information information systems infrastructure systems
play

Information Information systems/infrastructure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Information Information systems/infrastructure systems/infrastructure complexity complexity Actor Network Theory Actor Network Theory Complexity Complexity Types of components, types of links, speed of Types of components, types of


  1. Information Information systems/infrastructure systems/infrastructure complexity complexity Actor Network Theory Actor Network Theory

  2. Complexity Complexity • Types of components, types of links, speed of Types of components, types of links, speed of change change • Unpredicable (or uncontrollable) interactions, Unpredicable (or uncontrollable) interactions, unpredicatable (or uncontrollable) outcomes unpredicatable (or uncontrollable) outcomes • (propagation of) side-effects (propagation of) side-effects • ANT’s contribution: “Types” ANT’s contribution: “Types”

  3. Actor Network Theory Actor Network Theory • Understanding heterogeneity: interaction Understanding heterogeneity: interaction between the social, technical, institutional, … between the social, technical, institutional, … (humans and non-humans/technological and (humans and non-humans/technological and non-technological components) non-technological components) • Network of actants Network of actants • Origin: Social studies of science Origin: Social studies of science • The interaction between social, political, The interaction between social, political, technological, institutional elements in technological, institutional elements in construction of scientific facts and theories construction of scientific facts and theories (Kuhn) (Kuhn)

  4. Actor Network Theory 2 Actor Network Theory 2 • Theory/fact and technology: Theory/fact and technology: heterogeneous network heterogeneous network • Science and technological development: Science and technological development: – Transforming/building networks Transforming/building networks – Actors: (heterogeneous) networks Actors: (heterogeneous) networks

  5. Actors Actors • Always heterogeneous network Always heterogeneous network • No assumptions about differences between No assumptions about differences between human and technology human and technology • There ARE differences: constructed - not given There ARE differences: constructed - not given • Inscriptions of rules and programs-of-action, Inscriptions of rules and programs-of-action, delegations of roles and competences, .. delegations of roles and competences, .. • Humans are different - technologies are different Humans are different - technologies are different • Ideal for studying interaction between humans, Ideal for studying interaction between humans, organizations and technology (I.e. the role of organizations and technology (I.e. the role of the technology. Compare with Orlikowski’s the technology. Compare with Orlikowski’s technological artefact/technology-in-use technological artefact/technology-in-use distinction) distinction)

  6. Concepts Concepts • Actants Actants • Associations/networks/collectives (of humans and non-humans) Associations/networks/collectives (of humans and non-humans) • Association, Translation, composition, enrollment Association, Translation, composition, enrollment • Interference Interference – Ex.: gun, man, gun+man Ex.: gun, man, gun+man • Inscription, delegation Inscription, delegation • Program-of-action Program-of-action • Black-boxing Black-boxing • Irreversibility Irreversibility • ”Immutable mobiles” Immutable mobiles” ” • Fluids (”mutable mobiles”) Fluids (”mutable mobiles”) • Order’s dis-order Order’s dis-order

  7. Assumptions Assumptions • Everything – theories, facts, technologies, Everything – theories, facts, technologies, humans – are networks/collectives humans – are networks/collectives • Network building is a political process Network building is a political process • All actors have interests All actors have interests • Building alliances (humans and non- Building alliances (humans and non- humans) humans) • Power = size of the network Power = size of the network • The process is embedded in the product The process is embedded in the product

  8. Example: Lab reports Example: Lab reports • Lab reports - Fürst Lab reports - Fürst • Solution = sequence of translations (of interests Solution = sequence of translations (of interests and existing solutions and technologies) and existing solutions and technologies) • Interests and translations: Interests and translations: – Increased profits Increased profits =>More customers =>More customers =>Better service =>Better service =>Electronic transmission =>Electronic transmission =>Specific design =>Specific design

  9. Lab. reports - continued Lab. reports - continued • Integration with medical record Integration with medical record system system • Giving away modems for free Giving away modems for free • Integration with local practices Integration with local practices • For each translation: the network For each translation: the network (collective) grows, alignment is (collective) grows, alignment is maintained maintained

  10. Lab orders Lab orders • Interests Interests – lab: increased profits -> cost containment --> cut lab: increased profits -> cost containment --> cut manual registration work manual registration work – doctors: ? doctors: ? – patients: security, … patients: security, … – vendors, authorities, standardization bodies, vendors, authorities, standardization bodies, standards, … : ???? standards, … : ????

