justification logic for constructive modal logic
play

Justification logic for constructive modal logic Sonia Marin With - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 09, 2022 •434 likes •928 views

Justification logic for constructive modal logic Sonia Marin With Roman Kuznets and Lutz Straburger Inria, LIX, Ecole Polytechnique IMLA17 July 17, 2017 The big picture The big picture Justification logic: G odel: What is the

  1. Justification logic for constructive modal logic Sonia Marin With Roman Kuznets and Lutz Straßburger Inria, LIX, ´ Ecole Polytechnique IMLA’17 July 17, 2017

  2. The big picture

  3. The big picture Justification logic: G¨ odel: What is the classical provability semantics of intuitionistic logic? Artemov: Logic of Proofs gives an operational view of this S4 type of provability. ✷ A ❀ t : A ❀ t is a proof of A

  4. The big picture Justification logic: G¨ odel: What is the classical provability semantics of intuitionistic logic? Artemov: Logic of Proofs gives an operational view of this S4 type of provability. ✷ A ❀ t : A ❀ t is a proof of A Semantics: Peano arithmetics or epistemic possible worlds models Extensions: realisation of logics below and above S4

  5. The big picture Justification logic: G¨ odel: What is the classical provability semantics of intuitionistic logic? Artemov: Logic of Proofs gives an operational view of this S4 type of provability. ✷ A ❀ t : A ❀ t is a proof of A Semantics: Peano arithmetics or epistemic possible worlds models Extensions: realisation of logics below and above S4 Intuitionistic variants: Some investigations toward ◮ realisation theorems (Artemov/Steren and Bonelli), ◮ epistemic semantics (Marti and Studer), ◮ and arithmetical completeness (Artemov and Iemhoff), but where the modal language is restricted to the ✷ modality.

  6. The big picture Justification logic: G¨ odel: What is the classical provability semantics of intuitionistic logic? Artemov: Logic of Proofs gives an operational view of this S4 type of provability. ✷ A ❀ t : A ❀ t is a proof of A Semantics: Peano arithmetics or epistemic possible worlds models Extensions: realisation of logics below and above S4 Intuitionistic variants: Some investigations toward ◮ realisation theorems (Artemov/Steren and Bonelli), ◮ epistemic semantics (Marti and Studer), ◮ and arithmetical completeness (Artemov and Iemhoff), but where the modal language is restricted to the ✷ modality. However, intuitionistically ✸ cannot simply be viewed as the dual of ✷ .

  7. What are we doing here? Justifying ✸ : We start with Artemov’s treatment of the ✷ -fragment of intuitonistic modal logic.

  8. What are we doing here? Justifying ✸ : We start with Artemov’s treatment of the ✷ -fragment of intuitonistic modal logic. ✷ being read as provability, we propose to read ✸ as consistency. µ : A ✸ A ❀ ❀ µ is an witness of A

  9. What are we doing here? Justifying ✸ : We start with Artemov’s treatment of the ✷ -fragment of intuitonistic modal logic. ✷ being read as provability, we propose to read ✸ as consistency. µ : A ✸ A ❀ ❀ µ is an witness of A Intuitionistic modal logic?

  10. What are we doing here? Justifying ✸ : We start with Artemov’s treatment of the ✷ -fragment of intuitonistic modal logic. ✷ being read as provability, we propose to read ✸ as consistency. µ : A ✸ A ❀ ❀ µ is an witness of A Intuitionistic modal logic? The program: represent the operational side of the intuitionistic ✸ .

  11. What are we doing here? Justifying ✸ : We start with Artemov’s treatment of the ✷ -fragment of intuitonistic modal logic. ✷ being read as provability, we propose to read ✸ as consistency. µ : A ✸ A ❀ ❀ µ is an witness of A Intuitionistic modal logic? The program: represent the operational side of the intuitionistic ✸ . The focus: on constructive versions of modal logic.

