hitb 2009
play

HITB 2009 Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Binary deprotection with metasm and stuff Alexandre Gazet Yoann Guillot Sogeti / ESEC R&D Sogeti / ESEC R&D alexandre.gazet(at)sogeti.com yoann.guillot(at)sogeti.com HITB 2009 Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler


  1. Binary deprotection with metasm and stuff Alexandre Gazet Yoann Guillot Sogeti / ESEC R&D Sogeti / ESEC R&D alexandre.gazet(at)sogeti.com yoann.guillot(at)sogeti.com HITB 2009

  2. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Plan Metasm 1 Debugger Compiler Disassembler Binding Backtracking Analysis of a protection 2 Decompilation 3 A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 2/55

  3. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Metasm a pure ruby opensource framework assembler/dissassembler Ia32 (16/32/64bits), mips Even supports cr7 debugger linux, windows, remote compiler/decompiler (more or less :) GUI included ! A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 3/55

  4. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Plan Metasm 1 Debugger Compiler Disassembler Binding Backtracking Analysis of a protection 2 Breaking obfuscation Breaking code virtualization Putting the pieces together Conclusion(s) Decompilation 3 A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 4/55

  5. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Debugger A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 5/55

  6. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Debugger A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 6/55

  7. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Features Direct manipulation of the OS primitives sys ptrace WaitForDebugEvent Very fine & low-level control Unified high-level interface Linux, Windows, GDBserver Conditionnal breakpoints, callback. . . A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 7/55

  8. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Plan Metasm 1 Debugger Compiler Disassembler Binding Backtracking Analysis of a protection 2 Breaking obfuscation Breaking code virtualization Putting the pieces together Conclusion(s) Decompilation 3 A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 8/55

  9. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler C Compiler Rudimentary C compiler x86 only Framework integration easy to leverage Easy to customize e.g. dynamic symbol resolution A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 9/55

  10. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Plan Metasm 1 Debugger Compiler Disassembler Binding Backtracking Analysis of a protection 2 Breaking obfuscation Breaking code virtualization Putting the pieces together Conclusion(s) Decompilation 3 A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 10/55

  11. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Disassembler A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 11/55

  12. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Disassembly The reference: IDA Pro Excellent on unobfuscated binaries Not so useful on protected code No code interpretation Strong hypothesis Hypothesis Both branches are taken on a conditionnal jump Two instructions never overlap A subfunction call returns A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 12/55

  13. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Disassembly The reference: IDA Pro Excellent on unobfuscated binaries Not so useful on protected code No code interpretation Strong hypothesis Hypothesis Both branches are taken on a conditionnal jump Two instructions never overlap A subfunction call returns A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 12/55

  14. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Hypothesis: all call returns . t e x t :00403 E9F loc 403E9F : ; CODE XREF: .text: loc_40CDEF . t e x t :00403 E9F push ebp . t e x t :00403 EA0 push ecx . t e x t :00403 EA1 push ebp . t e x t :00403 EA2 c a l l sub 40BECD . t e x t :00403 EA7 outsb . t e x t :00403 EA8 edx , cmp esp . t e x t :00403 EAA push esp . t e x t :00403 EAB i n c e s i A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 13/55

  15. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Failure . t e x t :0040 BECD sub 40BECD proc near ; CODE XREF: .text :00 . t e x t :0040 BECD cmp eax , ebp . t e x t :0040 BECF [ esp +0] , 1 add dword ptr . t e x t :0040 BED4 t e s t ebx , 1 E2h . t e x t :0040 BEDA 0 Ch retn . t e x t :0040 BEDA sub 40BECD endp A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 14/55

  16. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Binding Our solution: Express instruction effects through symbolic expressions. This associates semantics to each instruction. Instruction ADD : r e s = Expression [ [ a [ 0 ] , :& , mask ] , :+ , [ a [ 1 ] , :& , mask ] ] binding [ a [ 0 ] ] = r e s binding [ : e f l a g z ] = Expression [ [ res , :& , mask ] , :==, 0] binding [ : e f l a g s ] = s i g n [ r e s ] binding [ : e f l a g c ] = Expression [ res , : > , mask ] binding [ : e f l a g o ] = Expression [ [ s i g n [ a [ 0 ] ] , :==, s i g n [ a [ 1 ] ] ] , : ’&&’ , [ s i g n [ a [ 0 ] ] , : ’!=’ , s i g n [ r e s ] ] ] A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 15/55

