Laboratory Underground Nuclear Astrophysics Study of the BBN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

laboratory underground nuclear astrophysics study of the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Laboratory Underground Nuclear Astrophysics Study of the BBN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Laboratory Underground Nuclear Astrophysics Study of the BBN reaction D( 4 He , ) 6 Li deep underground with LUNA Carlo Gustavino For the LUNA collaboration Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Primordial abundance of light elements 6 Li


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Laboratory Underground Nuclear Astrophysics

Study of the BBN reaction D(4He,γ)6Li deep underground with LUNA Carlo Gustavino

For the LUNA collaboration

  • Big Bang Nucleosynthesis
  • Primordial abundance of light elements
  • 6Li abundance problem
  • The D(4He,γ)6Li measurement at LUNA
  • Conclusions

Vulcano, 24-29 May 2010

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

The primordial abundance of light elements depends on:

  • Barionic density ωb (measured by CMB experiments at the level of %)
  • Standard Model (τn, ν, α..)
  • Nuclear astrophysics (cross sections of interest for 20<E<1000 keV)

Comparison between abundance calculation and observation provides:

  • Comparison between CMB and BBN results
  • Understanding of post primordial production of light elements
  • New physics

ωb(D)=0.021 ± 0.002 ωb(WMAP)=0.023 ± 0.001 Wonderful agreement between CMB and BBN determinations of ωb

7Li abundance predicted by BBN is

not compatible with ”Spite plateau”. Systematics in Astrophysics? Models? New physics?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Good agreement between calculations and observations for D, 4He, 3He. Problems for 7Li, 6Li

Schematic BBN network Already measured by LUNA: P(D,γ)3He

3He(4He,g)7Be

(D, 7Li abundance) Next: D(4He,γ)6Li (6Li abundance) Spin off:

3He(D,p)4He

(3He abundance)

He

3

He

4

Be

7

Li

7

H D p n

2 1 3 4 2 8 9 6 7 11 12 10

  • 1. n p + e +
  • 2. p + n D +
  • 3. D + p He +
  • 4. D + D He + n
  • 5. D + D H + p
  • 6. H + D He + n

3

3 3 3 3 3 4 3 7 7 7 7 7 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4

  • 7. H + He Li +
  • 8. He + n H + p
  • 9. He + D He + p
  • 10. He + He Be +
  • 11. Li + p He + He
  • 12. Be + n Li + p
  • 13. He + D Li +

5

e

Li

6 13

4 6

BBN reactions

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

  • D(4He,γ)6Li is the main reaction for the 6Li production
  • Theoretical predictions for the S-factor differ by ~2 order of magnitude.
  • The 6Li synthesis occurs mainly from 40 keV up to 400 keV, but NO DIRECT

MEASUREMENTS below 650 keV up to now.

  • Indirect coulomb dissociation measurements have been done in the region of interest

(kiener 91, NIC2008, NPA2009). Not reliable because the nuclear part is dominant.

  • The 6Li abundance in metal poor stars is very large (Asplund et al. 2006) compared to Big-

Bang Nucleosynthesis predictions (NACRE compilation). σ much larger and/or unforeseen 6Li sources older than the birth of the galaxy and/or new physics such as annihilation/decay of supersymmetric particles

D(4He,γ)6Li

LUNA BBN

The LUNA accelerator (Laboratory for Underground Nuclear Astrophysics) below the GRAN SASSO mountain offers a unique possibility of measuring the D(4He,γ)6Li cross section measurement FOR FIRST TIME. Need of a D(4He,γ)6Li direct measurement. Very difficult measurement because:

  • Low reaction yield: σ~10 fbarn-pbarn at

Ecm=50-100 keV

  • Beam Induced Background.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Gran Sasso National Laboratory (LNGS)

LUNA

Cosmic background reduction: µ: 10-6 n: 10-3 γ: 10-2-10-5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

The LUNA (400 kV) accelerator

Voltage Range: 50-400 kV Output Current: 1 mA (@ 400 kV) Absolute Energy error: ±300 eV Beam energy spread: <100 eV Long term stability (1 h) : 5 eV Terminal Voltage ripple: 5 Vpp

  • A. Formicola et al., NIMA 527 (2004) 471.

