group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties for
play

Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties for bar-joint and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties for bar-joint and point-hyperplane frameworks Bernd Schulze (with Katie Clinch, Anthony Nixon and Walter Whiteley) Lancaster University June 13, 2019 Bernd Schulze Group pairings with


  1. Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties for bar-joint and point-hyperplane frameworks Bernd Schulze (with Katie Clinch, Anthony Nixon and Walter Whiteley) Lancaster University June 13, 2019 Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 1 / 23

  2. Outline Rigidity of Euclidean, spherical and point-hyperplane frameworks 1 Symmetric frameworks 2 Pairing symmetry groups in S d and R d 3 Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 2 / 23

  3. Rigidity of Euclidean frameworks Framework in a space M : ( G , p ) , where G = ( V , E ) is a finite simple graph and p : V → M is a map. Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 3 / 23

  4. Rigidity of Euclidean frameworks Framework in a space M : ( G , p ) , where G = ( V , E ) is a finite simple graph and p : V → M is a map. We first consider Euclidean frameworks ( G , p ) in R d . Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 3 / 23

  5. Rigidity of Euclidean frameworks Framework in a space M : ( G , p ) , where G = ( V , E ) is a finite simple graph and p : V → M is a map. We first consider Euclidean frameworks ( G , p ) in R d . Given ( G , p ) , is every framework ( G , q ) in an open neighborhood of p satisfying the same length constraints for the edges: � p i − p j � = const ( ij ∈ E ) , congruent to ( G , p ) ? Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 3 / 23

  6. Rigidity of Euclidean frameworks Framework in a space M : ( G , p ) , where G = ( V , E ) is a finite simple graph and p : V → M is a map. We first consider Euclidean frameworks ( G , p ) in R d . Given ( G , p ) , is every framework ( G , q ) in an open neighborhood of p satisfying the same length constraints for the edges: � p i − p j � = const ( ij ∈ E ) , congruent to ( G , p ) ? If so, then ( G , p ) is called (locally) rigid. Otherwise ( G , p ) is called (locally) flexible. Figure: A flexible and a rigid framework in R 2 . Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 3 / 23

  7. Infinitesimal rigidity of Euclidean frameworks It is common to analyse rigidity by taking the derivative of the square of each length constraint, which leads to the linear system: � p i − p j , ˙ p i − ˙ p j � = 0 ( ij ∈ E ) . We then check the dimension of the solution space with variables ˙ p . Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 4 / 23

  8. Infinitesimal rigidity of Euclidean frameworks It is common to analyse rigidity by taking the derivative of the square of each length constraint, which leads to the linear system: � p i − p j , ˙ p i − ˙ p j � = 0 ( ij ∈ E ) . We then check the dimension of the solution space with variables ˙ p . p : V → R d is an infinitesimal motion of ( G , p ) if ˙ ˙ p satisfies the equations above. Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 4 / 23

  9. Infinitesimal rigidity of Euclidean frameworks It is common to analyse rigidity by taking the derivative of the square of each length constraint, which leads to the linear system: � p i − p j , ˙ p i − ˙ p j � = 0 ( ij ∈ E ) . We then check the dimension of the solution space with variables ˙ p . p : V → R d is an infinitesimal motion of ( G , p ) if ˙ ˙ p satisfies the equations above. ( G , p ) is called infinitesimally rigid if the dimension of the space of � d + 1 � infinitesimal motions of ( G , p ) is equal to (assuming that the points 2 p ( V ) affinely span R d ). Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 4 / 23

  10. Infinitesimal rigidity of Euclidean frameworks It is common to analyse rigidity by taking the derivative of the square of each length constraint, which leads to the linear system: � p i − p j , ˙ p i − ˙ p j � = 0 ( ij ∈ E ) . We then check the dimension of the solution space with variables ˙ p . p : V → R d is an infinitesimal motion of ( G , p ) if ˙ ˙ p satisfies the equations above. ( G , p ) is called infinitesimally rigid if the dimension of the space of � d + 1 � infinitesimal motions of ( G , p ) is equal to (assuming that the points 2 p ( V ) affinely span R d ). The matrix R ( G , p ) corresponding to this linear system above is the rigidity matrix. Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 4 / 23

