In Inter-Regio rail services, an opportunity for a structured transport system Gabriele Venditti Master student in Public Transport Governance University Milano Bicocca
• Introduction • Methodology • System before 2005 • New «stretegy» and inefficiecy • Example cases and key points • Proposal of a new governance system
Introduction • Is the governance of medium distance railway service bringing efficiency in this market segment? • Does it provide advantages for travellers and grant the right to mobility? • How can trans-regional train service contribute to a efficient transport system? Medium Loss of efficiency distance Progressive journeys weakening of historically Inter-Regio In the hand of services Loss of RAILWAYS competitiveness
Methodology • Public planning point of view (many qualitative aspects) • Official data for number of passengers provided by regional government • Elaboration of data conducted in collaboration with the transport department of Region Lombardia • Use of a specific “private” software for drawing timetable schemes • Only few data available for costs of production (use of official gross information)
Methodology Reconstruction of the Proposal for a new evolution of services in governance last 15 years Application of the best Changes to the structure of practices the service Change of view > Point out main Evolution of the governance Development of an environment CRITICAL ISSUES integrated transport system - Effects on travel solution Benchmark - Changes in demand New rules to define an innovative planning (n° passengers) environment - Variation of costs (subsidies)
Inter Regio Metropolitan and High speed / long (medium Regional systems distance distance) Major part of national Consistent infrastructure transport offer investments
System before 2005 - Implemented from 1985 on main national axes - «Modern system» with regular timetable and definition of main nodes of the network - System of medium and long distance trains (Inter-Regio and Intercity) - No fare integration
System before 2005 Organisation of National railway company from 2000 (passenger division) DOUBLE REGIME National passenger division Long Regional distance • Responsible for planning the long distance service • Economically autonomous (sustained by fare incomes) Regional passenger division SYSTEM • Plan the service in cooperation with regional governments • Regions buy the service from Railways and sign a contract service • Service is subsidized with public resources
Change of strategy Unification of Design of a Push for an passenger new service increase of divisions structure market-services - New service structure for Till 2005 After 2005 medium distances - Cut of all IR at the regional Long distance Intercity * Eurostar * border - Switch to Intercity Medium distance Inter-Regio Intercity - Confirmation and strengthening of double Regional services Regional trains Regional trains regime
Change of strategy Heavy regionalisation Fragmentation Overlapping services of trans regional offer Missing nodes
Change of strategy – lack of resources 2007 • Economical crisis of • New “expensive” FS contract services • Crisis of public • Reform of the rail • Relevant cut to finance transport service regional train • Uncertain resources service for public transports 2005 2008 - 19 % of resources for period 2009- 2016
Evolution of demand (Milano – Ventimiglia) 2161 2163 2165 2167 1735 2173 VENTIMIGLIA Vallecrosia Bordighera Ospedaletti Lig. San Remo July 2005 Taggia Arma S.Stefano R.L. S.Lorenzo Cipres Imperia Porto M. Imperia Oneglia Sunday Diano Marina Cervo S.Bartol. 2159 Andora Laigueglia 1733 1707 1737 2175 Alassio Albenga Ceriale Borghetto S.S. Loano Pietra Ligure Borgio Verezzi Finale Ligure M. Spotorno Noli Quiliano Vado SAVONA Albisola Celle Varazze Cogoleto Arenzano Genova Vesima Genova Voltri Genova Pra Genova Pegli 1730 2172 1738 Genova Sestri P. Ge.Cornigliano GE.SAMPIERDARENA GENOVA P.PRINC. Mignanego 2156 RONCO SCRIVIA ARQUATA SCRIVIA Stazzano Serrav. Cassano Spinola Villalvernia Carbonara Scriv. TORTONA MI 702 MI 704 20254 20258 20264 20290 20268 20294 20278 Pontecurone VOGHERA Lungavilla BRESSANA BOTT. Cava Manara PAVIA Certosa di Pavia 20252 Villamaggiore Locate T riulzi 20281 20253 20261 20299 20289 20283 MILANO ROGOREDO 1713 1725 1759 1727 1729 2183 2187 20293 2189 2191 2195 2197 2199 1731 1715 MILANO LAMBRATE MI.GRECO PIRELLI MILANO CENTRALE MI.P.GARIBALDI 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 lug05 B R lug05 IR A lug05 IR R lug05 R A lug05 R R 400 200 100 50