14N(p,γ)15O 3He(4He,γ)7Be 25Mg(p,γ)26Al 15N(p,γ)16O

D(4He,γ)6Li

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

  • α-beam (I~200 µA) on a D2 gas target: D(4He,γ)6Li
  • High Purity Germanium detector to detect the 1,6 MeV gamma’s from D(4He,γ)6Li

NATURAL BACKGROUND REDUCTION

  • 4π shield of lead to minimize the natural background
  • N2 flushing to reduce the Radioactivity induced by Radon (Radon Box)

BEAM-INDUCED BACKGROUND

  • Reduced volume for the gas target, to minimize the beam induced background (see later)
  • 3He-beam on a D2 gas target, to measure the beam induced background (see later)
  • Silicon detector faced the beam line as a monitor (see later)

D(4He,γ)6Li experimental approach

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Beam Induced Background origin d d

3He

α

d(α,α)d Rutherford scattering

d d n α

α beam Deuterium gas target d(d,n)3He reaction (n,n’γ) reaction on the surrounding materials (Pb, Ge, Cu). γ-ray background in the RoI for the D(α,γ)6Li DC transition (∼1.6 MeV)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Ge Detector Silicon Detector Deuterium inlet Steel pipe LEAD Alpha beam Deuterium exhaust

D(4He,γ)6Li conceptual set-up

  • Germanium detector close to the beam line
  • Pipe to minimize the path of scattered deuterium and hence to minimize the

d(d,n)3He reaction yield

  • Silicon detectors to monitor the neutron production detecting the protons

from the conjugate d(d,p)3H reaction

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10 Silicon Detectors to detect D(D,p)3H protons Steel pipe to minimize D+D reactions yield Main Chamber Germanium Detector

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Experiment MC Simulation

D(D,p)3H protons detection with Si detector: Proton peak Energy and shape are well reproduced. Very good data/simulation agreement.

D(D,p)3H reaction (march 2009 test)

Silicon detectors

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Basic idea:

  • Run with α-beam + deuterium target. Ge spectrum is mainly due to γ-lines due to (n,n’γ)

reactions due to the interaction of d(d,n)3He neutrons with the surrounding materials (Pb, Ge, Cu). In the Region of Interest (1580-1630 keV) is expected the γ-line due to the D(α,γ)6Li reaction.

  • One run with 3He-beam + deuterium target. Same spectrum as before but the γ-line due to

the D(α,γ)6Li reaction.

Signal is obtained by subtracting the two spectra

Ge spectrum (november 2009 test)

Region of Interest Germanium Detector

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Statistical evidence as a function of time for several operating conditions (Eα=400 keV, Mukhamedzhanov S-factor). Sensitivity (inferred from the november 2009 test)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

  • Very difficult measurement, no doubt.
  • Even in the case of an upper limit for the astrophysical factor, the

measurement will give a solid experimental base to confirm/discard the existence of (unknown) mechanisms to produce the observed 6Li abundance (i.e. post primordial production or new physics).

  • The neutron production has been minimized with the present set-up, at the

level of few neutron/second. However, a further study with DM people is in progress to prevent any possible interaction with the experiments at LNGS.

Conclusion Hope to see you next Vulcano workshop

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Extra Slides

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

E(3he)=333 keV E(4he)=360 keV Similar proton spectra->similar neutron spectra

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17 New measurement from LUNA needed!

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Impact on BBN Present status (including LUNA D(p, γ)3He but not 3He(4He, γ)7Be )

N.B. there is now a new D+D precision measurement (PRC 2006, LEONARD), therefore the relative uncertainty due to D+p and 3He+D is even higher!

NACRE Compilation, no direct measutrement Before LUNA Before LEONARD

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

σ(E)=S(E)/E e–2πη

πη 2πη πη = 31.29 = 31.29 Ζ1Ζ2 √µ/Εcm µ= = m1m2

2 / (

(m1+m2)

Astrophysical Factor Gamow Factor

  • Very low cross sections because of the coulomb barrier

UG experiments to reduce the background due to cosmic ray

N.B. differently from stars, in BBN we don’t have a fixed T (gamow peak), although there is a kinetic equilibrium

Why underground Measurements?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Extrapol. Mesurements E S(E) Sub-Thr resonance Narrow resonance Non resonant process Tail of a broad resonance

  • Very low cross sections
  • Danger in extrapolating

UnderGround Measurements

Why underground Measurements?