  11. Order continued... Order continued... • EDIFACT solution: failed to enroll EDIFACT solution: failed to enroll doctors doctors • Failed to align standardized solution Failed to align standardized solution and doctors’ interests and doctors’ interests • Fürst: “continuous ordering” Fürst: “continuous ordering” • Appears to be impossible to align with Appears to be impossible to align with established (EDIFACT/e-mail) established (EDIFACT/e-mail) standards standards

  12. Prescriptions Prescriptions • Social security: cost containment – more strict Social security: cost containment – more strict control control • Pharmacy: Cutting manual registration work, Pharmacy: Cutting manual registration work, improved logistics improved logistics • Patients: Less waiting (reiterated prescriptions ?) Patients: Less waiting (reiterated prescriptions ?) • Physicians: Quality control Physicians: Quality control • Failed to make a solution that anybody would pay Failed to make a solution that anybody would pay for for • Failed in translating the interests into an aligned Failed in translating the interests into an aligned network network

  13. More on Prescriptions More on Prescriptions • Failed standardization Failed standardization Complex socio-technical networks (failed Complex socio-technical networks (failed to understand the complex network of to understand the complex network of relations between the social and the relations between the social and the technical) technical) • Focused isolated on standardization Focused isolated on standardization • Didn’t address the need for translating Didn’t address the need for translating technology into use technology into use • Blind for interests Blind for interests

  14. Design: Making inscriptions Design: Making inscriptions • of programs-of-action of programs-of-action • which one? which one? • How? How? • Who? Who? • How strong is the inscription? How strong is the inscription? • Can users change it? Can users change it? • Flexibility!! Flexibility!!

  15. Inscriptions Inscriptions in standards in standards

  16. Example: Hotel keys (Latour) Example: Hotel keys (Latour) • Problem: Customers not returning keys Problem: Customers not returning keys • Anti-programs Anti-programs • 1. trial: Sign behind the counter: ”Please 1. trial: Sign behind the counter: ”Please remember to return the key” remember to return the key” • 2. trial: Ordering the ”doorman” to remind 2. trial: Ordering the ”doorman” to remind customers customers • 3. trial: Adding a metal nob to the key 3. trial: Adding a metal nob to the key • Inscribing = building network Inscribing = building network • Make it strong enough Make it strong enough

  17. Inscriptions in standards Inscriptions in standards • ” ”Materials” Materials” – The standards organizations The standards organizations – Systems architecture Systems architecture – EDIFACT syntax EDIFACT syntax – Messages Messages – Data elements Data elements • The socio-technical network! The socio-technical network! • The EDIFACT network: Big and strong The EDIFACT network: Big and strong

  18. Inscriptions in the EDIFACT actor Inscriptions in the EDIFACT actor network network • Emergent property: No user participation Emergent property: No user participation – Must know the rules and the network Must know the rules and the network – The complexity of the network The complexity of the network – The EDIFACT mafia in control The EDIFACT mafia in control – No flexibility No flexibility • Emergent inscriptions, aggregation of Emergent inscriptions, aggregation of side-effects side-effects

  19. Systems architecture Systems architecture • Message based, transaction oriented, Message based, transaction oriented, client/server, event-driven client/server, event-driven • EDIFACT: message based (modelling EDIFACT: message based (modelling paper forms) => email (X.400) paper forms) => email (X.400) • Labs: Labs: – Complete orders and reports Complete orders and reports – Ordering new analysis Ordering new analysis

Recommend


More recommend