Evolution of demand (Milano – Ventimiglia) 1735 VENTIMIGLIA Vallecrosia Bordighera Ospedaletti Lig. San Remo Taggia Arma July 2006 S.Stefano R.L. S.Lorenzo Cipres Imperia Porto M. Imperia Oneglia Diano Marina sunday Cervo S.Bartol. 33881 33411 Andora 33409 33889 33897 Laigueglia 1733 1707 1737 Alassio Albenga Ceriale Borghetto S.S. Loano Pietra Ligure Borgio Verezzi Finale Ligure M. Spotorno Noli Quiliano Vado SAVONA Albisola Celle Varazze Cogoleto Arenzano Genova Vesima Genova Voltri Genova Pra 33886 Genova Pegli 1730 2194 1738 Genova Sestri P. Ge.Cornigliano GE.SAMPIERDARENA GENOVA P.PRINC. 33878 Mignanego RONCO SCRIVIA ARQUATA SCRIVIA Stazzano Serrav. Cassano Spinola Villalvernia Carbonara Scriv. TORTONA MI 702 MI 704 20254 20260 20264 20266 20272 20276 20278 20280 2184 Pontecurone VOGHERA Lungavilla BRESSANA BOTT. Cava Manara PAVIA 20252 Certosa di Pavia Villamaggiore Locate T riulzi 20255 33229 20259 33283 20261 33287 20265 33389 20269 33405 20277 33407 33297 20281 20283 MILANO ROGOREDO 1713 1759 1727 2199 1725 1731 1715 MILANO LAMBRATE MI.GRECO PIRELLI MILANO CENTRALE MI.P.GARIBALDI 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 lug06 B A lug06 B R lug06 D R lug06 IR A lug06 IR R lug06 R A lug06 R R 400 200 100 50 Milano-Genoa-Ventimiglia 2005 2006 2015 pax on 296 164 250 board Variation -44% -15%
Evolution of demand (Milano – Bologna) 2124 2126 2128 2130 2132 2134 2136 2138 BOLOGNA C.LE January 2005 LAVINO Anzola Samoggia Working day C.F ranco Emilia MODENA Rubiera 2122 REGGIO EMILIA Villa Cade` S.Ilario d`Enza 20424 20400 2120 2912 PARMA Castelguelfo 2036 2922 2038 FIDENZA Alseno Fiorenzuola Cadeo Pontenure MI 962 20401 20408 20414 20416 20420 20402 20428 20430 20432 20434 20436 20438 20422 20426 PIACENZA 20418 S.Stefano Lodig. 20406 CODOGNO CASALPUSTERLENGO Secugnago MI 812 MI 964 20412 Lodi 20404 Tavazzano S. Zenone al L. Melegnano MI 961 MI 963 20425 S. Giuliano Mil. Borgolombardo S.Donato Milan. 20427 20435 2123 MILANO ROGOREDO 20403 20405 20419 20431 20433 20413 20439 2037 2125 20407 2127 2129 20411 20415 2131 20421 2133 20423 2039 2135 20429 2137 2139 2927 2141 20437 20417 2925 1757 MILANO LAMBRATE MILANO CENTRALE MI.GRECO PIRELLI MI.P.GARIBALDI 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 gen05 B A gen05 B R gen05 D A gen05 D R gen05 IR A gen05 IR R gen05 R A gen05 R R 400 200 100 50
Evolution of demand (Milano – Bologna) BOLOGNA C.LE January 2006 LAVINO Anzola Sam oggia C.F ranco Emilia Working day MODENA Rubiera 2122 REGGIO EMILIA Villa Cade` S.Ilario d`Enza 20424 20400 2272 2912 2274 2276 2278 2280 2282 2284 2286 2288 PARMA Castelguelfo 2036 2038 FIDENZA Alseno F iorenzuola Cadeo MI 962 Pontenure 20401 20408 20414 20416 20420 20402 20428 20430 20432 20434 20436 20438 20422 20426 2271 PIACENZA 20418 S.Stefano Lodig. 20406 CODOGNO CASALPUSTERLENGO Secugnago MI 812 MI 694 20412 Lodi 20404 20351 T avazzano S. Z enone al L. M elegnano MI 961 MI 963 20403 20425 20399 S. Giuliano M il. Borgolom bardo S.Donato M ilan. 20427 MILANO ROGOREDO 20415 20421 20431 20433 20435 20413 20439 2037 20405 2273 20407 2275 2277 20411 2279 20419 2281 20423 2283 2039 20429 2285 2287 20437 2289 20417 M ILANO LAM BRAT E 1757 MILANO CENTRALE M I.GRECO PIRELLI M I.P.GARIBALDI 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 gen06 B A gen06 B R gen06 D R gen06 IR A gen06 IR R gen06 R A gen06 R R 400 200 100 50
Recommend
More recommend
