Hit Width vs. Extraction Field Aidan Medcalf University of Dallas Oct 13, 2018
Data and MC Extraction Field Data Run MCB • Four extraction fields (see right) 1.04 1192 Extr104 • Used 2018_August_24, MCB1 MuonsCN 1.52 1175 Extr152 • Cuts: 1.7 840 MuonsCN 2.08 838 Extr208 • Highway, CBR of 0.15 (no highway on MC) • 90 cm crossed in drift direction • Corner LEMs ignored • Individual average waveforms were found for representative tracks with desirable angles 1
Average Hit Widths
Average Hit Widths, Data/MC Ratio 1.49 1.31
Average Hit Widths, 2.08 kV/cm Run 838
Average Hit Widths, 1.7 kV/cm Run 840
Average Hit Widths, 1.52 kV/cm Run 1157
Average Hit Widths, 1.04 kV/cm Run 1192
Representative Waveforms, 1.7 kV/cm Run 840
Representative Waveforms, 2.08 kV/cm Run 838
Results Extraction Field Data Mean MC Mean Data/MC Ratio View 0 View 1 View 0 View 1 View 0 View 1 1.04 37.1 36.6 12.3 6.26 3.01 5.84 1.52 18.6 17.2 11.2 5.84 1.66 2.96 1.7 16.9 7.29 10.8 5.63 1.64 1.36 2.08 16.1 7.38 10.3 5.36 1.49 1.31 • MC seems to match data well for high extraction fields, to within a multiplicative constant • MC is wrong for low extraction fields
Recommend
More recommend