hanne nex jensen department of political science enhedens
play

Hanne Nex Jensen Department of Political Science Enhedens navn og - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Workshop: Joint Supervi- sion as a shortcut to Teaching Based Research Hanne Nex Jensen Department of Political Science Enhedens navn og Sted og dato: vlg Indst > Sidehoved / Sidefod. Indfj Sted og


  1. Workshop: Joint Supervi- sion as a shortcut to Teaching Based Research Hanne Nexø Jensen Department of Political Science ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for RBT-Conference, March 16, 2016 dato og ”Enhedens navn” i Sidefod

  2. Purpose and structure en You will get ● to know more about joint supervision ● an opportunity to talk about short cuts between teaching/ supervision and research ● to exchange experiences ● to try out feedback practised as in a joint supervised group ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for RBT-Conference, March 16, 2016 dato og ”Enhedens navn” i Sidefod

  3. What is joint supervision? Writing group en Team Individual A joint supervised group consists of 2-7 students that read one another’s papers and give feedback with a super- visor present, Collegial supervision who defines, communicate ”Enhedens navn” and maintain og ”Sted og dato”: Cluster ground rules Collective vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Research Research Theory Method Analysis Discussion Conclusion question design chapter chapter Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for RBT-Conference, March 16, 2016 dato og ”Enhedens navn” i Sidefod

  4. Joint supervision’s contribution to Research en Joint supervised group, cluster Indirect contribution Inspirational Direct contribution ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: (use of time) (multiple brains) (research data, results) vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for RBT-Conference, March 16, 2016 dato og ”Enhedens navn” i Sidefod

  5. Joint supervision as a short cut to TBR? Student Supervisor Institution en Writing from day one Systematic use of More students finish on (supervision) time due to time scheduling Learn more, improve More in depth supervision Possibility of initiating writing skills, write better joint development of thesis. Learn from listing supervisors competences and collective problem solving (multiple brains) Experience processes like Positive spill-over Possibility of quality research, co-producers of between supervision and enhancement of research (new) knowledge research and teaching Enculturation into Parallel to peer review Possibility of initiating academia collegial supervision Moral support – prevents Learn from interaction Decrease in drop-out ”Enhedens navn” solitariness with other supervisors rates og ”Sted og dato”: Improve collaboration Improved competences Candidates collaboration skills and skills concerning skills improves vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / supervision Sidefod”. ”Students’ productiveness benefit from involvement in fellow Indføj ”Sted og students’ texts…” This involvement should ”be structured and dato” i feltet for led by the teachers.” (Lillejord & Dysthe 2008, p. 84) dato og ”Enhedens RBT-Conference, March 16, 2016 navn” i Sidefod

  6. Challenges in relation to joint supervision ● Time and competences: en Time Competences Student Lack of time to Needs to learn how to engage in co- give and receive students papers feedback Supervisor Time consuming to Needs to learn how to ● Studerende, der fortsat efterspørger develop and try out structure and manage individuel vejledning new ways of feedback in groups supervising Institution Accumulation of Hard to develop new tasks at certain administrative times procedures ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: vælg ”Indsæt” > ● Some students ask for individual ”Sidehoved / supervision Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for dato og ”Enhedens IRBT-Conference, March 16, 2016 navn” i Sidefod

  7. Example of joint supervised master thesis students Date Supervision Content en January Individual (app. Define the project • • 15 min.) Sign the contract/ • Individual (app. kick-start • 10 min.) February Group (2 hours) Frame, Problem • • formulation Literature search March Group (2 hours) Introduction • • Individual (1 Follow up • • student; 10 min.) April Group (2 hours) Methodology • • Individual (1 Follow up • • student; 10 min.) May Group (2 hours) Analysis • • ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: June Group (2 hours) Discussion • • vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Email brief question when needed (yes/ no) • Sidefod”. Shared office Indføj ”Sted og • (Janni Niclasen, Department of Psychology, UCP) dato” i feltet for dato og ”Enhedens IRBT-Conference, March 16, 2016 navn” i Sidefod

