Hoover Power Post-2017 Allocation: Winners and Losers by Total Load, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Hoover Power Post-2017 Allocation: Winners and Losers by Total Load, Ag Load, In-Lieu RCAlaw.com

Alternative 2A Total Load with “Pumping Equivalent” Load Compared to Alternative 1 Winners Losers ED3 (+215.99% Capacity, +197.21% Energy) AID (-14.2% Capacity, -51.75% Energy) ED8 (+30.35% Capacity, +22.67% Energy) AVIDD (-48.41% Capacity, -51.75% Energy) HVPD (+111.65% Capacity, +99.46% Energy) BWCDD (-33.59% Capacity, -37.61% Energy) MVWCDD (+17.68% Capacity, + 10.83% Energy) CHID (-65.48% Capacity, -67.34% Energy) QCID (+42.09% Capacity, +33.81% Energy) CMID (-92.93% Capacity, -93.35% Energy) RID (+44.6% Capacity, +35.84% Energy) ED2 (-10.16% Capacity, -15.48% Energy) STID (+3.65% Capacity, -2.47% Energy) ED4 (-39.62%Capacity, -43.2% Energy) TID (+42.58% Capacity, +34.14% Energy) ED5 (-60.04% Capacity, -62.41% Energy WMID (+39.48% Capacity, +31.12% Energy) ED6 (-31.83% Capacity, -35.89% Energy) ED7 (-71.18% Capacity, -72.9 Energy) MWD (-39.86% Capacity, -43.44% Energy) OWCD (-67.53% Capacity, -69.48% Energy) RWCD (-51.9% Capacity, -38.75% Energy) SIDD (-51.37% Capacity, -54.02% Energy) RCAlaw.com

Alternative 2B Ag Load with “Pumping Equivalent” Load Compared to Alternative 1 Winners Losers AID (+34.91% Capacity, +26.68% Energy) AVIDD (-18.78% Capacity, -24.12% Energy) ED2 (+41.28% Capacity, +32.91% Energy) BWCDD (-4.11% Capacity, -9.94% Energy) ED3 (+35.16 Capacity, +27.13% Energy) CHID (-45.67% Capacity, -48.65% Energy) ED8 (+104.98% Capacity, +92.9% Energy) CMID (-88.89% Capacity, -89.55% Energy) HVPD (+232.82% Capacity, +213.66% Energy) STID (-67.4% Capacity, -69.33% Energy) MVWCDD (+85.07% Capacity, +74.29% Energy) ED4 (-29.47% Capacity, -33.56% Energy) QCID (+123.44% Capacity, +110.43% Energy) ED5 (-41.68% Capacity, -45.13% Energy) RID (+127.37% Capacity, +113.61% Energy) ED6 (-17.46% Capacity, -22.37% Energy) TID (+124.2% Capacity, +110.94% Energy) ED7 (-80.97% Capacity, -82.1% Energy) WMID (+55.73% Capacity, +46.4% Energy) MWD (-59.34% Capacity, -61.75% Energy) OWCD (-99.49% Capacity, -99.52% Energy) RWCD (-38.1% Capacity, -3.68% Energy) SIDD (-23.45% Capacity,- 27.7% Energy) RCAlaw.com

Alternative 3A Total Load Compared to Alternative 1 Winners Losers AID (+4.82% Capacity, -1.57% Energy) AVIDD (-39.68% Capacity, -43.7% Energy) ED2 (+9.78% Capacity, +3.28% Energy) BWCDD (-37.18% Capacity, -41% Energy) ED3 (+227.09% Capacity, +207.66% Energy) CHID (-62.04% Capacity, -64.14% Energy) ED8 (+59.28% Capacity, +49.89% Energy) CMID (-96.04% Capacity, -96.27% Energy) HVPD (+89.28% Capacity, +78.37% Energy) ED4 (-55.32% Capacity, -57.97% Energy) MVWCDD (+43.82% Capacity, +35.43% Energy) ED5 (-67.92% Capacity, -69.82% Energy) RID (+76.68% Capacity, +65.98% Energy) ED6 (-73.03% Capacity, -74.63% Energy) STID (+26.73% Capacity, +19.17% Energy) ED7 (-64.79% Capacity, -66.89% Energy) TID (+13.29% Capacity, +6.61% Energy) MWD (-40.11% Capacity, -43.67% Energy) WMID (+70.45% Capacity, +60.22% Energy) OWCD (-60.33% Capacity, -62.71% Energy) QCID (-81.53% Capacity, -82.6% Energy) RWCD (-78.4% Capacity, -79.64% Energy) SIDD (-40.56% Capacity, -43.82% Energy) RCAlaw.com