  12. Constructive modal logic Formulas: A ::= ⊥ | a | A ∧ A | A ∨ A | A ⊃ A Logic CK : Intuitionistic Propositional Logic

  13. Constructive modal logic Formulas: A ::= ⊥ | a | A ∧ A | A ∨ A | A ⊃ A | ✷ A | ✸ A Logic CK : Intuitionistic Propositional Logic A k 1 : ✷ ( A ⊃ B ) ⊃ ( ✷ A ⊃ ✷ B ) + + necessitation: − − − k 2 : ✷ ( A ⊃ B ) ⊃ ( ✸ A ⊃ ✸ B ) ✷ A (Wijesekera/Bierman and de Paiva/Mendler and Scheele)

  14. Justification logic Justification logic adds proof terms directly inside its language. ✷ A t : A t is a proof of A ❀ ❀

  15. Justification logic Justification logic adds proof terms directly inside its language. ✷ A t : A t is a proof of A ❀ ❀ In the constructive version, we also add witness terms into the language. ✸ A ❀ µ : A ❀ µ is a witness of A

  16. Justification logic Modal formulas: A ::= ⊥ | a | A ∧ A | A ∨ A | A ⊃ A | ✷ A A ::= ⊥ | a | A ∧ A | A ∨ A | A ⊃ A | t : A Justification formulas: Grammar of terms: t ::= | | ( t · t ) | ( t + t ) | ! t c x c : proof constants x : proof variables · : application + : sum ! : proof checker

  17. Justification logic for constructive modal logic Modal formulas: A ::= ⊥ | a | A ∧ A | A ∨ A | A ⊃ A | ✷ A | ✸ A A ::= ⊥ | a | A ∧ A | A ∨ A | A ⊃ A | t : A | µ : A Justification formulas: Grammar of terms: t ::= | | ( t · t ) | ( t + t ) | ! t c x c : proof constants x : proof variables · : application + : sum ! : proof checker

  18. Justification logic for constructive modal logic Modal formulas: A ::= ⊥ | a | A ∧ A | A ∨ A | A ⊃ A | ✷ A | ✸ A A ::= ⊥ | a | A ∧ A | A ∨ A | A ⊃ A | t : A | µ : A Justification formulas: Grammar of terms: t ::= | | ( t · t ) | ( t + t ) | ! t c x µ ::= α | t ⋆ µ | ( µ ⊔ µ ) c : proof constants x : proof variables · : application + : sum ! : proof checker

  19. Justification logic for constructive modal logic Modal formulas: A ::= ⊥ | a | A ∧ A | A ∨ A | A ⊃ A | ✷ A | ✸ A A ::= ⊥ | a | A ∧ A | A ∨ A | A ⊃ A | t : A | µ : A Justification formulas: Grammar of terms: t ::= | | ( t · t ) | ( t + t ) | ! t c x µ ::= α | t ⋆ µ | ( µ ⊔ µ ) c : proof constants x : proof variables α : witness variables · : application ⋆ : execution + : sum ⊔ : disjoint witness union ! : proof checker

  20. Justification logic for constructive modal logic Axiomatisation JCK : taut: Complete finite set of axioms for intuitionistic propositional logic jk ✷ : t : ( A ⊃ B ) ⊃ ( s : A ⊃ t · s : B ) sum: s : A ⊃ ( s + t ) : A and t : A ⊃ ( s + t ) : A A ⊃ B A A is an axiom instance mp − ian − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − B c 1 : . . . c n : A

  21. Justification logic for constructive modal logic Axiomatisation JCK : taut: Complete finite set of axioms for intuitionistic propositional logic jk ✷ : t : ( A ⊃ B ) ⊃ ( s : A ⊃ t · s : B ) jk ✸ : t : ( A ⊃ B ) ⊃ ( µ : A ⊃ t ⋆ µ : B ) sum: s : A ⊃ ( s + t ) : A and t : A ⊃ ( s + t ) : A union: µ : A ⊃ ( µ ⊔ ν ) : A and ν : A ⊃ ( µ ⊔ ν ) : A A ⊃ B A A is an axiom instance mp − ian − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − B c 1 : . . . c n : A

  22. Justification logic for constructive modal logic Axiomatisation JCK : taut: Complete finite set of axioms for intuitionistic propositional logic jk ✷ : t : ( A ⊃ B ) ⊃ ( s : A ⊃ t · s : B ) jk ✸ : t : ( A ⊃ B ) ⊃ ( µ : A ⊃ t ⋆ µ : B ) sum: s : A ⊃ ( s + t ) : A and t : A ⊃ ( s + t ) : A union: µ : A ⊃ ( µ ⊔ ν ) : A and ν : A ⊃ ( µ ⊔ ν ) : A A ⊃ B A A is an axiom instance mp − ian − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − B c 1 : . . . c n : A

  23. The machinery Application: jk ✷ : t : ( A ⊃ B ) ⊃ ( s : A ⊃ t · s : B ) If t is a proof of A ⊃ B and s is a proof of A , then t · s is a proof of B .

