The Japanese Way The Japanese Way to Hydrogen Society to Hydrogen Society － JHFC Project － － JHFC Project － Shoji Tange Tange Shoji May 11, 2006 Japan Automobile Research Institute
Positioning of JHFC Project JHFC Proj ect JHFC Proj ect subsidized by METI subsidized by METI FCV Demonstration S tudy JARI JARI Hydrogen S tation Demonstration S tudy ENAA ENAA METI METI S tationary FC Demonstration S tudy NEF I ： METI Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry MET JARI ： Japan Automobile Research Institute JARI ENAA ： Engineering Advancement Association of Japan ENAA ： NEF New Energy Foundation NEF
Outline of JHFC Project � Test Vehicles Hydrogen FCVs � Refueling Stations Hydrogen S t at ions (CHG & LH) � Period of Implementation 2002 FY ~ 2005 FY (4 years) � Amount of Subsidies 2.0 Billion Yen ≒ $17 Million (2002 FY) 2.5 Billion Yen ≒ $20 Million (2003 FY) 2.0 Billion Yen ≒ $17 Million (2004 FY) 1.8 Billion Yen ≒ $16 Million (2005 FY)
Objectives To clearly show Energy-Saving Effect and 1. Environmental Impact Energy Efficiency of FCVs compared with ICEV. � Emissions & CO2 Reduction � To acquire Data for Codes & Standards 2. Development and Certification Practices To analyze Well to Tank, Tank to Wheel 3. Efficiency based on Japanese Situation To raise Public Awareness regarding FCVs 4. and Hydrogen Stations
Partners ＜ Automakers ＞ 8 ＜ Infra.Makers ＞ 15
JHFC Demonstration FCVs Toyota Motor Corp. Toyota Motor Corp. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. Ballard-made stacks Toyota-made stack UTCFC-made stack Ballard-made stacks Compressed hydrogen Compressed hydrogen Compressed hydrogen Compressed hydrogen 35 MPa 35 MPa 35 MPa 35 MPa DaimlerChrysler AG DaimlerChrysler AG General Motors Corp. General Motors Corp. Toyota/Hino Motors, Ltd. Toyota/Hino Motors, Ltd. Suzuki Motors Corp. Suzuki Motors Corp. Toyota-made stack Ballard-made stacks GM-made stack GM-made stack Compressed hydrogen Compressed hydrogen Compressed hydrogen Liquid hydrogen 35 MPa 35 MPa 35 MPa
Location － JHFC Hydrogen Stations Senju Senju (LPG reforming) (LPG reforming) Ome Ome Re-locatable Re-locatable (city gas reforming) (city gas reforming) (off-site H 2 cylinders) (off-site H 2 cylinders) Sagamihara Sagamihara TOKYO Ariake* (water electrolysis) Ariake* (water electrolysis) (liquid hydrogen storage) (liquid hydrogen storage) Yokohama-Asahi Yokohama-Asahi KANAGAWA (naphtha reforming) Kawasaki (naphtha reforming) Kawasaki (methanol reforming) (methanol reforming) Hadano Hadano (kerosene reforming) Yokohama-Tsurumi (kerosene reforming) Yokohama-Tsurumi (off-site) (off-site) Yokohama-Daikoku Yokohama-Daikoku (desulfurized gasoline reforming) (desulfurized gasoline reforming) * Collaboration with Tokyo Metropolitan Government AICHI :constructed in 2002FY EXPO2005 / Seto-North EXPO2005 / Seto-North (Off-site) (Off-site) : constructed in 2003FY : constructed in 2004FY EXPO2005 / Seto-South EXPO2005 / Seto-South (city gas reforming) (city gas reforming)
Specification － Hydrogen Stations FACILITY NAME HYDROGEN SOURCE COMPAINES IN CHARGE ① Yokohama-Daikoku Desulfurized - Gasoline Cosmo Oil Co., Ltd. ② Yokohama-Asahi Naphtha Nippon Oil Co., Ltd. Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd. ③ S enj u LPG, City Gas Taiyo Nippon S anso Corporation S howa S hell S ekiyu K.K. ④ Ariake Liquid Hydrogen Iwatani International Corporation ⑤ Kawasaki Methanol Japan Air Gases, Ltd. Kasumigaseki ⑥ Compressed Hydrogen Taiyo Nippon S anso Corporation （ Relocatable) ⑦ Hadano Kerosene Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. Kurita Water Industries Ltd. ⑧ S agamihara Electrolysis S inanen Co., Ltd. Itochu Enex. Co., Ltd. Ome （ Mobile ） ⑨ City Gas Babcock-Hitachi K.K. Tsurumi S oda Co., Ltd. By Product （ oda ） ⑩ Yokohama-Tsurumi S Iwatani International Corporation Toho Gas Co., Ltd. ⑪ Expo. S eto S outh City Gas Taiyo Nippon S anso Corporation Nippon S teel Corporation By Product （ COG ） ⑫ Expo. S eto North Taiyo Nippon S anso Corporation
