governor s committee on energy
play

Governors Committee on Energy Choice: Choice: Technical Working - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Governors Committee on Energy Choice: Choice: Technical Working Group on Innovation, Technology, & Renewable Energy Marta Tomic Community Solar, Program Director December 5, 2017 Agenda enda 1. Community solar and a comparison to


  1. Governor’s Committee on Energy Choice: Choice: Technical Working Group on Innovation, Technology, & Renewable Energy Marta Tomic Community Solar, Program Director December 5, 2017

  2. Agenda enda 1. Community solar and a comparison to other solar energy offerings 2. Benefits of community solar 3. Community solar in restructured markets 4. Key recommendations 2

  3. What Wh at is is Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar? r? Community mmunity solar ar refers ers to to » local cal solar lar facil ciliti ities es share ared d by multiple tiple commu mmunit nity membe mbers rs who o recei ceive ve credi edits ts on their ir elect ectricity ricity bills lls for r their ir share re of the e energ ergy y produ oduced ced. Community solar differs from » other customer-focused offerings such as community choice aggregation and green tariff programs (e.g.: 3 “subscription solar”)

  4. Co Comm mmunity unity Ch Choi oice ce Ag Aggr gregati egation on (C (CCA CA) Community Choice Aggregation must be legislatively enabled. A A program ogram that t allows lows cities ies and » count unties ies to buy and/or /or generate erate elect ectric ricity ity for residents, idents, busin sinesses esses and d government ernment elect ectricity ricity users ers withi thin n its s jurisdiction. isdiction. ˃ Aggregated buying power ˃ CCAs enter contracts with alternative suppliers or large generators connected to the transmission system ˃ Utility retains ownership and management Legal in 7 States: CA, IL, MA, NJ, OH, RI and of transmission and distribution. NY Under consideration in: UT, DE, MN 4 Image source: http://www.leanenergyus.org/cca-by-state/

  5. Gr Gree een n Ta Tari riff ff Pr Prog ograms rams (e (e.g .g. . “subscription solar”) Invol volve ve the e sale le of Renew newable able Energ ergy y Credi edits ts (RECs ECs) ) from m a » renew newabl able e energy rgy facility ility to individual ividual subscribers scribers. Pros Pros Cons Cons » » ˃ ˃ Flexible contract terms Subscribers pay a premium ˃ ˃ Allows subscribers to meet Renewable energy generating individual and corporate facilities are typically not sustainability goals sited locally ˃ ˃ Allows utilities to maintain Do not provide the energy the customer relationship from the generating facility on subscriber bills ˃ Do not offer the opportunity to reduce energy expenditures 5

  6. Ut Util ility ity-Scale Scale So Sola lar r an and d Large Large-Scale Scale Co Comm mmercial ercial So Sola lar Designed for a single off-taker. » ˃ In contrast, community solar allows individuals including renters, condominium owners, and businesses the opportunity to directly participate in and receive the benefits of solar. Typically sell power directly to utilities, who receive » the benefits of solar power. ˃ In contrast, community solar provides individuals and commercial entities the opportunity to directly participate in a generating facility and receive the benefits from their subscription. Utility-scale and large-scale are typically connected at » the transmission level. ˃ In contrast, community solar facilities are connected to the 6 local distribution system.

  7. Co Comm mmunity unity so sola lar r so solv lves es th the e ph phys ysical ical an and d ho home meownership ownership ba barr rrier iers s of of so sola lar 7 Source: Greentech Media U.S. Community Solar Market Outlook, Oct 2016

  8. Be Bene nefits fits of of Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar Promotes competition to create low-cost » customer focused offerings. Expands access to local renewable » energy for entities that cannot install rooftop solar (e.g., homeowners, small businesses, businesses that lease space, commercial and industrial Massachusetts: In facilities, renters, apartment complexes, local governments). Allows subscribers to directly benefit » 2016, 63 MW of from offsite community solar community solar installations. resulted in over Provides opportunity for customer » savings and re-investment in the local $154,000,000 in the economy. Commonwealth. Drives economic development and private » 8 investment.