  24. The machinery Application: jk ✷ : t : ( A ⊃ B ) ⊃ ( s : A ⊃ t · s : B ) If t is a proof of A ⊃ B and s is a proof of A , then t · s is a proof of B . jk ✸ : t : ( A ⊃ B ) ⊃ ( µ : A ⊃ t ⋆ µ : B ) Witness execution: If t is a proof of A ⊃ B and µ is a witness for A , then the same model denoted t ⋆ µ is also a witness for B .

  25. The machinery Application: jk ✷ : t : ( A ⊃ B ) ⊃ ( s : A ⊃ t · s : B ) If t is a proof of A ⊃ B and s is a proof of A , then t · s is a proof of B . jk ✸ : t : ( A ⊃ B ) ⊃ ( µ : A ⊃ t ⋆ µ : B ) Witness execution: If t is a proof of A ⊃ B and µ is a witness for A , then the same model denoted t ⋆ µ is also a witness for B . s : A ⊃ ( s + t ) : A , µ : A ⊃ ( µ ⊔ ν ) : B , . . . Sum and union: We adopt Artemov’s + to incorporate monotonicity of reasoning, and also transpose it on the witness side with ⊔ .

  26. The machinery Application: jk ✷ : t : ( A ⊃ B ) ⊃ ( s : A ⊃ t · s : B ) If t is a proof of A ⊃ B and s is a proof of A , then t · s is a proof of B . jk ✸ : t : ( A ⊃ B ) ⊃ ( µ : A ⊃ t ⋆ µ : B ) Witness execution: If t is a proof of A ⊃ B and µ is a witness for A , then the same model denoted t ⋆ µ is also a witness for B . s : A ⊃ ( s + t ) : A , µ : A ⊃ ( µ ⊔ ν ) : B , . . . Sum and union: We adopt Artemov’s + to incorporate monotonicity of reasoning, and also transpose it on the witness side with ⊔ . Iterated axiom necessitation and modus ponens:

  27. The machinery Justification logic can internalise its own reasoning.

Recommend

Formalizing Classical Modal Logic in Constructive Logic Christian Doczkal Gert Smolka

Formalizing Classical Modal Logic in Constructive Logic Christian Doczkal Gert Smolka

Formalizing Classical Modal Logic in Constructive Logic Christian Doczkal Gert Smolka Programming Systems Lab, Saarland University Coq-3 Workshop, Nijmegen, August 26, 2011 Christian Doczkal (Saarland University) Classical Modal Logic in

464 views • 32 slides
Justification Logic Who? Natalia Kotsani - based on the work of S. Artemov (The Logic of

Justification Logic Who? Natalia Kotsani - based on the work of S. Artemov (The Logic of

Justification Logic Who? Natalia Kotsani - based on the work of S. Artemov (The Logic of Justification, 2008) When? 24 October 2012 Table of contents 1. Introduction An example What is Justification Logic Why Justification Logic

392 views • 20 slides
Modal logic Benzm uller/Rojas, 2014 Artificial Intelligence 2 What is Modal Logic?

Modal logic Benzm uller/Rojas, 2014 Artificial Intelligence 2 What is Modal Logic?

Modal logic Benzm uller/Rojas, 2014 Artificial Intelligence 2 What is Modal Logic? Narrowly, traditionally: modal logic studies reasoning that involves the use of the expressions necessarily and possibly . More widely: modal logic

376 views • 36 slides
Justification Logic Who? Natalia Kotsani - based on the work of S. Artemov (The Logic of

Justification Logic Who? Natalia Kotsani - based on the work of S. Artemov (The Logic of

Justification Logic Who? Natalia Kotsani - based on the work of S. Artemov (The Logic of Justification, 2008) When? 28 November 2012 Table of contents 3.Basic Systems Justification Logic J 0 Logical Awareness Constants Specification Basic

293 views • 15 slides
Introduction to Temporal Logic Mehdi Dastani BBL-521 M.M.Dastani@uu.nl Modal Logic Modal logic

Introduction to Temporal Logic Mehdi Dastani BBL-521 M.M.Dastani@uu.nl Modal Logic Modal logic

Introduction to Temporal Logic Mehdi Dastani BBL-521 M.M.Dastani@uu.nl Modal Logic Modal logic is developed to model various concepts and phenomena. Logic of and (necessity / possibility) Various flavours: epistemic /

547 views • 18 slides
Introduction to modal logic Jos Proena HASLab - INESC TEC Universidade do Minho Braga,

