ipen adolescent
play

IPEN Adolescent Presentation May 20, 2014 San Diego IPEN San - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IPEN Adolescent Presentation May 20, 2014 San Diego IPEN San Diego 2014 Welcome Country Updates Coordinating Center Quality Control Overview of Analysis Updates on GIS LUNCH BREAK GIS Webinars GIS Methods


  1. Background • The Israeli IPEN-A is part of a larger study on “ Obesogenic environments and adolescents obesity” • Funding : 4-years grant from the Israel Science Foundation • Ethical Approval : Received Ethical approval for human clinical studies IPEN San Diego 2014

  2. Research outline • Phase I (April 2013-Jan 2014): Data on 114,000 adolescents from 121 towns (Maccabi). Geospatial Analysis of Adolescent BMI, BE, and SES, • Phase II (Jan 2014-Jan 2015): Telephone survey (N=1,500) • Phase III (Jan 2015-Jan 2016): Objective measurements of PA + face to face interviews (n=300) [Israeli IPEN-A] IPEN San Diego 2014

  3. Environmental Analysis of the IPEN-A site (Haifa) Study area – the city of Haifa: • Situated on the Israeli Mediterranean Coastal Plain, on the northern slopes of Mount Carmel • The third largest in the country, with a population of over 272,181 IPEN San Diego 2014

  4. Environmental analysis - methodology • Areal unit: 93 Admin units within the city of Haifa • Calculation of walkability index IPEN San Diego 2014

  5. Low SES / High Walkability Low SES / Low Walkability IPEN San Diego 2014

  6. High SES / High Walkability High SES / Low Walkability IPEN San Diego 2014

  7. Additional environmental analysis • Calculation of % of overweight and obese adolescents in the study area • Correlation analysis between: – areal SES ranks (source: ICBS) – Walkability (calculated for study) – Adolescents’ overweight and obesity (calculated for study) IPEN San Diego 2014

  8. % of overweight and obese adolescents in the study area* IPEN San Diego 2014

  9. Preliminary findings • Negative correlation between SES and walkability (r=-0.30, p<0.0001, n=93) • Negative correlation between SES and adolescents overweight and obesity (r=-0.44, p<0.0001, n=93) • Null correlation between walkability and adolescent BMI IPEN San Diego 2014

  10. Walkability vs SES: overview of city IPEN San Diego 2014

  11. Next on our agenda… • Pilot testing of IPEN-A questionnaires: June 2014 • Accelerometer data collection + interviews: Sept 2014-June 2015 IPEN San Diego 2014

  12. BEANZ : B UILT E NVIRONMENTS AND PHYSICAL A CTIVITY IN N EW Z EALAND YOUTH STUDY FUNDED BY: HEALTH RESEARCH COUNCIL OF NEW ZEALAND PRIMARY INVESTIGATORS: APROF ERICA HINCKSON & PROF GRANT SCHOFIELD INVESTIGATORS : DR SCOTT DUNCAN, DR MELODY OLIVER IPEN San Diego 2014 COLLABORATORS: SUZANNE MAVOA (U OF MELB AND SHORE & WHARIKI RESEARCH CENTRE), DR HANNAH BADLAND (UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE), PROF ESTER CERIN (U OF MELB AND UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG), DR VIVIENNE IVORY (UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO, WELLINGTON)

  13. North Shore- Auckland Wellington IPEN San Diego 2014

  14. IPEN San Diego 2014

  15. BEANZ RECRUITMENT • 8 schools recruited (6 Auckland, 2 Wellington) • Data collection completed at 4 schools, the remaining schools will be completed by September 2014 ACCEL: total Survey and RECRUITED: total SURVEY: total (only valid days/time Accelerometer (Consented) (IPEN Questionnaire) included) completed School 85 74 73 89 Auckland 1 120 104 104 124 Auckland 2 133 105 105 142 Auckland 3 105 97 97 109 Auckland 4 IPEN San Diego 2014 464 443 380 379 TOTAL

