Ice-Structure Interaction at the Confederation Bridge Pier Dhruba Tripathi Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary Calgary, Canada
Overview Confederation Bridge Introduction Monitoring – Direct, indirect, and observations Pressure panels Data analysis Activation Analysis Detailed Pressure Distribution Analysis Correlation Analysis Conclusion 5/18/2010 Tripathi 2
Confederation Bridge 5/18/2010 Tripathi 3
Confederation Bridge 12.9 km long 100 years design life 40 m above water (typical) 4.5m to14m deep precast concrete box girder Bridge Footings- Gravity foundation on bedrock 5/18/2010 Tripathi 4
Ice Force Monitoring Direct measurement of ice pressure Indirect measurement of the global ice force Observation of ice kinematics 5/18/2010 Tripathi 5
Indirect measurement of ice force Tilt meters measure displacements Stiffness of the pier determined by a pull test 5/18/2010 Tripathi 6
Ice load on the Bridge Limit stress (ice failure) Vertical structures – Crushing failure of ice Conical ice shield – flexural failure – causes lower load Limit force (ice driving force) 5/18/2010 Tripathi 7
Ice Load History 5/18/2010 Tripathi 8
Real-Time Monitoring Computers at the bridge can be accessed through internet Ice load – live chart at website updated every 15 minutes (http://ice.ucalgary.ca) Real-time access - videos from four cameras for the observation of ice-structure interaction 5/18/2010 Tripathi 9
Direct measurement of ice pressure 20 panels Covering 40m 2 5/18/2010 Tripathi 10
Ice Force Panels (IFPs) 1 10 2 9 3 8 A total of 160 4 5 6 7 sectors in 20 11 20 12 19 13 18 14 17 panels on the 15 16 cone 5/18/2010 Tripathi 11
Typical Panel 8 sectors (~500 x 500 mm) ~ 30 button on each sector 2 buttons instrumented Best represents average pressure 5/18/2010 Tripathi 12
Data 120 channels – upper cone (level ice and rubble) 40 channels – lower cone (Thick ice) 64 channels – pier shaft (Large keels) Tiltmeter data – Global ice force (comparison) 4 time-lapse video data, upward-looking sonar 5/18/2010 Tripathi 13
Ice Structure Interaction What happens at the ice structure interface? Pressure zones ( hpz ) ICE ? STRUCTURE Spatial and temporal pressure distribution ? 5/18/2010 Tripathi 14
Data Electrical signals Average data- every 17 seconds Full Ice season – continuous recording Triggered data- every 34 milliseconds For Events only 5/18/2010 Tripathi 15
Typical data header (120 data channels) 5/18/2010 Tripathi 16
Panel Reliability 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 4 panels and 10 sectors 42 sectors bad in 1998 7 panels and 16 sectors 72 sectors bad in 2003 5/18/2010 Tripathi 17
Events selection and Panels Events selection Ice forces – (tiltmeter data) Availability of pressure panel data Video analysis, when available Panels Panels on cone for interaction of level ice Waterline panels – level ice impact Panels above water-line – Rubble piles 5/18/2010 Tripathi 18
Data Conversion 93 94 89 90 113 114 109 110 2.5 LEGEND 2 89 90 93 94 Pressure, y ip (MPa) 109 110 113 114 1.5 1 0.5 0 -0.5 -1 09:04.3 09:13.0 09:21.6 09:30.2 09:38.9 09:47.5 09:56.2 10:04.8 Time stamp (min.) 5/18/2010 Tripathi 19
Baseline Unrealistic negative pressure Baselines differ in different channels Clear pressure peaks (sustained pressure for longer duration – very rare) Baselines changed over time 5/18/2010 Tripathi 20
Baseline Correction- Trimmed 5/18/2010 Tripathi 21
5/18/2010 Tripathi 22
5/18/2010 Tripathi 23
5/18/2010 Tripathi 24
Ice pressure and ice force 5/18/2010 Tripathi 25
Data Analysis Activation Analysis Sector considered active [pressure peak] > [a threshold] Detailed Pressure Distribution Analysis Peaks – supported by at least 5 adjacent peaks in each side 5/18/2010 Tripathi 26
Horizontal and vertical pressure distribution 93 94 89 90 113 114 109 110 5/18/2010 Tripathi 28
Activation, Integrated load 5 0.6 Integrated load =∑[ y i a i cos( α i )] 0.5 4 Panel Activation (No.) Integrated Load (MN) 0.4 3 0.3 2 0.2 1 0.1 0 0 09:09.3 09:11.9 09:14.4 09:17.0 09:19.6 09:22.2 09:24.8 09:27.4 09:30.0 09:32.5 09:35.1 09:37.7 09:40.3 09:42.9 09:45.5 09:48.0 09:50.6 09:53.2 89 90 93 94 109 110 113 114 Panel Activation Integrated Load 5/18/2010 Tripathi 29
Horizontal Pressure Distribution 5/18/2010 Tripathi 30
Horizontal Distribution 5/18/2010 Tripathi 31
Vertical pressure distribution 5/18/2010 Tripathi 32
Detailed Pressure Distribution Analysis 2 2 Sector 90 Sector 89 Sector Pressure (MPa) Sector Pressure (MPa) 1 1 0 0 -1 -1 -2 -2 12:09 12:09 Time (HH:MM) Time (HH:MM) 2 2 Sector 93 Sector 94 Sector Pressure (MPa) Sector Pressure (MPa) 1 1 0 0 -1 -1 -2 -2 12:09 12:09 Time (HH:MM) Time (HH:MM) 89 90 93 94 109 110 113 114 5/18/2010 Tripathi 33
Probability of exceedance 5/18/2010 Tripathi 34
Correlation Analysis • Strength and direction of a linear relationship of pressure between different sectors • Activation correlation • Time-series corrleation 5/18/2010 Tripathi 35
Time-series correleation 1 81 0.8 Correlation Coefficient 82 0.6 83 0.4 84 0.2 85 0 86 -0.2 89 -0.4 90 81 90 82 89 83 86 s 84 85 r o t c 85 84 e S 86 83 89 82 90 81 5/18/2010 Tripathi 36
Limitations Pressure panels readings - representation of absolute pressure Many of the sectors were damaged Availability of video data at night (apparently, the largest events occur at night) 5/18/2010 Tripathi 37
Further works Test the results by using numerical methods like finite element method. Process limit driving force events Add some more events to refine the result. 5/18/2010 Tripathi 38
Acknowledgements Dr. Tom Brown Noorma Shrestha Susan Tibbo Kelly Obert Mohamed El-Seify Derek Myane Dambar Tiwari May 29, 2009 39
Thank You ! Questions ?
Recommend
More recommend