highw ay 1 corridor investment program highw ay 1 tier i
play

Highw ay 1 Corridor Investment Program Highw ay 1 Tier I/II - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Highw ay 1 Corridor Investment Program Highw ay 1 Tier I/II Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Assessment Project Update November 2017 November 2017 Agenda Project Overview Purpose and Need Project Phasing Project


  1. Highw ay 1 Corridor Investment Program Highw ay 1 Tier I/II Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Assessment Project Update November 2017 November 2017

  2. Agenda • Project Overview • Purpose and Need • Project Phasing • Project Alternatives • Project Status • Update on Draft Environmental Document Comment Resolution • Review Key Issues • PDT Preferred Alternative • Preferred Alternative Selection November 2017 2

  3. Corridor Limits • Planned Improvements - 9 miles on Highway 1 – San Andreas to Morrissey November 2017 3

  4. Purpose and Need • Purpose of the Highway 1 Corridor Environmental Analysis • Reduce congestion • Encourage carpooling and use of alternative transportation modes as means to increase capacity • Improve safety November 2017 4

  5. Purpose and Need • Existing and Anticipated Needs to Address • Recurrent congestion • Existing and future delays for commuters, commerce, and emergency vehicles • Disincentives to use transit; congestion prevents cost-effective transit service • No incentives to carpool and lack of supporting facilities • Accident rates exceed statewide averages • “Cut-Through” traffic on local streets November 2017 5

  6. Project Phasing • Phased approach to implement project over an extended time period • Tier I: Program -level review (corridor) • Tier II: Project -level review (segment) • Future Tier II projects subject to project level environmental analysis November 2017 6

  7. Tier I & Tier II Project Limits November 2017 7

  8. Tier I Corridor - Alternatives Under Consideration • No Build Alternative • Does not address corridor purpose and need but offers comparison with impacts of other alternatives • Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative • Lower cost improvements to partly address corridor purpose and need without adding capacity • High Occupancy Vehicle Lane (HOV) Alternative • Designed to fully address corridor purpose and need November 2017

  9. Tier I Corridor : Engineering - Alternatives Development • Key Issues • Geometric constraints • Interchange review process • Engineering design- • Optimize local circulation • Caltrans standard design and right of way impacts • Caltrans conceptual agreement on corridor footprint November 2017 9

  10. Tier I Corridor : Engineering - Special Studies • Mobility Assessment • Transit Market Analysis (access and usage) • Mainline vehicular movements • Vehicular movements at ramp termini (safety) • Pedestrian movements at interchanges and overcrossings November 2017 10

  11. Tier II : Engineering - Project Limits • Standard Auxiliary Lanes • Chanticleer Ped/Bike Overcrossing • Total Project Cost $28M Final Design, ROW, & Construction • Auxiliary Lanes $21M, Bike/Ped OC - $7M November 2017 11

  12. Chanticleer Bike/Ped Overcrossing NB SB November 2017 12

  13. Project Timeline Adopt Final Tiered EI R/ EA Approach DED Public to per Circulation FHW A FHW A Sum m er 2 0 1 8 2 0 1 8 Fall 2 0 1 7 Nov 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 1 June 2 0 1 3 Adm inistrative Select FHW A Preferred Draft EI R/ EA Approval Tiered Alternative Docum ent November 2017 13

  14. Project Status Project Status November 2017 14

  15. Environmental Document Overview • Joint CEQA/NEPA document • California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) • National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) • Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Assessment Draft document was circulated for public • Combined Tier I and Tier II comments from November 4, 2015, document to January 25, 2016 November 2017 15

  16. Comment Resolution Update • 900 Separate Comments Received • Key Issues • Traffic / Air Quality / Greenhouse Gases • Biology • Cumulative Impacts Assessment • Growth Inducement Study November 2017 16

  17. Key issues - Traffic / Air Quality/ Greenhouse Gases • Issue • Use of 2004 AMBAG Model and Growth Projections • Resolution • Updated Traffic Analysis Memorandum • Air Quality Study Addendum Mirrors Updated Traffic Analysis November 2017 17

  18. Key issues - Biology • Issue • Santa Cruz Long-toed Salamander (SCLTS) Upland Habitat Impacts • Resolution • Completed Focused study on Upland Habitat • Updated Project Description November 2017 18

  19. Key issues – Cumulative Impact Assessment • Issues • Not Addressed Comprehensively • Resolution • Prepare a new 8-Step Cumulative Impacts Analysis November 2017 19

  20. Key issues – Grow th Inducement • Issue • Validate 2008 Growth Study Conclusion • Resolution • Prepare an Addendum With New Data November 2017 20

  21. PDT Preferred Alternative • On October 3, 2017, PDT Recommended: • The HOV Lane Alternative as the Preferred Tier I alternative, and • The Tier II Build Alternative as the preferred Tier II alternative • Review Alternative Comparison Matrix November 2017 21

  22. 2035 Annual Delay Tier I Peak hour speed Person Cost Alternatives (mph) (current hours $ million) (million) Tier I HOV Northbound AM = 39 $31 1.6 Alternative Southbound PM = 33 NB AM = 21 Tier I TSM 5.6 $107 Alternative SB PM = 10 NB AM = 12 No Build 8.0 $152 SB PM = 11 November 2017 22

  23. Greenhouse Gas 2035 Cut-through Emissions per Year Tier I Traffic 2035 compared to 2003 Alternatives (vehicles per day reduction) (metric tons/year) Soquel Drive (near Tier I HOV -33,413 Capitola Ave): 30,500 Alternative Other roads improve Tier I TSM No capacity -30,502 Alternative improvement No Build -32,907 None November 2017 23

  24. Tier I - Preferred Alternative Tier I HOV Lane Alternative recommended by the Project Development Team • Provides More Options for Future Tier II Projects • Overall Performance Addresses Project Purpose and Need • Reduce Cut-Through Traffic on Local Streets • Provides for Multi-Modal Operations November 2017 24

  25. Tier II – Build Alternative Tier II Build Alternative recommended by the Project Development Team • An important step towards implementing the HOV Lane Alternative • Consistent with the Measure D transportation sales tax measure approved by voters November 2017 25

  26. Environmental Review Process • Environmental review process for Tier I/Tier II EIR/EA • Response to comments/preparation of Final EIR/EA: November/December 2017 • FED to FHWA August 2018 • Certify Final EIR/Sign Finding of No Significant Impact: December 2018 November 2017 26

  27. Questions and Answers November 2017 27

Recommend


More recommend