  17. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Binding Our solution: Express instruction effects through symbolic expressions. This associates semantics to each instruction. Instruction ADD : r e s = Expression [ [ a [ 0 ] , :& , mask ] , :+ , [ a [ 1 ] , :& , mask ] ] binding [ a [ 0 ] ] = r e s binding [ : e f l a g z ] = Expression [ [ res , :& , mask ] , :==, 0] binding [ : e f l a g s ] = s i g n [ r e s ] binding [ : e f l a g c ] = Expression [ res , : > , mask ] binding [ : e f l a g o ] = Expression [ [ s i g n [ a [ 0 ] ] , :==, s i g n [ a [ 1 ] ] ] , : ’&&’ , [ s i g n [ a [ 0 ] ] , : ’!=’ , s i g n [ r e s ] ] ] A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 15/55

  18. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Binding Instruction CALL : binding [ : esp ] = Expression [ : esp , : − , opsz ] binding [ I n d i r e c t i o n [ : esp , 4] ] = d i . next addr For exemple: dword ptr [ esp ] = 0 x403EA7 esp = esp − 4 Instruction RDTSC : binding [ : eax ] = Expression : : Unknown binding [ : edx ] = Expression : : Unknown A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 16/55

  19. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Binding Instruction CALL : binding [ : esp ] = Expression [ : esp , : − , opsz ] binding [ I n d i r e c t i o n [ : esp , 4] ] = d i . next addr For exemple: dword ptr [ esp ] = 0 x403EA7 esp = esp − 4 Instruction RDTSC : binding [ : eax ] = Expression : : Unknown binding [ : edx ] = Expression : : Unknown A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 16/55

  20. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Binding Instruction CALL : binding [ : esp ] = Expression [ : esp , : − , opsz ] binding [ I n d i r e c t i o n [ : esp , 4] ] = d i . next addr For exemple: dword ptr [ esp ] = 0 x403EA7 esp = esp − 4 Instruction RDTSC : binding [ : eax ] = Expression : : Unknown binding [ : edx ] = Expression : : Unknown A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 16/55

  21. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Backtracking, the theory Definition Symbolic emulation by walking the instruction flow backwards. A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 17/55

  22. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Backtracking, the facts Execution flow: c a l l loc 40becdh ; @403ea2h e826800000 [ . . . ] cmp eax , ebp ; @40becdh 39e8 [ esp +0] , 1 add dword ptr ; @40becfh 8344240001 t e s t ebx , 1 e2h ; @40bed4h f7c3e2010000 0 ch r e t ; @40bedah c20c00 Backtracing x dword ptr [esp] for 40bedah ret 0ch backtrace 40becfh dword ptr [esp] => dword ptr [esp]+1 1 backtrace up 40becdh->403ea2h dword ptr [esp]+1 2 backtrace 403ea2h dword ptr [esp]+1 => 403ea8h 3 backtrace result: 403ea8h 4 A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 18/55

  23. Metasm Debugger Analysis of a protection Compiler Decompilation Disassembler Metasm Result: loc 403e9fh : push ebp ; @403e9fh 55 push ecx ; @403ea0h 51 push ebp ; @403ea1h 55 c a l l loc 40becdh ; @403ea2h e826800000 noreturn db 6 eh ; @403ea7h // Xrefs : 40 bedah loc 403ea8h : cmp edx , esp ; @403ea8h 39e2 push esp ; @403eaah 54 [ . . . ] // Xrefs : 403 ea2h loc 40becdh : cmp eax , ebp ; @40becdh 39e8 add dword ptr [ esp +0] , 1 ; @40becfh 8344240001 t e s t ebx , 1 e2h ; @40bed4h f7c3e2010000 r e t 0 ch ; @40bedah c20c00 x: loc_403ea8h A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 19/55

  24. Breaking obfuscation Metasm Breaking code virtualization Analysis of a protection Putting the pieces together Decompilation Conclusion(s) Plan Metasm 1 Analysis of a protection 2 Breaking obfuscation Breaking code virtualization Putting the pieces together Conclusion(s) Decompilation 3 A. Gazet, Y. Guillot Binary deprotection with metasm 20/55

Recommend


More recommend