Designated Route on Public Road Senju Station Station Senju Oume Station Oume Station 9 4 9 4 Public Road Ariake Station Station Ariake Highway 10 10 Tokyo Tokyo Sagamihara Sagamihara 5 5 8 8 Station Station Tokyo Tokyo Kawasaki Kawasaki Yokohama Yokohama Station Station 3 3 Bay Bay Asahi Station Asahi Station 7 7 12 12 6 6 Yokohama Yokohama Kanagawa Kanagawa 11 11 2 2 Turumi Station Station Turumi 1 1 Yokohama Yokohama Chiba Chiba Daikoku Station Station Daikoku Hadano Hadano (JHFC Park) (JHFC Park) Station Station
Driving Test Result － Energy Consumption Compared with ICV and HEV, FCV showed better fuel economy. Apr. 2004 – Dec. 2005 FCV - ICV – HEV Comparison Result (without vehicle weight modification) 5 0 Test Route ： Designated ： Gasoline density 0.729 kg/L Gasoline equivalent fuel economy [km/L gas.eq.] Gasoline energy (LHV) ： Air Conditioner ： 45.1 MJ/kg ON Hydrogen energy (LHV) ： 120 MJ/kg 4 0 ： Average weight of FCV 1717.1 kg FCV Average Line ： Average weight of ICV 1348.6 kg (number of data ＝ 2856 ) ： Average weight of HEV 1335.9 kg 3 0 2 0 HEV Average Line (number of data ＝ 1882 ) 1 0 ICV Average Line (number of data ＝ 1807 ) 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 A v e r a g e v e h i c l e speed [ k m / h ] FCV's Group : FCHV, X-Trail, FCV, FCX, HydroGen3, F-Cell, Mitsubishi FCV, wagonR-FCV (including vehicles carrying secondary batteries, etc.) ICV's Group : Kluger, X-Trail, CR-V, Astra, A-Class, Grandis, Wagon R HEV's Group : Prius, former Prius, Estima Hybrid, Tino Hybrid, Insight
10-15 Mode Test Result FCV indicated superior energy consumption rate per vehicle weight G a s o l i n e D e n s i t y ： 0 . 7 2 9 k g / L 4 0 3 7 ． 0 G a s o l i n e E n e r g y ( L H V ) ： 4 5 . 1 M J / k g 3 4 ． 0 H y d r o g e n E n e r g y ( L H V ) ： 1 2 0 M J / k g ) t 3 1 ． 0 F C V a v e r a g e d v e h i c l e w e i g h t ： 1 7 1 7 k g e n t 2 9 ． 9 e l a 3 0 r a v n i o u 2 5 ． 0 i 2 3 ． 8 q t e p m e 2 0 ． 7 u n i l s 2 0 6 0 ％ o n s o 5 5 ％ a 5 5 ％ c 5 0 ％ g y L g T o p T o p r / 2 1 1 ． 1 F C S t a c k M a x . E f f i c i e n c y 1 0 ． e T o p A v e r a g e m A v e r a g e R u n n e r n R u n n e r k A v e r a g e 1 0 E ( R u n n e r T o p A v e r a g e R u n n e r 0 I C V G r o u p H E V G r o u p F C V G r o u p S i m u l a t i o n R e s u l t * ■A l l t h e s e d a t a i n c l u d e m o d i f i c a t i o n b y v e h i c l e w e i g h t I C V G r o u p ： T o y o t a C r u g a r , N i s s a n X - T R A I L 、 H o n d a Ｃ Ｒ －Ｖ , O p e l Z a f i l a , M i t s u b i s h i G r a n d i s , S u z u k i W a g o n R H E V G r o u p ： T o y o t a P r i u s , O l d P r i u s , E s t i m a H y b r i d , N i s s a n T i n o H y b r i d , H o n d a I n s i g h t F C V G r o u p ： T o y o t a F C Ｈ V , N i s s a n X - T R A I L F C V , H o n d a F C X , G M H y d r o G e ｎ 3 , D a i m l e r C h l y s l e r F - C e l l , , M i t s u b i s h i F C V , S u z u k i W a g o n R - F C V ※J A R I“ 2 0 0 3 F Y F u e l C e l l V e h i c l e I n v e s t i g a t i o n R e p o r t “ P . 2 4 1 - 2 6 4 , 2 0 0 4
Fuel Cell Bus Service in Tokyo Tokyo Tokyo Service Route Station Station Term Aug. 2003 - Dec.2004 Term Aug. 2003 - Dec.2004 Monzen- - Monzen Vehicle FCHV-BUS2 (1 unit) Vehicle FCHV-BUS2 (1 unit) Nakacho Nakacho Route 2 routes of 15 to 20 km Route 2 routes of 15 to 20 km 4 to 5 round-trips per day 4 to 5 round-trips per day Route: Ariake H H 2 2 Station Station Ariake Umi 01 Route: Higashi 16 Ariake H 2 Ariake H 2 Station Station Tokyo Tokyo Bigsight Bigsight Tokyo Tokyo Tokyo Tokyo Teleport Teleport ２ ｋ ｍ ２ ｋ ｍ
FC Bus Test Result － Energy Consumption R o u t e ： H i g a s h i 1 6 R o u t e ： U m i 0 1 T e m p . ( A v e r a g e B u s S p e e d ： 1 2 k m / h ) ( A v e r a g e B u s S p e e d ： 1 4 k m / h ) 1 2 3 0 ) t 2 5 1 0 n e ℃) l a e v t i .( a u q 8 R 2 0 p e n l m o e i e t s T p e i c d m i 6 1 5 r u , e s g k h n / p o s C m o k y ( m 4 1 0 g t r A e n E 5 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 / 2 0 0 4 / A u g S e p O c t N o v D e c J a n F e b M a r A p r M a y J u n J u l A u g S e p O c t N o v D e c
Recommend
More recommend