  16. PHD PROJECTS • Tom Steward (PhD candidate) • VC Scholarship, AUT • Greig Logan (PhD candidate) • HRC Scholarship • Thesis title: Vigorous intensity physical activity and the metabolic health of adolescents IPEN San Diego 2014

  17. GPS SUB STUDY • Subsample (30 participants per school) • Fitted with a Qstarz BT-Q1000XT GPS receiver to wear for 7 days • Worn alongside accelerometer in a pouch Also complete VERITAS-BEANZ (online mapping component) IPEN San Diego 2014

  18. IPEN San Diego 2014

  19. EFFECTS OF EPOCH LENGTH AND INTENSITY CUT POINTS ON ACCELEROMETER-DERIVED ESTIMATES OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN ADOLESCENTS Vector Magnitude: counts measured by each of the three axes examined together Logan GRM, Duncan S, Harris N, Hinckson EA, Schofield G (2014) • 423 participants from Auckland secondary schools participating in the BEANZ study IPEN San Diego 2014 • Measurement on the vertical axis (clear bar)-adolescents are not meeting guidelines, large differences in MVPA with the three other vector magnitude (VM) cut points.

  20. NEXT STEPS • Complete data collection by September 2014 • No ActivPALS • Meeting with Ester in Melbourne during September 2014 to analyse data • Publication plan IPEN San Diego 2014

  21. IPEN Adolescent - Portugal GIS expert Land use PILOT: 164 students in schools (87 girls) Accelerometer GPS Parent and children survey 20 % don’t have complete data gps/acc/parent survey Building strategies : Adolescent no parent survey Texting on weekends for accelerometer compliance Call to assure GPs is working properly IPEN San Diego 2014

  22. IPEN-Adolescent - Spain IPEN San Diego 2014

  23. IPEN-Adolescent - Spain  Staffing  Javier Molina-García (PI; University of Valencia), Ana Queralt (Co-I; University of Valencia), Susana Aznar-Lain (Co-I; University of Castilla-La Mancha) and PhD student  Funding status  Received funding from Valencian Community  Participant recruitment & data collection  Recruitment through schools  Sample size : 300 participants with accelerometry (age range 16-18 yrs)  Start & finish dates : Fall 2013-Fall 2014 IPEN San Diego 2014

  24. IPEN-Adolescent - Spain  Surveys  Survey for adolescents and parents  Bike sharing program (additional questions)  GIS & Neighborhood selection  Start working on this topic (June 2014) IPEN San Diego 2014

  25. IPEN Adolescent Presentations – Taiwan May 20 th San Diego 2014 IPEN San Diego 2014

  26. IPEN Adolescent – Taiwan update  Team members  Ling-Ling Lee, Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Tzu Chi College of Technology  Chia-Feng, Maple, Yen: Assistant Professor in Public Health, Tzu Chi University  Shyang-Woei Lin, Associate Professor in Environment Science, Don-Hwa University  Yi-Liang Kuo: Assistant Professor in Physical Therapy, Tzu Chi University  Han-Lin Chen: Associate Professor in Geographical Science, Tzu Chi College of Technology  Chi-Fen Zeng, Lecturer in Nursing, Department of Nursing, Tzu Chi College of Technology  Hui-Jin Chen, research assistant IPEN San Diego 2014 IPEN San Diego 2014

  27. IPEN Adolescent – Taiwan  Funding  Funding obtained from National Science Council for a second year project and funding for a third year project is seeking  Aims – first year 2012.08.01-2013.07.31  Systematic review  A systematic review of the association between the built environment and physical activity in Asian adolescents  Pilot test of the survey and procedure  Survey translation and validation   Survey translation   Back translation   Discussion in group   Discussion in panel  Data analysis IPEN San Diego 2014 IPEN San Diego 2014

