Indonesian Perspective: THE NEW REGIME IN HANDLING CORPORATE CRIME Kiki Ahmad Yani (Prosecutor) REGIONAL WORKSHOP On PRIVATE SECTOR CORRUPTION ACLC, September 24, 2019
Procurement process Getting License Private sector Tax payment involvement Legal Dispute Etc
CONSPIRATION IN PROCUREMENT PROCESS PUBLIC OFFICIALS Has authority to development budget and project PARLIAMENT MEMBERS giving approval for the budget that submitted by the officials COMPANY/PRIVATE SECTOR Looking for company profit by joining the government procurement
DISTRIBUTION of BRIBE Parliament member High level official 7%-10% 2 % Procurement committee Project leader 2 % 1 % Miscellaneous fee Local official 2 % 2 % + Company profit (who win the project tender) 10%-15% + REMAINING BUDGET only Company profit 56% (who get the transferred project) 5%-10% Total fee and company profit 44 %
TERM FOR MONEY USED TO BRIBE • Commitment fee • Chapter • Arranger fee • Banana • Lobbying fee • Sugar • Marketing/Commercial • Cake fee • Book • Washington Apple • Birthday present • Malang apple • Entertain • Donuts • Et cetera • Attention • Cheese • coffee
WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE? Parliament Member; • High level government official • ( Minister, Governor, Mayor, Regent, etc ) Project leader; • Management of the corporation • ( Director, manager, head of division, etc ); and • The corporate ….?!?
Case statistics based on the PERPETRATORS (Per June 2019) NO JABATAN 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 JUMLAH 1 Parliaments members (in all level) 2 7 8 27 5 16 8 9 19 23 20 103 8 255 2 Minister/high level public official 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 9 3 2 1 1 27 3 Ambassador 2 1 1 4 4 Commissioner 3 2 1 1 7 5 Governor 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 3 1 1 2 20 6 Mayor/regent/deputy mayor 3 6 6 5 4 3 3 3 12 4 9 13 30 9 110 7 Echelon I, II, III dan IV 2 9 15 10 22 14 12 15 8 6 2 7 10 43 24 8 207 8 Judge 1 2 2 3 2 3 1 3 5 22 9 Prosecutor 1 2 3 1 1 8 10 Police 1 1 2 11 Advocate/lawyer 2 1 2 2 4 1 12 12 Individual/private sector 1 4 5 3 12 11 8 10 16 24 16 18 26 28 56 26 264 13 Others 4 1 2 3 4 8 1 2 8 8 3 21 13 31 9 118 14 Corporation 1 4 1 6 1062 TOTAL 4 23 29 27 55 45 65 38 49 59 61 62 98 123 260 64
The obstacles to bring the corporate to the court 1. Legal void and loophole of the law Procedure 2. Corporate mens rea 3. Enforcement (of judicial order)
(Supreme Court Regulation/SCR) Perma No.13/2016 Concerning law procedures in handling corporation as a criminal Consist of: The Objective of the SCR. (article 2) • Qualification of the corporate crime. (article 3-6) • In case if the corporate conducting merger, acquisition, separation or • dissolution. (article 7-8, 16-17) The summon and who will represent the corporate. (article 9, 10, 11, • 13, 15, 18) Type of Indictment. (article 12) • Restitution. (article 20) • Confiscated assets of the corporate. (article 21) • Criminal convictions. (article 23-26) • Enforcement (of judicial order). (article 27-33) • etc •
The JUDGE could define a CORPORATE LIABILITY in the following ways: 1. The corporation has no crime prevention mechanism; 2. The corporation lets its members or employees commit a criminal offense; and 3. The corporation gains benefit of the criminal act;
PT . DGI case PT DGI (PT Duta Graha Indonesia), the • company name has changed to PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Found guilty of corruption in many projects (8 • projects). The Judges ordered PT DGI to pay a fine worth • Rp700 million (US$ 50.000,) The Judges also ordered PT DGI to pay • restitution worth Rp 85.490.234.737 (US$ 6.2 million), from Rp240 billion (US$ 17 million) Rights to join the auction of government • procurement has been revoked for 6 months
The corporate has been named as a suspect COMPANY CRIME PT . PUTRA RAMADHAN (PT TRADHA) Money laundering Conspiration in government procurement PT . NINDYA KARYA (state company) PT . TUAH SEJATI Conspiration in government procurement PT . MERIAL ESA Giving bribe PT . PALMA SATU Giving bribe
Terima Kasih
Recommend
More recommend