  8. Month Milestones Exercises Presentation Feb. 1 Intro Non-stop, fill in the pentagon Work- & time plan 2 Subject of the Research question – tools and Project design thesis project design template Structure of the a. Intro: a question you want Interview/question guide 3 paper an answer to before you leave (” box test” and two checklists) b. Brainstorm, fill in the project design template March 4 Question Test your question guides two- Method incl. method and-two checklist guides Method Write down your pre- Theory & positioning 5 understanding, your scientific theoretical research, give feedback use the method checklist 6 Theory, Read my feedback, write down Analysis and data questions. Draw your analytical positioning processing model, give FB April Analysis 5. minutes presentation of Intro/conclusion -mirror + exercise; research question 7 & 8 main results (everybody) and conclusion, feedback Intro/conclusion Draft an abstract The good paper/ the 9 common thread May 10 & 11 Draft On-location FB on 5-10 pages from another cluster ‘Give a hand- exercise ’ 29.5 Deadline 12.00 28.6 Feedback on grade Institut for Statskundskab

  9. Fieldwork as a supervised learning activity Where: Department of en Anthropology Experiment: online community during fieldwork (4 students in a group + a researcher) Mandatory: papers including reflections. Every one gives and receives feedback from co- students and researcher ”Enhedens navn” og ”Sted og dato”: Café SoFa: social forum vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og • Source: Helle Bundgaard, Department of Anthropology dato” i feltet for IRBT-Conference, March 16, 2016 dato og ”Enhedens navn” i Sidefod

  10. Exchang e experiences 1. Write down how you may use joint en supervision in your daily practice either as a teacher/ supervisor, re- searcher, student or consultant 2. Present your idea in a cluster 3. Point to one thing from the others ideas that you can make use of / get inspiration from and ”Enhedens navn” Point to one thing that the others can use from og ”Sted og dato”: your idea vælg ”Indsæt” > ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for IRBT-Conference, March 16, 2016 dato og ”Enhedens navn” i Sidefod

  11. Literature ● Akister, Jane, Isabel Williams, and Andrew Maynard. 2009. "Using group supervision for undergraduate dissertations: a preliminary enquiry into the student experience." Practice and en Evidence of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education :77-94. ● Baker, Mary-Jane, Elizabeth Cluett, Lorraine Ireland, Sheila Reading, and Susan Rourke. 2014. "Supervising undergraduate research: A collective approach utilising groupwork and peer support." Nurse Education Today no. 34 (4):637-642. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.006. ● Dysthe, Olga, Akylina Samara, and Kariane Westrheim. 2006. "Multivoiced supervision of Master's students: a case study of alternative supervision practices in higher education." Studies in Higher Education no. 31 (3):299-318. ● Jensen, Hanne Nexø. 2015. Opgave- og skrivevejledning i klynger. Håndbog for undervisere og vejledere på videregående uddannelser . Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur. ● Kangasniemi, Mari, Sanna-Mari Ahonen, Eeva Liikanen, and Kati Utriainen. 2011. "Health science students' conceptions of group supervision." Nurse Education Today no. 31 (2):179-183. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.05.015. ● Lillejord, Sølvi, and Olga Dysthe. 2008. "Productive learning practice – a theoretical discussion based on two cases." Journal of Education and Work no. 21 (1):75-89. doi: 10.1080/13639080801957154. ● Nordentoft, Helle Merete, Rie Thomsen, and Gitte Wichmann-Hansen. 2013. "Collective academic supervision: a model for participation and learning in higher education." Higher Education no. 65 (5):581-593. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9564-x. ● Utriainen, Kati, Sanna-Mari Ahonen, Mari Kangasniemi, and Eeva Liikanen. 2011. "Health Science ”Enhedens navn” Students' Experiences of Group Supervision of the Bachelor's Thesis." Journal of Nursing Education og ”Sted og dato”: no. 50 (4):205-210. ● Wichmann-Hansen, Gitte, Rie Thomsen, and Helle Merete Nordentoft. 2015. "Challenges in Collective Academic Supervision: supervisors’ experiences from a Master Programme in Guidance vælg ”Indsæt” > and Counselling." Higher Education no. 70 (1):19-33. doi: 10.1007/s10734-014-9821-2. ”Sidehoved / Sidefod”. Indføj ”Sted og dato” i feltet for dato og ”Enhedens RBT-Conference, March 16, 2016 navn” i Sidefod

Recommend


More recommend