Alternative 3B Ag Load Compared to Alternative 1 Winners Losers AID (+60.17% Capacity, +50.4% Energy) AVIDD (-7.92% Capacity, -13.97% Energy) ED2 (+67.74% Capacity, +57.8% Energy) BWCDD (-11.89% Capacity, -17.24% Energy) ED3 (+35.94% Capacity, +27.86% Energy) CHID (-42.02% Capacity, -45.2% Energy) ED8 (+143.37% Capacity, +129.02% Energy) CMID (-93.95% Capacity, -94.31% Energy) HVPD (+189.19% Capacity, +172.54% Energy) ED4 (-49.22% Capacity, -52.22% Energy) MVWCDD (+119.73% Capacity, +106.93% Energy) ED5 (-54.5% Capacity, -57.2% Energy) RID (+169.95% Capacity, +153.61% Energy) ED6 (-68.27% Capacity, -70.16% Energy) TID (+73.14% Capacity, +62.89% Energy) ED7 (-77.41% Capacity, -78.75% Energy) WMID (+84.89% Capacity, +73.81% Energy) MWD (-60.66% Capacity, -62.99% Energy) OWCD (-99.39% Capacity, -99.43% Energy) QCID (-71.76% Capacity, -73.41% Energy) RWCD (-73.1% Capacity, -68.89% Energy) SIDD (-9.11% Capacity, -14.16% Energy) STID (-61.29% Capacity, -63.58% Energy) RCAlaw.com

Policy Issue Results Alternative Best Result 2A Total Load with MWD “Pumping Equivalent” Load 2B Ag Load with “Pumping BWCDD, ED6 Equivalent” Load 3A Total Load ED7, OWCD 3B Ag Load RID RCAlaw.com

Hoover Contractor APA SS #2A APA SS #2B APA SS #3A APA SS #3B Aguila ID 2102 3305 2568 3924 Avra Valley I&DD 325 512 380 580 Buckeye WCD 1979 2857 1872 2626 Chandler Heights ID 321 505 353 539 Cortaro Marana ID 455 715 255 390 ED2 17474 27479 21352 32625 ED3 Pinal (Incl. ED1) 50243 21490 52008 21614 ED4 Pinal 11743 13737 8690 9877 ED5 Pinal 5902 8614 4738 6720 ED6 Pinal (Incl. ED5 M) 5699 6900 2255 2653 ED7 Maricopa 3026 1998 3697 2372 ED8 Maricopa 17454 27447 21328 32587 Harquahala Valley PD 5270 8287 4713 7201 Maricopa Co. Mun. WCD 5316 3594 5294 3478 McMullen Valley WCDD 4472 7033 5465 8350 Ocotillo WCD 776 12 948 14 Queen Creek ID 2515 3955 327 500 Roosevelt ID 4656 7321 5689 8692 Roosevelt WCD 3294 4183 1463 1821 San Tan ID 539 170 659 201 Silverbell I&DD 346 544 422 645 RCAlaw.com Tonopah ID 2210 3475 1756 2684 Wellton-Mohawk ID 4059 4532 4960 5380

Hoover Pre-1987 APA Post-1987 Change From 1987 1987 Hoover Customer Capacity – MW Energy – MWh Capacity – MW Energy – MWh Capacity Energy Buckeye WCD 3.000 12,636 2.980 10,201 -0.7% -19.3% Chandler Heights ID 0.900 3,792 0.930 3,164 3.3% -16.6% Cortaro Marana ID 7.800 32,848 6.440 22,003 -17.4% -33.0% ED2 18.700 78,746 19.450 66,473 4.0% -15.6% ED3 Pinal (Excl. ED1) 10.300 43,378 10.710 36,613 4.0% -15.6% ED4 Pinal 18.700 78,746 19.450 66,473 4.0% -15.6% ED5 Pinal 14.200 59,799 14.770 50,476 4.0% -15.6% ED6 Pinal (Incl. ED5 M) 8.700 36,641 8.360 28,579 -3.9% -22.0% ED7 Maricopa 10.100 42,532 10.500 35,902 4.0% -15.6% Maricopa Co. Mun. WCD 8.500 35,794 8.840 30,215 4.0% -15.6% Ocotillo WCD 2.300 9,683 2.390 8,175 3.9% -15.6% Roosevelt ID 3.100 13,049 3.220 11,020 3.9% -15.5% Roosevelt WCD 6.500 27,371 6.760 23,106 4.0% -15.6% Salt River Project 37.300 157,079 38.790 132,590 4.0% -15.6% San Tan ID 0.500 2,106 0.520 1,777 4.0% -15.6% 2.800 11,789 2.910 9,953 3.9% -15.6% Wellton-Mohawk ID 153.400 645,989 157.020 536,720 Total 189.000 1987 Hoover A Capacity Note: Pre-1987 Allocation customers were reduced by 15.6% on energy to create energy for Hoover B capacity and increased 4% for Hoover A capacity upgrades, plus adjustments for Buckeye, Chandler Heights, Cortaro and ED6 that had excess resources at that time. The remaining Post-1987 Hoover A, i.e., 189 MW - 157 MW = 32 MW, was allocated to new eligible entities including Aguila, Avra Valley, ED1, ED8, Harquahala, McMullen, Queen Creek, Silverbell and RCAlaw.com Tonopah. Example, CMID lost 17.4% of its entitlement, plus the 16% "A" energy loss = 33%.