  9. Communi unity ty solar r is legisla slative tively ly enabled ed in 16 states es and the the Distri rict ct of Columb mbia. ia. = CS in restruc structu tured ed market rkets = CS in vertic rticall lly integr tegrate ted market rkets 9

  10. Communi unity ty solar r is legisla slative tively ly enabled ed in 16 states es and the Distri rict ct of Columb mbia. ia. MA: 112 MW MN: 80 MW OR: 160 MW operational, operational, NY: 250 MW 175 MW 515 MW in by 2018 qualified development CO: 37 MW CA: 100 MW IL: 300 MW MD: 220 MW operational, by 2018 by 2020 by 2019 ~200 MW by 2019 = CS in restruc structu tured ed market rkets HI: 80 MW by = CS in 2019 vertic rticall lly integr tegrate ted market rkets 10

  11. Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar r in in Re Rest structur ructured ed Ma Mark rkets ets » Community solar fits in all market types. ˃ 6 vertically integrated markets: CO, MN, HI, WA, OR, CA ˃ 11 restructured markets: MA, NY, MD, IL, RI, VT, NH, ME, CT, DE and DC » Maryland Register, Proposed Action on Regulations, published 4/29/2016: 1 1

  12. Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar r in in Re Rest structur ructured ed Ma Mark rkets ets Community solar ownership: » ˃ A Subscriber Organization shall be any for-profit or not-for- profit entity permitted by state law that: + (A) owns or operates one or more community solar facility(ies) for the benefit of subscribers, or + (B) contracts with a third-party entity to build, own or operate one or more community solar facilities. ˃ In restructured markets, this includes third party providers, customer owned facilities, and retail suppliers. Electric distribution utility responsible for » administering the credits. Community solar credit rates are consistent for all 1 » 2 end-users, regardless of the competitive retail supplier.

  13. Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar r in in Re Rest structur ructured ed Ma Mark rkets ets Interconnection » ˃ Community solar facilities are interconnected at the local distribution system. ˃ Community solar system owners are responsible for all maintenance up to the point of interconnection. ˃ Project interconnection is governed by a set of safety standards and regulations that apply to all distributed solar energy projects. ˃ Clear rules and regulations for project interconnection and queue management. 1 3

  14. Co Comm mmunity unity So Sola lar: r: 5 G 5 Gui uiding ding Prin Pr inciples ciples » Expand consumer access » Provide tangible economic benefits » Put consumers first » Promote fair market competition » Complement existing programs 1 4 IREC, Model Rules for Shared Renewable Energy Programs (2017), http://www.irecusa.org/publications/guiding-principles-for-shared-renewable-energy-programs/

  15. Ke Key y Re Reco commendation mmendations Create a statewide community solar program to » provide all customer types the opportunity to access solar energy through off-site solar installations. Allow for multiple subscribers to directly benefit » from a single off-site solar installation. Enable subscribers to receive a bill credit for » their share of production from an off-site facility. Encourage competition to create low-cost community » solar offerings and expand access to all customer types. 1 5

  16. Th Than ank y k you ou! Marta rta Tomic mic Commu mmunit nity y Solar, ar, Program gram Direc rector tor marta rta@vo @votesolar.org tesolar.org www.v w.vote otesolar.org solar.org

  17. Re Reso sources urces Interstate Renewable Energy Council Guiding Principles: » ˃ http://www.irecusa.org/publications/guiding-principles-for-shared-renewable-energy- programs/ Coalition for Community Solar Access Policy decision » matrix: ˃ http://www.communitysolaraccess.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/CCSA-Policy-Decision-Matrix- Final-11-15-2016.pdf Links to authorizing legislation and/or regulations » ˃ Massachusetts: Virtual Net Metering, Chapter 169, https://malegislature.gov/Laws/SessionLaws/Acts/2008/Chapter169 ˃ New York: PSC Order Establishing a Community DG Program, http://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx?DocRefId={76520435- 25ED-4B84-847 ˃ Maryland: Chapter 347, + 1 http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2015RS/Chapters_noln/CH_347_hb1087e.pdf 7 Title 20 Public Service Commission, Subtitle 62 Community Solar Energy + Generating Systems, http://www.dsd.state.md.us/COMAR/subtitle_chapters/20_Chapters.aspx#Sub

Recommend


More recommend