  28. IPEN Adolescent – Taiwan  Aims – second year 2013.08.01-2014.07.31  Test the association between the neighborhood built environment and physical activity among oriental adolescents  Data collection  NEWSY-Chinese  Accelerometer  GIS  Preparing papers for publication  A systematic review of the association between the built environment and physical activity in Asian adolescents  Validation of NEWSY-Chinese  Training needs  No training needs for accelerometer or GIS  Materials preparation  NEWSY-Chinese IPEN San Diego 2014 IPEN San Diego 2014

  29. IPEN Adolescent -Taiwan • GIS & Neighborhood selection • 45 neighborhoods selected in Taipei and Hualien • Neighborhood selection: statistical sectors Walkability: GIS-based info on residential density, walk score • • Individual level GIS information available Area of road and distance to major road from home? • IPEN San Diego 2014 IPEN San Diego 2014

  30. IPEN Adolescent -Taiwan • Participant recruitment & data collection • Data collection completed in 140 adolescents across quadrants • Collected data Accelerometer 5-day (4 weekday and 1 weekend or 3 plus 2) • NEWSY-C (self-report) • Sociodemographic factors (self-report) • IPEN San Diego 2014 IPEN San Diego 2014

  31. Coordination Center Updates  NIH Progress Report Due June 1, 2014  Need recruitment updates by gender/race – will send template  Need report of staff time for last year (name, degree, job title, person months)  Updated Other Support documents from investigators  Will use country updates for report narrative  If have subcontract, will need a signed face page  Communication  Regular check ins (twice a year at least)  Especially during neighborhood selection and data collection  Need check-ins with Portugal and Taiwan  Website  Surveys, protocols, etc. posted on Methods & Measures page  Represent your country on IPEN Adolescent page (only 2 countries so far) IPEN San Diego 2014

  32. Timeline  Yrs 1-2: Study preparation and data collection (Coordinating Center: sub-studies and protocol development, trainings and webinars, GIS templates, recruitment tracking, survey codebook development)  Yr 3: Study preparation and data collection in some countries, data transfer and processing (Coordinating Center: all of the above + accelerometer/survey data checking, data transfer protocol development and timeline, data processing)  Yr 4: Analysis and papers IPEN San Diego 2014

  33. Quality Control Tracking System IPEN San Diego 2014

  34. Recruitment Report • We will provide template • Complete and return monthly (more frequently depending on data collection schedule • Tracking recruitment by gender and quadrant IPEN San Diego 2014

  35. Survey codebook IPEN San Diego 2014

  36. ESTER IPEN San Diego 2014

  37. IPEN GIS Templates 2.0 Marc Adams Arizona State University May 19-20 San Diego 2014 IPEN San Diego 2014

  38. Why GIS Templates?  Need for greater specificity to common concepts, clearer definitions, and guidance on common GIS variables and procedures for IPEN Adolescent.  Following these templates closely will ensure that the IPEN Adolescent study has a common set of comparable GIS variables  Provide transparency. Document consistency and any deviations. Critical for GIS comparability evaluation IPEN San Diego 2014

  39. IPEN Adult: Walkability - 15 Cities on 5 Continents � IPEN San Diego 2014

  40. What’s New?  Version 2.0 of templates released!  www.bit.ly/IPEN_template_drafts  Open for public comments. Please send by June 10 th !  We want to know your thoughts, concerns, confusions, gaps  All existing templates revised for IPEN-A!  Incorporated lessons learned from IPEN Adult  Resolved inconsistencies across templates  Standardized units of measurement (metric)  Handling missing values  Now clearer and w/improved guidance on GIS procedures  More organized, easier to to read and use! IPEN San Diego 2014

  41. What’s New? (cont.)  4 New Templates  Templates released this week  Template questions answered online now  Qualtrics Online Survey System  Will make preliminary reviews and comparability evaluation quicker IPEN San Diego 2014