Introduction to modal logic Jos Proena HASLab - INESC TEC Universidade do Minho Braga,

Introduction to modal logic Jos Proena HASLab - INESC TEC Universidade do Minho Braga, Portugal Maro, 2016 Whats in a logic? Modal Logic Bisimulation and modal equivalence Temporal logic Hybrid logic A logic A language i.e. a

1.44k views • 64 slides
Introduction to modal logic Lus Soares Barbosa Jos Proena HASLab - INESC TEC Universidade

Introduction to modal logic Lus Soares Barbosa Jos Proena HASLab - INESC TEC Universidade

Introduction to modal logic Lus Soares Barbosa Jos Proena HASLab - INESC TEC Universidade do Minho Braga, Portugal February/March 2018 Whats in a logic? Modal Logic Bisimulation and modal equivalence Richer modal logics A logic

823 views • 59 slides
Temporal and Modal Logic Based on paper: E.A. Emerson. Temporal and Modal Logic J. van Leeuwen,

Temporal and Modal Logic Based on paper: E.A. Emerson. Temporal and Modal Logic J. van Leeuwen,

Temporal and Modal Logic Based on paper: E.A. Emerson. Temporal and Modal Logic J. van Leeuwen, editor, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Volume B: Formal Models and Semantics, pages 9951072, Elsevier, 1990. Temporal and Modal

554 views • 27 slides
Modal dal Logic ic Submitted to Prof . Lubomr Popelnsk, Masaryk University Prepared by

Modal dal Logic ic Submitted to Prof . Lubomr Popelnsk, Masaryk University Prepared by

Outline Introduction Kripke's Formulation of Modal Logic Frames and Forcing Modal Tableaux Soundness and completeness Modal Axioms and special Accessibility Relations Modal dal Logic ic Submitted to Prof . Lubomr Popelnsk, Masaryk

582 views • 34 slides
Model Theory of Modal Logic Lecture 1: A brief introduction to modal logic Valentin Goranko

Model Theory of Modal Logic Lecture 1: A brief introduction to modal logic Valentin Goranko

Introduction Model Theory of Modal Logic Lecture 1: A brief introduction to modal logic Valentin Goranko Technical University of Denmark Third Indian School on Logic and its Applications Hyderabad, 25 January, 2010 Introduction Some course

600 views • 29 slides
The Expressive Power of Backround Modal Dependence Logic Modal logic Team semantics Modal

The Expressive Power of Backround Modal Dependence Logic Modal logic Team semantics Modal

The Expressive Power of Modal Dependence Logic Jonni Virtema The Expressive Power of Backround Modal Dependence Logic Modal logic Team semantics Modal dependence logic Jonni Virtema Modal definability Succinctness Japan Advanced

769 views • 37 slides
On the relation between possibilistic logic and modal logics of belief Mohua Banerjee 1 , Didier

On the relation between possibilistic logic and modal logics of belief Mohua Banerjee 1 , Didier

Possibilistic vs. modal logic Minimal Epistemic Logic Generalized Possibilistic Logic GPL with objective formulas On the relation between possibilistic logic and modal logics of belief Mohua Banerjee 1 , Didier Dubois 2 , Lluis Godo 3 , Henri

611 views • 23 slides
Why is modal logic decidable Petros Potikas NTUA 9/5/2017 Petros Potikas (NTUA) Modal logic

Why is modal logic decidable Petros Potikas NTUA 9/5/2017 Petros Potikas (NTUA) Modal logic

Why is modal logic decidable Petros Potikas NTUA 9/5/2017 Petros Potikas (NTUA) Modal logic decidability 9/5/2017 1 / 26 Outline Introduction 1 Syntax 2 Semantics 3 Modal logic vs. First-Order Logic 4 Petros Potikas (NTUA) Modal

1.28k views • 94 slides
Modal logic for concurrent processes Lu s Soares Barbosa Interaction & Concurrency

Modal logic for concurrent processes Lu s Soares Barbosa Interaction & Concurrency

Modal logic for concurrent processes Lu s Soares Barbosa Interaction & Concurrency Course Unit (Lcc) Universidade do Minho, 23.III.2018 Modal languages Hennessy-Milner logic Modal equivalence and bissimulation Motivation Systems

461 views • 32 slides
T alk outline 1. Higher-Order Modal Logic (HOML) 2. Automating HOML 3. Evaluation 4. Example /

T alk outline 1. Higher-Order Modal Logic (HOML) 2. Automating HOML 3. Evaluation 4. Example /