  11. Infinitesimal rigidity of Euclidean frameworks It is common to analyse rigidity by taking the derivative of the square of each length constraint, which leads to the linear system: � p i − p j , ˙ p i − ˙ p j � = 0 ( ij ∈ E ) . We then check the dimension of the solution space with variables ˙ p . p : V → R d is an infinitesimal motion of ( G , p ) if ˙ ˙ p satisfies the equations above. ( G , p ) is called infinitesimally rigid if the dimension of the space of � d + 1 � infinitesimal motions of ( G , p ) is equal to (assuming that the points 2 p ( V ) affinely span R d ). The matrix R ( G , p ) corresponding to this linear system above is the rigidity matrix. For regular configurations p (i.e., R ( G , p ) has maximum rank), rigidity is equivalent to infinitesimal rigidity. Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 4 / 23

  12. Infinitesimal rigidity of spherical frameworks Next, we consider spherical frameworks ( G , p ) in S d . Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 5 / 23

  13. Infinitesimal rigidity of spherical frameworks Next, we consider spherical frameworks ( G , p ) in S d . In S d the ‘distance’ between two points is determined by their inner product. Hence we are interested in the solutions of: � p i , p j � = const ( ij ∈ E ) . Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 5 / 23

  14. Infinitesimal rigidity of spherical frameworks Next, we consider spherical frameworks ( G , p ) in S d . In S d the ‘distance’ between two points is determined by their inner product. Hence we are interested in the solutions of: � p i , p j � = const ( ij ∈ E ) . Since p i is constrained to be on S d , we also have � p i , p i � = 1 ( i ∈ V ) . Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 5 / 23

  15. Infinitesimal rigidity of spherical frameworks Next, we consider spherical frameworks ( G , p ) in S d . In S d the ‘distance’ between two points is determined by their inner product. Hence we are interested in the solutions of: � p i , p j � = const ( ij ∈ E ) . Since p i is constrained to be on S d , we also have � p i , p i � = 1 ( i ∈ V ) . Again, taking derivatives, we obtain the following system of first-order inner product constraints: � p i , ˙ p j � + � p j , ˙ p i � = 0 ( ij ∈ E ) � p i , ˙ p i � = 0 ( i ∈ V ) . Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 5 / 23

  16. Infinitesimal rigidity of spherical frameworks Next, we consider spherical frameworks ( G , p ) in S d . In S d the ‘distance’ between two points is determined by their inner product. Hence we are interested in the solutions of: � p i , p j � = const ( ij ∈ E ) . Since p i is constrained to be on S d , we also have � p i , p i � = 1 ( i ∈ V ) . Again, taking derivatives, we obtain the following system of first-order inner product constraints: � p i , ˙ p j � + � p j , ˙ p i � = 0 ( ij ∈ E ) � p i , ˙ p i � = 0 ( i ∈ V ) . p : V → R d + 1 is called an infinitesimal motion of ( G , p ) if it satisfies this ˙ system of linear constraints, and ( G , p ) is infinitesimally rigid if the � d + 1 � dimension of its space of infinitesimal motions is equal to 2 (assuming the points p ( V ) linearly span R d + 1 ). Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 5 / 23

  17. > 0 and A d (or R d ) Transfer between S d Figure: The transfer of infinitesimal motions between S d > 0 and A d Theorem (S. and Whiteley, 2012) : A bar-joint framework ( G , p ) is infinitesimally rigid in A d if and only if ( G , φ ◦ p ) is infinitesimally rigid in S d > 0 , where φ is the central projection from the origin O . Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 6 / 23

  18. > 0 and A d (or R d ) Transfer between S d Figure: The transfer of infinitesimal motions between S d > 0 and A d Theorem (S. and Whiteley, 2012) : A bar-joint framework ( G , p ) is infinitesimally rigid in A d if and only if ( G , φ ◦ p ) is infinitesimally rigid in S d > 0 , where φ is the central projection from the origin O . Moreover, infinitesimal rigidity properties of ( G , p ) in S d remain unchanged if any subset of the joints are inverted in O . Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 6 / 23

  19. Point-line frameworks Jackson and Owen introduced the notion of a point-line framework in R 2 . Such a framework consists of points and lines in the plane which are linked by point-point distance constraints, point-line distance constraints, and line-line angle constraints. Figure: Point-line framework in R 2 . Bernd Schulze Group pairings with equivalent rigidity properties June 13, 2019 7 / 23

Recommend


More recommend