  42. Nomenclature for Variables  Required variable means that this variable has been judged to be most likely completed across all countries. All countries should produce the required variables, if you have data available to calculate it.  Desired variable means that this variable has been judged to be of greater importance or higher quality than the required ones. Desired variables should be calculated in addition to the required variables.  Speculative variable means that it is unknown whether this variable can be completed by even a subset of countries. Speculative variables should be calculated, by those who can, but are considered exploratory. IPEN San Diego 2014

  43. Existing Templates: Variable Updates  Removed some rare and redundant variables  E.g. crow-fly access to parks  School buffers added. Sizes and types to be determined soon.  Operationalized different types of bus and rail networks into a reasonable hierarchy IPEN San Diego 2014

  44. Nomenclature for GIS Procedures  Recommended procedures should be used instead of acceptable procedures. Recommended procedures have been judged to be more common or precise methods of calculating the variables. All countries should attempt to perform recommended procedures.  Acceptable procedures should be used only if recommended procedures cannot be used , or if recommended procedures have been deemed inappropriate for country-specific reasons. Acceptable procedures are less accurate than desired procedures, but acceptable to use.  Speculative procedures are the least accurate or least common procedural option. Should only be used if recommended or acceptable procedures cannot be accomplished IPEN San Diego 2014

  45. Updated Guidance on GIS Procedures  Opportunity to improve comparability of various GIS methods across countries  Existing templates now have clearer examples for classifying land use subcategories (Appendix A)  Recommended and acceptable procedures for:  Multiple parcels that intersect and partially overlap participants buffer edges  Parcels with vertical mix use  Parcels with horizontal mixed use IPEN San Diego 2014

  46. New GIS Templates Neighborhood Selection (released Nov ‘ 13) 1. Office Land Use 1. 2. Vacant Land Use Regional Accessibility 3.  Invite your comments on these IPEN San Diego 2014

  47. IPEN-A Qualtrics System  Improved infrastructure for answering template questions  Easier, more standardized reporting. Quicker prelim checks  Verifications, skip patterns, and conditional logic in background  You will receive a copy of responses via email and know we received them immediately  CC can export answers to Excel, SPSS, etc. IPEN San Diego 2014

  48. Final Steps  Interest in other templates?  Industrial land use?  Need consensus on required and desired buffer sizes and types before we can finalize buffer template!  250m, 500m, 1km, 2km, 2.5km  Detail street network buffers, sausage buffers, pedestrian enhanced buffers  Residential AND school buffers planned (30 possible buffers)  Home-to-school route buffers suggested IPEN San Diego 2014

  49. Next Steps (cont.)  Share draft templates with GIS staff and investigators.  Send comments by June 10 th  CC to finalize templates  CC will review comments, make revisions, and accommodations  CC will send out final versions by July 15h.  Start participant-level GIS analyses after finalized IPEN San Diego 2014

  50. LUNCH!! IPEN San Diego 2014

  51. UD4H IPEN San Diego 2014

  52. MAPS -Global Goal: Using MAPS Abbreviated as a starting point, modify and add items for use in an international context. The instrument will be used on participant- level routes, beginning from a participant’s home and traveling ~. 25 miles (~400m) in the direction of a pre-determined destination. The tool will be completed either on site or remotely using Google Streetview. Instruments compiled: Bikeability Toolkit (Australia)  Route-based checklist. Each item rated in three domains (commuting/utility, recreation, primary school student) as either satisfactory,  issues, or N/A. If there are issues, raters are provided a box to answer where/what the problem is. Additional section regarding off-road paths not included. ALPHA (Europe)  Includes sections: Types of residences, distance to local facilities, walking and cycling infrastructure, maintenance of walking and cycling  infrastructure, safety, how pleasant for walking or cycling, walking and cycling network EAST_HK, Environment in Asia Scan Tool (Hong Kong)  Developed from SPACES, Analytic and Checklist Audit Tool (Brownson), Irvine-Minnesota Inventory (Boarnet) and Chinese NEWS.  Data collected on undefined 'street segments', likely US routes (could include intersections). REAT, Residential Environment Assessment Tool (UK)  Completed on postcodes (containing on average 17 households, often defined as a single street of houses). Items assessed either by  property or by postcode. FASTVIEW, Forty Area Study Street View tool (UK)  Google Streetview tool, developed from PERS (Pedestrian Environment Review System). Completed on 'audit links' of 50-300 meters,  mostly 'stretched between road junctions' SPACES, Systematic Pedestrian and Cycling Environmental Scan (Australia)  Data collected on either both sides of street segments (between two intersections), one side, or for multiple segments (indicated below).  When applicable, intersection items are completed for the intersection at the beginning of the segment. SPEEDY/ISCOLE  School audit tool. Mostly in-school, but some questions regarding surrounding area (included here).  IPEN San Diego 2014