Theorem Provers for Every Normal Modal Logic 1 T obias Gleiner Alexander Steen Christoph Benzmller Freie Universitt Berlin 21st Int. Conf. on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning 1This work has been supported by

852 views • 53 slides
Intuitionistic and Modal Logic Dick de Jongh Institute for Logic, Language and Computation

Intuitionistic and Modal Logic Dick de Jongh Institute for Logic, Language and Computation

Intuitionistic and Modal Logic Dick de Jongh Institute for Logic, Language and Computation University of Amsterdam dickdj@science.uva.nl Dick de Jongh Days in Logic 08 Overview Introduction to intuitionism Proofs and proof systems

1.71k views • 128 slides
The rules of constructive reasoning Rosalie Iemhoff Utrecht University 1 / 31 Intuitionistic

The rules of constructive reasoning Rosalie Iemhoff Utrecht University 1 / 31 Intuitionistic

The rules of constructive reasoning Rosalie Iemhoff Utrecht University 1 / 31 Intuitionistic logic 2 / 31 Constructive theories Intermediate logics Intuitionistic logic Modal logics Substructural logics 3 / 31 Theorems versus proofs A is

584 views • 30 slides
Coalgebra and Modal Logic Notes from a Research Program Larry Moss, Indiana University my

Coalgebra and Modal Logic Notes from a Research Program Larry Moss, Indiana University my

Coalgebra and Modal Logic Coalgebra and Modal Logic Notes from a Research Program Larry Moss, Indiana University my sincere thanks to Alexander Kurz Coalgebra and Modal Logic My Goals I looked at the other titles/abstracts while preparing

899 views • 53 slides
Embedding Modal Logic in PVS John Rushby Computer Science Laboratory SRI International Menlo

Embedding Modal Logic in PVS John Rushby Computer Science Laboratory SRI International Menlo

Embedding Modal Logic in PVS John Rushby Computer Science Laboratory SRI International Menlo Park, CA John Rushby Modal Logic in PVS: 1 Background for Modal Logic The idea is to reason about different modes of truth What it means for

728 views • 38 slides
Logic for Processes Lus Soares Barbosa HASLab - INESC TEC Universidade do Minho Braga,

Logic for Processes Lus Soares Barbosa HASLab - INESC TEC Universidade do Minho Braga,

Logic for Processes Lus Soares Barbosa HASLab - INESC TEC Universidade do Minho Braga, Portugal May 2019 Modal languages Hennessy-Milner logic Modal equivalence and bissimulation A temporal logic of processes Modal -calculus

977 views • 74 slides
Algebraic Study of Lattice-Valued Logic and Lattice-Valued Modal Logic Yoshihiro Maruyama

Algebraic Study of Lattice-Valued Logic and Lattice-Valued Modal Logic Yoshihiro Maruyama

Introduction On Algebras of Lattice-Valued Logic L -VL On Algebras of Lattice-Valued Modal Logic L -ML Algebraic Study of Lattice-Valued Logic and Lattice-Valued Modal Logic Yoshihiro Maruyama Faculty of Integrated Human Studies, Kyoto

781 views • 53 slides
Projective unification in modal logic II Projective unification in modal logic II Piotr Wojtylak

Projective unification in modal logic II Projective unification in modal logic II Piotr Wojtylak

Projective unification in modal logic II Projective unification in modal logic II Piotr Wojtylak Institute of Mathematics, Silesian University, Katowice, Poland Projective unification in modal logic II Piotr Wojtylak Institute of Mathematics,

827 views • 82 slides
Closing a Gap in the Complexity of Refinement Modal Logic Antonis Achilleos 1 Michael Lampis 2 1.

Closing a Gap in the Complexity of Refinement Modal Logic Antonis Achilleos 1 Michael Lampis 2 1.

Refinement Modal Logic The existential fragment Full RML Thank you Closing a Gap in the Complexity of Refinement Modal Logic Antonis Achilleos 1 Michael Lampis 2 1. Graduate Center, City University of New York aachilleos@gc.cuny.edu 2. KTH

840 views • 44 slides
How Widespread Are Justification Logics? Melvin Fitting City University of New York The

How Widespread Are Justification Logics? Melvin Fitting City University of New York The

How Widespread Are Justification Logics? Melvin Fitting City University of New York The Workshop on Proof Theory, Modal Logic and Reflection Principles Moscow 2017 1 You probably know something about justification logics already. You

646 views • 51 slides

More recommend