & Increase Coordination Among Colleges 8. Align Resources with Student Success Recommendations 20

COMMUNITY COLLEGE BACCALAUREATE 21

The California Context 1960 Master Plan for Higher Education University of California California State University California Community Colleges Independent Institutions 22

CA Master Plan for Higher Education (1960)  University of California  Primary academic research institution  Undergraduate through doctoral programs  California State University*  Broader undergraduate through masters programs  Less stringent admissions requirements  Community Colleges  Certificates and Associate Degrees in academic and vocational programs  Open access *Authorized to offer doctoral degrees in selected areas, SB 724 (2005) 23

California Community College Mission • Open Access to Higher Education • Transfer Education • Career Technical Education • Adult/Continuing Education • Basic Skills/Remedial Education • Support Services • Economic Development 24

Changes in Degree Requirements  The high school diploma is no longer the entry requirement for jobs.  The associate degree has been replaced by the bachelor ’ s degree as the entry requirement for many jobs.  The Master Plan needs to be updated to reflect new workforce realities. 25

Bachelor’ s Degree Pathways  Articulation Agreement  Two + Two Program  University Center  Distance Learning/Degree Completion  Community College Baccalaureate 26

States Currently Authorizing Community College Baccalaureates 1. New York 1970 12. Indiana 2004 2. West Virginia 1990 13. Washington 2005 3. Utah 1992 14. Georgia 2005 4. Vermont 1993 15. North Dakota 2006 5. Florida 1997 16. Arkansas 2006 6. Nevada 1998 17. Oklahoma 2006 7. Louisiana 2001 18. Wisconsin 2010 8. Hawaii 2003 19. Illinois 2012 9. Texas 2003 20. Michigan 2012 10. Minnesota 2003 21. Colorado 2014 11. New Mexico 2004 27

CCC Baccalaureate Degree Study Group Conclusion “After much discussion and feedback, the Study Group believes that the offering of baccalaureates by the California community colleges merits serious review and discussion by the Chancellor and the Board of Governors.” Report Presented to the CCC Board of Governors March 4, 2014 28

SB 850 (Block, 2014): Community College Baccalaureate Pilot Program  Enables 15 districts to propose and implement one bachelor ’ s degree.  State Chancellor/BOG to determine pilot districts based on resources, and local and regional needs  Coordination with the state universities  Duplication of public university programs to be avoided  Legislature to set student fees, state compensation  Local boards to determine governance, administration, standards, and formats  Evaluation and report to State Chancellor and Board of Governors 29

SB 850 (Block, 2014): Approvals  Senate Higher Education Committee (4/24/14)  Senate Appropriations Committee (5/23/14)  Senate (5/27/14)  Assembly Higher Education Committee (6/24/14)  Assembly Appropriations Committee (TBD)  Assembly (TBD)  Senate (TBD)  Governor (TBD) 30

ACCJC Bachelor ’ s Degree Requirements  Added to draft standards new requirements specific to bachelor ’ s degree  Minimum 120 semester credits  Minimum GE requirement 36 semester credits  All standards apply and interpreted in the context of the degree (e.g. faculty credentials, library resources, etc. should be appropriate to the degree)  Substantive Change Process 31

ADULT EDUCATION 32

AB 86 Regional Consortia  Community College Districts  K-12 Districts 33

LEADING & MANAGING THE INSTITUTION 34

Leadership in the 21 st Century External Forces Internal Forces 35

Changing External Impacts State Economy State District Comm. Colleges Budget Regulations & Policies Legislative University Term Changes Limits Community Business Technology & College Industry Federal Student Regulations Needs Accreditation Demographics Requirements & Actions 36

Community Colleges Three Types of CEOs Chancellor Superintendent President President (Institutional) College College College College Single College in Multi-College District Single College District Multi-College District 37