  53. MAPS -Global IPEN San Diego 2014

  54. MAPS -Global IPEN San Diego 2014

  55. MAPS -Global Proposed Global Tool • Seeking detailed input on content, wording, and clarification requests • Deadline for feedback: 6/20/2014 IPEN San Diego 2014

  56. MAPS-Global Project Phase II: Reliability Study – Proposed design  4 countries to participate  Each country will collect MAPS data 2 ways:  ‘on -the- street’ using standard MAPS protocol  ‘online’ using Google Streetview methods  Total target n = 400 routes (100 per country = 80 residential+20 commercial areas) IPEN San Diego 2014

  57. MAPS-Global Project Phase II: Reliability Study – Proposed design (cont’d)  Selection of routes in each country: if possible, use current study participants to select starting  address of routes balance routes across Walk-by-SES quadrants:  25 per quadrant = 20 residential + 5 commercial  Reliability assessments: MAPS on-the-street : each route audited by 2 assessors  (200 audits = 100 routes x 2 assessors within each country) Google Streetview method : each route audited by 1 country  assessor + 1 UD4H assessor (100 in-country + 100 UD4H) IPEN San Diego 2014

  58. MAPS-Global Project Phase II: Reliability Study – Proposed design (cont’d)  San Diego Coordinating Center (CC) will:  Conduct web training on MAPS protocols for country assessors  Process MAPS data and aggregate across the 4 countries  Conduct the reliability analysis  Participating countries and San Diego CC will make recommendations, if needed, for modifying the MAPS-Global instrument and protocols IPEN San Diego 2014

  59. Break!! IPEN San Diego 2014

  60. Publication Plans (Jim)  Slides from 2012 presentation come next IPEN San Diego 2014

  61. Paper writing & authorship (Ilse)  Publication committee  Publication guidelines  Proposal process IPEN San Diego 2014

  62. Guiding Principles of IPEN Publications  To fulfil the Specific Aims of the IPEN study  To maximize the scientific impact of IPEN by encouraging publication of many high-quality papers  To contribute evidence to policy discussions in national and international governments and organizations  To provide opportunities for investigators in every participating country to be lead author on a paper IPEN San Diego 2014

  63. General issues  Vancouver-rules  Publication Committee monitors  Publication proposals are needed  Use of as many countries as possible: pooled analyses  One author from each IPEN country shall be included on manuscripts in which that country’s data are included. IPEN San Diego 2014

  64. Manuscript Assignment Procedure  List of potential manuscripts provided and open for other ideas  Researchers can choose manuscripts they want to lead (1 st , 2 nd , 3 rd choice)  Publication committee allocates papers IPEN San Diego 2014

  65. Proposal Procedure  Lead author assembles a group of potential authors and a small writing group  Lead author submits paper proposal  Proposals discussed and approved by Publication Committee  Circulation of early draft, active participation of all co-authors  Monitoring of whole process by Publication Committee IPEN San Diego 2014

  66. IPEN San Diego 2014

  67. IPEN San Diego 2014

Recommend


More recommend